Guest Gandalf Grey Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 Back To The Fab 50s By Ed Naha Created Aug 6 2007 - 10:08am I personally want to thank the geniuses that came up with the concepts of globalization and the out-sourcing of American jobs. Who knew that globalization could be so retro? Why, this year alone, China has done its best to bring America back to the Fabulous Fifties. No, I'm not talking about the squeaky clean 1950s found on "Leave It To Beaver" or "Ozzie and Harriet." I'm talking about the REAL 1950s, wherein electric appliances blew up like Vesuvius, lawn chairs would eat their owners, frozen food contained more chemicals than a Gilbert Chemistry Set, toys could kill ya, everything was flammable, fast-food burgers had fur and pesticides were considered one of the major food groups. It was an, er, experimental time. Granted, America today gets a lot of shoddy and/or dangerous imports on the cheap from a lot of countries but, this year, China seems to be going for the gold. Americans first became concerned when countless brands of cat and dog food made, in part, with Chinese ingredients proved fatal. That, unfortunately, was just the tip of the iceberg. Counterfeit Chinese cold medicine supposedly made with glycerin instead included the toxin diethyleneglycol. On the plus side, it got rid of your cold for good.as well as your capacity to ever catch a cold in the future. Dried apples were preserved with cancer causing chemicals. Frozen catfish were filled with banned anti-biotics. (Maybe they were prone to the aforementioned colds?) Scallops and sardines were coated with putrefying bacteria as well as waste products giving new meaning to the phrase "something smells fishy." Juices and fruits were pulled because they were termed "filthy" and contained chemicals not fit for human consumption, something children have been saying for years. Mushrooms were laced with illegal pesticides. On the plus side, they didn't have bugs. Toxic chemicals found their way into cosmetics while toothpaste boasted anti-freeze. A raid in Beijing last month netted 18,000 fake Viagra tablets, presumably resulting in semi-stiff fines. In Heilongjiang province, 10,000 doses of bogus rabies vaccine were found as well as 20,250 bottles of fake cardiovascular medicine and 211 bottles of blood protein. All in all, bogus versions of 67 medicines made by 53 companies were tagged. Remember the good old days when all you had to worry about from China were phony DVDs? This year, it was found that Chinese honey contained both life-threatening anti-biotics and extra sugar. Almost 70 percent of honey consumed in America is from China. Hotcha! Oh, yeah. This same honey finds its way into items like cereals, snack foods, meats, beverages and health products. And speaking of health products, China exports one-third of the world's Vitamin A, along with a lot of B-12 and health supplements. Earlier this year, some retailers found themselves selling multi-vitamins containing that old healthy stand-by: lead. I mean, who needs Iron supplements, when you can get lead? Even our toddlers can get a life's dosage of lead via Chinese fun goods. In June of this year, wooden Thomas the Tank Engine and Friends toys were recalled because of excess lead in their paint jobs. Little girls' necklaces also contained excess lead. Kmart earrings also gave off that lead ambience. Attention, Kmart shoppers: Russian Roulette being played on aisles 1 to 50. Last week, Mattel recalled 1.5 million Chinese made toys because of both excess lead and their ability to cut children via jagged edges. Among the better-known toys were "Poison Me, Elmo," "Botulism Barney" and "When Big Bird Attacks." When I was a kid, Mattel's slogan was "You can tell it's Mattel, it's swell." Today, it's been amended to "You can tell it's Mattel, it's swill." Also, this year the "Cooky" children's stationery set was recalled because, not only did it include paper, pencil, markers and erasers but a razor as well. That's one, tough Cooky. Pine-cone-shaped candles were yanked from the shelves after it was discovered that, not only did they burn on the inside, but on the outside as well! Ceramic heaters were given the heave-ho when it was made known that their chords got hotter than the heaters, quite often bursting into flame. Certain brands of glassware were recalled after they began breaking for no discernable reason. (I mean, you can blame poltergeists for just SO much.) Chinese lounge chairs were recalled after their target audience found the various chair settings more suitable for contestants in the Iron Man competition than fat guys wanting to inhale beer while watching "The World's Biggest Loser." The FDA banned the sale of Chinese catfish, eel, shrimp, basa and dace because they contained cancer-causing food additives as well as drugs. Some Chinese monkfish may have been mislabeled, allowing American diners to chow-down some puffer fish, instead. For anyone who doesn't know about puffer fish, in Japan it's considered a delicacy in that it contains the toxin tetrodotoxin, a poison that can kill its chow-downer by, first numbing the body and, finally, causing paralysis, thus transforming any meal into the culinary equivalent of "The Most Dangerous Game." It's a staple of Japanese culture. Then again, so are Godzilla and twenty-year old strippers dressed in Catholic Girl School Uniforms. Factoring in exploding tires, collapsing hammocks, rickety baby cribs, imploding electric saws, giant palm tree lights which transform themselves into pyrotechnic displays, bicycles that fall apart and go out of control and cell phone batteries that go boom, China's manufacturing sector has proven itself as quality conscious as, let's say, our own Executive Branch of Government. Now, the point of this screed is not to bash China. It's to bash those who are responsible for this dross - the CEOs of worldwide companies who are interested in one thing and one thing only: the bottom line. The people responsible for this are the greediest people on earth and they have decided to exploit the poorest and call that exploitation "globalization." "The 'whatever we can do to get it a few cents cheaper' attitude has now led to U.S. firms being confronted with major problems," says Steve Vickers, president of the consultancy International Risk. "We end up doing business with people we shouldn't be doing business with. Or we end up dumping people and leaving them with the ability to continue to manufacture our product." Indeed, as a government, China is ill-equipped to handle the "faster, cheaper" explosion. China doesn't have a centralized food-safety regulatory system; responsibility is split among at least six agencies overseeing health, agriculture and commerce. The lines of authority are ill-defined, and different bodies oversee different laws. China also has no equivalent to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission that can alert consumers to recalls or hazardous products, although it does have an official Web site listing automobile recalls. Not that the U.S. is much better at handling imports. Although Chinese products accounted for about 60% of recalled products this year, the FDA inspects only 1 percent of food imports. (And, although inefficient, the FDA is polite - giving several weeks' notice to any facility it intends to inspect.) And, because the U.S. is SO good at management, the inspection of various imports falls not only to the FDA but the Consumer Product Safety Commission (an independent agency), U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Trade Representative and the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration. A seventh agency, the Department of Letting Things Fall Through the Cracks, is currently on the fast-track in the Bush Administration. Democratic Senators Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin co-authored an amendment that is basically an early-warning system for bupkis goods but it was passed during a time wherein Bush wants to close half of the FDA's 13 food-testing labs. Guess that 1% of food inspected was too lofty a goal. This year's uproar has caused China to blacklist more than 400 of its exporters although Forbes couldn't figure out exactly what kind of punishments were meted out. This week, China and the U.S. agreed on a food safety accord which called for more meetings and, uh, stuff. Now, the irony of all this is: according to the International Monetary Fund, China will become the biggest driver of the global economy this year. Although China is the world's fourth-largest economy, it accounts for only 5 percent of the global economy. This year, it's projected to grow 11.2 percent, far above the predicted 2 percent expansion of the US economy. It will make the largest contribution to the world's growth rate of any country. China is slated to provide a quarter of the annual growth rate of the world economy, while China, Russian and India together will account for more than half of world growth. Until we get a government in place that truly represents its people both in terms of their well-being and their economic stability, what can we do? Heck! Lets all put on an oldies station, chug a pint of paint, grab a tin toy with ragged edges and run after the mosquito truck as it sprays out DDT. Let's party like it's 1959! Whoah! Check it out! Glow-in-the-dark hot dogs! _______ -- NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available to advance understanding of political, human rights, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 "A little patience and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their spells dissolve, and the people recovering their true sight, restore their government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are suffering deeply in spirit, and incurring the horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public debt. But if the game runs sometimes against us at home we must have patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an opportunity of winning back the principles we have lost, for this is a game where principles are at stake." -Thomas Jefferson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Topaz Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:56:40 -0700, "Gandalf Grey" <gandalfgrey@infectedmail.com> wrote: >No, I'm not talking about the squeaky clean 1950s found on "Leave It To >Beaver" or "Ozzie and Harriet." As Neal Gabler points out in his book An Empire of Their Own, ". . . the Jewish immigrants who founded the film business wanted more than wealth and power: they felt a powerful craving for acceptance as mainstream Americans . . . With this goal in mind, the films of Hollywood's Golden Era invariably portrayed clergymen in a sympathetic light . . . " In more recent years however, ". . . Hollywood has swung to the opposite extreme-presenting a view of the clergy that is every bit as one-sided in its cynicism and hostility as the old treatment may have been idealized . . . " http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/ http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gandalf Grey Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 "Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:rcthb3p58fsobu59jicakrh14cr8qshvsd@4ax.com... > On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:56:40 -0700, "Gandalf Grey" > <gandalfgrey@infectedmail.com> wrote: > > >>No, I'm not talking about the squeaky clean 1950s found on "Leave It To >>Beaver" or "Ozzie and Harriet." > > As Neal Gabler points out in his book An Empire of Their Own, ". . . > the Jewish immigrants Fuck off, nazi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lorad474@cs.com Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 On Aug 7, 9:56 am, "Gandalf Grey" <gandalfg...@infectedmail.com> wrote: > Back To The Fab 50s > > By Ed Naha > Created Aug 6 2007 - 10:08am > > I personally want to thank the geniuses that came up with the concepts of > globalization and the out-sourcing of American jobs. Who knew that > globalization could be so retro? Why, this year alone, China has done its > best to bring America back to the Fabulous Fifties. > > No, I'm not talking about the squeaky clean 1950s found on "Leave It To > Beaver" or "Ozzie and Harriet." I'm talking about the REAL 1950s, wherein > electric appliances blew up like Vesuvius, lawn chairs would eat their > owners, frozen food contained more chemicals than a Gilbert Chemistry Set, > toys could kill ya, everything was flammable, fast-food burgers had fur and > pesticides were considered one of the major food groups. It was an, er, > experimental time. > > Granted, America today gets a lot of shoddy and/or dangerous imports on the > cheap from a lot of countries but, this year, China seems to be going for > the gold. > > Americans first became concerned when countless brands of cat and dog food > made, in part, with Chinese ingredients proved fatal. That, unfortunately, > was just the tip of the iceberg. > > Counterfeit Chinese cold medicine supposedly made with glycerin instead > included the toxin diethyleneglycol. On the plus side, it got rid of your > cold for good.as well as your capacity to ever catch a cold in the future. > > Dried apples were preserved with cancer causing chemicals. > > Frozen catfish were filled with banned anti-biotics. (Maybe they were prone > to the aforementioned colds?) > > Scallops and sardines were coated with putrefying bacteria as well as waste > products giving new meaning to the phrase "something smells fishy." > > Juices and fruits were pulled because they were termed "filthy" and > contained chemicals not fit for human consumption, something children have > been saying for years. > > Mushrooms were laced with illegal pesticides. On the plus side, they didn't > have bugs. > > Toxic chemicals found their way into cosmetics while toothpaste boasted > anti-freeze. > > A raid in Beijing last month netted 18,000 fake Viagra tablets, presumably > resulting in semi-stiff fines. In Heilongjiang province, 10,000 doses of > bogus rabies vaccine were found as well as 20,250 bottles of fake > cardiovascular medicine and 211 bottles of blood protein. All in all, bogus > versions of 67 medicines made by 53 companies were tagged. Remember the good > old days when all you had to worry about from China were phony DVDs? > > This year, it was found that Chinese honey contained both life-threatening > anti-biotics and extra sugar. Almost 70 percent of honey consumed in America > is from China. Hotcha! Oh, yeah. This same honey finds its way into items > like cereals, snack foods, meats, beverages and health products. And > speaking of health products, China exports one-third of the world's Vitamin > A, along with a lot of B-12 and health supplements. Earlier this year, some > retailers found themselves selling multi-vitamins containing that old > healthy stand-by: lead. > > I mean, who needs Iron supplements, when you can get lead? Even our toddlers > can get a life's dosage of lead via Chinese fun goods. In June of this year, > wooden Thomas the Tank Engine and Friends toys were recalled because of > excess lead in their paint jobs. Little girls' necklaces also contained > excess lead. Kmart earrings also gave off that lead ambience. > > Attention, Kmart shoppers: Russian Roulette being played on aisles 1 to 50. > > Last week, Mattel recalled 1.5 million Chinese made toys because of both > excess lead and their ability to cut children via jagged edges. Among the > better-known toys were "Poison Me, Elmo," "Botulism Barney" and "When Big > Bird Attacks." > > When I was a kid, Mattel's slogan was "You can tell it's Mattel, it's > swell." Today, it's been amended to "You can tell it's Mattel, it's swill." [...] And why this plague upon the people? Because of corruption. Corruption of legal, health, and national sovereignty standards. And who did this? The same neocons who brought you the WTO and favored nation tading status for communist china - where they 'harvest' organs from political (pro-democracy) prisoners, use child and slave labor, and still occupy Tibet. That there red china.. And who are these neocons? The same one that hold government office today. You get what you vote for... and then some. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Topaz Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 By Dr. William Pierce http://www.natvan.com "The Jews were very influential in Germany after the First World War. They were strongly entrenched in the legal profession, in banking, in advertising and merchandising, in show business, in organized vice, in publishing and other media. They were trying hard to change the spirit of Germany. They were pushing modernism in art, music, and literature. They were pushing for "diversity" and "tolerance." They were ridiculing German tradition and culture and morality and the German sense of personal honor, trying hard to make young Germans believe that it was "cool" to be rootless and cosmopolitan. They were promoting the same culture of lies that they have been promoting here. That was the so-called "Weimar" period, because right after the First World War some important government business, including the ratification of a new German constitution, took place in the city of Weimar. The Jews loved the Weimar period, but it was, in fact, the most degenerate period in Germany's history. The Jews, of course, didn't think of it as degenerate. They thought of it as "modern" and "progressive" and "cool." Really, it was a very Jewish period, where lying was considered a virtue. The Jews were riding high. Many books have been written by Jews in America about Weimar Germany, all praising it to the skies and looking back on it with nostalgia. Even without the so-called "Holocaust," they never have forgiven the Nazis for bringing an end to the Weimar period. There was a Hollywood film made 30 years ago, in 1972, about Weimar Germany. The film was called Cabaret, and it starred Liza Minelli. It depicted Berlin night life, with all its degeneracy, including the flourishing of homosexuality, and also depicted the fight between the communists and the Jews and the other proponents of modernism on the one hand and the Nazis on the other hand. The Hollywood filmmakers, of course, were solidly on the side of the degenerates and portrayed the Nazis as the bad guys, but this film is another example of the Jews outsmarting themselves. The Jews who made the film saw everything from their viewpoint, through their own eyes, and the degenerate Gentiles under their spell also saw things from the Jewish viewpoint, but the Jews apparently didn't stop to think -- or didn't care -- that a normal, healthy White person would view things differently. Check it out for yourself. Cabaret is still available in video stores. The point I am making is this: In the 1920s, after the First World War, the Jews were trying to do to Germany what they began doing to America after the Second World War, in the 1960s. Many Germans, the healthiest elements in Germany, resisted the Jews' efforts, just as many Americans have resisted the Jews' efforts in America. In Germany the Jews were a bit premature. Although they had much of the media under their control, they didn't control all of the media. They tried to move too fast. The healthiest Germans resisted and beat them. In America, in the 1960s, the Jews had almost total media control before they began their big push, and they proceeded more carefully. In America they are winning. The culture of lies has prevailed in America. It's still possible for Americans to win, but it's going to be a lot tougher this time. We'd better get started. The first step is to regain at least partial control of our media, so that we can begin contradicting the lies. This American Dissident Voices broadcast is a part of that first step." http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/ http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gandalf Grey Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 "Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:hk0ib3t90md87mi72t8hqftg1t1fp58icb@4ax.com... > > By Dr. William Pierce > http://www.natvan.com > > "The Jews were very influential in Germany after the First World War. Eat shit and die, nazi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Topaz Posted August 8, 2007 Share Posted August 8, 2007 Here is an article from Frauen Warte magazine, the National Socialist Party's magazine for women: The Educational Principles of the New Germany: What Schools and Parents Need to Know About the Goals of National Socialist Education German people, German parents! The new Germany created by our people's chancellor Adolf Hitler places special demands on the German youth. The German youth are a foundation of the rebuilding of the German people and the German fatherland. The people and the fatherland place their hands on the shoulders of the youth and determine what educational and cultural values and goals are necessary for this youth to meet the needs of people and fatherland. This requires a truly national and social education for the German youth, and all involved in education has to serve these educational and cultural goals with their full energy. Parents and teachers above all! All those involved in education must have a clear and unified idea of the educational tasks before them. The four iron pillars of the national school and educational system are: race, military training, leadership, and religion! Race National Socialist education is an education in the thinking of the German people, in understanding German traditions, in awakening the pure, uncorrupted and honest people's consciousness, their sense of belonging to the people. Only a pure member of the German race can have such an understanding of his people, crowning it with the willingness to sacrifice all for the people. He must know that without his people he is a miserable nothing, and that it is better if he himself die than that his people and fatherland perish! He who thinks that National Socialist education has as its goal a kind of hyperpatriotism has not understood it. Something entirely different is intended. Something should be awakened in the soul of young Germans that will fill their hearts and whole being until their souls can no longer restrain the overflowing, until a powerful and jubilant "Hail Germany" springs from their lips! That call itself is not the first or most significant goal: rather it is its foundation in the soul, a foundation that jubilantly, freely, confidently, cheerfully and passionately expresses itself. It is the holy sense of people and fatherland! Awakening this in the German youth requires that they have a clear understanding of the value of people and fatherland. They must realize that the German people has a right to independence and freedom, honor and power. They must learn that it has a right to its own fate among the peoples of the earth, and it must gain with the other peoples the place in the sun that belongs to it. It must do this not through force, rather because the German people is a noble nation that has created values for the entire world that no other people was capable of. We want to awaken in the German youth this free, righteous and noble national pride so that at the thought of Germany's past, present and future their hearts will pound and their eyes will gleam. That is the first foundation of National Socialist education. Military Training It is clear that the German youth must be resolved to defend their fatherland with their lives. Despite all the nonsense about promises and disarmament, Germany is surrounded by weapons. The German youth must learn military virtues. Their bodies must be steeled, made hard and strong, so that the youth may become capable soldiers who are healthy, strong, trained, energetic and able to bear hardships. Gymnastics, games, sports, hiking, swimming, and military exercises must all be learned by the youth. Our youth should not sit in stuffy rooms and develop crooked backs and weak eyes. Alongside the basic and truly important education of the mind, they should develop healthy bodies by being outdoors. The idea of the healthy and strong German should not be mere empty talk. Parents can help here. They will train our youth in simplicity and cleanliness. They will train them, even when they are older, not to waste their spare time by dubious or even harmful activities such as card playing, drinking alcohol and bad music, rather to prepare their bodies for their future tasks. Leadership A youth being trained for such important national duties must accept the idea of following the F Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gandalf Grey Posted August 8, 2007 Share Posted August 8, 2007 "Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:jlsjb3p9et4l3lnqhr4pqep2auvd35381m@4ax.com... > Here is an article from Frauen Warte magazine, the National Socialist > Party's magazine for > women: > The Educational Principles of the New Germany: Your bigoted "new germany" died with your bastard leader Hitler, nazi. Choke on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Topaz Posted August 8, 2007 Share Posted August 8, 2007 ADOLF HITLER NUREMBERG SPEECH OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1936 I CAN come to no terms with a Weltanschhauung [bolshevism] which everywhere as its first act after gaining power is - not the liberation of the working people - but the liberation of the scum of humanity, the asocial creatures concentrated in the prisons - and then the letting loose of these wild beasts upon the terrified and helpless world about them.... Bolshevism turns flourishing countrysides into sinister wastes of ruins; National Socialism transforms a Reich of destruction and misery into a healthy State and a flourishing economic life.... Russia planned a world revolution and German workmen would be used but as cannon-fodder for bolshevist imperialism. But we National Socialists do not wish that our military resources should be employed to impose by force on other peoples what those peoples themselves do not want. Our army does not swear on oath that it will with bloodshed extend the National Socialist idea over other peoples, but that it will with its own blood defend the National Socialist idea and thereby the German Reich, its security and freedom, from the aggression of other peoples.... The German people as soldiers is one of the best peoples in the world: It would have become a veritable 'Fight to the Death Brigade' for the bloody purposes of these international disseminators of strife. We have removed this danger, through the National Socialist Revolution, from our own people and from other peoples.... These are only some of the grounds for the antagonisms which separate us from communism. I confess: these antagonisms cannot be bridged. Here are really two worlds which do but grow further apart from each other and can never unite. When in an English newspaper a Parliamentarian complains that we wish to divide Europe into two parts, then unfortunately we are bound to inform this Robinson Crusoe living on his happy British island that - however unwelcome it may be - this division is already an accomplished fact.... That one should refuse to see a thing does not mean that it is not there. For many a year in Germany I have been laughed to scorn as a prophet; for many a year my warnings and my prophecies were regarded as the illusions of a mind diseased.... Bolshevism has attacked the foundations of our whole human order, alike in State and society, the foundations of our conception of civilization, of our faith and of our morals: all alike are at stake. If this bolshevism would be content to promote this doctrine in a single land, then other countries might remain unconcerned, but its supreme principle is its internationalism and that means the confession of faith that these views must be carried to triumph throughout the whole world, i.e., that the world as we know it must be turned upside down. That a British headline-writer refuses to recognize this signifies about as much as if in the fifteenth century a humanist in Vienna should have refused to admit the intention of Mohammedanism to extend its influence in Europe and should have objected that this would be to tear the world asunder - to divide it into East and West. Unfortunately I cannot escape the impression that most of those who doubt the danger to the world of bolshevism come themselves from the East. As yet politicians in England have not come to know bolshevism in their own country; we know it already. Since I have fought against these Jewish Soviet ideas in Germany, since I have conquered and stamped out this peril, I fancy that I possess a better comprehension of its character than do men who have only at best had to deal with it in the field of literature.... I have won my successes simply because in the first place I endeavored to see things as they are and not as one would like them to be; secondly, when once I had formed my own opinion I never allowed weaklings to talk me out of it or to cause me to abandon it; and thirdly, because I was always determined in all circumstances to yield to a necessity when once it had been recognized. Today when fate has granted me such great successes I will not be disloyal to these funda- mental principles of mine.... .. . .: It is not necessary for me to strengthen the fame of the National Socialist Movement, far less that of the German Army, through military triumphs. He who is undertaking such great economic and cultural tasks as we are and is so determined to carry them through can find his fairest memorial only in peace.... But this bolshevism which as we learned only a few months since intends to equip its army so that it may with violence, if necessary, open the gate to revolution amongst other peoples - this bolshevism should know that before the gate of Germany stands the new German Army.... I believe that as a National Socialist I appear in the eyes of many bourgeois democrats as only a wild man. But as a wild man I still believe myself to be a better European, in any event a more sensible one, than they. It is with grave anxiety that I see the possibility in Europe of some such development as this: democracy may continuously disintegrate the European States, may make them internally ever more uncertain in their judgment of the dangers which confront them, may above all cripple all power for resolute resistance. Democracy is the canal through which bolshevism lets its poisons flow into the separate countries and lets them work there long enough for these infections to lead to a crippling of intelligence and of the force of resistance. I regard it as possible that then - in order to avoid something still worse - coalition governments, masked as Popular Fronts or the like, will be formed and that these will endeavor to destroy - and perhaps will successfully destroy - in these peoples the last forces which remain, either in organization or in mental outlook, which could offer opposition to bolshevism. The brutal mass-slaughters of National Socialist fighters, the burning of the wives of National Socialist officers after petrol had been poured over them, the massacre of children and of babies of National Socialist parents, e.g. in Spain, are intended to serve as a warning to forces in other lands which represent views akin to those of National Socialism: such forces are to be intimidated so that in a similar position they offer no resistance. If these methods are successful: if the modern Girondins are succeeded by Jacobins, if Kerensky's Popular Front gives place to the Bolshevists, then Europe will sink into a sea of blood and mourning.... http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/ http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gandalf Grey Posted August 8, 2007 Share Posted August 8, 2007 "Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:kaakb3pibae6l5ob4b0raqkheh1hecejl1@4ax.com... > ADOLF HITLER Sucks dick in Hell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The pirate, rogue dick Posted August 8, 2007 Share Posted August 8, 2007 On Aug 8, 1:37 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote: > ADOLF HITLER > NUREMBERG > SPEECH OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1936 > > I CAN come to no terms with a Weltanschhauung [bolshevism] which > everywhere as its first act after gaining power is - not the > liberation of the working people - but the liberation of the scum of > humanity, the asocial creatures concentrated in the prisons - and then > the letting loose of these wild beasts upon the terrified and helpless > world about them.... > > Bolshevism turns flourishing countrysides into sinister wastes of > ruins; National Socialism transforms a Reich of destruction and misery > into a healthy State and a flourishing economic life.... > > Russia planned a world revolution and German workmen would be used but > as cannon-fodder for bolshevist imperialism. But we National > Socialists do not wish that our military resources should be employed > to impose by force on other peoples what those peoples themselves do > not want. Our army does not swear on oath that it will with bloodshed > extend the National Socialist idea over other peoples, but that it > will with its own blood defend the National Socialist idea and thereby > the German Reich, its security and freedom, from the aggression of > other peoples.... The German people as soldiers is one of the best > peoples in the world: It would have become a veritable 'Fight to the > Death Brigade' for the bloody purposes of these international > disseminators of strife. We have removed this danger, through the > National Socialist Revolution, from our own people and from other > peoples.... > > These are only some of the grounds for the antagonisms which separate > us from communism. I confess: these antagonisms cannot be bridged. > Here are really two worlds which do but grow further apart from each > other and can never unite. When in an English newspaper a > Parliamentarian complains that we wish to divide Europe into two > parts, then unfortunately we are bound to inform this Robinson Crusoe > living on his happy British island that - however unwelcome it may be > - this division is already an accomplished fact.... That one should > refuse to see a thing does not mean that it is not there. For many a > year in Germany I have been laughed to scorn as a prophet; for many a > year my warnings and my prophecies were regarded as the illusions of a > mind diseased.... > > Bolshevism has attacked the foundations of our whole human order, > alike in State and society, the foundations of our conception of > civilization, of our faith and of our morals: all alike are at stake. > If this bolshevism would be content to promote this doctrine in a > single land, then other countries might remain unconcerned, but its > supreme principle is its internationalism and that means the > confession of faith that these views must be carried to triumph > throughout the whole world, i.e., that the world as we know it must be > turned upside down. That a British headline-writer refuses to > recognize this signifies about as much as if in the fifteenth century > a humanist in Vienna should have refused to admit the intention of > Mohammedanism to extend its influence in Europe and should have > objected that this would be to tear the world asunder - to divide it > into East and West. Unfortunately I cannot escape the impression that > most of those who doubt the danger to the world of bolshevism come > themselves from the East. As yet politicians in England have not come > to know bolshevism in their own country; we know it already. Since I > have fought against these Jewish Soviet ideas in Germany, since I have > conquered and stamped out this peril, I fancy that I possess a better > comprehension of its character than do men who have only at best had > to deal with it in the field of literature.... I have won my successes > simply because in the first place I endeavored to see things as they > are and not as one would like them to be; secondly, when once I had > formed my own opinion I never allowed weaklings to talk me out of it > or to cause me to abandon it; and thirdly, because I was always > determined in all circumstances to yield to a necessity when once it > had been recognized. Today when fate has granted me such great > successes I will not be disloyal to these funda- mental principles of > mine.... > > . . .: It is not necessary for me to strengthen the fame of the > National Socialist Movement, far less that of the German Army, through > military triumphs. He who is undertaking such great economic and > cultural tasks as we are and is so determined to carry them through > can find his fairest memorial only in peace.... But this bolshevism > which as we learned only a few months since intends to equip its army > so that it may with violence, if necessary, open the gate to > revolution amongst other peoples - this bolshevism should know that > before the gate of Germany stands the new German Army.... I believe > that as a National Socialist I appear in the eyes of many bourgeois > democrats as only a wild man. But as a wild man I still believe myself > to be a better European, in any event a more sensible one, than they. > It is with grave anxiety that I see the possibility in Europe of some > such development as this: democracy may continuously disintegrate the > European States, may make them internally ever more uncertain in their > judgment of the dangers which confront them, may above all cripple all > power for resolute resistance. Democracy is the canal through which > bolshevism lets its poisons flow into the separate countries and lets > them work there long enough for these infections to lead to a > crippling of intelligence and of the force of resistance. I regard it > as possible that then - in order to avoid something still worse - > coalition governments, masked as Popular Fronts or the like, will be > formed and that these will endeavor to destroy - and perhaps will > successfully destroy - in these peoples the last forces which remain, > either in organization or in mental outlook, which could offer > opposition to bolshevism. > > The brutal mass-slaughters of National Socialist fighters, the burning > of the wives of National Socialist officers after petrol had been > poured over them, the massacre of children and of babies of National > Socialist parents, e.g. in Spain, are intended to serve as a warning > to forces in other lands which represent views akin to those of > National Socialism: such forces are to be intimidated so that in a > similar position they offer no resistance. If these methods are > successful: if the modern Girondins are succeeded by Jacobins, if > Kerensky's Popular Front gives place to the Bolshevists, then Europe > will sink into a sea of blood and mourning.... > > http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com > > http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/ > > http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html Moe gave the same speech in the three stooges: Back to the Front... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Topaz Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 By Dr. William Pierce http://www.natvan.com "The Jews were very influential in Germany after the First World War. They were strongly entrenched in the legal profession, in banking, in advertising and merchandising, in show business, in organized vice, in publishing and other media. They were trying hard to change the spirit of Germany. They were pushing modernism in art, music, and literature. They were pushing for "diversity" and "tolerance." They were ridiculing German tradition and culture and morality and the German sense of personal honor, trying hard to make young Germans believe that it was "cool" to be rootless and cosmopolitan. They were promoting the same culture of lies that they have been promoting here. That was the so-called "Weimar" period, because right after the First World War some important government business, including the ratification of a new German constitution, took place in the city of Weimar. The Jews loved the Weimar period, but it was, in fact, the most degenerate period in Germany's history. The Jews, of course, didn't think of it as degenerate. They thought of it as "modern" and "progressive" and "cool." Really, it was a very Jewish period, where lying was considered a virtue. The Jews were riding high. Many books have been written by Jews in America about Weimar Germany, all praising it to the skies and looking back on it with nostalgia. Even without the so-called "Holocaust," they never have forgiven the Nazis for bringing an end to the Weimar period. There was a Hollywood film made 30 years ago, in 1972, about Weimar Germany. The film was called Cabaret, and it starred Liza Minelli. It depicted Berlin night life, with all its degeneracy, including the flourishing of homosexuality, and also depicted the fight between the communists and the Jews and the other proponents of modernism on the one hand and the Nazis on the other hand. The Hollywood filmmakers, of course, were solidly on the side of the degenerates and portrayed the Nazis as the bad guys, but this film is another example of the Jews outsmarting themselves. The Jews who made the film saw everything from their viewpoint, through their own eyes, and the degenerate Gentiles under their spell also saw things from the Jewish viewpoint, but the Jews apparently didn't stop to think -- or didn't care -- that a normal, healthy White person would view things differently. Check it out for yourself. Cabaret is still available in video stores. The point I am making is this: In the 1920s, after the First World War, the Jews were trying to do to Germany what they began doing to America after the Second World War, in the 1960s. Many Germans, the healthiest elements in Germany, resisted the Jews' efforts, just as many Americans have resisted the Jews' efforts in America. In Germany the Jews were a bit premature. Although they had much of the media under their control, they didn't control all of the media. They tried to move too fast. The healthiest Germans resisted and beat them. In America, in the 1960s, the Jews had almost total media control before they began their big push, and they proceeded more carefully. In America they are winning. The culture of lies has prevailed in America. It's still possible for Americans to win, but it's going to be a lot tougher this time. We'd better get started. The first step is to regain at least partial control of our media, so that we can begin contradicting the lies. This American Dissident Voices broadcast is a part of that first step." http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/ http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Topaz Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 Leon Degrelle "We have the power. Now our gigantic work begins." Those were Hitler's words on the night of January 30, 1933, as cheering crowds surged past him, for five long hours, beneath the windows of the Chancellery in Berlin. His political struggle had lasted 14 years. He himself was 43, that is, physically and intellectually at the peak of his powers. He had won over millions of Germans and organized them into Germany's largest and most dynamic political party, a party girded by a human rampart of hundreds of thousands of storm troopers, three fourths of them members of the working class. He had been extremely shrewd. All but toying with his adversaries, Hitler had, one after another, vanquished them all. Standing there at the window, his arm raised to the delirious throng, he must have known a feeling of triumph. But he seemed almost torpid, absorbed, as if lost in another world. It was a world far removed from the delirium in the street, a world of 65 million citizens who loved him or hated him, but all of whom, from that night on, had become his responsibility. And as he knew-as almost all Germans knew on January 1933 -- that this was a crushing, an almost desperate responsibility. Half a century later, few people understand the crisis Germany faced at that time. Today, it's easy to assume that Germans have always been well-fed and even plump. But the Germans Hitler inherited were virtual skeletons. During the preceding years, a score of "democratic" governments had come and gone, often in utter confusion. Instead of alleviating the people's misery, they had increased it, due to their own instability: it was impossible for them to pursue any given plan for more than a year or two. Germany had arrived at a dead end. In just a few years there had been 224,000 suicides - a horrifying figure, bespeaking a state of misery even more horrifying. By the beginning of 1933, the misery of the German people was virtually universal. At least six million unemployed and hungry workers roamed aimlessly through the streets, receiving a pitiful unemployment benefit of less than 42 marks per month. Many of those out of work had families to feed, so that altogether some 20 million Germans, a third of the country's population, were reduced to trying to survive on about 40 pfennigs per person per day. Unemployment benefits, moreover, were limited to a period of six months. After that came only the meager misery allowance dispensed by the welfare offices. Notwithstanding the gross inadequacy of this assistance, by trying to save the six million unemployed from total destruction, even for just six months, both the state and local branches of the German government saw themselves brought to ruin: in 1932 alone such aid had swallowed up four billion marks, 57 percent of the total tax revenues of the federal government and the regional states. A good many German municipalities were bankrupt. Those still lucky enough to have some kind of job were not much better off. Workers and employees had taken a cut of 25 percent in their wages and salaries. Twenty-one percent of them were earning between 100 and 250 marks per month; 69.2 percent of them, in January of 1933, were being paid less than 1,200 marks annually. No more than about 100,000 Germans, it was estimated, were able to live without financial worries. During the three years before Hitler came to power, total earnings had fallen by more than half, from 23 billion marks to 11 billion. The average per capita income had dropped from 1,187 marks in 1929 to 627 marks, a scarcely tolerable level, in 1932. By January 1933, when Hitler took office, 90 percent of the German people were destitute. No one escaped the strangling effects of the unemployment. The intellectuals were hit as hard as the working class. Of the 135,000 university graduates, 60 percent were without jobs. Only a tiny minority was receiving unemployment benefits. "The others," wrote one foreign observer, Marcel Laloire (in his book New Germany), "are dependent on their parents or are sleeping in flophouses. In the daytime they can be seen on the boulevards of Berlin wearing signs on their backs to the effect that they will accept any kind of work." But there was no longer any kind of work. The same drastic fall-off had hit Germany's cottage industry, which comprised some four million workers. Its turnover had declined 55 percent, with total sales plunging from 22 billion to 10 billion marks. Hardest hit of all were construction workers; 90 percent of them were unemployed. Farmers, too, had been ruined, crushed by losses amounting to 12 billion marks. Many had been forced to mortgage their homes and their land. In 1932 just the interest on the loans they had incurred due to the crash was equivalent to 20 percent of the value of the agricultural production of the entire country. Those who were no longer able to meet the interest payments saw their farms auctioned off in legal proceedings: in the years 1931-1932, 17,157 farms-with a combined total area of 462,485 hectares - were liquidated in this way. The "democracy" of Germany's "Weimar Republic" (1918 -1933) had proven utterly ineffective in addressing such flagrant wrongs as this impoverishment of millions of farm workers, even though they were the nation's most stable and hardest working citizens. Plundered, dispossessed, abandoned: small wonder they heeded Hitler's call. Their situation on January 30, 1933, was tragic. Like the rest of Germany's working class, they had been betrayed by their political leaders, reduced to the alternatives of miserable wages, paltry and uncertain benefit payments, or the outright humiliation of begging. Germany's industries, once renowned everywhere in the world, were no longer prosperous, despite the millions of marks in gratuities that the financial magnates felt obliged to pour into the coffers of the parties in power before each election in order to secure their cooperation. For 14 years the well-blinkered conservatives and Christian democrats of the political center had been feeding at the trough just as greedily as their adversaries of the left Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.