al-Qaida Has Rebuilt, U.S. Intel Warns

P

Patriot Games

Guest
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/7/11/192336.shtml?s=lh

al-Qaida Has Rebuilt, U.S. Intel Warns
NewsMax.com Wires Thursday, July 12, 2007

WASHINGTON -- U.S. intelligence analysts have concluded al-Qaida has rebuilt
its operating capability to a level not seen since just before the Sept. 11
terrorist attacks, The Associated Press has learned.

The conclusion suggests that the group that launched the most devastating
terror attack on the United States has been able to regroup along the
Afghan-Pakistani border despite nearly six years of bombings, war and other
tactics aimed at crippling it.

Still, numerous government officials say they know of no specific, credible
threat of a new attack on U.S. soil.

A counterterrorism official familiar with a five-page summary of the new
government threat assessment called it a stark appraisal to be discussed at
the White House on Thursday as part of a broader meeting on an upcoming
National Intelligence Estimate.

The official and others spoke on condition of anonymity because the secret
report remains classified.

Counterterrorism analysts produced the document, titled "Al-Qaida better
positioned to strike the West." The document focuses on the terror group's
safe haven in Pakistan and makes a range of observations about the threat
posed to the United States and its allies, officials said.

Al-Qaida is "considerably operationally stronger than a year ago" and has
"regrouped to an extent not seen since 2001," the official said,
paraphrasing the report's conclusions. "They are showing greater and greater
ability to plan attacks in Europe and the United States."

The group also has created "the most robust training program since 2001,
with an interest in using European operatives," the official quoted the
report as saying.

At the same time, this official said, the report speaks of "significant gaps
in intelligence" so U.S. authorities may be ignorant of potential or planned
attacks.

John Kringen, who heads the CIA's analysis directorate, echoed the concerns
about al-Qaida's resurgence during testimony and conversations with
reporters at a House Armed Services Committee hearing on Wednesday.

"They seem to be fairly well settled into the safe haven and the ungoverned
spaces of Pakistan," Kringen testified. "We see more training. We see more
money. We see more communications. We see that activity rising."

The threat assessment comes as the 16 U.S. intelligence agencies prepare a
National Intelligence Estimate focusing on threats to the United States. A
senior intelligence official, who spoke on condition of anonymity while the
high-level analysis was being finalized, said the document has been in the
works for roughly two years.

Kringen and aides to National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell would not
comment on the details of that analysis. "Preparation of the estimate is not
a response to any specific threat," McConnell's spokesman Ross Feinstein
said, adding that it would be ready for distribution this summer.

Counterterrorism officials have been increasingly concerned about al-Qaida's
recent operations. This week, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff
said he had a "gut feeling" that the United States faced a heightened risk
of attack this summer.

Kringen said he wouldn't attach a summer time frame to the concern. In
studying the threat, he said he begins with the premise that al-Qaida would
consider attacking the U.S. a "home run hit" and that the easiest way to get
into the United States would be through Europe.

The new threat assessment puts particular focus on Pakistan, as did Kringen.

"Sooner or later you have to quit permitting them to have a safe haven"
along the Afghan-Pakistani border, he told the House committee. "At the end
of the day, when we have had success, it is when you've been able to get
them worried about who was informing on them, get them worried about who was
coming after them."

Several European countries - among them Britain, Denmark, Germany and the
Netherlands - are also highlighted in the threat assessment partly because
they have arrangements with the Pakistani government that allow their
citizens easier access to Pakistan than others, according to the
counterterrorism official.

This is more troubling because all four are part of the U.S. visa waiver
program, and their citizens can enter the United States without additional
security scrutiny, the official said.

The Bush administration has repeatedly cited al-Qaida as a key justification
for continuing the fight in Iraq.

"The No. 1 enemy in Iraq is al-Qaida," White House press secretary Tony Snow
said Wednesday. "Al-Qaida continues to be the chief organizer of mayhem
within Iraq, the chief organization for killing innocent Iraqis."

The findings could bolster the president's hand at a moment when support on
Capitol Hill for the war is eroding and the administration is struggling to
defend its decision for a military buildup in Iraq. A progress report that
the White House is releasing to Congress this week is expected to indicate
scant progress on the political and military benchmarks set for Iraq.

The threat assessment says that al-Qaida stepped up efforts to "improve its
core operational capability" in late 2004 but did not succeed until December
of 2006 after the Pakistani government signed a peace agreement with tribal
leaders that effectively removed government military presence from the
northwest frontier with Afghanistan.

The agreement allows Taliban and al-Qaida operatives to move across the
border with impunity and establish and run training centers, the report
says, according to the official.

It also says that al-Qaida is particularly interested in building up the
numbers in its middle ranks, or operational positions, so there is not as
great a lag in attacks when such people are killed.

"Being No. 3 in al-Qaida is a bad job. We regularly get to the No. 3
person," Tom Fingar, the top U.S. intelligence analyst, told the House
panel.

The counterterror official said the report does not focus on al-Qaida leader
Osama bin Laden, his whereabouts or his role in the terrorist network.
Officials say al-Qaida has become more like a "family-oriented" mob
organization with leadership roles in cells and other groups being handed
from father to son, or cousin to uncle.

Yet bin Laden's whereabouts are still of great interest to intelligence
agencies. Although he has not been heard from for some time, Kringen said
officials believe he is still alive and living under the protection of
tribal leaders in the border area.

Armed Services Committee members expressed frustration that more was not
being done to get bin Laden and tamp down activity in the tribal areas. The
senior intelligence analysts tried to portray the difficulty of operating in
the area despite a $25 million bounty on the head of bin Laden and his top
deputy.

"They are in an environment that is more hostile to us than it is to
al-Qaida," Fingar said.
 
On Jul 12, 7:14 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@The_Beach.com>
wrote:
> http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/7/11/192336.shtml?s=lh
>
> al-Qaida Has Rebuilt, U.S. Intel Warns
> NewsMax.com Wires Thursday, July 12, 2007
>
> WASHINGTON -- U.S. intelligence analysts have concluded al-Qaida has rebuilt
> its operating capability to a level not seen since just before the Sept. 11
> terrorist attacks, The Associated Press has learned.
>


So PG, will we be fighting them here?

Rick Hohensee
 
<hohenseerick@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1184280083.267405.188480@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 12, 7:14 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@The_Beach.com>
> wrote:
>> http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/7/11/192336.shtml?s=lh
>> al-Qaida Has Rebuilt, U.S. Intel Warns
>> NewsMax.com Wires Thursday, July 12, 2007
>> WASHINGTON -- U.S. intelligence analysts have concluded al-Qaida has
>> rebuilt
>> its operating capability to a level not seen since just before the Sept.
>> 11
>> terrorist attacks, The Associated Press has learned.

> So PG, will we be fighting them here?


Yep.

Its a virtual certainty.

When? Sooner rather than later.

How? Most likely a biological weapon. Unlike chemical weapons, most
biological weapons are self-propogating. If you zap somebody with a
chemical agent that person gets ****ed but somebody a block away is
unharmed. If you zap somebody with a biological agent that person gets
****ed, you sneak away, and that person propogates your attack for you
geometrically (or much worse). Al Qaeda knows that a biological weapon is
far superior to a chemical weapon both for its terror-causing
characteristics AND because it self-propogates.

Where? In order of importance: Washington, DC; New York; Los Angeles;
somewhere/anywhere in the Midwest.

This War on Terror hasn't even started yet. Afghanistan was the equivalent
of the Redskins getting off the bus, walking into the locker room, and
shoving the reporters out of the way so they could suit up. Iraq was and is
the equivalent of the Redskins sauntering onto the field for a little
stretching and pass-me-an-easy-one-so-I-look-good warm-up.

The really big stuff hasn't even happenned yet.

In the big picture scheme of things we're out of countries to attack (except
Iran) and our enemy is mostly invisible. The really hard work hasn't even
started yet.
 
On Jul 13, 10:50 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@The_Beach.com>
wrote:
> <hohenseer...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1184280083.267405.188480@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Jul 12, 7:14 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@The_Beach.com>
> > wrote:
> >>http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/7/11/192336.shtml?s=lh
> >> al-Qaida Has Rebuilt, U.S. Intel Warns
> >> NewsMax.com Wires Thursday, July 12, 2007
> >> WASHINGTON -- U.S. intelligence analysts have concluded al-Qaida has
> >> rebuilt
> >> its operating capability to a level not seen since just before the Sept.
> >> 11
> >> terrorist attacks, The Associated Press has learned.

> > So PG, will we be fighting them here?

>
> Yep.
>
> Its a virtual certainty.
>
> When? Sooner rather than later.
>
> How? Most likely a biological weapon. Unlike chemical weapons, most
> biological weapons are self-propogating. If you zap somebody with a
> chemical agent that person gets ****ed but somebody a block away is
> unharmed. If you zap somebody with a biological agent that person gets
> ****ed, you sneak away, and that person propogates your attack for you
> geometrically (or much worse). Al Qaeda knows that a biological weapon is
> far superior to a chemical weapon both for its terror-causing
> characteristics AND because it self-propogates.
>
> Where? In order of importance: Washington, DC; New York; Los Angeles;
> somewhere/anywhere in the Midwest.
>
> This War on Terror hasn't even started yet. Afghanistan was the equivalent
> of the Redskins getting off the bus, walking into the locker room, and
> shoving the reporters out of the way so they could suit up. Iraq was and is
> the equivalent of the Redskins sauntering onto the field for a little
> stretching and pass-me-an-easy-one-so-I-look-good warm-up.
>
> The really big stuff hasn't even happenned yet.
>
> In the big picture scheme of things we're out of countries to attack (except
> Iran) and our enemy is mostly invisible. The really hard work hasn't even
> started yet.


So, GWB has failed in his mission to defeat the terrorists. They're
now stronger than ever. Right?
 
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1184339962.172246.202390@o61g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 13, 10:50 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@The_Beach.com>
> wrote:
>> <hohenseer...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1184280083.267405.188480@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>> > On Jul 12, 7:14 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@The_Beach.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/7/11/192336.shtml?s=lh
>> >> al-Qaida Has Rebuilt, U.S. Intel Warns
>> >> NewsMax.com Wires Thursday, July 12, 2007
>> >> WASHINGTON -- U.S. intelligence analysts have concluded al-Qaida has
>> >> rebuilt
>> >> its operating capability to a level not seen since just before the
>> >> Sept.
>> >> 11
>> >> terrorist attacks, The Associated Press has learned.
>> > So PG, will we be fighting them here?

>> Yep.
>> Its a virtual certainty.
>> When? Sooner rather than later.
>> How? Most likely a biological weapon. Unlike chemical weapons, most
>> biological weapons are self-propogating. If you zap somebody with a
>> chemical agent that person gets ****ed but somebody a block away is
>> unharmed. If you zap somebody with a biological agent that person gets
>> ****ed, you sneak away, and that person propogates your attack for you
>> geometrically (or much worse). Al Qaeda knows that a biological weapon
>> is
>> far superior to a chemical weapon both for its terror-causing
>> characteristics AND because it self-propogates.
>> Where? In order of importance: Washington, DC; New York; Los Angeles;
>> somewhere/anywhere in the Midwest.
>> This War on Terror hasn't even started yet. Afghanistan was the
>> equivalent
>> of the Redskins getting off the bus, walking into the locker room, and
>> shoving the reporters out of the way so they could suit up. Iraq was and
>> is
>> the equivalent of the Redskins sauntering onto the field for a little
>> stretching and pass-me-an-easy-one-so-I-look-good warm-up.
>> The really big stuff hasn't even happenned yet.
>> In the big picture scheme of things we're out of countries to attack
>> (except
>> Iran) and our enemy is mostly invisible. The really hard work hasn't
>> even
>> started yet.

> So, GWB has failed in his mission to defeat the terrorists.


No, continuing the Redskins illustration.... Somebody had to prepare the
team, train the team, and get the team to the stadium. Bush has done an
excellent job (so far) of that. Its not clear to me if he can finish strong
(bombing Iran) or not.

> They're now stronger than ever. Right?


Wrong.

However, the WAY we diminished them has made them a BIGGER problem. It
isn't like we had a choice, that's just how things go. Continuing the
Redskins illustration... IF the kickoff lands on the 1-yard line and
bounces into the receiving player the option of letting it go into the
endzone and starting on the 20-yard line disappears, right? So, we had no
choice except to deny Al Qaeda (and the Taliban) a country of their own.
Which now leaves us with no easily identifiable enemy upon whom we can
retaliate...

The War on Terror is about to change, and change significantly, in the next
few years and it will represent something like Phase II when in fact it just
the REAL beginning of the War on Terror.
 
Back
Top