Al Qaeda claims responsibility for the Bhutto murder. You know. AlQaeda. The guys that the Left Wing

Al Qaeda claims responsibility for the Bhutto murder. You know. Al

Qaeda. The guys that the Left Wing-Nuts claim don't even exist.

"An obscure Italian Web site said Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, al Qaeda's

commander in Afghanistan, told its reporter in a phone call, "We

terminated the most precious American asset which vowed to defeat

[the] mujahedeen."

It said the decision to assassinate Bhutto was made by al Qaeda's No.

2 leader, Ayman al Zawahri in October. Before joining Osama bin Laden

in Afghanistan, Zawahri was imprisoned in Egypt for his role in the

assassination of then-Egyptian President Anwar Sadat."

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/12/us-checking-al.html

"Bhutto had been outspoken in her opposition to al Qaeda and had

criticized the government of President Pervez Musharraf for failing to

take strong action against the Islamic terrorists."

On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:23:24 -0800 (PST), PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com

wrote:

>Al Qaeda claims responsibility for the Bhutto murder. You know. Al

>Qaeda. The guys that the Left Wing-Nuts claim don't even exist.

Who said they don't exist? Care to provide some sort of evidence of

this astonishing claim?

If Bush had been a tad "more concerned" about capturing Bin Laden, and

by extension Ayman al Zawahri, maybe Bhutto would be alive today.

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/14/barnes-osama/

>"An obscure Italian Web site said Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, al Qaeda's

>commander in Afghanistan, told its reporter in a phone call, "We

>terminated the most precious American asset which vowed to defeat

>[the] mujahedeen."

>

>It said the decision to assassinate Bhutto was made by al Qaeda's No.

>2 leader, Ayman al Zawahri in October. Before joining Osama bin Laden

>in Afghanistan, Zawahri was imprisoned in Egypt for his role in the

>assassination of then-Egyptian President Anwar Sadat."

>

>http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/12/us-checking-al.html

>

>"Bhutto had been outspoken in her opposition to al Qaeda and had

>criticized the government of President Pervez Musharraf for failing to

>take strong action against the Islamic terrorists."

"wrabenator" <wrabenator@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:e80d0947-c274-422d-a27e-fd01bc558dfc@w56g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

On Dec 27, 2:23 pm, PissingOffTheL...@excite.com wrote:

>> Al Qaeda claims responsibility for the Bhutto murder. You know. Al

>> Qaeda. The guys that the Left Wing-Nuts claim don't even exist.

>>

>> "An obscure Italian Web site said Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, al Qaeda's

>> commander in Afghanistan, told its reporter in a phone call, "We

>> terminated the most precious American asset which vowed to defeat

>> [the] mujahedeen."

>>It said the decision to assassinate Bhutto was made by al Qaeda's No.

>> 2 leader, Ayman al Zawahri in October. Before joining Osama bin Laden

>> in Afghanistan, Zawahri was imprisoned in Egypt for his role in the

>> assassination of then-Egyptian President Anwar Sadat."

>> http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/12/us-checking-al.html

>> "Bhutto had been outspoken in her opposition to al Qaeda and had

>> criticized the government of President Pervez Musharraf for failing to

>> take strong action against the Islamic terrorists."

>>

>

>Al-qaeda? Didn't George W. Bush smoke them out, track them down,

> and bring them to justice in our courts long ago?

>

Yeah, hasn't that mission been accomplished? You don't suppose

Bush could've made a mistake, do you?

PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com wrote:

> Al Qaeda claims responsibility for the Bhutto murder. You know. Al

> Qaeda. The guys that the Left Wing-Nuts claim don't even exist.

>

> "An obscure Italian Web site said Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, al Qaeda's

> commander in Afghanistan, told its reporter in a phone call, "We

> terminated the most precious American asset which vowed to defeat

> [the] mujahedeen."

>

> It said the decision to assassinate Bhutto was made by al Qaeda's No.

> 2 leader, Ayman al Zawahri in October. Before joining Osama bin Laden

> in Afghanistan, Zawahri was imprisoned in Egypt for his role in the

> assassination of then-Egyptian President Anwar Sadat."

>

> http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/12/us-checking-al.html

>

> "Bhutto had been outspoken in her opposition to al Qaeda and had

> criticized the government of President Pervez Musharraf for failing to

> take strong action against the Islamic terrorists."

>

>

Blame Bush's boy Musharraf.

--

"Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched."

--- George Herbert Walker Bush, in an interview with Sarah McClendon, 1992

wrabenator wrote:

> Al-qaeda? Didn't George W. Bush smoke them out, track them down, and

> bring them to justice in our courts long ago?

Quite a number of them they have. No thanks the the Dems who've done

nothing but try to derail for political reasons. Tell me, what have the

Dems done to try to squash global terrorism? Where is their plan? We

all know what the Dems are against, but not what they are for. No plan,

just political trash talking.

Flash Bazbo wrote:

> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:23:24 -0800 (PST), PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com

> wrote:

>

>> Al Qaeda claims responsibility for the Bhutto murder. You know. Al

>> Qaeda. The guys that the Left Wing-Nuts claim don't even exist.

>

> Who said they don't exist? Care to provide some sort of evidence of

> this astonishing claim?

>

> If Bush had been a tad "more concerned" about capturing Bin Laden, and

> by extension Ayman al Zawahri, maybe Bhutto would be alive today.

Bush would love to get Bin Laden. It would score a political boost. It

would do little to slow terrorism. Bhutto would be dead either way.

She was a threat to the radical factions in Pakistan.

<wrabenator@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:007ba1ea-b387-47c5-9122-c4d3d7f28b40@v32g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...

On Dec 28, 5:28 am, miles <n...@nopers.com> wrote:

> wrabenatorwrote:

> > Al-qaeda? Didn't George W. Bush smoke them out, track them down, and

> > bring them to justice in our courts long ago?

>

> Quite a number of them they have. No thanks the the Dems who've done

> nothing but try to derail for political reasons. Tell me, what have the

> Dems done to try to squash global terrorism? Where is their plan? We

> all know what the Dems are against, but not what they are for. No plan,

> just political trash talking.

The branch of government required to plan and execute effective

policies against threats to security is the executive branch.

Congress under Dim rule has tried repeatedly to cut the budget to prosecute

the war. Iraq 'is' only one front on the war against Islamo-fascism. It's a

common mindset left over from a President who 'loathed' the military.

--

CB

http://www.democrap.com/mambo/

Click to play the clip, Islamofascist call on American Useful Idiots

<wrabenator@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:b9f45d59-4c00-452d-a10a-9649c099d562@e4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...

On Dec 28, 5:30 am, miles <n...@nopers.com> wrote:

> Flash Bazbo wrote:

> > On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:23:24 -0800 (PST), PissingOffTheL...@excite.com

> > wrote:

>

> >> Al Qaeda claims responsibility for the Bhutto murder. You know. Al

> >> Qaeda. The guys that the Left Wing-Nuts claim don't even exist.

>

> > Who said they don't exist? Care to provide some sort of evidence of

> > this astonishing claim?

>

> > If Bush had been a tad "more concerned" about capturing Bin Laden, and

> > by extension Ayman al Zawahri, maybe Bhutto would be alive today.

>

> Bush would love to get Bin Laden. It would score a political boost. It

> would do little to slow terrorism. Bhutto would be dead either way.

> She was a threat to the radical factions in Pakistan.

According to the current U. S. administration, "the threat to the

radical factions in Pakistan" is from the administration's friends and

allies in Mr. Musharraf's government and military. Both Bhuttos were

democrats, more-or-less, one deposed and hanged by the military, the

other deposed twice, accused of corruption, and run out of the

country. The current U. S. administration has subsidized Musharraf and

the military and continues to do so.

A Pakistan dude spoke on his government last night on FoxNews describing his

government as "Social Democrats".

What that tells us 'is' al-Qaeda doesn't give a shee'it who it kills. If Dim

Libs in America think their actions to subvert President Bush will appease

the animals who murdered Bhutto, their mistaken. Butt then when did Dim Libs

ever see the light so to speak?

CB wrote:

> <wrabenator@gmail.com> wrote in message

> news:007ba1ea-b387-47c5-9122-c4d3d7f28b40@v32g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...

> On Dec 28, 5:28 am, miles <n...@nopers.com> wrote:

>

>> wrabenatorwrote:

>>

>>> Al-qaeda? Didn't George W. Bush smoke them out, track them down, and

>>> bring them to justice in our courts long ago?

>>>

>> Quite a number of them they have. No thanks the the Dems who've done

>> nothing but try to derail for political reasons. Tell me, what have the

>> Dems done to try to squash global terrorism? Where is their plan? We

>> all know what the Dems are against, but not what they are for. No plan,

>> just political trash talking.

>>

>

>

> The branch of government required to plan and execute effective

> policies against threats to security is the executive branch.

>

> Congress under Dim rule has tried repeatedly to cut the budget to prosecute

> the war. Iraq 'is' only one front on the war against Islamo-fascism. It's a

> common mindset left over from a President who 'loathed' the military.

>

Lower your skirt. your ignorance is showing. The military built by

Clinton won the Iraq War in a few days. The military corrupted by Bush

lost the Occupation in a few days.

There were no terrorists in Iraq prior to Bush's Occupation. When Bush

was elected there were a few hundred terrorists of all persuasions

around the world. Six years after Bush's election, every Muslim has

become a potential killer. Now there are roughly a billion terrorists,

all hating the U.S.

--

"Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched."

--- George Herbert Walker Bush, in an interview with Sarah McClendon, 1992

miles wrote:

> Flash Bazbo wrote:

>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:23:24 -0800 (PST), PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com

>> wrote:

>>

>>> Al Qaeda claims responsibility for the Bhutto murder. You know. Al

>>> Qaeda. The guys that the Left Wing-Nuts claim don't even exist.

>>

>> Who said they don't exist? Care to provide some sort of evidence of

>> this astonishing claim?

>>

>> If Bush had been a tad "more concerned" about capturing Bin Laden, and

>> by extension Ayman al Zawahri, maybe Bhutto would be alive today.

>

> Bush would love to get Bin Laden. It would score a political boost.

> It would do little to slow terrorism. Bhutto would be dead either

> way. She was a threat to the radical factions in Pakistan.

She was a threat to Musharraf, who plays Bush as if he were the boy he is.

--

"Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched."

--- George Herbert Walker Bush, in an interview with Sarah McClendon, 1992

CB wrote:

> <wrabenator@gmail.com> wrote in message

> news:b9f45d59-4c00-452d-a10a-9649c099d562@e4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...

> On Dec 28, 5:30 am, miles <n...@nopers.com> wrote:

>

>> Flash Bazbo wrote:

>>

>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:23:24 -0800 (PST), PissingOffTheL...@excite.com

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> Al Qaeda claims responsibility for the Bhutto murder. You know. Al

>>>> Qaeda. The guys that the Left Wing-Nuts claim don't even exist.

>>>>

>>> Who said they don't exist? Care to provide some sort of evidence of

>>> this astonishing claim?

>>>

>>> If Bush had been a tad "more concerned" about capturing Bin Laden, and

>>> by extension Ayman al Zawahri, maybe Bhutto would be alive today.

>>>

>> Bush would love to get Bin Laden. It would score a political boost. It

>> would do little to slow terrorism. Bhutto would be dead either way.

>> She was a threat to the radical factions in Pakistan.

>>

>

>

> According to the current U. S. administration, "the threat to the

> radical factions in Pakistan" is from the administration's friends and

> allies in Mr. Musharraf's government and military. Both Bhuttos were

> democrats, more-or-less, one deposed and hanged by the military, the

> other deposed twice, accused of corruption, and run out of the

> country. The current U. S. administration has subsidized Musharraf and

> the military and continues to do so.

>

> A Pakistan dude spoke on his government last night on FoxNews describing his

> government as "Social Democrats".

>

> What that tells us 'is' al-Qaeda doesn't give a shee'it who it kills. If Dim

> Libs in America think their actions to subvert President Bush will appease

> the animals who murdered Bhutto, their mistaken. Butt then when did Dim Libs

> ever see the light so to speak?

>

>

>

what that tells us is that Bush doesn't give a damn who he slurs or

murders. Who gained by Bhutto's murder, hmmm? Musharraf squeezed the

trigger, but Bush put the gun in his hand and gave him permission to use it.

--

"Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched."

--- George Herbert Walker Bush, in an interview with Sarah McClendon, 1992