RoyalOrleans

I'll take "Big, Fat Hypocrite" for $800, Alex.

Man.... it has to do with the Illuminati.

Ahh... Ok. Then I take back what I said.

Osama will never face a U.S. trial because he is no longer extant.

Colonial, Sunbeam, and some other bread baking companies should file a class action suit against Honda for copying the "bread truck design" for the Element. . [attach=full]2707[/attach]

You want to know what I like about you, TJ? Your bravery. It takes a courageous man to post a topic about lip gloss. I, for one, could never pull that one off.

What's there to understand?

Would you settle for finches?

http://www.youtube.com/user/KAOSKTRL#p/a/f/0/AHcxzBwjYHg

I would take you sailing.

Ren... I am always right. And I'm not one of these people who has to be right all of the time... it just works out that way.

Che-mart I just purchased the "My American Revolutionary kicked your commie revolutionary's ass" t-shirt. I might have to shell out some dough to get the "Che is dead, get over it" shirt now.

Obama Pollster: US Will Love Obamacare Come on, you apes! Get behind the coup d'etat to seize one-sixth of the U.S. economy through coercion and force! Come on... bow to your master, lick his palm, and praise him for saving us from the evil, slimy, smelly, kitty-cat eating, puppy killing insurance companies and their gross, nasty, wicked profits. (Dick's Caveat: Please note sarcasm. Dick doesn't do smilies.)

My idea of a perfect first date is supper at the Outback, watch Speed on VHS, and motorboat my way to the promised land. Kidding.... Unless I am in a relationship where it is give and take, here and there; I never let my date decide what we do or where we go for the first date. The first date, in my opinion, is all about me and my ability to show the date a good time. On a first date, especially if it is someone I want to bang, I spend some bank and skip the typical "movie" venue. (A movie on the first date is droll and boring. "Sorry, I have nothing to say to you for two hours so we'll watch some piece of horsesh!t in a crowded theater.).

I wonder if they have mood lipgloss for dead people?

Whatever, man. I didn't turn my back on a 75% conservative, I turned my back on a 25% socialist. And I didn't vote for a 100% socialist figurehead. Either way, both candidates are controlled by an oligarch of bankers. I'm sick and tired of "voting for the lesser evil". Neither candidate would have been beneficial to this country. If not universal healthcare, McCain would've pushed some other socialist agenda of equal or greater proportions. A vote cast is not a vote wasted, TJ. Democracy is mob rule: if you want to vote the way YOUR mob sees fit, go ahead and do it. If you want to believe that one candidate is less evil than the other... fine... go sell that the tourists.

You can apply that "unfair to single a person out" to anyone or anything to make it look good. By that rationale, you could say that it is unfair to single out Obama as a socialist for all of his healthcare reform campaigning. It's the same thing, but different political affiliation. So in the essence of fairness, we could go so far as to say: don't pigeon hole Hitler because he hated the Jews and look at other things he's done. Evil: no matter how great or small is still evil. Garbage next to refuse is trash. I believe that Obama is a socialist for his healthcare agenda (among other things) and I believe Sarah Palin is a socialist for her dealings with Big Oil in Alaska (among other things). There is no difference between the two as far as I am concerned. Argue the semantics of it all day long, but at the end of the day Palin and Obama are not that unlike. You can lump Bush I and II and McCain into that pigeon-hole, too. Furthermore, I would love a 100% Liberal as President. Not the modern, mainstream Liberal that has been pegged to the Progressives and the Democrats. A liberal in the sense of Ludwig von Mises, Frederich Hayek, and now Ron Paul. A "classic liberal" who believes in the shrinking of government and the promotion of the free markets. A man schooled in Austrian economics and not some pompous Keynesian. If all Libertarians voted for Obama, it was because of the thinly veiled promise to pull troops out of Iraq and thus ending the war over there. Which, I for one, would get behind with a passion (We can not afford to wage war, we're broke, and borrowing from future generations.). Yet, I didn't vote for the Obama (I wrote in my candidate), but I would say "Job well done" if he had kept that promise (which you and I know he had no intention of keeping). The libertarians are scattered and lack central leadership. I don't think the support they gave to Obama was substantial enough to cause a sway in the election.

Barack Obama and Sarah Palin on Taxing Oil Companies and Giving the Money to Others My only problem with Sarah Palin is that she's a socialist. Plain and simple. Palin said of herself "a pit bull in lipstick", but I believe she is G. Dubya in a skirt. Those who doubt me live in Alaska... by choice! The problem I have with neocons is that they don't believe it is socialism if a neocon implements it. My state is crooked, your state is crooked; we're all beneath a federal entitlement umbrella and can't get out from under. Solution? Legalize the Constitution.

In my NCAA Tourney brackets, I have Kentucky going all the way.

A friend of mine used to work in loss prevention (fancy word for mall cop) at a high end department store. He always referred to Tommy Hilfiger as the "root of all evil" in the mall security game. My friend also added that he would have at the very least one attempt to steal and one getaway with Tommy Hilfiger merchandise a day. Fortunately, Hilfiger's fashion is easy to spot in a crowd. Just look for the most hideous clothing ever sewn by Salvadorans, Puerto Ricans, the Chinese, and the Vietnamese.

He said the rest of you suck.

Freedom is not defined by safety. Freedom is defined by the ability of citizens to live without government interference. Government cannot create a world without risks, nor would we really wish to live in such a fictional place. Only a totalitarian society would even claim absolute safety as a worthy ideal, because it would require total state control over its citizens’ lives. Liberty has meaning only if we still believe in it when terrible things happen and a false government security blanket beckons. - Ron Paul

Ok.... Here we have one of those kind of horizontal conversations, TJ. From the horizon, we'll make a u-turn, and start talking in circles. I saw your point, added my two cents, and now you explain it different way. Placating my intelligence and ultimately not adding anything that isn't already understood. For the sake of argument, you're preaching to the choir. There isn't anything above that I don't already know or somewhat and for the most part agree with. ------------------- They can talk until their blue in the face about jobs and the economy, but nothing gets done that truly is beneficial to anyone. In the end, entitlement legislation will best serve those who wrote it. The rest will be left up to time and government as usual. You say they need something to occupy their time, I say they won't do it effectively. You say there is no hope for them to take time off and I agree with vehement passion. Potatoes, pah-tah-toes... we're not moving material here. So... I will end my participation in this discussion on jobs in this thread, but I guess you can get off topic if you want in your own thread. We can go back to discussing Scott Brown if you like. I brought up the jobs bill as an example of something that would classify him as "another politician".

Evil applied a little at time becomes a greater evil. Both sides of the aisle seem to be under the notion that the federal government is an efficient entity for creating employment.