BUSH LIES AGAIN & AGAIN. THIS TIME IT'S ABOUT CIA TAPES!

[Sarcastic American!]

White House, Justice Department, Congress told CIA not to destroy
interrogation tapes
12/07/2007 @ 9:32 pm
Filed by Katie Baker


Update: "White House and Justice Department officials, along with
senior members of Congress, advised the Central Intelligence Agency in
2003 against a plan to destroy hundreds of hours of videotapes showing
the interrogations of two operatives of Al Qaeda, government officials
said Friday," according to the New York Times.

Advertisement
"The chief of the agency’s clandestine service nevertheless ordered
their destruction in November 2005, taking the step without notifying
even the C.I.A.’s own top lawyer, John A. Rizzo, who was angry at
the decision," the Times said. "Top C.I.A. officials had decided in
2003 to preserve the tapes in response to warnings from White House
lawyers and lawmakers that destroying the tapes would be unwise, in
part because it could carry legal risks, the government officials
said."

 

[steve]

On Dec 9, 1:55 am, "Sarcastic American!" <not4ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> White House, Justice Department, Congress told CIA not to destroy
> interrogation tapes
> 12/07/2007 @ 9:32 pm
> Filed by Katie Baker
>
> Update: "White House and Justice Department officials, along with
> senior members of Congress, advised the Central Intelligence Agency in
> 2003 against a plan to destroy hundreds of hours of videotapes showing
> the interrogations of two operatives of Al Qaeda, government officials
> said Friday," according to the New York Times.
>
> Advertisement
> "The chief of the agency’s clandestine service nevertheless ordered
> their destruction in November 2005, taking the step without notifying
> even the C.I.A.’s own top lawyer, John A. Rizzo, who was angry at
> the decision," the Times said. "Top C.I.A. officials had decided in
> 2003 to preserve the tapes in response to warnings from White House
> lawyers and lawmakers that destroying the tapes would be unwise, in
> part because it could carry legal risks, the government officials
> said."

and you know its a lie how?

 

[Gene]

steve <misledrkstar@aol.com> wrote in news:f6666db9-e2f3-42d3-88b9-
fb452950e219@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

> On Dec 9, 1:55 am, "Sarcastic American!" <not4ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> White House, Justice Department, Congress told CIA not to destroy
>> interrogation tapes
>> 12/07/2007 @ 9:32 pm
>> Filed by Katie Baker
>>
>> Update: "White House and Justice Department officials, along with
>> senior members of Congress, advised the Central Intelligence Agency in
>> 2003 against a plan to destroy hundreds of hours of videotapes showing
>> the interrogations of two operatives of Al Qaeda, government officials
>> said Friday," according to the New York Times.
>>
>> Advertisement
>> "The chief of the agency’s clandestine service neverth
> eless ordered
>> their destruction in November 2005, taking the step without notifying
>> even the C.I.A.’s own top lawyer, John A. Rizzo, who w
> as angry at
>> the decision," the Times said. "Top C.I.A. officials had decided in
>> 2003 to preserve the tapes in response to warnings from White House
>> lawyers and lawmakers that destroying the tapes would be unwise, in
>> part because it could carry legal risks, the government officials
>> said."
>
> and you know its a lie how?
>

Because his lips were moving - dummy.

--
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much
liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." Thomas
Jefferson

"History is earmarked by the successes of liberals and mistakes of
conservatives." - ETG

 

[steve]

On Dec 9, 4:54 am, Gene <Retired...@PatrioticLiberal.com> wrote:
> steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote in news:f6666db9-e2f3-42d3-88b9-
> fb452950e...@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 9, 1:55 am, "Sarcastic American!" <not4ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> White House, Justice Department, Congress told CIA not to destroy
> >> interrogation tapes
> >> 12/07/2007 @ 9:32 pm
> >> Filed by Katie Baker
>
> >> Update: "White House and Justice Department officials, along with
> >> senior members of Congress, advised the Central Intelligence Agency in
> >> 2003 against a plan to destroy hundreds of hours of videotapes showing
> >> the interrogations of two operatives of Al Qaeda, government officials
> >> said Friday," according to the New York Times.
>
> >> Advertisement
> >> "The chief of the agency’s clandestine service neverth
> > eless ordered
> >> their destruction in November 2005, taking the step without notifying
> >> even the C.I.A.’s own top lawyer, John A. Rizzo, who w
> > as angry at
> >> the decision," the Times said. "Top C.I.A. officials had decided in
> >> 2003 to preserve the tapes in response to warnings from White House
> >> lawyers and lawmakers that destroying the tapes would be unwise, in
> >> part because it could carry legal risks, the government officials
> >> said."
>
> >   and you know its a lie how?
>
> Because his lips were moving - dummy.
>


come back when you can prove its a lie.

 

[snausages]

On Dec 8, 11:48 pm, steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:

> come back when you can prove its a lie.

The interrogation methods of the CIA came directly from the White
House. Even if Bush didn't see the tapes, he knew what was going on.

 

[Greg]

"snausages" <goofindoo@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:323c3a91-2057-4450-8d3e-307839d55e2d@b1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 8, 11:48 pm, steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> come back when you can prove its a lie.
>
> The interrogation methods of the CIA came directly from the White
> House. Even if Bush didn't see the tapes, he knew what was going on.

BULLSHIT!

 

[snausages]

On Dec 9, 12:57 am, "Greg" <russiana...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> BULLSHIT!

Brilliant rejoinder. You're a credit to Bushies everywhere.

 

[steve]

On Dec 9, 3:27 pm, snausages <goofin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 8, 11:48 pm, steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > come back when you can prove its a lie.
>
> The interrogation methods of the CIA came directly from the White
> House. Even if Bush didn't see the tapes, he knew what was going on.

like i said, you cant prove whats on the tapes. on top of that, are
you suggesting that every person caught get waterboarded?

 

[snausages]

On Dec 9, 1:21 am, steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 9, 3:27 pm, snausages <goofin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 8, 11:48 pm, steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > come back when you can prove its a lie.
>
> > The interrogation methods of the CIA came directly from the White
> > House. Even if Bush didn't see the tapes, he knew what was going on.
>
> like i said, you cant prove whats on the tapes. on top of that, are
> you suggesting that every person caught get waterboarded?

My point, which I guess I didn't make clearly, was that Bush not only
knows of the criminal acts perpetrated by the CIA, he was also one of
the architects of the illegal methods used by the CIA.

 

[Gene]

steve <misledrkstar@aol.com> wrote in
news:c143e194-2b26-46b0-90af-84998f44f9a9@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

> On Dec 9, 4:54 am, Gene <Retired...@PatrioticLiberal.com> wrote:
>> steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote in news:f6666db9-e2f3-42d3-88b9-
>> fb452950e...@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 9, 1:55 am, "Sarcastic American!" <not4ud...@yahoo.com>
>> > wrot
> e:
>> >> White House, Justice Department, Congress told CIA not to destroy
>> >> interrogation tapes
>> >> 12/07/2007 @ 9:32 pm
>> >> Filed by Katie Baker
>>
>> >> Update: "White House and Justice Department officials, along with
>> >> senior members of Congress, advised the Central Intelligence
>> >> Agency in 2003 against a plan to destroy hundreds of hours of
>> >> videotapes showing the interrogations of two operatives of Al
>> >> Qaeda, government officials said Friday," according to the New
>> >> York Times.
>>
>> >> Advertisement
>> >> "The chief of the agency’s clandestine service neve
> rth
>> > eless ordered
>> >> their destruction in November 2005, taking the step without
>> >> notifying even the C.I.A.’s own top lawyer, John A. Rizzo,
>> >> wh
> o w
>> > as angry at
>> >> the decision," the Times said. "Top C.I.A. officials had decided
>> >> in 2003 to preserve the tapes in response to warnings from White
>> >> House lawyers and lawmakers that destroying the tapes would be
>> >> unwise, in part because it could carry legal risks, the government
>> >> officials said."
>>
>> >   and you know its a lie how?
>>
>> Because his lips were moving - dummy.
>>
>
>
> come back when you can prove its a lie.

The tongue job you dimwits do on Bush's asshole can't keep up with the
stink coming from that dimwitted silver spooner.
--
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much
liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." Thomas
Jefferson

"History is earmarked by the successes of liberals and mistakes of
conservatives." - ETG

 

[Gene]

snausages <goofindoo@gmail.com> wrote in news:48176744-1608-4d22-bfd4-
6216aa9e5634@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

> On Dec 9, 1:21 am, steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 9, 3:27 pm, snausages <goofin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Dec 8, 11:48 pm, steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > come back when you can prove its a lie.
>>
>> > The interrogation methods of the CIA came directly from the White
>> > House. Even if Bush didn't see the tapes, he knew what was going on.
>>
>> like i said, you cant prove whats on the tapes. on top of that, are
>> you suggesting that every person caught get waterboarded?
>
> My point, which I guess I didn't make clearly, was that Bush not only
> knows of the criminal acts perpetrated by the CIA, he was also one of
> the architects of the illegal methods used by the CIA.
>

The only way to make a point stick with stevie is to have it etched on a
baseball bat and whack him repeatedly with it. After all he still is a Bush
Butt boy.

--
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty
than to those attending too small a degree of it." Thomas Jefferson

"History is earmarked by the successes of liberals and mistakes of
conservatives." - ETG

 

[steve]

On Dec 10, 12:09 am, Gene <Retired...@PatrioticLiberal.com> wrote:
> snausages <goofin...@gmail.com> wrote in news:48176744-1608-4d22-bfd4-
> 6216aa9e5...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 9, 1:21 am, steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> On Dec 9, 3:27 pm, snausages <goofin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > On Dec 8, 11:48 pm, steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > come back when you can prove its a lie.
>
> >> > The interrogation methods of the CIA came directly from the White
> >> > House. Even if Bush didn't see the tapes, he knew what was going on.
>
> >> like i said, you cant prove whats on the tapes. on top of that, are
> >> you suggesting that every person caught get waterboarded?
>
> > My point, which I guess I didn't make clearly, was that Bush not only
> > knows of the criminal acts perpetrated by the CIA, he was also one of
> > the architects of the illegal methods used by the CIA.


whats your point? everyone knows. so whats the big ****ing deal? if
it was so illegal, why havet your heros impeached the president then?


>
> The only way to make a point stick with stevie is to have it etched on a
> baseball bat and whack him repeatedly with it. After all he still is a Bush
> Butt boy.
>

a bush butt boy? the tounge job on bush's asshole? whats with all
you libs and the facination with homosexual innuendo? it seems you all
have a problem with your sexuallity and expressing yourself. you do
know that most guys that have that type of hostility are lashing out
because they think they might be gay? i suggest you go see a mental
health specialist, they may be able to help you accept who you are.

 

[ChasNemo]

On Dec 9, 1:03�pm, steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 12:09 am, Gene <Retired...@PatrioticLiberal.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > snausages <goofin...@gmail.com> wrote in news:48176744-1608-4d22-bfd4-
> > 6216aa9e5...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>
> > > On Dec 9, 1:21 am, steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
> > >> On Dec 9, 3:27 pm, snausages <goofin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> > On Dec 8, 11:48 pm, steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > >> > > � �come back when you can prove its a lie.
>
> > >> > The interrogation methods of the CIA came directly from the White
> > >> > House. �Even if Bush didn't see the tapes, he knew what was going on.
>
> > >> � like i said, you cant prove whats on the tapes. on top of that, are
> > >> you suggesting that every person caught get waterboarded?
>
> > > My point, which I guess I didn't make clearly, was that Bush not only
> > > knows of the criminal acts perpetrated by the CIA, he was also one of
> > > the architects of the illegal methods used by the CIA.
>
> �whats your point? everyone knows. so whats the big ****ing deal? if
> it was so illegal, why havet your heros impeached the president then?
>
>
>
> > The only way to make a point stick with stevie is to have it etched on a
> > baseball bat and whack him repeatedly with it. After all he still is a Bush
> > Butt boy.
>
> � a bush butt boy? the tounge job on bush's asshole? whats with all
> you libs and the facination with homosexual innuendo? it seems you all
> have a problem with your sexuallity and expressing yourself. you do
> know that most guys that have that type of hostility are lashing out
> because they think they might be gay? i suggest you go see a mental
> health specialist, they may be able to help you accept who you are.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

It's disgusting to see you rightards taking your usual "wide stance"
as you project your own dishonest homosexuality onto others. <snicker>

 

[Gene]

steve <misledrkstar@aol.com> wrote in
news:d5f80f79-df7a-450a-968d-1b5f865219fb@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

> On Dec 10, 12:09 am, Gene <Retired...@PatrioticLiberal.com> wrote:
>> snausages <goofin...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:48176744-1608-4d22-bfd4-
>> 6216aa9e5...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 9, 1:21 am, steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
>> >> On Dec 9, 3:27 pm, snausages <goofin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 8, 11:48 pm, steve <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > come back when you can prove its a lie.
>>
>> >> > The interrogation methods of the CIA came directly from the
>> >> > White House. Even if Bush didn't see the tapes, he knew what
>> >> > was going on.
>>
>> >> like i said, you cant prove whats on the tapes. on top of that,
>> >> are
>> >> you suggesting that every person caught get waterboarded?
>>
>> > My point, which I guess I didn't make clearly, was that Bush not
>> > only knows of the criminal acts perpetrated by the CIA, he was also
>> > one of the architects of the illegal methods used by the CIA.
>
>
> whats your point? everyone knows. so whats the big ****ing deal? if
> it was so illegal, why havet your heros impeached the president then?
>
>
>>
>> The only way to make a point stick with stevie is to have it etched
>> on a baseball bat and whack him repeatedly with it. After all he
>> still is a Bush Butt boy.
>>
>
> a bush butt boy? the tounge job on bush's asshole? whats with all
> you libs and the facination with homosexual innuendo? it seems you all
> have a problem with your sexuallity and expressing yourself. you do
> know that most guys that have that type of hostility are lashing out
> because they think they might be gay? i suggest you go see a mental
> health specialist, they may be able to help you accept who you are.


What a laugh. Kiddo it is the repugs that are hiding in the closet. I
don't have a problem with gays but you turds are scared shitless of the
word - so much so that you marry some poor woman, raise kids and then
like Haggart, Foley and the Idaho toe tapping fruitcake are dragged out
lying your asses off about how you really don't suck dick that much -
what a laugh. You are all hypocrits

So Sally tell me when are you coming out?



--
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much
liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." Thomas
Jefferson

"History is earmarked by the successes of liberals and mistakes of
conservatives." - ETG

 

[Clave]

"steve" <misledrkstar@aol.com> wrote in message
news:d5f80f79-df7a-450a-968d-1b5f865219fb@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 10, 12:09 am, Gene <Retired...@PatrioticLiberal.com> wrote:

<...>

>> The only way to make a point stick with stevie is to have it etched on a
>> baseball bat and whack him repeatedly with it. After all he still is a
>> Bush
>> Butt boy.
>>
>
> a bush butt boy? the tounge job on bush's asshole? whats with all
> you libs and the facination with homosexual innuendo?

It's the quickest way to get a Republican's attention.

Jim

 

[ChasNemo]

On Dec 9, 5:50�pm, "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com> wrote:
> "steve" <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:d5f80f79-df7a-450a-968d-1b5f865219fb@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Dec 10, 12:09 am, Gene <Retired...@PatrioticLiberal.com> wrote:
>
> <...>
>
> >> The only way to make a point stick with stevie is to have it etched on a
> >> baseball bat and whack him repeatedly with it. After all he still is a
> >> Bush
> >> Butt boy.
>
> > �a bush butt boy? the tounge job on bush's asshole? whats with all
> > you libs and the facination with homosexual innuendo?
>
> It's the quickest way to get a Republican's attention.
>
> Jim

Other than one ReThuglyKKKan tapping on an airport ment's room stall
floor to signal another RepuglyKKKan in the next stall. <snicker>

 

[steve]

On Dec 10, 5:50 am, "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com>
wrote:
> "steve" <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:d5f80f79-df7a-450a-968d-1b5f865219fb@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Dec 10, 12:09 am, Gene <Retired...@PatrioticLiberal.com> wrote:
>
> <...>
>
> >> The only way to make a point stick with stevie is to have it etched on a
> >> baseball bat and whack him repeatedly with it. After all he still is a
> >> Bush
> >> Butt boy.
>
> > a bush butt boy? the tounge job on bush's asshole? whats with all
> > you libs and the facination with homosexual innuendo?
>
> It's the quickest way to get a Republican's attention.
>
> Jim

its a sign of sexually frustrated men lashing out because they have
a problem with their sexuallity. there is nothing wrong with being
gay, they should seek therapy.

 

[Clave]

"steve" <misledrkstar@aol.com> wrote in message
news:2314ff8a-b640-4487-8cff-5e306c9f388c@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 10, 5:50 am, "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com>
> wrote:
>> "steve" <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:d5f80f79-df7a-450a-968d-1b5f865219fb@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On Dec 10, 12:09 am, Gene <Retired...@PatrioticLiberal.com> wrote:
>>
>> <...>
>>
>> >> The only way to make a point stick with stevie is to have it etched on
>> >> a
>> >> baseball bat and whack him repeatedly with it. After all he still is a
>> >> Bush
>> >> Butt boy.
>>
>> > a bush butt boy? the tounge job on bush's asshole? whats with all
>> > you libs and the facination with homosexual innuendo?
>>
>> It's the quickest way to get a Republican's attention.
>>
>> Jim
>
> its a sign of sexually frustrated men lashing out because they have
> a problem with their sexuallity. there is nothing wrong with being
> gay, they should seek therapy.

That doesn't even make sense.

 

[theloneranger100@aol.com]

On Dec 9, 2:50�pm, "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com> wrote:
> "steve" <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:d5f80f79-df7a-450a-968d-1b5f865219fb@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Dec 10, 12:09 am, Gene <Retired...@PatrioticLiberal.com> wrote:
>
> <...>
>
> >> The only way to make a point stick with stevie is to have it etched on a
> >> baseball bat and whack him repeatedly with it. After all he still is a
> >> Bush
> >> Butt boy.
>
> > �a bush butt boy? the tounge job on bush's asshole? whats with all
> > you libs and the facination with homosexual innuendo?
>
> It's the quickest way to get a Republican's attention.

That's what Leftist Pukes think, Poopsie..........It's your "Nature",
donchaknow...........

 

[theloneranger100@aol.com]

On Dec 10, 2:20�am, "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com>
wrote:
> "steve" <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:2314ff8a-b640-4487-8cff-5e306c9f388c@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 10, 5:50 am, "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com>
> > wrote:
> >> "steve" <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:d5f80f79-df7a-450a-968d-1b5f865219fb@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.com....
>
> >> > On Dec 10, 12:09 am, Gene <Retired...@PatrioticLiberal.com> wrote:
>
> >> <...>
>
> >> >> The only way to make a point stick with stevie is to have it etched on
> >> >> a
> >> >> baseball bat and whack him repeatedly with it. After all he still is a
> >> >> Bush
> >> >> Butt boy.
>
> >> > �a bush butt boy? the tounge job on bush's asshole? whats with all
> >> > you libs and the facination with homosexual innuendo?
>
> >> It's the quickest way to get a Republican's attention.
>
> >> Jim
>
> > �its a sign of sexually frustrated men lashing out because they have
> > a problem with their sexuallity. there is nothing wrong with being
> > gay, they should seek therapy.
>
> That doesn't even make sense.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Nothing "Makes Sense" to a Leftist Puke, Poopsie........You ought to
know that...........Leftist Pukes have Everything ASS
BACKWARDS..........Donchaknow..........