Buckwheat Within 3% of the Barfly Hitlary in PA!

P

Patriot Games

Guest
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Newsmax_Zogby_Pa_race/2008/04/19/89395.html

Newsmax/Zogby Tracking: Pa. Race Suddenly Tightens

Saturday, April 19, 2008

UTICA, New York - New York's Hillary Clinton remains barely ahead of rival
Barack Obama of Illinois leading up to Tuesday's presidential primary in
Pennsylvania, a new Newsmax/Zogby daily tracking poll shows.

Her advantage is a statistically insignificant three points, 46% to 43%,
over Obama, as support in the race ebbs and flows within a tight margin -
she led by five points yesterday.

The two-day tracking survey, which was conducted April 18-19, 2008, included
11% who were either undecided or supported someone else.

The telephone survey, conducted using live operators working out of Zogby's
on-site call center in Upstate New York, included 607 likely Democratic
primary voters in Pennsylvania. It carries a margin of error of +/- 4.1
percentage points.

The daily tracking in the Keystone state will continue through Monday
evening, with the final release issued early on Election Day.

Pollster John Zogby: "Okay, so let's play Confound the Pollsters. Obama, who
polled a mere 40% yesterday had a good today at 46% to Clinton's 44%. We
quadruple-checked our Saturday sample and it is solid. Perhaps the buzz from
both his San Francisco statements and the ABC debate has subsided.

He picked up a few more points in Philadelphia and the east, where he has
been leading, in the central state area, and up-ticked a bit with men.

Clinton seems to have added a few points in the Pittsburgh region. But a
very close examination of these numbers over the five days we have been
tracking shows that it is whites and Catholics who are undecided. They
clearly do not like Clinton and are definitely not breaking for Obama.

They compose a pretty big chunk of Democratic voters who say they will vote
for McCain in the general election. If this small group of white/Catholic
undecideds do not vote, Obama can win Pennsylvania if he is able to get out
his base of young voters, African American voters, and Very Liberal voters.

If those white/Catholics do vote, then they will probably vote for Clinton
and she can conceivably meet the 10-point victory threshold that meets
pundits' expectations. It looked like she was moving some of these voters
after the debate, but today is a different story. Too soon to tell."

As Zogby mentions, this latest Newsmax/Zogby two-day tracking poll shows
Obama had a good day in eastern Pennsylvania, where he campaigned at several
stops. Meanwhile, Clinton retains a big lead in western Pennsylvania and a
sturdy lead in central Pennsylvania, including the state capital of
Harrisburg.

But in every demographic group, the race has become remarkably stable.
Clinton leads by 11 points among women, while Obama leads by 7 points among
men. Obama leads among those under age 54, while Clinton holds an edge among
those age 55 and older.

She leads among Catholics, 58% to 26%, reflecting a small gain for Obama.
But Clinton gained among Protestants yesterday and now trails Obama by 14
points. The two religious demographic groups are roughly the same size in
Pennsylvania.

Among the very liberal Democratic Party voters, Obama leads by 19 points, up
7 points over yesterday. Clinton leads by a small margin among mainline
liberals, and by larger margins among moderates and conservative Democratic
primary voters.

The economy continues to be the most important issue to voters, and they
continue to favor Clinton over Obama in terms of choosing a candidate who
would both help their personal financial situation, and help the U.S.
economy at large.

Clinton was also seen as the candidate who better understands Pennsylvania -
56% said as much, while just 29% said Obama better understands the state,
this most recent polling showed. However, Obama made a small gain on this
question in the last day's polling.
 
Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:
"German women, German men !
It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the
Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.
Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not
forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National
Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily
politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very
unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic
intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not
respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the
woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different
value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German
woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best
sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other
areas than the man.

The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but
also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in
the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices
and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best
suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless
devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.

The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the
past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea
of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread
winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the
man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is
not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her
talents and abilities.
Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the
frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men
were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to
the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men
always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all
great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination
have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually
loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the
woman.

It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must
be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our
attitude toward women.

The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in
government, politics, economics and social relations has not left
women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought
impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some
good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that
are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations
have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set
in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a
distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with
former ideals.

A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary
and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most
suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious
duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can
continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of
the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the
builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's
source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place
for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,
in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that
those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in
the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their
abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other
ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially
reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to
fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.

The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.
It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no
intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer
and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.
But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in
motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the
living mother of a family who gives the state children.

German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning
to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more
rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected
to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and
her daily bread is not a good trade.

A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in
our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now
the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most
evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's
birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without
emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The
government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the
resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental
change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is
responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying
about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each
elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by
1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are
the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it
will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine
the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.

We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our
national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The
national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation
on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the
woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends
to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of
our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our
blood is assured..."


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
 
"Smirnoff" <Unlised@unlisted.com> wrote in message
news:11IOj.3035$lU5.983@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
> "Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote in message
> news:480b35ba$0$31753$4c368faf@roadrunner.com
>> http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Newsmax_Zogby_Pa_race/2008/04/19/89395.html
>> Newsmax/Zogby Tracking: Pa. Race Suddenly Tightens

> You are right to be fearful of Obama our next president. This is the only
> thing you are any good at Archy


You've been dismissed.

That means go away.
 
"Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote in message
news:480b76c0$0$31742$4c368faf@roadrunner.com
> "Smirnoff" <Unlised@unlisted.com> wrote in message
> news:11IOj.3035$lU5.983@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
>> "Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote in message
>> news:480b35ba$0$31753$4c368faf@roadrunner.com
>>> http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Newsmax_Zogby_Pa_race/2008/04/19/89395.html
>>> Newsmax/Zogby Tracking: Pa. Race Suddenly Tightens

>> You are right to be fearful of Obama our next president.
>> This is the only thing you are any good at Archy

>
> You've been dismissed.
>
> That means go away.


You are a coward that means you surrender and lose once again Archie.
 
Is this a winner take all state?....AAC


On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 08:23:29 -0400, "Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote:

>http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Newsmax_Zogby_Pa_race/2008/04/19/89395.html
>
>Newsmax/Zogby Tracking: Pa. Race Suddenly Tightens
>
>Saturday, April 19, 2008
>
>UTICA, New York - New York's Hillary Clinton remains barely ahead of rival
>Barack Obama of Illinois leading up to Tuesday's presidential primary in
>Pennsylvania, a new Newsmax/Zogby daily tracking poll shows.
>
>Her advantage is a statistically insignificant three points, 46% to 43%,
>over Obama, as support in the race ebbs and flows within a tight margin -
>she led by five points yesterday.
>
>The two-day tracking survey, which was conducted April 18-19, 2008, included
>11% who were either undecided or supported someone else.
>
>The telephone survey, conducted using live operators working out of Zogby's
>on-site call center in Upstate New York, included 607 likely Democratic
>primary voters in Pennsylvania. It carries a margin of error of +/- 4.1
>percentage points.
>
>The daily tracking in the Keystone state will continue through Monday
>evening, with the final release issued early on Election Day.
>
>Pollster John Zogby: "Okay, so let's play Confound the Pollsters. Obama, who
>polled a mere 40% yesterday had a good today at 46% to Clinton's 44%. We
>quadruple-checked our Saturday sample and it is solid. Perhaps the buzz from
>both his San Francisco statements and the ABC debate has subsided.
>
>He picked up a few more points in Philadelphia and the east, where he has
>been leading, in the central state area, and up-ticked a bit with men.
>
>Clinton seems to have added a few points in the Pittsburgh region. But a
>very close examination of these numbers over the five days we have been
>tracking shows that it is whites and Catholics who are undecided. They
>clearly do not like Clinton and are definitely not breaking for Obama.
>
>They compose a pretty big chunk of Democratic voters who say they will vote
>for McCain in the general election. If this small group of white/Catholic
>undecideds do not vote, Obama can win Pennsylvania if he is able to get out
>his base of young voters, African American voters, and Very Liberal voters.
>
>If those white/Catholics do vote, then they will probably vote for Clinton
>and she can conceivably meet the 10-point victory threshold that meets
>pundits' expectations. It looked like she was moving some of these voters
>after the debate, but today is a different story. Too soon to tell."
>
>As Zogby mentions, this latest Newsmax/Zogby two-day tracking poll shows
>Obama had a good day in eastern Pennsylvania, where he campaigned at several
>stops. Meanwhile, Clinton retains a big lead in western Pennsylvania and a
>sturdy lead in central Pennsylvania, including the state capital of
>Harrisburg.
>
>But in every demographic group, the race has become remarkably stable.
>Clinton leads by 11 points among women, while Obama leads by 7 points among
>men. Obama leads among those under age 54, while Clinton holds an edge among
>those age 55 and older.
>
>She leads among Catholics, 58% to 26%, reflecting a small gain for Obama.
>But Clinton gained among Protestants yesterday and now trails Obama by 14
>points. The two religious demographic groups are roughly the same size in
>Pennsylvania.
>
>Among the very liberal Democratic Party voters, Obama leads by 19 points, up
>7 points over yesterday. Clinton leads by a small margin among mainline
>liberals, and by larger margins among moderates and conservative Democratic
>primary voters.
>
>The economy continues to be the most important issue to voters, and they
>continue to favor Clinton over Obama in terms of choosing a candidate who
>would both help their personal financial situation, and help the U.S.
>economy at large.
>
>Clinton was also seen as the candidate who better understands Pennsylvania -
>56% said as much, while just 29% said Obama better understands the state,
>this most recent polling showed. However, Obama made a small gain on this
>question in the last day's polling.
 
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:01:34 -0400, "Smirnoff" <Unlised@unlisted.com> wrote:

>
>
>"Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote in message
>news:480b35ba$0$31753$4c368faf@roadrunner.com
>> http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Newsmax_Zogby_Pa_race/2008/04/19/89395.html
>>
>> Newsmax/Zogby Tracking: Pa. Race Suddenly Tightens
>>

>
> You are right to be fearful of Obama our next president. This is the only
>thing you are any good at Archy
>

The problem I see is that Obama might not be "seasoned" enough for the presidency,
yet, that could also be a good thing. Of the three candidates, IMO, he is the most
decent and also most likable. As a lifetime Republican, the only way I could ever,
ever vote for John McCain would be if he picked a VP that wasn't just another
politician....and even then I would have to think long and hard about it.....AAC
 
"AnAmericanCitizen" <NoAmnesty@earthlink.net> wrote in
message news:0h5o049k8ovii8osh4ito4al9bohtchhth@4ax.com
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:01:34 -0400, "Smirnoff"
> <Unlised@unlisted.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote in message
>>news:480b35ba$0$31753$4c368faf@roadrunner.com
>>> http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Newsmax_Zogby_Pa_race/2008/04/19/89395.html
>>>
>>> Newsmax/Zogby Tracking: Pa. Race Suddenly Tightens
>>>

>>
>> You are right to be fearful of Obama our next president.
>>This is the only thing you are any good at Archy
>>

> The problem I see is that Obama might not be "seasoned"
> enough for the presidency, yet, that could also be a good
> thing. Of the three candidates, IMO, he is the most
> decent and also most likable. As a lifetime Republican,
> the only way I could ever, ever vote for John McCain
> would be if he picked a VP that wasn't just another
> politician....and even then I would have to think long
> and hard about it.....AAC


Ones loyalty should be with America before their political party. I was a
life long republican as were my parents until I smartened up and saw what
they were doing to our country. Bush has been the worse leader I have ever
seen and a future leader that sings a song of bombing another nation before
any attempt has been made to solve problems differently is utterly stupid.
He is worse than Reagan when he declared the USSR an illegal state and
bombing would start in 30 minutes.
 
"Smirnoff" <Unlised@unlisted.com> wrote in message
news:6k0Pj.3072$lU5.1390@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
>
>
> "AnAmericanCitizen" <NoAmnesty@earthlink.net> wrote in
> message news:0h5o049k8ovii8osh4ito4al9bohtchhth@4ax.com
>> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:01:34 -0400, "Smirnoff"
>> <Unlised@unlisted.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote in message
>>>news:480b35ba$0$31753$4c368faf@roadrunner.com
>>>> http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Newsmax_Zogby_Pa_race/2008/04/19/89395.html
>>>>
>>>> Newsmax/Zogby Tracking: Pa. Race Suddenly Tightens
>>>>
>>>
>>> You are right to be fearful of Obama our next president.
>>>This is the only thing you are any good at Archy
>>>

>> The problem I see is that Obama might not be "seasoned"
>> enough for the presidency, yet, that could also be a good
>> thing. Of the three candidates, IMO, he is the most
>> decent and also most likable. As a lifetime Republican,
>> the only way I could ever, ever vote for John McCain
>> would be if he picked a VP that wasn't just another
>> politician....and even then I would have to think long
>> and hard about it.....AAC

>
> Ones loyalty should be with America before their political party. I was a
> life long republican as were my parents until I smartened up and saw what
> they were doing to our country. Bush has been the worse leader I have ever
> seen and a future leader that sings a song of bombing another nation
> before any attempt has been made to solve problems differently is utterly
> stupid. He is worse than Reagan when he declared the USSR an illegal state
> and bombing would start in 30 minutes.
>


Bombing threats eliminates threats.
Proven fact.



Jim E
 
Back
Top