As Hitlary Hid, Dem Race on Hold After Hostage Crisis

[Patriot Games]

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/clinton_hostage_crisis/2007/11/30/53623.html

Democratic Race on Hold After Hostage Crisis

Friday, November 30, 2007

WASHINGTON -- A fearful truce settled over the bitter 2008 Democratic
presidential race Friday, after front-runner Hillary Clinton grappled with a
hostage crisis at one of her New Hampshire offices.

Clinton had been due to address a meeting of party activists just outside
the nation's capital of Washington, at which her top rivals had already
savaged her record, but abruptly called off the appearance after the drama
erupted.

Police in the northeastern state said a man believed to be armed with a bomb
took over the office in Rochester, New Hampshire, and was reported to be
holding hostages. Two captives were later reported released. The senator was
in the Washington area at the time.

Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean told shocked delegates
about the incident, as they prepared to welcome the former first lady, the
long-time leader in the increasingly nasty Democratic race.

"She is not going to be able to join us today," Dean said, adding that
Clinton was dealing with the crisis.

The drama overshadowed afternoon speeches at the event, as the two
candidates who did appear, Senator Joseph Biden and Dennis Kucinich, avoided
attacking Clinton and offered thoughts to those involved.

"It is an unusual day," Biden said at the DNC fall meeting in suburban
Virginia.

"I am sure like everyone here, I pray to God it all works out right, and I
wish Hillary the best of luck as she heads to New Hampshire."

The Clinton campaign did not immediately confirm the Senator was rushing to
the state, which holds its first-in-the-nation primary contest on January 8.

"There is an ongoing situation in our Rochester, NH office," the Clinton
campaign said in a statement.

"We are in close contact with state and local authorities and are acting at
their direction. We will release additional details as appropriate."

Kucinich, a long-shot hope for the Democratic nomination, also said Clinton
was in his thoughts.

"We are in solidarity with Hillary at this moment, when we think of what she
is going through, and what her staff is going through," he said.

Earlier, Clinton rivals Barack Obama and John Edwards lashed out at Clinton
as new polls showed Clinton's lead slipping.

Obama meanwhile harvested a new crop of headlines with an early morning
breakfast meeting in New York with billionaire mayor Michael Bloomberg, who
has repeatedly denied he is mulling an independent presidential run.

At the Democratic meeting, Obama took square aim at Clinton, tying her to a
tainted governing style that "festered" in Washington long before President
George W. Bush came on the scene.

"The same old Washington textbook campaigns just won't do in this election,"
Obama said, rejecting Clinton's claims she is a candidate of change.

And he raised Clinton's Senate votes in 2002 to authorize war in Iraq and
this year calling for the designation of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps as
a terror group, which critics say could provide a US path to war with
Tehran.

Without mentioning Clinton by name, Obama decried Democrats who believed
"the only way to look tough on national security is by talking and voting
and acting like George Bush Republicans."

Former senator John Edwards, desperate to muscle in on the Clinton-Obama
duel ahead of the fabled Iowa caucuses nominating contest on January 3,
hammered exclusionary US politics.

"There's a wall around Washington and we need to take it down," said
Edwards, in remarks which implicitly accused Clinton of lacking "backbone."

"Do you want someone who is going to pretend that wall around Washington
isn't there, or defend the people who helped build it?" said Edwards who
accuses Clinton of trawling for campaign cash from Washington lobbyists.

A new poll meanwhile showed momentum for Obama, putting him ahead of Clinton
in Iowa, with the former first lady leading by a wide margin but slipping in
New Hampshire which holds its primary on January 8.

The American Research Group survey in Iowa had Obama on 27 percent, Clinton
on 25 percent and Edwards on 23 percent in the key state.

Since the same firm's poll last month, Obama was up five points and Clinton
had slipped seven. Edwards was up by eight points but still trailed at 23
percent.

The survey was consistent with other state polls showing either Obama or
Clinton ahead, but the race statistically deadlocked.

 

[Lars Eighner]

In our last episode, <4751726c$0$28823$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>, the lovely
and talented Patriot Games broadcast on alt.politics:

> Clinton had been due to address a meeting of party activists just outside
> the nation's capital of Washington, at which her top rivals had already
> savaged her record, but abruptly called off the appearance after the drama
> erupted.

So, let's see. She canceled in Washington and went to New Hampshire, where
the problem was, and cooperated with local law enforcement who believed it
was best for her not to speak to the hostage-taker, so they could keep the
possibility of speaking to her as a bargaining chip.

She goes where the problem is. How exactly is that hiding?

--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> usenet@larseighner.com
Countdown: 415 days to go.

 

[snausages]

On Dec 1, 11:12 am, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
> In our last episode, <4751726c$0$28823$4c368...@roadrunner.com>, the lovely
> and talented Patriot Games broadcast on alt.politics:
>
> > Clinton had been due to address a meeting of party activists just outside
> > the nation's capital of Washington, at which her top rivals had already
> > savaged her record, but abruptly called off the appearance after the drama
> > erupted.
>
> So, let's see. She canceled in Washington and went to New Hampshire, where
> the problem was, and cooperated with local law enforcement who believed it
> was best for her not to speak to the hostage-taker, so they could keep the
> possibility of speaking to her as a bargaining chip.
>
> She goes where the problem is. How exactly is that hiding?
>
> --
> Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> use...@larseighner.com
> Countdown: 415 days to go.

Well, you got to remember that Patriot is a Bushie. Bush ran away
from all of his problems, hid during 9-11. So, in order to make Bush
look heroic, Patriot has adopted Bush double speak. Hide means
confront, and confront means hide.

 

[Topaz]

Feminism is Jewish.

Gloria Steinem was a Jew. Bella Abzug was a Jew. Betty Friedan was
a Jew.

Friedan, as the writer of "The Feminen Mystique" and founder of
NOW, really
started the modern feminist movement.

"THE JEWISH 100: A Ranking Of the Most Influential Jews Of All Time"
By Michael Shaprio

# 56 Betty Friedan (b. 1921)

Born Betty Naomi Goldstein to Harry and Miriam (Horowitz) Goldstein in
Peoria, Illinois, educated at Smith College, married in 1947 to Carl
Friedan, the mother of three children, divorced in 1969, activist,
best-selling author, professor, a founder of the National Organization
for Women (NOW), the National Women's Political Caucus, and the First
Women's Bank, researcher, journalist, Democrat, clinical psychologist,
and grandmother, Betty Friedan was the most influential feminist of
the postwar era. Deemed by Marilyn French and others as an "initiator
of the 'second wave' of feminism, " Friedan's writings and lectures,
including the highly influential books THE FEMININE MYSTIQUE and THE
SECOND STAGE, synthesized women's views on what equality meant and how
to live and work... When the war against fascism ended two decades
later, four million women lost their jobs to returning GIs. Women were
again told that their place was in the home. The freedom to work to
build up and defend their nation was over. Men would earn the family's
bread. What the boys needed was a warm place to come home to every
night. Ironically, American soldiers had accepted some of the values
toward women (Kinder, Kuche, Kirche - children, kitchen, church) as
the Nazis they thought they had defeated...


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

 

[Patriot Games]

"Lars Eighner" <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote in message
news:slrnfl3ceq.19cp.usenet@debranded.larseighner.com...
> In our last episode, <4751726c$0$28823$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>, the
> lovely
> and talented Patriot Games broadcast on alt.politics:
>> Clinton had been due to address a meeting of party activists just outside
>> the nation's capital of Washington, at which her top rivals had already
>> savaged her record, but abruptly called off the appearance after the
>> drama
>> erupted.
> So, let's see. She canceled in Washington and went to New Hampshire

It doesn't take 6 hours to get to New Hampshire from DC.

She HID.

> and cooperated with local law enforcement who believed it
> was best for her not to speak to the hostage-taker,

Cite?

> She goes where the problem is. How exactly is that hiding?

She went to where the problem WAS. She HID until all was safe, THEN came
out of hiding to make a speech.

She HID from a crackpot with road flares....

She'll probably go underground with soiled panties an faint if she has to
confront Iran with nuclear weapons.

 

[Patriot Games]

"snausages" <goofindoo@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:799808b8-beb9-41a5-bcaf-f62fd52798b8@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 1, 11:12 am, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
>> In our last episode, <4751726c$0$28823$4c368...@roadrunner.com>, the
>> lovely
>> and talented Patriot Games broadcast on alt.politics:
>> > Clinton had been due to address a meeting of party activists just
>> > outside
>> > the nation's capital of Washington, at which her top rivals had already
>> > savaged her record, but abruptly called off the appearance after the
>> > drama
>> > erupted.
>> So, let's see. She canceled in Washington and went to New Hampshire,
>> where
>> the problem was, and cooperated with local law enforcement who believed
>> it
>> was best for her not to speak to the hostage-taker, so they could keep
>> the
>> possibility of speaking to her as a bargaining chip.
>> She goes where the problem is. How exactly is that hiding?
> Well, you got to remember that Patriot is a Bushie. Bush ran away
> from all of his problems, hid during 9-11. So, in order to make Bush
> look heroic, Patriot has adopted Bush double speak. Hide means
> confront, and confront means hide.

Actually, Bush was in plain sight at the children's school the whole time.
Hitlary HID immediately.

Bush, not hiding and still at the children's school, gave a speech. Hitlary
didn't give her DC speech and HID immediately.

Bush left in Air Force One heading back to Washington. During the hostage
event Hitlary remained in hiding.

While on Air Force One Bush was in constant communication with the White
House and Pentagon. During the hostage event Hitlary was nowhere to be
seen, found, or heard from.

Air Force One was diverted to an airbase while all commercial aviation was
grounded. Bush gave another public speech. During the hostage event
Hitlary was nowhere to be seen, found, or heard from.

Bush arrived in DC to take command of the situation from the White House
while the Pentagon was still burning and while an unknown number of
terrorists could still be around. During the hostage event Hitlary was
nowhere to be seen, found, or heard from.

Hitlary came out of deep hiding ONLY AFTER the hostage event was completely
over.

As you can see your comparison is completely false.

 

[wbyeats@ireland.com]

On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:18:31 -0500, "Patriot Games"
<Patriot@America.com> wrote:

>"Lars Eighner" <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote in message
>news:slrnfl3ceq.19cp.usenet@debranded.larseighner.com...
>> In our last episode, <4751726c$0$28823$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>, the
>> lovely
>> and talented Patriot Games broadcast on alt.politics:
>>> Clinton had been due to address a meeting of party activists just outside
>>> the nation's capital of Washington, at which her top rivals had already
>>> savaged her record, but abruptly called off the appearance after the
>>> drama
>>> erupted.
>> So, let's see. She canceled in Washington and went to New Hampshire
>
>It doesn't take 6 hours to get to New Hampshire from DC.
>
>She HID.

She asked if she should come immediately - local law enforcement said
no.

>> and cooperated with local law enforcement who believed it
>> was best for her not to speak to the hostage-taker,
>
>Cite?

It was all over the news - try looking by removing your head from your
rectum.

>> She goes where the problem is. How exactly is that hiding?

>She went to where the problem WAS. She HID until all was safe, THEN came
>out of hiding to make a speech.

She never hid from anything - why do you feel you must hide from the
truth.

>She HID from a crackpot with road flares....

Bull - she handled the entire situation like a future Prez should.

>She'll probably go underground with soiled panties an faint if she has to
>confront Iran with nuclear weapons.

Ummm nope - that was Bush hiding in the bunker after 9/11. Mr PG's
ignorance seemingly knows no bounds. Try getting a story straight for
a change.

WB Yeats

 

[Topaz]

Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:
"German women, German men !
It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the
Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.
Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not
forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National
Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily
politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very
unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic
intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not
respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the
woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different
value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German
woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best
sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other
areas than the man.

The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but
also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in
the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices
and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best
suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless
devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.

The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the
past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea
of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread
winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the
man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is
not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her
talents and abilities.
Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the
frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men
were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to
the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men
always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all
great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination
have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually
loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the
woman.

It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must
be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our
attitude toward women.

The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in
government, politics, economics and social relations has not left
women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought
impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some
good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that
are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations
have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set
in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a
distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with
former ideals.

A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary
and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most
suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious
duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can
continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of
the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the
builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's
source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place
for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,
in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that
those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in
the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their
abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other
ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially
reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to
fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.

The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.
It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no
intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer
and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.
But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in
motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the
living mother of a family who gives the state children.

German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning
to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more
rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected
to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and
her daily bread is not a good trade.

A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in
our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now
the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most
evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's
birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without
emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The
government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the
resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental
change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is
responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying
about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each
elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by
1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are
the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it
will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine
the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.

We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our
national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The
national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation
on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the
woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends
to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of
our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our
blood is assured..."


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html