S
Sid9
Guest
Biden's Iraq plan scores Senate win
By Elana Schor
September 27, 2007
The Senate found its first bipartisan consensus on the Iraq war Wednesday,
dealing a minor rebuke to the Bush administration and a major boost to the
long-shot White House run of Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.).
Two of Biden's presidential rivals, Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) and
Chris Dodd (Conn.), joined with fellow Democrats to back the political
remedy for Iraq that he has promoted for more than a year. Biden's amendment
calling for a decentralized Iraqi government passed 75-23 and won over 26
Republicans, giving the Foreign Relations Committee chairman a shot in the
arm as he headed to Wednesday night's Democratic debate in New Hampshire.
"We just declared the central animating strategy the president has taken to
be mistaken," Biden said, unable to suppress a grin as he declared his 2008
opponents' support "nice to see."
Biden billed his vision of diverse federal regions in Iraq as a strong
challenge to President Bush's war policy, and Democratic leaders who were
cool to the plan earlier this year declared Wednesday that the new Congress
finally had prodded Bush toward a new approach to Iraq.
But even Biden's GOP supporters were reluctant to deem his non-binding
measure a sign of hope in the endless search for a solution to Iraq that has
dominated the Senate since spring.
"It's an achievement by Congress," said Sen. John Warner (R-Va.), who
co-sponsored the plan and helped Biden round up Republican backers. "I would
not pronounce it the best we can do."
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) also supported Biden, but noted afterward
that the non-binding plan would allow the administration to avoid acting on
its political prescriptions.
"We did show through this vote that there was consensus on . a recognition
that Iraq is, politically, a very diverse country," Murkowski said. "I don't
know if it demonstrates more beyond that."
One GOP aide went further, saying that most Republicans decided against
opposing Biden's plan after revisions made clear that it would not force any
decisions on Baghdad.
"What is the Iraqi government going to do [in response]? Say, 'thanks for
the input, but we're fine'?" the aide said. The aide described Republicans'
perspective as: "This doesn't really do anything, and why not let
[Democrats] have it, for practical reasons."
Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) missed the vote on Biden's plan as well as a vote
on Iran offered by Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), both of which were added to the
defense authorization bill. Obama's office has said he would likely support
the Biden language.
Sen. Sam Brownback (Kan.), a dark horse in the Republican presidential race,
endorsed Biden's plan months ago, while his only White House foe in the
chamber, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), also missed the vote.
Democrats continued to offer no clues on whether more options to draw down
the U.S. troop presence in Iraq would come to the floor this month. But
Warner sent a strong signal, telling reporters that Iraq withdrawal would
come up again during the defense appropriations debate.
"I don't feel, as this bill continues to move forward, that we'll see any
[proposal] reach the 60-vote mark," Warner said.
The Bush administration previously has opposed a mandate for federalizing
the Iraqi government, but the State Department did not comment publicly
Wednesday on Biden's plan.
Meanwhile, every Democratic leader backed Kyl's amendment on Iraq, which
called for Tehran's Revolutionary Guard Corps to be designated a terrorist
group. More incendiary language referring to the use of "all instruments of
U.S. power in Iraq" to block Iran's activities was dropped from the
amendment, but Biden and Dodd still opposed the language. The amendment
passed 76-22.
Clinton supported the Iran amendment, exposing her to continued criticism
from anti-war groups active in the Democratic presidential primary.
"It is disturbing for the Senate to be unable and unwilling to do what most
Americans want it to do - end the debacle in Iraq," said Tom Andrews,
director of Win Without War and a central member of the Americans Against
Escalation in Iraq coalition. "It is outrageous for the Senate to be pushing
our nation one step closer to disaster in Iran."
The Senate will move on to an expanded hate-crimes ban on Thursday, with
Republicans seeking to hammer Democrats for using the Pentagon bill as a
platform to debate non-defense issues. Majority Whip Dick Durbin's (D-Ill.)
bid to add relief for undocumented immigrant students also is likely to come
up before final debate on the defense bill concludes next week.
Illustrating Republicans' frustration with a coming fourth week of debate on
the defense bill, a GOP group moved Wednesday afternoon to cut off debate on
the legislation. It is unclear when Democrats would set a final vote on that
cloture filing, but one could occur as soon as Friday.
By Elana Schor
September 27, 2007
The Senate found its first bipartisan consensus on the Iraq war Wednesday,
dealing a minor rebuke to the Bush administration and a major boost to the
long-shot White House run of Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.).
Two of Biden's presidential rivals, Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) and
Chris Dodd (Conn.), joined with fellow Democrats to back the political
remedy for Iraq that he has promoted for more than a year. Biden's amendment
calling for a decentralized Iraqi government passed 75-23 and won over 26
Republicans, giving the Foreign Relations Committee chairman a shot in the
arm as he headed to Wednesday night's Democratic debate in New Hampshire.
"We just declared the central animating strategy the president has taken to
be mistaken," Biden said, unable to suppress a grin as he declared his 2008
opponents' support "nice to see."
Biden billed his vision of diverse federal regions in Iraq as a strong
challenge to President Bush's war policy, and Democratic leaders who were
cool to the plan earlier this year declared Wednesday that the new Congress
finally had prodded Bush toward a new approach to Iraq.
But even Biden's GOP supporters were reluctant to deem his non-binding
measure a sign of hope in the endless search for a solution to Iraq that has
dominated the Senate since spring.
"It's an achievement by Congress," said Sen. John Warner (R-Va.), who
co-sponsored the plan and helped Biden round up Republican backers. "I would
not pronounce it the best we can do."
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) also supported Biden, but noted afterward
that the non-binding plan would allow the administration to avoid acting on
its political prescriptions.
"We did show through this vote that there was consensus on . a recognition
that Iraq is, politically, a very diverse country," Murkowski said. "I don't
know if it demonstrates more beyond that."
One GOP aide went further, saying that most Republicans decided against
opposing Biden's plan after revisions made clear that it would not force any
decisions on Baghdad.
"What is the Iraqi government going to do [in response]? Say, 'thanks for
the input, but we're fine'?" the aide said. The aide described Republicans'
perspective as: "This doesn't really do anything, and why not let
[Democrats] have it, for practical reasons."
Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) missed the vote on Biden's plan as well as a vote
on Iran offered by Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), both of which were added to the
defense authorization bill. Obama's office has said he would likely support
the Biden language.
Sen. Sam Brownback (Kan.), a dark horse in the Republican presidential race,
endorsed Biden's plan months ago, while his only White House foe in the
chamber, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), also missed the vote.
Democrats continued to offer no clues on whether more options to draw down
the U.S. troop presence in Iraq would come to the floor this month. But
Warner sent a strong signal, telling reporters that Iraq withdrawal would
come up again during the defense appropriations debate.
"I don't feel, as this bill continues to move forward, that we'll see any
[proposal] reach the 60-vote mark," Warner said.
The Bush administration previously has opposed a mandate for federalizing
the Iraqi government, but the State Department did not comment publicly
Wednesday on Biden's plan.
Meanwhile, every Democratic leader backed Kyl's amendment on Iraq, which
called for Tehran's Revolutionary Guard Corps to be designated a terrorist
group. More incendiary language referring to the use of "all instruments of
U.S. power in Iraq" to block Iran's activities was dropped from the
amendment, but Biden and Dodd still opposed the language. The amendment
passed 76-22.
Clinton supported the Iran amendment, exposing her to continued criticism
from anti-war groups active in the Democratic presidential primary.
"It is disturbing for the Senate to be unable and unwilling to do what most
Americans want it to do - end the debacle in Iraq," said Tom Andrews,
director of Win Without War and a central member of the Americans Against
Escalation in Iraq coalition. "It is outrageous for the Senate to be pushing
our nation one step closer to disaster in Iran."
The Senate will move on to an expanded hate-crimes ban on Thursday, with
Republicans seeking to hammer Democrats for using the Pentagon bill as a
platform to debate non-defense issues. Majority Whip Dick Durbin's (D-Ill.)
bid to add relief for undocumented immigrant students also is likely to come
up before final debate on the defense bill concludes next week.
Illustrating Republicans' frustration with a coming fourth week of debate on
the defense bill, a GOP group moved Wednesday afternoon to cut off debate on
the legislation. It is unclear when Democrats would set a final vote on that
cloture filing, but one could occur as soon as Friday.
