Deathbringer

Alright neo, I pray to you and promise to pray to you forever in thanks should you be so kind as to cure my Usenet addiction!

Meanwhile, California continues its southward slide as predicted by the theory of plate tectonics. The Earth continues to orbit the Earth, as dictated by heliocentric theory... Over the weekend, please write a letter to your college and/or high school informing them that their science education program is apparently not teaching basic concepts such as scientific vocabulary.

I have absolutely no objections to an anarchy. In fact, it sounds like a great idea! First, I'd loot the the fire departments and hospitals and start charging supply donations and a loyalty pledge and/or sexual favors every time somebody needed paramedics or their house saved from imminent conflagration. Don't want to serve me/blow me/fund my imminent rise to glory? Sigh. Looks like your son little Timmy doesn't get rescued just yet... Next, I will show up with a rifle and a sword and a couple of friends and declare myself king of New Hampshire, thereby ending the anarchy and instituting a Deathbringerocracy. People who oppose me will be forced to take cover in their armored compounds against my advancing army, laid siege to and be forced to listen to Ingve Malmstein from a speaker truck until they lose their minds. With no organized fighting force to stop me and a monopoly on public services, I will soon conquer New England, and eventually the entire east coast of America! The good news is that I'd probably be a reasonably nice despot, and most of people would survive. That is, excluding all Useneters. You guys are whacked. I'll use you for shock troops when I invade California...

Umm, no, I can't seem to remember anything pro-Jew. I seem to remember getting the impression that both sides of the conflict in Israel were being rather stubborn about perpetuating their side of this stupid and endless conflict. One might conclude that either they need better propaganda, or perhaps you're just a crazy anti-Semite who shrieks when you see sunlight.

I asked how you would do things differently if you could change it, Codebreaker. I ask again.

On a side note, bonobos indisputably have sex for fun. So do chimps. So do people, as chronicled ever since recorded history began. Assuming that primitive man and prehistoric woman didn't get it on for fun is flatly stupid. What did some of you do, find abstinence education pamphlets scrawled on the back of a cave? Hellooooo?

I will demonstrate what lead me to search through by typing this response to your question. Somewhere, both the RAM on my computer and the hard drive of a massive server somewhere just got influenced by my actions. Next time somebody goes to the URL for this thread, the server will act differently because of its own individual experience. Logically, the Usenet server has a soul. To quote you: > > > M refers to the physical entity in question. > > B(M) refers to the behaviour of M in question. > > P refers to the a property in question. > > > and where M is the same in (1) and (2), B(M) is the same in (1) and > > (2), and P is the same in (1) and (2). > > > 1) B(M) is explained by the laws of physics without requiring > > knowledge of whether it has P or not. > > > 2) Presence of P or lack of, does not influence/affect B(M), else the > > explanation of behaviour could not be the same with or without P. > > > If (1) is true, then (2) is true. To paraphrase: Server refers to the Usenet server. B(Server) refers to the behavior of the server. Soul refers to the property of having a soul. These variables do not change usage between parts of the proof. 1. B(Server) is explained by the laws of physics without gathering knowledge about whether or not it has Soul. 2. Presence or lack of a soul does not influence/affect B(Server), else the explanation of behavior would not be the same with or without Soul. Now, had I done an experiment and magically bestowed the Usenet server with a soul and observed that its behavior did not change, it would be logical to assume that the Usenet server always had property Soul. As it is, we actually have no idea if Soul influences B(Server) and therefore such reasoning really is as silly as it sounds.

You are a sad, strange man. I already rebutted your rant on one of the previous times you used it, and I will not be bothered to dig it up for you. Now, explain what the heck you think evolution involves because I'm getting the sense that your definition of evolution is not the same as mine. Flying pigs? What the hell are you even talking about? Please define it in your own words. WITHOUT UNDUE INVECTIVE.

What a fine example of the moral superiority of fundies you are, Stooges. Tell you what, you try to set a good example, and then see if people follow you, OK?

Not really. Manipulating the ignorant masses is so childishly easy that you would pose no threat even if you were armed to the teeth. As long as people have their bread and circus, nothing happens. Ever. Throw in a religious revival led by people who just happen to be very good friends with the current crop of leaders for added stability. Find a perpetual enemy to scapegoat for anything that goes wrong, scare the populace to its wits end, and also use it to justify your own increased powers which you promise you are not using and never will use for anything but good. All of the control, none of the assassination attempts. Call it a despot's paradise.

You just copy and paste that cookie cutter rant after every valid point I make specifically to piss me off, don't you? Its getting old. I've already tried to explain it to you twice now.

Yeah, normal. Too bad normal does not involve humans.

I've raised chickens. They're fucking stupid. If you could make your watermelons sumo wrestle with your pumpkins and sell tickets, would you?

Ah, good. The oil company lobbyists will be able to jet ski to work in Washington.

lol You're either good at being sarcastic or one special mental case who shouldn't be locked up just for the laughs you generate.