P
Patriot Games
Guest
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/7/26/212156.shtml?s=ic
Obama: Hillary's Foreign Policy Like Bush's
Democrat Barack Obama accused Hillary Clinton on Thursday of backing a
foreign policy toward hostile nations no different than U.S. President
George W. Bush's in an escalation of their war of words this week.
Obama, an Illinois senator, fired back at New York Sen. Clinton for calling
him "irresponsible and naive" for saying during a CNN/YouTube debate on
Monday that he would be willing to meet without preconditions the leaders of
Iran, Syria, North Korea, Cuba and Venezuela during his first year in
office.
The dust-up between the two top contenders in the race for the Democratic
presidential nomination in the November 2008 election has been the most
dramatic spat thus far in the campaign.
Clinton has tried to portray herself as the most experienced option among
Democrats, far more prepared to be commander-in-chief than Obama, who has
been in the U.S. Senate less than three years compared to her eight years as
first lady to President Bill Clinton and senator since 2001.
Clinton took a more cautious approach to a debate question about meeting
troublesome world leaders, arguing the president should only meet with such
leaders after lower-level diplomatic spadework is completed.
Obama, in a conference call with reporters, said that is Bush's position as
well.
"The Bush administration's policy is to say that we will not talk to these
countries unless they meet various preconditions. That's their explicit
policy," Obama said.
At the same time, Obama seemed to walk back a little bit from his debate
position, saying diplomatic preparation would be necessary before
presidential meetings.
"Nobody expects that you would suddenly just sit down with them for coffee
without having done the appropriate groundwork. But the question was, would
you meet them without preconditions, and part of the Bush doctrine has been
to say no," he said.
"You'll have to ask Senator Clinton what differentiates her position from
theirs," Obama added.
Bush considers Iran a brewing nuclear menace and has refused to meet Iranian
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. But he has allowed U.S. diplomats to meet
Iranians about U.S. charges that Iran is stirring up trouble in Iraq.
He has allowed diplomatic contacts with North Korea, Syria and Venezuela
while having no dealings with communist Cuba. Acting Cuban President Raul
Castro said on Thursday he would welcome talks with the United States after
Bush leaves office.
Some Democrats believe Bush may have missed opportunities for diplomatic
progress by refusing to meet some of these leaders. Critics say the
president has alienated much of the world with a foreign policy they call
arrogant, particularly with the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.
Obama made a case for talking to leaders shunned by the United States.
"The fact of the matter is when we talk to world leaders, it give us the
opportunity to speak about our ideals, our values and our interests, and I
am not afraid to have that conversation with anybody," he said.
He said if he were to sit down with the Iranian president, "I will send a
strong message that Israel is our friend, that we will assist in their
security and that we don't find nuclear weapons acceptable as Iran is
currently envisioning it."
"That's not a propaganda coup for the president of Iran," he said. He added
that the debate over the issue was whether to pursue conventional thinking
or consider new ideas.
Obama: Hillary's Foreign Policy Like Bush's
Democrat Barack Obama accused Hillary Clinton on Thursday of backing a
foreign policy toward hostile nations no different than U.S. President
George W. Bush's in an escalation of their war of words this week.
Obama, an Illinois senator, fired back at New York Sen. Clinton for calling
him "irresponsible and naive" for saying during a CNN/YouTube debate on
Monday that he would be willing to meet without preconditions the leaders of
Iran, Syria, North Korea, Cuba and Venezuela during his first year in
office.
The dust-up between the two top contenders in the race for the Democratic
presidential nomination in the November 2008 election has been the most
dramatic spat thus far in the campaign.
Clinton has tried to portray herself as the most experienced option among
Democrats, far more prepared to be commander-in-chief than Obama, who has
been in the U.S. Senate less than three years compared to her eight years as
first lady to President Bill Clinton and senator since 2001.
Clinton took a more cautious approach to a debate question about meeting
troublesome world leaders, arguing the president should only meet with such
leaders after lower-level diplomatic spadework is completed.
Obama, in a conference call with reporters, said that is Bush's position as
well.
"The Bush administration's policy is to say that we will not talk to these
countries unless they meet various preconditions. That's their explicit
policy," Obama said.
At the same time, Obama seemed to walk back a little bit from his debate
position, saying diplomatic preparation would be necessary before
presidential meetings.
"Nobody expects that you would suddenly just sit down with them for coffee
without having done the appropriate groundwork. But the question was, would
you meet them without preconditions, and part of the Bush doctrine has been
to say no," he said.
"You'll have to ask Senator Clinton what differentiates her position from
theirs," Obama added.
Bush considers Iran a brewing nuclear menace and has refused to meet Iranian
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. But he has allowed U.S. diplomats to meet
Iranians about U.S. charges that Iran is stirring up trouble in Iraq.
He has allowed diplomatic contacts with North Korea, Syria and Venezuela
while having no dealings with communist Cuba. Acting Cuban President Raul
Castro said on Thursday he would welcome talks with the United States after
Bush leaves office.
Some Democrats believe Bush may have missed opportunities for diplomatic
progress by refusing to meet some of these leaders. Critics say the
president has alienated much of the world with a foreign policy they call
arrogant, particularly with the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.
Obama made a case for talking to leaders shunned by the United States.
"The fact of the matter is when we talk to world leaders, it give us the
opportunity to speak about our ideals, our values and our interests, and I
am not afraid to have that conversation with anybody," he said.
He said if he were to sit down with the Iranian president, "I will send a
strong message that Israel is our friend, that we will assist in their
security and that we don't find nuclear weapons acceptable as Iran is
currently envisioning it."
"That's not a propaganda coup for the president of Iran," he said. He added
that the debate over the issue was whether to pursue conventional thinking
or consider new ideas.
