(B)ill (J)efferson Clinton is correct. Osama (Oops, I mean Obama) iswinning primaries in which most,

[PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com]

(B)ill (J)efferson Clinton is correct. Osama (Oops, I mean Obama) is
winning primaries in which most, or nearly most, of the voters are
black, and also caucuses, which are inherently unfair and un-
democratic.

However, Hitlary is winning the DemocRat primaries in which most of
the voters are not black (California, Massachusetts, New Hampshire,
New York, New Jersey) some which happen to be the largest states.

This racial tension will not end any time soon. It will last through
the DemocRat party convention, and beyond. If Hitlary wins the
nomination, will black voters be angry and stay home? If Osama (Oops,
I mean Obama) wins the nomination, will many, if not most, of the
white voters who say now that they will vote for him in November,
really vote for him in November?

The Clintons will not give up. They have power, connections, and
influence. They will do whatever it takes to win the nomination for
Hitlary.

This is really going to be fun to watch.

 

[Governor Swill]

PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com used a stick in the sand to babble
>(B)ill (J)efferson Clinton is correct. Osama (Oops, I mean Obama) is
>winning primaries in which most, or nearly most, of the voters are
>black, and also caucuses, which are inherently unfair and un-
>democratic.

Whine, whine, whine. I didn't hear the Clintons whine about the
caucus system when he was winning them in the nineties.

Swill

 

[Flash Bazbo]

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:53:31 -0800 (PST), PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com
wrote:

>(B)ill (J)efferson Clinton is correct. Osama (Oops, I mean Obama) is
>winning primaries in which most, or nearly most, of the voters are
>black, and also caucuses, which are inherently unfair and un-
>democratic.

Oh, man! President Obama is so going to piss you off! Hahahaha

 

[3960 Dead]

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:05:37 -0500, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

>PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com used a stick in the sand to babble
>>(B)ill (J)efferson Clinton is correct. Osama (Oops, I mean Obama) is
>>winning primaries in which most, or nearly most, of the voters are
>>black, and also caucuses, which are inherently unfair and un-
>>democratic.
>
>Whine, whine, whine. I didn't hear the Clintons whine about the
>caucus system when he was winning them in the nineties.

Clinton isn't whining about them.

Pissed on by the Left is.
>
>Swill
--

What do you call a Republican with a conscience?

An ex-Republican.

http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=8827 (From Yang, AthD (h.c)

"Prosperity and peace are in the balance," -- Putsch, not admitting that he's against both

Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001

Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
Zepps_News-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
Zepps_essays-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson

 

[DeserTBoB]

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 05:28:42 GMT, 3960 Dead
<zepp22113960@finestplanet.com> wrote:

>>Whine, whine, whine. I didn't hear the Clintons whine about the
>>caucus system when he was winning them in the nineties.
>
>Clinton isn't whining about them.
>
>Pissed on by the Left is. <snip>

Actually, Clinton's campaign HAS issued a statement saying that she
believes the caucus system to be inherently undemocratic, as it caters
to "party regulars" over all voters. What they left out was that it
was being "raided" by the GOP now in open states, which has give Obama
his inflated numbers, and the inflated Dem turnout numbers to coincide
with attenuated GOP turnout numbers. Poli Sci 101: GOPers turn out
even in a hurricane.

Someone needs to get a clue about this at the DNC and start closing
these primaries and caucuses. Want to be "independent?" Fine, vote
for sheriff and county hospital chief.

 

[stickyw]

All Americans should be required to have at least a borderline IQ to
be allowed to vote. That would eliminate 9/10th of the Sambo votes.

 

[Governor Swill]

DeserTBoB <desertb@rglobal.net> used a stick in the sand to babble
>Actually, Clinton's campaign HAS issued a statement saying that she
>believes the caucus system to be inherently undemocratic, as it caters
>to "party regulars" over all voters. What they left out was that it
>was being "raided" by the GOP now in open states, which has give Obama
>his inflated numbers, and the inflated Dem turnout numbers to coincide
>with attenuated GOP turnout numbers. Poli Sci 101: GOPers turn out
>even in a hurricane.

What do you mean "raided"?

Swill

 

[AnAmericanCitizen]

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:16:55 -0500, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

>DeserTBoB <desertb@rglobal.net> used a stick in the sand to babble
>>Actually, Clinton's campaign HAS issued a statement saying that she
>>believes the caucus system to be inherently undemocratic, as it caters
>>to "party regulars" over all voters. What they left out was that it
>>was being "raided" by the GOP now in open states, which has give Obama
>>his inflated numbers, and the inflated Dem turnout numbers to coincide
>>with attenuated GOP turnout numbers. Poli Sci 101: GOPers turn out
>>even in a hurricane.
>
>What do you mean "raided"?
>
>Swill

A funny thing happened in South Carolina....democrats and independents voted for John
McCain. Same thing happened in Florida. So, "raiding"certainly isn't only a GOP
thing, and possibly, not a GOP thing at all, as I believe most Republicans think
Hillary would be easier to beat than Obama. Had Hillary won the caucuses that helped
put Obama over the top, would she have made the same statement?....

Calling Obama Osama is desperation time.....AAC