RoyalOrleans

I asked you to respond to this in a PM to me. You flamed me. A flame, no matter the context, is a comment meant to hurt the addressee. I mean, those are almost your words... verbatim. Do I need to drag out all of your posts regarding what you believe a flame is? I would be happy to, TJ, but you might not want to... I mean they will prove that you draw the flames out of other member's comments. You turn, twist, and pervert the words of others to make it sound like you are being victimized with a flame. Sounds kind of like the statement that I made to you, huh? What? You called me out on that and we swapped a few PMs and I made the conscious effort to move forward. You broke your word when you left that remark. Don't think the same rules for flaming does not apply to you because you can justify it as a "comparison". Yeah... you compared my manhood to that of a little girl. That's a flame where most people come from. I am highly offended, but not surprised as I knew all along that you had no desire for changing yourself for the better. You should spend a lot less time accusing me of this, offensively flaming me for that, and more time producing some statistics to back up your claim.

When asked what he thought of the situation, GA 4th District Representative Hank Johnson - D replied "Dat island fittin' ta sink!".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ok9SVRfxWPA

Sucks to be him!

[attach=full]2744[/attach]

I wish I could come up with something for this. I am speechless!

Hank Johnson defeated that moonbat Cynthia McKinney for Georgia's 4th Congressional District... which says a lot for the constituency. I live in the 9th District, but my business is inside the 4th. I pray for errant bolts of lightning almost every day. Johnson makes $175K a year doing the congress gig, could you imagine someone paying him a fraction of that in the private sector? Jesus. Hmmmmm.... I wonder if Johnson meant the decommissioned USS Guam.

In some cases, it would depend on the street.

Government workers do not produce anything that creates wealth. They only consume the wealth produced by someone else.

Plants Need CO2 - Carbon Dioxide is Green!

I watched the clips of the game this morning. Go Hawks!

When the global warming gestapo is established, they will make sure you know this damn well.

I know some guys who talk like this, too. Reminds me of this white guy that I know (I don't know his real name, but we all call him "White Mike".), who proclaims to be from the streets (The mean streets of Middle-of-nowhere, GA.). He is blacker than my long time Marine brother and close friend who happens to be black, but speaks like a nerdy white guy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt2yGzHfy7s Obama wants a "civilian army" and has stated this before. Well... he's getting it! Not quite what he wants I'm sure, because they don't march lockstep with Homeland Security goons. Sometimes it is best not to say things like that out loud. Or... in the Obamacare bill...

Now you resort to flames? Ohh... TJ. How does it feel to be back to your same old self? That old TJ who you've been trying to repress for so long has finally reared his head. Welcome back, old hat. I guess you never had any real intention of changing, huh? That you wanted everyone else to swaddle you with attention and shower you with affection through the "Times Hush" thread. Once you have their affections, you use their goodwill against them as soon as there is a conflicting viewpoint or a slight difference in outlook. "Ohhhh... woe is me!". You play the victim card well. So now you flame me after posting in a different thread that you will only expose a flame, but not return one. Hypocrite! You point out every little idiosyncrasy that could be misconstrued as a flame, but you don't think that it applies to you. The jig is up, TJ, we all know what type of person that you really are and we all know what you're capable. So I have inserted the quotes into your signatures. Not for a cheap laugh, not for a reason to ride you, but a reminder to you that we (the people of this forum) know who you really are. ------- If you want to respond to this remark, TJ. Then I'd suggest doing it in a PM. ------- Now... back on topic. You still can't turn the tables on to me, TJ. No matter what you say, how you say it, who you say it to, you can not take away the fact that you never said that it is your "opinion". Instead, you assert the thoughts of "experts" on the subject as the truth. It might be true, but there is certainly not much proof other than exit poll results. And I never said anything about not using exit polls. I was referring to all the stupid, c ckeyed opinion polls that plagued the Internet and mainstream days, weeks, months leading up to the election. An opinion poll is a survey done before the actual poll, whereas an exit poll is a post poll survey. Either of which are speculative. Though I'm more comfortable with an exit poll, because in an opinion poll the question might be directed at a group that doesn't even vote. I never asserted myself with God-to-honest facts, I have always contended that what I say is a matter of opinion. Thus "I think", "My opinion", or "Perhaps..." peppering my remarks. If you believe that everything I type is FACT... then do some homework. And if you can't tell a difference, then crack a dictionary and look up "opinion". You can't believe everything that you read. ----- Hugo posted it. It is up to hugo to decide if he wants to or not.

Well... the less said about 'him,' the better. - George Will on Ann Coulter

Hey, hotshot. Ohh so clever! So neat! So wonderful! Turn the tables! Turn the flow of the discussion away from TJ! Wonderful bumbling move there TJ. Uh-uh... you don't get to turn the tide on me. I asked you FIRST. Prove your case to me. I asked you FIRST. Prove your case to me. I asked you FIRST. We wouldn't be at this point, if you'd do as I requested originally. I asked you FIRST. You won't get a bit of satisfaction out of me until you reply with the facts that prove your case. What? Fear the results? I bet you do! LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: TJ is being very typical of TJ at this point in time. He knows that he cannot prove his facts, so he turns the tables onto me and asks me to prove my case. I'm not surprised and neither should you. TJ just hates that I have a leg up on him so he resorts to diversion by turning the tables.

Hmmm... hmmm... Prove your case, big shot. And I'll consider the evidence. Until then, good luck with your diversions and dodges and attempts to insult my intelligence.

You sure said a whole lot to say nothing at all. Just rehashing every allegation, accusation, and assertion that you have made thus far. I guess if you tell a lie enough, like they do in Washington, it becomes the truth. I understand your little claim and I would admit my mistake if you can substantiate your claim. If you can't, I totally understand and we'll continue this pointless circular debate. Again, I ask you to provide facts and stats verifying your claim that "libertarians put Obama in the White House" or continue to be embarrassed at every turn. You are making the accusations, you are making these claims... the least you can do is substantiate your assertion with some cold, hard evidence. Until you can prove it, I will wait in abeyance for your remark.

Because her statements weren't prepared beforehand or written on her hand, Palin can't retaliate or answer errant questions from the crowd. She certainly can't think for herself. Jesus said to go two by two. The young man no doubt had someone there who agreed with him, but they were too frightened to speak. One man of you shall chase a thousand: for the LORD your God, he it is that fighteth for you, as he hath promised you. Joshua 23:10 - - - - - Now.... snaf... nice little diversion to switch the flow of the discussion back to something else. What? Too frightened to answer hugo?

Any man who shrugs responsibility for his actions should be whipped in the square of his hometown.

Karma is a bitch of a mistress.

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. - Albert Einstein Keep voting for the same politicians, you get the same results. And that's all about that I have to say about this. You two can boo-hoo, bitch and moan, cry, kick and scream about the hand dealt to the conservative movement all you want. So just cry until your little heart's are content with pity and loathing. That does a lot of good. If McCain had won the election, we'd have four more years like the last eight years. It would've forced complacency while treating with the quarter-half-full socialists on either side of the aisle. McCain could not bring about the changes needed with the fervor of a true conservative off the cusp of a horrible president. This should be a time for the conservatives to trim the fat and move forward. This should be a golden opportunity to get back to the absolute basics of this movement by severing ties with luke warm politicians whose values are becoming more and more contrary to the movement. This should be an opportunity to get back to the promotion of the free markets, laissez faire capitalism, adherence to the Constitution, and the promotion of the American ideal through our exceptionalism. That cannot happen when you continue to return candidates who straddle the center aisle, thus we must cut loose the baggage and move forth. The road will be difficult: wrought with wins and losses. We must fight forward or lose all that is dear to us by compromising and perverting the Constitution and the dilution of principles. So, I say, again, go ahead and boo-hoo and cry, point your little finger, but I have drawn the line in the sand. Believe what you want, but you can't convince me to have sympathy for your plight.