Bush expands sanctions against Myanmar rulers [?]

F

Flendt

Guest
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.as...01_NOOTR_RTRMDNC_0_-300709-2&sec=worldupdates

ByMatt Spetalnick and Tabassum Zakaria
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush expanded U.S. sanctions
against Myanmar's rulers on Friday, accusing them of "vicious persecution"
of democracy protesters, and urged China and India to step up pressure on
their neighbor.

Unveiling the second package of U.S. measures in less than a month, Bush
said he was adding more of Myanmar's military leaders to a list already
facing sanctions and had ordered a tightening of U.S. export controls on the
Asian country.

But in a tacit admission that U.S. steps alone would not be enough, he urged
China, India and other countries in the region to "review their own laws and
policies" on Myanmar, the former Burma.

"Burma's rulers continue to defy the world's just demands to stop their
vicious persecution," Bush told reporters. "They continue to reject the
clear will of the Burmese people to live in freedom under leaders of their
own choosing."

Bush's latest announcement followed weeks of mostly unsuccessful
international efforts to get Myanmar's government to ease up on repression
of protesters and open a dialogue with detained opposition leader Aung San
Suu Kyi.

Myanmar's junta has kept a tight lid on the country since crushing Buddhist
monk-led protests that began in September and grew into the largest
anti-government demonstrations in 20 years. Official media said 10 people
died.

Bush unveiled one set of limited sanctions last month targeting 14 military
leaders, toughening U.S. measures that had been in place for years but had
forced little change.

"In light of the ongoing atrocities by these men and their associates, the
United States has today imposed additional sanctions," Bush said on Friday.

U.S. DEMANDS

He designated 11 more leaders under existing sanctions, including a freeze
on U.S. assets, and also named 12 new "individuals and entities" to be
covered by U.S. penalties.

The White House said Bush's tightening of exports controls would include a
ban on the sale of high-performance computers to Myanmar.

Bush demanded the International Committee of the Red Cross be given access
to political prisoners, that Suu Kyi and other detained leaders be allowed
to communicate with each other and that U.N. envoy Ibrahim Gambari be
allowed back.

"And ultimately, reconciliation requires that Burmese authorities release
all political prisoners and begin negotiations with the democratic
opposition under the auspices of the United Nations," he said.

Bush said the United States would "consider additional measures if Burma's
leaders do not end the brutal repression."

Mindful of the limits of U.S. influence with Myanmar, Bush renewed his
appeal for China and India to do more. China, the closest the isolated junta
has to an ally, has expressed concern about the crackdown and helped
facilitate Gambari's visit earlier this month but has been reluctant to go
further.

Beijing has leverage as Myanmar's key trading partner and arms supplier,
while India also has some economic sway.

Bush this week voiced impatience with the international response to Myanmar.
But on Friday, he praised the European Union and Australia for "targeted
sanctions," commended Japan for cutting assistance and voiced appreciation
for criticism of the junta by Singapore, Indonesia and the Philippines.

Derek Mitchell, an Asia expert at the Center for Strategic and International
Studies, said the new U.S. sanctions were "certainly worthwhile doing even
if no one else does it."

"If we want to get other nations to follow, we have to set an example," he
said. But he acknowledged China and India had shown no signs of emulating
the U.S. moves.

---

Again Bush does not understand that we must engage other nations, not shut
them out. Even those who might be considered an enemy.
 
In article <wqASi.79263$m81.1998@fe01.news.easynews.com>,
"Flendt" <bre@com.org> wrote:


> Again Bush does not understand that we must engage other nations, not shut
> them out. Even those who might be considered an enemy.


Well, we didn't just engage Iraq, we got married to it.

How polygamous should the US be?

--
NeoLibertarian

"Underlying most arguments against the free market
is a lack of belief in freedom itself."
---Milton Friedman
 
Neolibertarian wrote:

> In article <wqASi.79263$m81.1998@fe01.news.easynews.com>,
> "Flendt" <bre@com.org> wrote:
>
>
>> Again Bush does not understand that we must engage other nations, not shut
>> them out. Even those who might be considered an enemy.

>
> Well, we didn't just engage Iraq, we got married to it.
>
> How polygamous should the US be?


Oops, Wrong country.
 
In article <QFJSi.64$dy4.36@newsfe06.lga>, kT <cosmic@lifeform.org>
wrote:

> Neolibertarian wrote:
>
> > In article <wqASi.79263$m81.1998@fe01.news.easynews.com>,
> > "Flendt" <bre@com.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Again Bush does not understand that we must engage other nations, not shut
> >> them out. Even those who might be considered an enemy.

> >
> > Well, we didn't just engage Iraq, we got married to it.
> >
> > How polygamous should the US be?

>
> Oops, Wrong country.


You can say THAT again!


--
NeoLibertarian

"The government's view of the economy could be summed
up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it
keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving,
subsidize it."
---Ronald Reagan
 
Back
Top