Jump to content

Anatomy of an Impropriety, or Ann Coulter Vs. Bill Maher


Guest Pookie

Recommended Posts

Guest Pookie

Anatomy of an Impropriety, or Ann Coulter Vs. Bill Maher

Warner Todd Huston

 

March 5, 2007

The double standard of Leftists who are ignoring the outrage of Bill

Maher -- who alluded to his wish that Vice President Dick Cheney was

assassinated - while at the same time are wildly fanning themselves in mock

outrage as if they had the vapors over Ann Coulter -- for calling Democrat

John Edwards a bad name -- was on full display in the MSM over the weekend.

 

If you are a conservative who stays up on the "happenings" in conservative

news, you'd have by now heard that firebrand Columnist Ann Coulter called

Democratic Candidate John Edwards a "faggot" at the CPAC convention the

other day. You are also probably aware of all the lefty types wading into

the waters of high dudgeon over her typically button-pushing remark and

you'll have seen Democrats and their supporters coming out of the woodwork

to claim astonishment at Coulter's comment, demanding that conservatives

distance themselves from her.

 

You'll also have noticed that every upstanding Conservative and GOP

candidate was falling all over themselves in compliance to denounce

Coulter's remarks.

 

Now, right here I'll probably get myself in trouble with some conservatives

who are in a permanent mode of "fed-up" and who always get a thrill out of

Coulter's work. I'll get tsk, tsked by them because, well, I just don't like

her. Whenever I see her on TV, I stop paying attention, whenever I hear her

on the radio I change stations, and I have long since stopped reading her

columns. In fact, I see little difference between her and any of the

hatemongers on the left like, for instance, a Bill Maher.

 

Of course, I am sympathetic to her core message of conservative values, but

in my opinion she is no longer an effective conservative columnist having

long ago diluted her message by a career that has advanced to the stage of

"personality" instead of pundit. She is the H.L. Mencken of our times...

minus the intellect.

 

Sadly, she obviously feels she has to say increasingly outrageous things to

stay at the top of the news. In fact, at this point she isn't much different

than Whitney Houston, Paris Hilton, or Britney Spears all of whom seem to

feel a need to continuously up the ante of crazy behavior to keep getting

noticed.

 

In other words, Coulter no longer does much to aid the cause because her own

fame -- or more properly her infamy -- has become her driving force, the

cause having been eclipsed by her need to stay in the news. I feel, at this

point, that she is hurting us on the right more than helping us.

 

Alright, that being said -- and start the hate mail now -- it just cannot

escape notice how the two infamies, Coulter's and Maher's, are being treated

by the MSM.

 

First of all let's rate the relative outrages. Coulter called Edwards a

derogatory name equating him to a man that likes homosexual sex, a name that

is tinged with the cultural meaning of not being a "real" man, being an

effete, and a weakling. OK, inappropriate in serious policy discussion,

sure. But is it a hanging offense? Hardly.

 

Bill Maher, on the other hand, basically called for the assassination of a

sitting American vice president! Of the two Maher's comments are by far the

more egregious.

 

Coulter's comment is intemperate, childish, lowbrow, even frat house-like

for its part, but it was just a derogatory name in the end. Maher wants

people KILLED, for Heaven's sake. But is the left cranking up the

water-works and crying for his head on a platter? The big question is, where

are all the MSM talking heads calling for Democrats to immediately distance

themselves from his immoral behavior? In fact, where have they ever been for

denouncing Maher's ignorance? Since the 2000 election Maher has been just as

caught up in the need for notice that Coulter is in the grips of with his

every appearance seemingly geared to showcase an ever increasing

intemperance, a wild eyed shrillness, and is filled with unstable verbiage.

 

If he isn't infected with BDS (Bush derangement syndrome), no one is.

 

Now, let's take a perusal of some of the gnashing of teeth and rending of

clothes that the MSM has indulged in with Coulter over the last few days,

shall we?

 

Reuters

 

Outspoken U.S. conservative columnist Ann Coulter is drawing fire from

Republicans and Democrats alike after publicly using a derogatory gay slur

in reference to Democratic presidential hopeful John Edwards.

 

Dallas Morning News

 

Ann Coulter outdoes herself - Conservative firebrand uses anti-gay slur

against John Edwards

 

CNN

 

Coulter under fire for anti-gay slur

 

A blog on the Houston chronicle's site has this:

 

She's a charmer, isn't she? Here's what's I find funny: conservative

friends will tell me that nobody really looks at Coulter as a serious

person. With her calls for assassinations of public officials, general

name-calling, and highly casual relationship with anything resembling facts,

she's the court jester, a source of entertainment whom nobody really thinks

of as one of the grown-ups.

 

The Nation had this:

 

So Ann Coulter called John Edwards a "faggot." All this proves is that the

woman's gaydar is seriously on the fritz. Last year she diagnosed Bill

Clinton as a "latent homosexual" whose "promiscuity" is "reminiscent of a

bathhouse." Then on Hardball she called Al Gore a "total fag." Meanwhile,

Ted Haggard and Mark Foley stage 120 Days of Sodom right under her nose, and

all she can say when confronted with the goods is "who knew Congressman

Foley was a closeted Democrat?"

 

The New York Times joined the fray, too.

 

These conferences (CPAC) have historically been known for displaying what

its own organizers would describe as over-the-top behavior, and one of the

regular speakers - Ann Coulter - offered an example of it when she used an

anti-gay epithet on Friday to describe John Edwards, the former senator from

North Carolina and Democratic presidential contender.

 

And Editor and Publisher quoted Dana Milbank:

 

The Post's Dana Milbank, in a column for the Saturday paper, observed:

"Ann Coulter used an anti-gay slur to describe John Edwards (the line drew

applause) and asked: 'Did Al Gore actually swallow Michael Moore?' When a

questioner asked Coulter why she praises marriage but broke off so many

engagements, she responded by calling the questioner ugly."

 

The Minnesota Daily, a University Paper, even tried their hand at the story:

 

The remark is so filled with bigotry it's surprising anyone would have the

gall to say it in public, even if they believe it in private.

 

And that was the coverage by just a few news sources this weekend. There is

a lot more where those came from. Imagine what it will be as the early part

of the week rolls on and the "real" MSM pundits get a crack at this story

from their weekend off work.

 

Naturally Democrat party spokesmen were all over the comment, too.

 

DNC Chairman, Howard Dean immediately released this statement: "There is no

place in political discourse for this kind of hate-filled and bigoted

comments. While Democrats and Republicans may disagree on the issues, we

should all be able to agree that this kind of vile rhetoric is out of

bounds. The American people want a serious, thoughtful debate of the issues.

Republicans--including the Republican presidential candidates who shared the

podium with Ann Coulter today--should denounce her hateful remarks."

 

Naturally, the man the comment was aimed at, John Edwards, had plenty to

say, as well. Edward's campaign manager David Bonior said in an e-mail

message: "John was singled out for a personal attack because the Republican

establishment knows he poses the greatest threat to their power. Since they

have nothing real to use against him, Coulter's resorting to the classic

right-wing strategy of riling up hate to smear a progressive champion."

 

Even Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese got into the act with the

following: "To interject this word into American political discourse is a

vile and disgusting way to sink the debate to a new, all-time low. Make no

doubt about it, these remarks go directly against what our Founding Fathers

intended and have no place on the schoolyard, much less our country's

political arena."

 

Solmonese went on to say, "It is clear that some in the Republican Party

plan to run in 2008 the same way they did in 2004, by using discrimination

to divide the country and rally their base. But, 2008 is not 2004, and this

time the politics of fear and smear will not work. The American people are

tired of those who would rather divide than unite."

 

(Those last three comments can be seen here: Ann Coulter's Done It Again)

 

OK, we get it. Ann was a nitwit and said something inappropriate. How can

anyone even be surprised any more?

 

Now, for the Right's part, there isn't anyone with any standing in the

conservative community who is seen to be supporting Coulter's nonsense. All

the GOP presidential candidates denounced her remark almost immediately (as

can be seen in any of the linked stories above). Sean Hannity tried to

gently distance himself from the kind of comments Coulter made and the

right's favorite blogger, Michelle Malkin has also denounced the blond

bomb...uh, shell.

 

Well, there is all the mess over Ann. It's got everyone abuzz, for sure.

 

Now, let's turn to Bill Maher's most recent comment.

 

As reported here on Newsbusters, on his HBO program "Real Time", Maher

thought a "funny joke" was offered by Congressman Barney Frank who said that

the bomb that recently missed vice president Cheney on an overseas visit was

"wasted" because it didn't kill him (to audience laughter and applause, I

might add).

 

The exchange went on:

 

Maher: But I have zero doubt that if Dick Cheney was not in power, people

wouldn't be dying needlessly tomorrow. (applause)

 

Scarborough: If someone on this panel said that they wished that Dick

Cheney had been blown up, and you didn't say.

 

Frank: I think he did.

 

Scarborough: Okay. Did you say.

 

Maher: No, no. I quoted that.

 

Frank: You don't believe that?

 

Maher: I'm just saying if he did die, other people, more people would

live. That's a fact.

 

Now, here is a definitive listing of all the outrage exhibited over Bill

Maher in the MSM and by GOP sources:

 

Newsmax

 

Bill Maher: Better If Cheney Is Dead

 

NewsBusters (as noted above)

 

Noel Sheppard's blog Bill Maher is Sorry the Assassination Attempt on Dick

Cheney Failed

 

There you have it.

 

Two sources.

 

No Republicans finger wagging over Maher's comments. No Democrats rushing to

the microphones to denounce Maher's constant over the top rhetoric. No MSM

reports of Maher wishing the VP were assassinated.

 

Zip.

 

Nadda.

 

Nuthin'.

 

And, this isn't a lone comment by Bill Maher, either. His wasn't the kind

that might make people want to give him a pass because it was so unusual.

Maher has been outrageous with his over the top rhetoric for some time, even

losing a job over it when ABC decided not to renew his TV contract for his

old show, "Politically Incorrect". He's called America a stupid country with

stupid people, said that torture is worse in Iraq now than it was under

Saddam, said that Bush couldn't find his ass with two hands, was heard

telling Christians to "go screw", called RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman "gay",

said that Laura Bush is like Hitler's dog... well, I could go on and on and

on.

 

Now, for her part, Coulter has said that her Edwards comment was "just a

joke". I am sure Maher would have the same retort when his outrageous

comments were pointed out.

 

But, the more salient point by contrasting these two people and their

"jokes" is the way that the MSM treats them.

 

They ignore Maher.

 

They constantly and instantly pounce on Coulter.

 

NEITHER personality can be considered too serious a commentator on political

or societal events, but only Coulter is focused upon by the MSM.

Predictably, a hatemonger from the left gets a pass by the MSM, yet one

coming from the right is made infamous by the very same people.

 

Interesting, wouldn't you say?

 

 

http://newsbusters.org/node/11193

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest Jerry Kraus

While I realize this may be news to you, many people consider Vice-

President Cheney a murderer, a profiteer and a war criminal. Thus,

among a substantial proportion of the world's population, including in

this country, his death would not be considered a great tragedy.

Thus, Bill Maher's remarks have been largely ignored.

 

In contrast, Mr. Edwards is considered a credible candidate for

President with no clear negatives. Furthermore, homosexuals represent

an important economic and political block in the United States.

 

So, if you're wondering why Ms. Coulter is being hammered by her own,

it's because she's attacking the powerful and the credible. Mr. Maher

is attacking a bum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest lab~rat  >:-)

On 5 Mar 2007 08:51:21 -0800, "Jerry Kraus" <jkraus_1999@yahoo.com>

puked:

>While I realize this may be news to you, many people consider Vice-

>President Cheney a murderer, a profiteer and a war criminal.

 

Yes, there are idiots that think that. Probably a bunch of faggots,

too. <efg>

--

lab~rat >:-)

Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest lab~rat  >:-)

On 5 Mar 2007 08:57:55 -0800, "Fact Attack" <ilp3003@yahoo.com> puked:

>being a faggot is worse than being dead, so what Ann Coulter said was

>more offensive and she should apologize.

>

She apologized if she offended any homosexuals by comparing them to

Edwards. I thought that was kinda funny...

--

lab~rat >:-)

Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest carlos

On Mar 5, 9:19 am, "lab~rat >:-)" <c...@cheeze.net> wrote:

> On 5 Mar 2007 08:57:55 -0800, "Fact Attack" <ilp3...@yahoo.com> puked:

>

> >being a faggot is worse than being dead, so what Ann Coulter said was

> >more offensive and she should apologize.

>

> She apologized if she offended any homosexuals by comparing them to

> Edwards. I thought that was kinda funny...

> --

> lab~rat >:-)

> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

 

Hello,

 

As usual, one of our resident morons has put on his Pookie persona to

post lies, and another lying nymshifter has joined in the lie-fest.

 

If either of them would read the transcript of, or watch, the show

about which they comment, they'd see, like the rest of us, that Maher

never said he wished Cheney had died in the blast.

 

He said that Cheney is responsible for many deaths.

 

Both Pookie and Lab-rat are in violation of the eighth Commandment:

Thou shalt not bear false witness.

 

Enjoy hell, sinners!

 

Carlos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest lab~rat  >:-)

On 5 Mar 2007 09:41:41 -0800, "carlos" <carlosmachina@gmail.com>

puked:

>On Mar 5, 9:19 am, "lab~rat >:-)" <c...@cheeze.net> wrote:

>> On 5 Mar 2007 08:57:55 -0800, "Fact Attack" <ilp3...@yahoo.com> puked:

>>

>> >being a faggot is worse than being dead, so what Ann Coulter said was

>> >more offensive and she should apologize.

>>

>> She apologized if she offended any homosexuals by comparing them to

>> Edwards. I thought that was kinda funny...

>> --

>> lab~rat >:-)

>> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

>

>Hello,

>

>As usual, one of our resident morons has put on his Pookie persona to

>post lies, and another lying nymshifter has joined in the lie-fest.

>

>If either of them would read the transcript of, or watch, the show

>about which they comment, they'd see, like the rest of us, that Maher

>never said he wished Cheney had died in the blast.

 

As typical of the room-temperature IQ liberals, you have a

comprehension problem and then you pass it off as the person talking

over your head is lying.

 

Post where I ever suggested that Maher wished Cheney died, or admit

you lied, or admit you are just plan old stump stupid.

 

>He said that Cheney is responsible for many deaths.

>

>Both Pookie and Lab-rat are in violation of the eighth Commandment:

>Thou shalt not bear false witness.

>

>Enjoy hell, sinners!

 

The more you mention religion, the closer I think you are to

stump-stupid...

--

lab~rat >:-)

Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest lab~rat  >:-)

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:04:56 GMT, "Tough Tonto" <Chemo@subby.com>

puked:

>

>> being a faggot is worse than being dead,

>

> The voice of experience?

>

>

>

 

Don't be silly, no one has experienced being dead...

--

lab~rat >:-)

Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Horse Face Coulter

"lab~rat >:-)" <chase@cheeze.net> wrote in message

news:7hjou291roclfbe2p55h17chphbras6gud@4ax.com...

> On 5 Mar 2007 08:51:21 -0800, "Jerry Kraus" <jkraus_1999@yahoo.com>

> puked:

>

>>While I realize this may be news to you, many people consider Vice-

>>President Cheney a murderer, a profiteer and a war criminal.

>

> Yes, there are idiots that think that. Probably a bunch of faggots,

> too. <efg>

> --

> lab~rat >:-)

> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

 

Cheney is queer as a 3 dollar bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Kevin Cunningham

"Pookie" <pookie18323@optonline.net> wrote in message

news:EzXGh.32$R91.29@newsfe12.lga...

> Anatomy of an Impropriety, or Ann Coulter Vs. Bill Maher

> Warner Todd Huston

>

> March 5, 2007

> The double standard of Leftists who are ignoring the outrage of Bill

> Maher -- who alluded to his wish that Vice President Dick Cheney was

> assassinated - while at the same time are wildly fanning themselves in

> mock outrage as if they had the vapors over Ann Coulter -- for calling

> Democrat John Edwards a bad name -- was on full display in the MSM over

> the weekend.

>

Minor problem, proposition 1 (Cheney's no good and should die) has nothing

to do with 2 (John Edwards, a married man and father). Ya kinda need that

if your gonna excell in logic however your a right winger and excelling in

logic is not your strong suit.

 

I think that Mr. Maher should apologize to Mr. Cheney, not that Mr. Cheney

has acted grown up, but Mr. Maher's actions aren't governed by Mr. Cheneys.

Now, Ms. Coulter should apologize to Mr. Ewards fulsomely. Mr. Cheney has

the problem of being a liar and a thief, a problem Mr. Edwards doesn't have.

Ms. Coulter's problem is so defined by her "sexual identity"

problems....well, there's a bunch of them and I don't want to get into that

mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Paulie Walnuts

"lab~rat >:-)" <chase@cheeze.net> wrote in

news:gijou2964kb9q688iimgims2c6addr0kei@4ax.com:

> On 5 Mar 2007 08:57:55 -0800, "Fact Attack" <ilp3003@yahoo.com> puked:

>

>>being a faggot is worse than being dead, so what Ann Coulter said was

>>more offensive and she should apologize.

>>

> She apologized if she offended any homosexuals by comparing them to

> Edwards. I thought that was kinda funny...

 

It should also apologize to the transgendered community for giving them a

bad name. Love that adam's apple Andy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Paulie Walnuts

"Horse Face Coulter" <KookyCoulter-AlQueda@FoxNews.net> wrote in

news:Si_Gh.7245$re4.2802@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net:

>

> "lab~rat >:-)" <chase@cheeze.net> wrote in message

> news:7hjou291roclfbe2p55h17chphbras6gud@4ax.com...

>> On 5 Mar 2007 08:51:21 -0800, "Jerry Kraus" <jkraus_1999@yahoo.com>

>> puked:

>>

>>>While I realize this may be news to you, many people consider Vice-

>>>President Cheney a murderer, a profiteer and a war criminal.

>>

>> Yes, there are idiots that think that. Probably a bunch of faggots,

>> too. <efg>

>> --

>> lab~rat >:-)

>> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

>

> Cheney is queer as a 3 dollar bill.

>

>

>

 

nah, tricky dickie is straight.. remember the old skank he was caught with

when drunkenly shooting up his supposed friend. It's his handpuppet, the

former cheerleader, who oozes faggotry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Paulie Walnuts

"Pookie" <pookie18323@optonline.net> wrote in

news:EzXGh.32$R91.29@newsfe12.lga:

>

 

I wouldn't mind seeing Coulter get "Anna Nicoled" sooner than later

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Biff Limbaugh

"Pookie" <pookie18323@optonline.net> wrote in message

news:EzXGh.32$R91.29@newsfe12.lga...

> Anatomy of an Impropriety, or Ann Coulter Vs. Bill Maher

> Warner Todd Huston

>

> March 5, 2007

> The double standard of Leftists who are ignoring the outrage of Bill

> Maher -- who alluded to his wish that Vice President Dick Cheney was

> assassinated - while at the same time are wildly fanning themselves in

mock

> outrage as if they had the vapors over Ann Coulter -- for calling Democrat

> John Edwards a bad name.

 

What Democratic convention was it that Maher made his comments again? What

democrat intoduced him saying it was a good thing he was there? What group

of people did he offend? I missed that part Pukie.

 

Grow the fuck up Pukie, this was a Republican convention not a comedy show.

It was going to happen sooner or later with her. It was the immature

Republican brownshirts that shouted their approval. And I'm sure you are one

of them.

 

Protect her as much as you want but she just lost millions in speaking

engagements and advertising. And in the word of Romney, that's a good thing.

 

By the way, Coulter is losing advertisers, republicans and supporters.

Fuck.... the wannabe Malkin even told her to STFU. Can't wait for the book,

"The fall of mAnn Coulter".

 

Let's put this another way. If Edwards was a light skinned black and

Coulter made the reark that you can't say ******, would you aplaud her.

Probably. Did you see any of the clips of the CPAC convention? It looked

more like a Klan rally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Biff Limbaugh

"lab~rat >:-)" <chase@cheeze.net> wrote in message

news:gijou2964kb9q688iimgims2c6addr0kei@4ax.com...

> On 5 Mar 2007 08:57:55 -0800, "Fact Attack" <ilp3003@yahoo.com> puked:

>

> >being a faggot is worse than being dead, so what Ann Coulter said was

> >more offensive and she should apologize.

> >

> She apologized if she offended any homosexuals by comparing them to

> Edwards. I thought that was kinda funny...

 

You would bigot.....

> --

> lab~rat >:-)

> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Biff Limbaugh

"lab~rat >:-)" <chase@cheeze.net> wrote in message

news:p4nou216d6b171ev3rgr8q2rq6tqju24ed@4ax.com...

> On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:04:56 GMT, "Tough Tonto" <Chemo@subby.com>

> puked:

>

> >

> >> being a faggot is worse than being dead,

 

The dead do....

 

> >

> > The voice of experience?

> >

> >

> >

>

> Don't be silly, no one has experienced being dead...

> --

> lab~rat >:-)

> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jim E

"Jerry Kraus" <jkraus_1999@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:1173113477.563271.103520@c51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

> While I realize this may be news to you, many people consider Vice-

> President Cheney a murderer, a profiteer and a war criminal. Thus,

> among a substantial proportion of the world's population, including in

> this country, his death would not be considered a great tragedy.

> Thus, Bill Maher's remarks have been largely ignored.

>

> In contrast, Mr. Edwards is considered a credible candidate for

> President with no clear negatives.

 

 

I thought his beeing one of the ambulance chasers who is responsible for the

increasing health care costs in this country was a negative.

Slip the blinders bunnybrain.

 

 

Jim E

 

Furthermore, homosexuals represent

> an important economic and political block in the United States.

 

Only to the loons of the perverted left.

 

 

Jim E

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest kyldltn@yahoo.com

On Mar 5, 10:28 am, "Pookie" <pookie18...@optonline.net> wrote:

> Anatomy of an Impropriety, or Ann Coulter Vs. Bill Maher

> Warner Todd Huston

>

> March 5, 2007

> The double standard of Leftists who are ignoring the outrage of Bill

> Maher -- who alluded to his wish that Vice President Dick Cheney was

> assassinated

 

 

Bzzzzzzzzt! Didn't happen. Another rightard myth is born.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Baldin Lee Pramer

On Mar 5, 9:28 am, "Pookie" <pookie18...@optonline.net> wrote:

> Anatomy of an Impropriety, or Ann Coulter Vs. Bill Maher

> Warner Todd Huston

> Bill Maher, on the other hand, basically called for the assassination of a

> sitting American vice president!

 

No, he didn't. Just because all the other idiots are claiming this,

there is no reason you have to.

 

Baldin Lee Pramer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest JimPgh

On 5 Mar 2007 08:51:21 -0800, "Jerry Kraus" <jkraus_1999@yahoo.com>

wrote:

>While I realize this may be news to you, many people consider Vice-

>President Cheney a murderer, a profiteer and a war criminal. Thus,

>among a substantial proportion of the world's population, including in

>this country, his death would not be considered a great tragedy.

>Thus, Bill Maher's remarks have been largely ignored.

>

>In contrast, Mr. Edwards is considered a credible candidate for

>President with no clear negatives. Furthermore, homosexuals represent

>an important economic and political block in the United States.

>

>So, if you're wondering why Ms. Coulter is being hammered by her own,

>it's because she's attacking the powerful and the credible. Mr. Maher

>is attacking a bum.

 

You spun that so much I bet you got dizzy & fell down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest J. Carroll

JimPgh wrote:

> On 5 Mar 2007 08:51:21 -0800, "Jerry Kraus" <jkraus_1999@yahoo.com>

> wrote:

>

>> While I realize this may be news to you, many people consider Vice-

>> President Cheney a murderer, a profiteer and a war criminal. Thus,

>> among a substantial proportion of the world's population, including

>> in this country, his death would not be considered a great tragedy.

>> Thus, Bill Maher's remarks have been largely ignored.

>>

>> In contrast, Mr. Edwards is considered a credible candidate for

>> President with no clear negatives. Furthermore, homosexuals

>> represent an important economic and political block in the United

>> States.

>>

>> So, if you're wondering why Ms. Coulter is being hammered by her own,

>> it's because she's attacking the powerful and the credible. Mr.

>> Maher is attacking a bum.

>

> You spun that so much I bet you got dizzy & fell down.

 

Cracked your noggin' did you?

That's two you have now.

 

 

--

 

John R. Carroll

Machining Solution Software, Inc.

Los Angeles San Francisco

http://www.machiningsolution.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest lab~rat  >:-)

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:36:18 GMT, "Horse Face Coulter"

<KookyCoulter-AlQueda@FoxNews.net> puked:

>

>"lab~rat >:-)" <chase@cheeze.net> wrote in message

>news:7hjou291roclfbe2p55h17chphbras6gud@4ax.com...

>> On 5 Mar 2007 08:51:21 -0800, "Jerry Kraus" <jkraus_1999@yahoo.com>

>> puked:

>>

>>>While I realize this may be news to you, many people consider Vice-

>>>President Cheney a murderer, a profiteer and a war criminal.

>>

>> Yes, there are idiots that think that. Probably a bunch of faggots,

>> too. <efg>

>> --

>> lab~rat >:-)

>> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

>

>Cheney is queer as a 3 dollar bill.

>

 

Really? I suppose you say that as evidence to support your wild ass

theory that homosexuality is hereditary. And I'll bet you curse your

father every day as well...

--

lab~rat >:-)

Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest lab~rat  >:-)

On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:21:49 GMT, "Biff Limbaugh" <BiffL@lycos.com>

puked:

>

>"lab~rat >:-)" <chase@cheeze.net> wrote in message

>news:gijou2964kb9q688iimgims2c6addr0kei@4ax.com...

>> On 5 Mar 2007 08:57:55 -0800, "Fact Attack" <ilp3003@yahoo.com> puked:

>>

>> >being a faggot is worse than being dead, so what Ann Coulter said was

>> >more offensive and she should apologize.

>> >

>> She apologized if she offended any homosexuals by comparing them to

>> Edwards. I thought that was kinda funny...

>

>You would bigot.....

 

Bigot against Edwards? You're retarded, right?

--

lab~rat >:-)

Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest lab~rat  >:-)

On 5 Mar 2007 17:59:39 -0800, "Baldin Lee Pramer"

<BaldinPramer@msn.com> puked:

>On Mar 5, 9:28 am, "Pookie" <pookie18...@optonline.net> wrote:

>> Anatomy of an Impropriety, or Ann Coulter Vs. Bill Maher

>> Warner Todd Huston

>

>> Bill Maher, on the other hand, basically called for the assassination of a

>> sitting American vice president!

>

>No, he didn't. Just because all the other idiots are claiming this,

>there is no reason you have to.

>

>Baldin Lee Pramer

 

I didn't hear about all this. Is there a cite that is in question?

--

lab~rat >:-)

Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...