RoyalOrleans

I'm not into twisted gay sex romps where he portrays Drew Peterson and I portray the unsuspecting wife. So, he can be gay all by himself.

You're not gay? Then why are you the Lord of the Queers?

Hey, TJ! Play WoW lately? Just curious? Posted in any of the forums lately? Just curious? I've just recently started playing WoW and would like to get involved in a forum. You know? To meet and greet fellow players and all. Can you suggest a site? How about one that gets into political debates?

Ohhh... this is all for entertainment. Nothing funnier to expose the soft, pink underbelly of a leviathan with narcissistic tendencies.

Hahaha! You bought it hook, line, and sinker! I baited you with words, and nothing more than shallow words over the Internet, and you bit the hook. You fell for it, you are the gullible one in this instance. You caved. You showed a weakness. You rolled over to show that soft, pink underbelly. I took a stab. And you writhed. Now you wallow in embarrassment, you wallow in your own pitiful sludge, you wreak of the stench of stupid. Hahahahah!!!! No matter what you say, no matter how you reply to me; WE ALL know what type of person you really are and WE laugh and mock you. Again, you bit and I reeled you in! Hahahahahahaha!!!!! LOSER! I now light a cigar and tip my glass to you. You were one disgusting leviathan to bring down. This victory I gave to you and I wasn't upset, because I knew there was not a thing I could do about it. I ceded to a far superior power! All hail King TJ! Lord of the Queers!

In your little world, you think that I am angry. You think that I am upset. Nothing could be further from the truth. And I am obsessed with getting this point across to you: I ceded victory of the gay sex game to you, TJ! You won! You beat me! You bested me! You are victorious! All hail, King TJ! Lord of the Queers.

I did start the game. I read your stupid fukken PM. I did not heed the words. I should have known that you'd best me with your great girth of homoerotic innuendos and alliterations. So, I ceded victory. And I have told you that over and over and over again! So accept the fact that you won the gay game! Get over it and move on! You won! All hail, King TJ! Lord of the Queers!

His employers must be so proud of the time he wastes posting all over the X-amount of forums he's a part. That is all he will get from me, too. Ditto. TJ has become a special little project of mine.

Don't you fukken work, TJ? Concentrate on keeping your job rather than sexual daydreams about me.

Despite the year of its ratification, the Constitution is timeless and does not need to be rewritten. The problem is that the Constitution does not fit the needs of its opponents, so they find ambiguous statements and pervert them. The most disgusting part of the perversion of the Constitution is that the many social programs that have been implemented under the "promote general welfare" line in the preamble. The preamble of the Constitution is just that: a preamble. It is not operative. Just as the preamble to the second amendment, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State...", is not operative. It is, like other parts of the Constitution, an introduction to the operative clause, "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." The preamble of the Constitution, merely served as an explanation as to why the document was being written. It proceeded to, in Article 1, Section 1, to say, "All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.." In all subsequent sections, a preamble was again used to explain the purpose of the section. In Article 1, Section 8, the preamble states, "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;” It's not operative. It’s nothing more than an explanation for the purpose of the section, followed by the operative. The powers listed after the preamble are ALL that Congress has purview over. The ‘United States’ does not mean ‘people’, it means the country- the government. When the founders wrote the Constitution, they were very specific with the rights of the people. How would one know this? Well, they mentioned it specifically: “..the right of the people to peacefully assemble” (I Amendment); “the right of the people to be secure…” (IV Amendment); “….are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” (X Amendment); “the right of the people to keep and bear arms…” (II Amendment) Healthcare is not a right, and it never has been. It is also not a federal power, it never has been. It is a state power, delegated to the states under the10th Amendment. If people want socialized healthcare, I’m fine with that. Massachusetts has it, and NO one has heard a peep from me. It is a disaster, but not one soul has heard me condemn it-- it is their right to institute it, no matter how much I hate the idea. It was no accident that the constitution was written the way it was, as they knew full well that local government is more efficient and less oppressive than a centralized government, and took measures to ensure it. And they were right: the states of California and Michigan, as terribly screwed as they are, are FAR more efficient than the federal government. It’s why Chicago, as corrupt as that city is, is far less corrupt than the federal government. If the states want socialized healthcare, they should pursue it. Where it should not be pursued is in Congress, as they’ve absolutely zero authority to do so.

Yes, I started it and you won! All hail, King TJ! Lord of the Queers!

Out of control? Haha... that's laughable. You're laughable. This thing is perfectly under control, "can't get right". I know exactly what I am doing and what I did, to hopefully END THE BS, was cede victory over to you. YOU are spinning it out of control with the constant barrage of allegations that I started the gay games and repeating them to ad nauseum! What's the matter? Don't know how to win the right way? Can't get that right? What is it about ceding victory do you not understand? You won! You won! All hail! King TJ, Lord of the Queers! Ohhhh.... and let it be known all over this forum that I started the gay games but YOU finished them! I admit defeat, I lose, I have lost, I have been beaten and sorely to a far superior power! Again! All hail! King TJ, Lord of the Queers!

Democrats hate the Constitution because it gives individuals freedom and they can't control or pander to them. Below is what our Progressive Democrat Statists want... The Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto 1. Abolition of private property in land and application of all rents of land to public purpose. (kelo vs new London, supreme court ruled ?common good? rather than ?public use?) 2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. (check? we have it) 3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance. (partially there, death tax) 4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. (reverse, illegal?s get handouts at the cost of the taxpayers... really just vote buying) 5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly. (gee.. what?s happening now, control of banks) 6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the state. (FCC expansion , Cap and Trade) 7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan. (let?s just start with GM and Chrysler, plus all the mandates, regulations and laws that inhibit production? oh yeah, cap and trade) 8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture. (is this the civilian force as strong as the military Obama was talking about?) 9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country. (farmer subsidies come with government control.) 10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc. (check? got it, well almost.. home school and private are still being targeted)

This rightfully negates all entitlement programs, the welfare state, and related miscellany.

Morons elect morons. We are in dire straits as a country as this dangerous media figure wipes his ass with the Constitution.

Big Gay TJ's Big Gay Sex Dream... In case you all didn't know, little TJ and I have been going back and forth in a big gay tug-of-war! To sum things up, I ceded victory to TJ in the "gay sex game". Why did I cede, you might ask? Alright I will tell you... A) TJ has said that I have a hard time admitting that I was wrong to instigate a gay sex game. B) I'm not gay and have no need for a sash and crown. C) TJ is a far superior mind in the gay sex game arena than I knew, unbeknown to my fellows in the boards, in my heart that I would lose miserably. D) I'm not gay and would rather not be known as the winner of a gay sex game. Again, I urge all of you to congratulate TJ on a sweeping victory and welcome our new gay king! ALL HAIL TJ! LORD OF THE QUEERS! The Full Story (Link to the thread in the off-topic forum)

Doesn't "lovely lotus flower" have four "R's" where the "L's" are located?

.

Ohhh... imagine the duties to be fulfilled! I'm sure he'll be the MC on Big Gay Rosie's Big Gay Boat Ride. http://storage.people.com/jpgs/20060410/20060410-750-73.jpg It takes a big man to admit when he has erred. And I have ceded to a far greater power than me. Al Hail, King TJ! Lord of the Queers!

[attach=full]2643[/attach]

[attach=full]2641[/attach] So here we go. The Democrats in the House (thanks to the leadership of slobbering Barney Frank) have been working on financial industry reform legislation. This legislation is a Socialist's wet dream. It allows government bureaucrats to scan the private sector - spot some prey - create a story of despair and danger - and swoop in for the kill. It was Slobbering Barney who originally came up with the idea .. but now it's being refined by Pennsylvania Democrat (of course) Paul Kanjorski. Kanjorski is proposing legislation that would expand the powers of our imperial federal government beyond anything we have seen thus far. It will eclipse George Bush and Barack Obama and Barney Frank and Harry Reid. Kanjorski's brilliant idea is legislation within the next few weeks that will give the federal government the power to preemptively break up financial firms that it deems "too big to fail." We aren't talking about creating pools for bailout emergencies or "living wills" for institutions if they should fail. We are talking about the federal government having the power to decide when a company is too big, and using force to dismantle that private company. Unfortunately, Kanjorski isn't alone. He has an ally in the House. And that ally happens to be a Republican. Actually ... no surprise there. The Republican Party has pretty much become a party of big government as well ... just not as big as fast. Alabama Republican Richard Shelby says that he like Kanjorski's idea. Yep. Shelby says that he supports having a federal regulator that would have the power to make financial firms "stronger or smaller" before they pose a threat to the economy. Kanjorski is dismayed to point out that our Constitution limits the powers of the federal government. He describes those powers as "not clearly defined." He says that with his legislation, "we're going to be evident in the power." You know ... I thought the 10th Amendment was actually pretty clear on this. The federal government only has the powers specifically enumerated in that document. All other powers are reserved for the states or the people. How "not clearly defined is this"? I hope you folks understand that today's Democrat Party views our Constitution as a nuisance. It stands in the way of their grand schemes for an American Society of Government. Ask Pelosi about the Constitutionality of her health care takeover and she screams "Are you serious?" Kanjorski talks about a Constitution that does not "clearly" define government power, and the White House dismisses the need for any Constitutional inquiries made of the ACORN Administrations big government dreams. Elections have consequences! A year ago you woke up to the reality of a president and a congress intent on relegating our Constitution to the "casual reading" section of your local Barnes and Noble.

[attach=full]2640[/attach] We are just adding to the list of people in Washington who see our Constitution as nothing but a limit to what they can do with the power of government. First it was Nancy Pelosi scoffing at a question from reporters about healthcare and how it is constitutional. Then we had Robert Gibbs who wasn't concerned in the least about the Constitution and didn't believe White House lawyers needed to look into the Constitutionality of Obamacare. Now we have Illinois Senator Roland Burris. There's a waste of a Senate seat. He'll be gone soon, so maybe there will be an improvement. Burris was asked to specify which part of the Constitution authorizes Congress to implement an individual mandate on individuals to buy health insurance. Burris' answer? It is the responsibility of the federal government "to provide for the health, welfare and the defense of the country." Well guess what? The word "health" does not appear in the Constitution. The guy is wrong. Rather than worrying about reading 2,000 page healthcare bills, Roland Burris and his Democrat buddies should try and refresh themselves on our Constitution - the foundations of this country and what make this country great. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvKOQA6qrhE&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - GOP Rep. John Boehner "U.S. Constitution Quote" FAIL[/ame] Somewhere in Washington D.C., a former Boehner speech writer is doing the walk of shame with his box of personal belongings. Jackasses! All of them! On both sides of the aisle!

Take me... out to the ballgame to the pub for beer and a burger to the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra to any Blues or Jazz club to a busy mall or airport to people watch to an outdoor concert hiking or cycling in the Blue Ridge Mountains a museum to Barnes and Noble to read magazines without paying for them(!) Don't take me.... to a NASCAR event to a department store, like Target, with no intention of scouring the clearance racks. to a protestant church to an environmental summit to a meeting of the minds, because the minds are full of sh!t. to the Outback Steakhouse. to a restaurant with napkin dispensers to Chuckie Cheeze.

You forgot to add: abortion clinic

Fukk, hugo! I just blew coffee through my nose. (No... it wasn't coffee grounds.)