Jump to content

$1 billion has been wasted on abstinence-only programs,


Guest Sid9

Recommended Posts

December 5, 2007

First Rise in U.S. Teen Births Since '91

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 9:09 p.m. ET

 

ATLANTA (AP) -- In a troubling reversal, the nation's teen birth rate rose

for the first time in 15 years, surprising government health officials and

reviving the bitter debate about abstinence-only sex education.

 

The birth rate had been dropping since its peak in 1991, although the

decline had slowed in recent years. On Wednesday, government statisticians

said it rose 3 percent from 2005 to 2006.

 

The reason for the increase is not clear, and federal health officials said

it might be a one-year statistical blip, not the beginning of a new upward

trend.

 

However, some experts said they have been expecting a jump. They blamed

it on increased federal funding for abstinence-only health education

that doesn't teach teens how to use condoms and other contraception .

 

Some key sexually transmitted disease rates have been rising, including

syphilis, gonorrhea and chlamydia. The rising teen pregnancy rate is part of

the same phenomenon, said Dr. Carol Hogue, an Emory University professor of

maternal and child health.

 

''It's not rocket science,'' she said.

 

At the same time, some research suggests teens are using condoms far more

often than they did 15 years ago.

 

The new teen birth numbers are based on the 15-19 age group of women, which

accounted for most of the 440,000 births to teens in 2006. The rate rose to

nearly 42 births per 1,000 in that group, up from 40.5 in 2005. That

translates to an extra 20,000 births to teen mothers.

 

In 1991, the peak year for teen births, there were nearly 62 births per

1,000.

 

The new report is based on a review of more than 99 percent of the birth

certificates from last year by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention.

 

The report, released Wednesday, quickly took on political implications.

 

Opponents of abstinence-based programs seized on the data as evidence of

wrong-headed government policy.

 

''Congress needs to stop knee-jerk approving abstinence-only funding when

it's clear it's not working,'' said U.S. Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., who is

pushing for more comprehensive sex education.

 

The new report offers a state-by-state breakdown of birth rates overall.

Many of those with the highest birth rates teach abstinence instead of

comprehensive sex education, according to the Planned Parenthood Federation

of America.

 

And research has concluded that abstinence-only programs do not cause a

decrease in teenage sexual activity, Planned Parenthood officials added.

 

''In the last decade, more than $1 billion has been wasted on

abstinence-only programs,'' said Cecile Richards, the organization's

president, in a prepared statement.

 

Decreased condom use and increased sexual activity are two likely

explanations for the higher teen birth rate. But not all data supports those

theories, said John Santelli, a professor of population and family health at

Columbia University's school of public health.

 

For example, a biannual government survey of high school students found that

the percentage of those who said they used a condom the last time they had

sex rose to 63 percent in 2005, up from 46 percent in 1991.

 

Contraceptive-focused sex education is still common, and the new teen birth

numbers reflect it's failing, argued Moira Gaul of the Family Research

Council, a conservative advocacy organization in Washington, D.C.

 

The CDC also reported that births to unwed mothers reached an all-time high

in 2006, but that is part of a continuing upward trend and was expected.

 

Health officials cautioned that the rise in teen births is not the chief

cause of births to unwed mothers, however. Women in their 20s and 30s

represent the largest proportion, with teens accounting for fewer than a

quarter, said Stephanie Ventura, head of the CDC's reproductive statistics

branch.

 

About thirty years ago, more than half of unwed mothers were teenagers, she

said.

 

The report on births also showed:

 

--That the U.S. fertility rate is at the highest level since 1971, at 2.1

children. That is an increase of 2 percent from 2005 to 2006.

 

--Total births rose 3 percent to nearly 4.3 million in 2006.

 

--Rate of Caesarean section deliveries also rose 3 percent, setting a new

record of 31 percent of all births. Health officials say the rate, which has

risen by about half since 1996, is higher than is medically necessary.

 

The high C-section rate is believed to at least partly explain why rates of

preterm and low-weight births also rose in 2006. Planned deliveries,

including those involving C-sections, are often done before a pregnancy

comes to full term, health experts said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

Popular Days

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...