BIN LADEN THANKS BUSH/REPUBLICANS: 'Iraq is 'perfect base''

Z

Zeno

Guest
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:26:46 -0600, Captain America
<america.captain@gmail.com> wrote:

>Zeno wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:36:26 -0600, Captain America
>> <america.captain@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Loon-A-Tron Watch wrote:
>>>> Where does it say he thanked Pres. Bush?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> He did so implicitly when he realized that he and his team of terrorist
>>> have a new "perfect base" to carry out their deeds.
>>>
>>> Not only that, Bush killed Osama's enemy, Saddam, so he helped Osama
>>> in that regard too.

>>
>> I'm not sure if you are accidentally lying or purposely lying (a
>> muslim). Regardless, search for the word "Iraq" in this link (bin
>> laden's declaration of war).
>>
>> http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1998.html
>>
>> It is quit obvious by reading those sentences, bin Laden was
>> protecting Iraq.

>
>It's even more obvious that the entire thing didn't mention Saddam, who
>he hates, which I have previously stated. So nice spin, but it won't
>work, the truth still stands.
>
>
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/08/AR2006090800777.html
>
>Far from aligning himself with al-Qaeda and Jordanian terrorist Abu
>Musab al-Zarqawi, Hussein repeatedly rebuffed al-Qaeda's overtures and
>tried to capture Zarqawi, the report said. Tariq Aziz, the detained
>former deputy prime minister, has told the FBI that Hussein "only
>expressed negative sentiments about [Osama] bin Laden."
>
><snip>
>
>As recently as Aug. 21, Bush suggested a link between Hussein and
>Zarqawi, the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, who was killed by U.S. forces
>this summer. But a CIA assessment in October 2005 concluded that
>Hussein's government "did not have a relationship, harbor, or turn a
>blind eye toward Zarqawi and his associates," according to the report.


Right, Saddam didn't want bin Laden in Iraq. LOL, when you are a
dictator, that can be expected.

It seems that you are either diverting attention away from your
earlier (false) statement, or, you have lost sight of it.

To refresh your memory, you claimed
"
.... Bush killed Osama's enemy, Saddam ...
"

I'll try again. Saddam was not an "enemy" to Saddam. The United
States of America is the enemy of Osama bin Laden.

It only makes sense. If Saddam is no longer in around it is
reasonable to expect the power thirsty bin Laden to try to take over
Iraq and impose (draconian) sharia law on the Iraqi people.

It will be necessary for you to do better in your next response.


>>> The least bush can do is put his signature somewhere in the city. To:
>>> Osama From: George.
>>>

>>
>>
 
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:26:46 -0600, Captain America
<america.captain@gmail.com> wrote:

>Zeno wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:36:26 -0600, Captain America
>> <america.captain@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Loon-A-Tron Watch wrote:
>>>> Where does it say he thanked Pres. Bush?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> He did so implicitly when he realized that he and his team of terrorist
>>> have a new "perfect base" to carry out their deeds.
>>>
>>> Not only that, Bush killed Osama's enemy, Saddam, so he helped Osama
>>> in that regard too.

>>
>> I'm not sure if you are accidentally lying or purposely lying (a
>> muslim). Regardless, search for the word "Iraq" in this link (bin
>> laden's declaration of war).
>>
>> http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1998.html
>>
>> It is quit obvious by reading those sentences, bin Laden was
>> protecting Iraq.

>
>It's even more obvious that the entire thing didn't mention Saddam, who
>he hates, which I have previously stated. So nice spin, but it won't
>work, the truth still stands.
>
>
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/08/AR2006090800777.html
>
>Far from aligning himself with al-Qaeda and Jordanian terrorist Abu
>Musab al-Zarqawi, Hussein repeatedly rebuffed al-Qaeda's overtures and
>tried to capture Zarqawi, the report said. Tariq Aziz, the detained
>former deputy prime minister, has told the FBI that Hussein "only
>expressed negative sentiments about [Osama] bin Laden."
>
><snip>
>
>As recently as Aug. 21, Bush suggested a link between Hussein and
>Zarqawi, the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, who was killed by U.S. forces
>this summer. But a CIA assessment in October 2005 concluded that
>Hussein's government "did not have a relationship, harbor, or turn a
>blind eye toward Zarqawi and his associates," according to the report.


corrected text follows

Right, Saddam didn't want bin Laden in Iraq. LOL, when you are a
dictator, that can be expected.

It seems that you are either diverting attention away from your
earlier (false) statement, or, you have lost sight of it.

To refresh your memory, you claimed
"
.... Bush killed Osama's enemy, Saddam ...
"

I'll try again. Saddam was not an "enemy" to bin Laden . The United
States of America is the enemy of Osama bin Laden.

It only makes sense. If Saddam is no longer in around it is
reasonable to expect the power thirsty bin Laden to try to take over
Iraq and impose (draconian) sharia law on the Iraqi people.

It will be necessary for you to do better in your next response.


>>> The least bush can do is put his signature somewhere in the city. To:
>>> Osama From: George.
>>>

>>
>>
 
On Mar 21, 12:34 pm, Zeno <Z...@home.kom> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:26:46 -0600, Captain America
>
>
>
> <america.capt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Zeno wrote:
> >> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:36:26 -0600, Captain America
> >> <america.capt...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> >>> Loon-A-Tron Watch wrote:
> >>>> Where does it say he thanked Pres. Bush?

>
> >>> He did so implicitly when he realized that he and his team of terrorist
> >>> have a new "perfect base" to carry out their deeds.

>
> >>> Not only that, Bush killed Osama's enemy, Saddam, so he helped Osama
> >>> in that regard too.

>
> >> I'm not sure if you are accidentally lying or purposely lying (a
> >> muslim). Regardless, search for the word "Iraq" in this link (bin
> >> laden's declaration of war).

>
> >>http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1998.html

>
> >> It is quit obvious by reading those sentences, bin Laden was
> >> protecting Iraq.

>
> >It's even more obvious that the entire thing didn't mention Saddam, who
> >he hates, which I have previously stated. So nice spin, but it won't
> >work, the truth still stands.

>
> >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/08/AR200...

>
> >Far from aligning himself with al-Qaeda and Jordanian terrorist Abu
> >Musab al-Zarqawi, Hussein repeatedly rebuffed al-Qaeda's overtures and
> >tried to capture Zarqawi, the report said. Tariq Aziz, the detained
> >former deputy prime minister, has told the FBI that Hussein "only
> >expressed negative sentiments about [Osama] bin Laden."

>
> ><snip>

>
> >As recently as Aug. 21, Bush suggested a link between Hussein and
> >Zarqawi, the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, who was killed by U.S. forces
> >this summer. But a CIA assessment in October 2005 concluded that
> >Hussein's government "did not have a relationship, harbor, or turn a
> >blind eye toward Zarqawi and his associates," according to the report.

>
> corrected text follows
>
> Right, Saddam didn't want bin Laden in Iraq. LOL, when you are a
> dictator, that can be expected.
>
> It seems that you are either diverting attention away from your
> earlier (false) statement, or, you have lost sight of it.
>
> To refresh your memory, you claimed
> "
> ... Bush killed Osama's enemy, Saddam ...
> "
>
> I'll try again. Saddam was not an "enemy" to bin Laden . The United
> States of America is the enemy of Osama bin Laden.
>


and hell knows, humans are only capable of having one enemy. WTF is
wrong with you?


> It only makes sense.


No it doesn't

> If Saddam is no longer in around it is
> reasonable to expect the power thirsty bin Laden to try to take over
> Iraq and impose (draconian) sharia law on the Iraqi people.
>


Only thing that makes sense.

> It will be necessary for you to do better in your next response.


You come up with Osama's only enemy is the U.S. and you're telling me
to come up with better responses?
I don't know what clown conservative school you went to, but Osama was
also enemies with the Soviets too during his stint with the
Mujahideen, and now with the Saudis
because Osama pleaded with the Sultan of Saudi Arabia that he be
allowed wipe out his secular enemy Saddam Hussein just to avoid the
U.S. setting foot onto holy Saudi soil. But the Saudi king told him
no, so now Osama's **** list is the U.S., Saudi Arabia, the crumbling
soviet union, and the secular Saddam Hussein. Before that, Osama
didn't have much of a beef with us, except that we supported Israel.


>
> >>> The least bush can do is put his signature somewhere in the city. To:
> >>> Osama From: George.
 
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:36:26 -0600, Captain America
<america.captain@gmail.com> wrote:

>Not only that, Bush killed Osama's enemy, Saddam, so he helped Osama
>in that regard too.


Bin Laden may have hated Saddam, the Soviets, the Saudi king, Israel,
and anything one else that doesn't conform to sharia law (99% of the
world). But, bin Laden's sworn purpose in life is to kill Americans.
Here is his testimony confirming that fact.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1998.html

Because bin Laden hates essentially everyone to some degree, by your
reasoning, ANYTHING that Bush does - in effect - "helps" bin Laden.
Which is plainly a false conclusion.

Simply, you are wrong.
 
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:25:27 -0700 (PDT), Christopher Helms
<Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Mar 20, 8:01
 
In article <3pimu3tbbgqmebt9hdq94e1rrabh5pcqsl@4ax.com>,
Zeno <Zeno@home.kom> wrote:

> >He did so implicitly when he realized that he and his team of terrorist
> >> > >have a new "perfect base" to carry out their deeds.
> >>
> >> > >
 
Back
Top