ImWithStupid

She thinks people want to know about it...

Albert Einstein Perfect example is drug laws. Imperfect example is immigration restrictions. Gun free zones. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0vyxgJLJVA

I was making a joke about Target. Hugo doesn't have a sense of humor. As for Hugo's question... He must have been too lazy to actually read the post I left a link to, that would have gave him an idea what my answer would be. http://Off Topic Forum.com/topic/35789-palin-gets-people-killed/page__view__findpost__p__117540

If you can find me a rifle scope where the crosshairs of the reticle extend past the body of the rifle scope, I'll accept that what was on Palin's pic was a "gunsight". However, you can't argue that the image that Target used is a bullseye, obviously to draw some form of violence or force toward whatever it is on, whether it's hit by a beanbag, bullet, arrow or urine, force has been applied to the object. What was the tweet the great bimbo deleted? Do you think anyone who is referred to as "the great bimbo" could win a general election? http://Off Topic Forum.com/topic/35789-palin-gets-people-killed/page__view__findpost__p__117540

If you can find me a rifle scope where the crosshairs of the reticle extend past the body of the rifle scope, I'll accept that what was on Palin's pic was a "gunsight". However, you can't argue that the image that Target used is a bullseye, obviously to draw some form of violence or force toward whatever it is on, whether it's hit by a beanbag, bullet, arrow or urine, force has been applied to the object.

Well it is completely obvious that the store is only named Target and uses that symbol is to incite violence.

...and Ozzy Osborne is responsible for suicides, Jodi Foster is responsible for Reagan being shot, J.D. Salinger is responsible for the death of John Lennon... Ahhh exactly! Ain’t that right hugo? Your distain for Sarah is obviously clouding your sense of reason. I'm pretty sure Hugo was saying that, whether she was responsible for it or not, she'll be seen as (at least) partially responsible. It'll ruin any chance she has at becoming POTUS, as it will definitely be brought up in the future, if she tries to run. The fact that IWS can bring up the author of Catcher in the Rye as an example, proves the point. Whether Salinger was responsible or not, it's common knowledge what supposedly "inspired" the assassination. And if it becomes common knowledge that Palin was "responsible" for the death of Gifford, her political career is over. Only an idiot would place blame on a detached, trumped up, person or thing that supposedly or actually "inspired" a mentally deranged person to harm themselves or others. As for ending Palin's political career. Won't happen. This will be just like all the past events that the left and the media try to pin on a conservative person or group, before learning the truth in the situation. this too will fade away as just another left wing witch hunt and as the rest of these attempts, going back at least half a century that I can think of off the top of my head, will only be heard again from idiots who ignore the truth, As for if this keeps Palin from running for Pres in 2012, that would be a welcome outcome, of the left wing hate/smear machine.

[attach=full]1680[/attach]

You missed my point. First off. I never said he was far left. I said he was mentally deranged. Secondly. Everything I showed from the Daily Kos is just as likely to be his trigger as Palin's map and tweet. He is anti-Constitution (specifically the amendments/changes to), anti-immigration, anti-God. She is a former Republican, who participated in the reading of the Constitution on the floor of Congress (1st Amendment) on Thursday for comprehensive immigration reform and is Jewish. (She is also pro-gun, pro-business, against excessive government spending, anti-amnesty/pro-border security, pro-military. Far from being a far left Democrat) My point as I made from my first post is, trying to put blame on what makes a mentally ill person do crazy things, and especially when those crazy actions take innocent life, is either an act of a person spouting complete and utter stupidity because they are truly stupid, or an act of someone who is trying to profit, either personally or politically. If it is the former, I hope something is learned from such idiocy. If it's the latter, I hope that these people find themselves on some appropriate level of hell. ...and the Beatles are responsible for the Tate/LaBianca murders, the neighbors dog is responsible for the Son of Sam murders, pornography is responsible for Ted Bundy...

[attach=full]3078[/attach]

...and Ozzy Osborne is responsible for suicides, Jodi Foster is responsible for Reagan being shot, J.D. Salinger is responsible for the death of John Lennon...

I guess as someone who claims to be a libertarian, I thought you would believe a little more in personal responsibility. Until shown otherwise, I pretty much agree with this quote...

I guess I missed the evidence that this anti-flag, anti-God, anti-Constitution, reader of Karl Marx was a Palin supporter. It makes little difference, politically, if he was or not. Sarah got where she is at by appealing to emotions. A Romney aide is already mass producing pictures of Miss Green. Ya live by the sword ya die by the sword. I must admit anyone who reads is not a likely Palin supporter. So, in your mind, no matter what this mentally deranged person's motives, it's Palin's fault?

I guess I missed the evidence that this anti-flag, anti-God, anti-Constitution, reader of Karl Marx was a Palin supporter.