Biblical Contradictions for AIG

ALLAH IS GREAT

New member
And you'll actually explain how they came to be?

I'll just move that first contadiction here.That's the one I really need to understand.

 

ALLAH IS GREAT

New member
Contradiction 1

OK then MRIH.You want one example,I'll give it to you.

One of the Bible's 10 basic Pillars, the ten commandments, says: "Thou shalt not kill. (Exodus 20:13).'' Is it not?

Yet, we see *** Almighty Commanding His servants to not only kill the enemy's men, but also the innocent children and non-virgin women who have not done anything to anyone:

Samuel 15:2-4

2 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I remember that which Amalek did to Israel, how he laid wait for him in the way, when he came up from Egypt.

3 Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ***.

4 And Saul gathered the people together, and numbered them in Telaim, two hundred thousand footmen, and ten thousand men of Judah.

"Now kill all the boys [innocent kids]. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man. (Numbers 31:17-18)"

MRIH is this not a contradiction?

It is most ironic that *** Almighty prohibited ordinary murders but supposedly allowed massacres to be done by the mass!!

Which is it MRIH,"Thou Shalt not kill" -- OR-- "Kill all the children and non-virgin women!" ?

 

ALLAH IS GREAT

New member
Well sweety,this doesn't answer anything.BTW the title says biblical contradictions,it doesn't matter who said it they all contradict each other.Some say one thing the others says another.

I've said this before,it is a contradiction since both verses are said to be from *** and both are biblical verses. So what is it?kill or don't kill,slay or don't slay,maime or don't maime.

MRIH,your hypocrisy is so sickening.The fact that your bible says slay infants,sucklings and non-virginal women while you scream that the Quran is evil is just stupid.

Contradiction 2

How can *** prohibit brothers from marrying their biological sisters after He initially allowed it for Abraham and Sarah??:

''And yet indeed she is my sister; she is the daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and she became my wife. (Genesis 20:12)"

"Cursed be he that lieth with his sister, the daughter of his father, or the daughter of his mother. And all the people shall say, Amen. (Deuteronomy 27:22)"

So, Deuteronomy 27:22 contradicts the previous Law right?

 
Well sweety,this doesn't answer anything.
If you can't read, that is your problem.

BTW the title says biblical contradictions,it doesn't matter who said it they all contradict each other.
WTF??? Does this have to do with anything?

Some say one thing the others says another.
I'm lost.

I've said this before,it is a contradiction since both verses are said to be from *** and both are biblical verses.
OK explained this before, but I'll explain it again. The word "Kill" here does not mean the same "kill" in the other verse. Case in point examine these three sentences: 1)You killed a person in an accident.

2) You killed a burglar in your home.

3) You killed your husband in a fit of rage.

Clearly all three of these words have different meanings, intentions and motives. The first is clearly involuntary and could not be avoided, The second is avoidable but with implied dire circumstances with various outcomes, and third is unjustifiable and the very meaning used for the 6th Commandment. The meanings of kill from the prophet use the 2nd meaning. Many words in the english language have dual meanings like this. Take the word "love" for example. I do not love to eat pizza the same way I love my children.

So what is it?kill or don't kill,slay or don't slay,maime or don't maime.
I know english is your second language, so don't get hung up on semantics.

MRIH,your hypocrisy is so sickening.
And so is yours.

The fact that your bible says slay infants,sucklings and non-virginal women while you scream that the Quran is evil is just stupid.
Christianity does NOT teach to kill "slay infants,sucklings and non-virginal women" There are so many things about Christianity that you do not understand. The main thing is the concept of redemption through Jesus Christ. The law of Moses is clear, those that break the commandments are doomed to death, but the gift of *** is Eternal Life through Jesus Christ.

How can *** prohibit brothers from marrying their biological sisters after He initially allowed it for Abraham and Sarah??:
''And yet indeed she is my sister; she is the daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and she became my wife. (Genesis 20:12)"

Cursed be he that lieth with his sister, the daughter of his father, or the daughter of his mother. And all the people shall say, Amen. (Deuteronomy 27:22)"

So, Deuteronomy 27:22 contradicts the previous Law right?
That is a really good question, AIG. And I will give you some positive rep for it! I truelly don't know the answer, except that perhaps Abraham was in sin with Sarah. Abraham is not ***, and the bible does say that "For ALL have sinned and fallen short of the Glory of ***." Abraham is no different.
 

ALLAH IS GREAT

New member
''Clearly all three of these words have different meanings, intentions and motives. The first is clearly involuntary and could not be avoided, The second is avoidable but with implied dire circumstances with various outcomes, and third is unjustifiable and the very meaning used for the 6th Commandment. The meanings of kill from the prophet use the 2nd meaning. Many words in the english language have dual meanings like this. Take the word "love" for example. I do not love to eat pizza the same way I love my children.''

Ok then MRIH thanks for the english lesson.You always come back to saying english is my second language.

You haven't explained anything.Slaying innocent infants,sucklings and non-virginal women is murder and wrong and your bible advertises it openly.

That is a really good question, AIG. And I will give you some positive rep for it! I truelly don't know the answer, except that perhaps Abraham was in sin with Sarah. Abraham is not ***, and the bible does say that "For ALL have sinned and fallen short of the Glory of ***." Abraham is no different.

I don't think you should blaspheme Abraham.Thanks what a great contradiction right?

 
Ok then MRIH thanks for the english lesson.You always come back to saying english is my second language.You haven't explained anything.Slaying innocent infants,sucklings and non-virginal women is murder and wrong and your bible advertises it openly.
I guess the debate is taking a diferent direction... Listen, I commend you for your excellent proficiency in the English language, however there are times (like the aforementioned) that you need some instruction on English. There is no shame in it! I meant no offense by it. There is no way we could have these discussions in Somoli, because I wouldn't know anything. I would venture a guess that there are words in Somoli that have different meanings depending on how they are used, Maybe?

I don't think you should blaspheme Abraham.Thanks what a great contradiction right?
Blasphemy can only be performed on a Deity, since Abraham is only a man, it is hardly blasphemy anything I say against him. The FACT that all men are sinners is no insult ...so... Calling Abraham a sinner is truthful.
 

eddo

New member
How can *** prohibit brothers from marrying their biological sisters after He initially allowed it for Abraham and Sarah??:

''And yet indeed she is my sister; she is the daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and she became my wife. (Genesis 20:12)"

"Cursed be he that lieth with his sister, the daughter of his father, or the daughter of his mother. And all the people shall say, Amen. (Deuteronomy 27:22)"

So, Deuteronomy 27:22 contradicts the previous Law right?
no.

Genesis is the story of creation and at the time of creation, the population of the world was low, so people had to marry those related to them to grow as a race of people. *** knew that they could handle that biologically, because genetics of the individuals was much purer then, since there wasn't so far to come from the orginal creation, Adam. By the time Dueteronomy was written (some thousand or so years after creation,) the world was much more populous, and therefore it was uneccessary to marry close relatives, and again *** knew this (and he also knew that it would start to lead to biological issues.) The Dueteronomy law doesn't contradict the previous laws, it supercedes them.

Not a contridiction.

Next?

 
no.Genesis is the story of creation and at the time of creation, the population of the world was low, so people had to marry those related to them to grow as a race of people. *** knew that they could handle that biologically, because genetics of the individuals was much purer then, since there wasn't so far to come from the orginal creation, Adam. By the time Dueteronomy was written (some thousand or so years after creation,) the world was much more populous, and therefore it was uneccessary to marry close relatives, and again *** knew this (and he also knew that it would start to lead to biological issues.) The Dueteronomy law doesn't contradict the previous laws, it supercedes them.

Not a contridiction.

Next?
That's a nice interpretation, eddo.
 

Cogito Ergo Sum

New member
Well here is one of those landmines AIG... BOOM

I wish that this system could support Unicode for Hebrew because you would be able to see it but the fact is the same.

You are misquoting the phrase you are trying to use as a contradiction.

In Hebrew, it reads:

"You shall not murder."

In fact, the Hebrew word used is specifically not "kill" for which there are 2 separate words, but rather "murder; unauthorized homicide", a completely different word which was used just for this reason.

Big difference!

Your other translations are screwed as well, but then again, the King James translation is the absolute worst translation there is. They massacred the Hebrew.

This can be confirmed by asking any Rabbi.

MRIH...She's just ignorant of the original Hebrew text but this doesn't change the fact that she is WRONG.

 

DizzyME

New member
I don't think there is enough room on this site for all the bible contradictions and the lousy excuses people come up with to explain them.
 

DizzyME

New member
sure there is Dizzy. go for it. ;)
Why should I bother? Seriously. I have been over this and over this on other sites, and it's not like it does any good. People who want to live in denial will continue to do so. I'll leave it to those who aren't bored of it yet. lol

 

eddo

New member
:) the "excuses" aren't lousy if they are right. Some people just don't want to accept that just maybe, Jesus was exactly who he said he was, and the bible is right about him.
 
Why should I bother? Seriously. I have been over this and over this on other sites, and it's not like it does any good. People who want to live in denial will continue to do so. I'll leave it to those who aren't bored of it yet. lol
Sounds like YOU are the one with the excuses... You make a blanket statement that there are SOOOOO many contradictions in the bible, but you are unwilling to present even one?????
Don't make blanket statements you are not prepared to back up (unless you want to look really stupid)

 

eddo

New member
Sounds like YOU are the one with the excuses... You make a blanket statement that there are SOOOOO many contradictions in the bible, but you are unwilling to present even one?????
Don't make blanket statements you are not prepared to back up (unless you want to look really stupid)

Well to give DizzeMe some credit, her and I (and some others here) have discussed Bible contradictions on other boards many times. She has presented them, and they have been refuted- just apparetnly not to her satisfaction.

 
Well to give DizzeMe some credit, her and I (and some others here) have discussed Bible contradictions on other boards many times. She has presented them, and they have been refuted- just apparetnly not to her satisfaction.
Well this (GF) is a blank slate for her. So if she wants to run around making these blanket statements on this board, she needs to be prepared to back'em up or someone will rip her a new *******!

 
Top Bottom