Bush's Plan for a New Cold War: U.S. Against Everybody Else

[mg]

As everyone knows, the world was slow to respond to the aggression of
Nazi Germany prior to WWII. Now, with Bush's naked aggression in Iraq,
it looks like there are a lot of countries who don't want to see a
repeat of that mistake. China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Tajikistan and Uzbekistan just sent a message to George Bush a couple
of months ago, for instance, that said: Watch Us Play War Games!
http://www.nyinquirer.com/nyinquirer/2007/08/russian-and-chi.html

In a scramble to stop a domino effect, Bush recently offered India a
nuclear power plant deal in an effort to kill a pipeline deal that
would have Iran providing natural gas to Pakistan, India and China.
Congress approved the deal and Bush signed the Peaceful Atomic Energy
Cooperation Act into law last December. There's a real nice picture of
Rice and pack of other Republicans gathered around smiling during the
signing ceremony at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/18/AR200...

Everyone, obviously, thought this was pretty much a done deal
representing yet another brilliant foreign policy coup by the Bush
administration. The reality, though, is that this deal has a lot of
problems and India is having second thoughts. "Ummm, let's see now.
Whose side do we really want to be on in the new Cold War", one Indian
said to the other Indian. It appears their answer is the same that
Pakistan already gave Bush in regard to pipeline. They want to be on
Iran's side.

So, it looks like by the time Bush and oil Nazis leave Washington,
It'll basically be the U.S. against, Russia, China, Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Pakistan, India and Iran, and
eventually perhaps others like Iraq, Syria and Saudi Arabia, for
instance.

"IN BRIEF
India-U.S. accord on nuclear energy in doubt

AP

October 17, 2007

New Delhi -- India's Prime Minister is raising doubts about a nuclear
energy accord with Washington, telling U.S. President George W. Bush
his government is having "certain difficulties" finalizing the deal,
which has faced mounting domestic opposition.

The pact would reverse three decades of U.S. anti-proliferation policy
by allowing the United States to send nuclear fuel and technology to
India, which has been cut off from the global atomic trade by its
refusal to sign non-proliferation treaties and its testing of nuclear
weapons.

But Communist parties key to the survival of Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh's government argue against closer ties with the United States."
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20071017.WORLD17-3/T...

http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/53581
http://www.energybulletin.net/5632.html
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007\10\17\story_...
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wn_report/2007/10/16/2007-10-16_putin...

 

[Raymond]

On Oct 19, 1:51?pm, mg <mgkel...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> As everyone knows, the world was slow to respond to the aggression of
> Nazi Germany prior to WWII. Now, with Bush's naked aggression in Iraq,
> it looks like there are a lot of countries who don't want to see a
> repeat of that mistake. China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
> Tajikistan and Uzbekistan just sent a message to George Bush a couple
> of months ago, for instance, that said: Watch Us Play War Games!http://www.nyinquirer.com/nyinquirer/2007/08/russian-and-chi.html

Is there not some chosen curse,
Some hidden thunder in the stores of heaven,
Red with uncommon wrath, to blast the man
Who owes his greatness to his country's ruin?
- Joseph Addison, Cato (act I, sc. 1)

> In a scramble to stop a domino effect, Bush recently offered India a
> nuclear power plant deal in an effort to kill a pipeline deal that
> would have Iran providing natural gas to Pakistan, India and China.
> Congress approved the deal and Bush signed the Peaceful Atomic Energy
> Cooperation Act into law last December. There's a real nice picture of
> Rice and pack of other Republicans gathered around smiling during the
> signing ceremony at:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/18/AR200...
>
> Everyone, obviously, thought this was pretty much a done deal
> representing yet another brilliant foreign policy coup by the Bush
> administration. The reality, though, is that this deal has a lot of
> problems and India is having second thoughts. "Ummm, let's see now.
> Whose side do we really want to be on in the new Cold War", one Indian
> said to the other Indian. It appears their answer is the same that
> Pakistan already gave Bush in regard to pipeline. They want to be on
> Iran's side.
>
> So, it looks like by the time Bush and oil Nazis leave Washington,
> It'll basically be the U.S. against, Russia, China, Kazakhstan,
> Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Pakistan, India and Iran, and
> eventually perhaps others like Iraq, Syria and Saudi Arabia, for
> instance.
>
> "IN BRIEF
> India-U.S. accord on nuclear energy in doubt
>
> AP
>
> October 17, 2007
>
> New Delhi -- India's Prime Minister is raising doubts about a nuclear
> energy accord with Washington, telling U.S. President George W. Bush
> his government is having "certain difficulties" finalizing the deal,
> which has faced mounting domestic opposition.
>
> The pact would reverse three decades of U.S. anti-proliferation policy
> by allowing the United States to send nuclear fuel and technology to
> India, which has been cut off from the global atomic trade by its
> refusal to sign non-proliferation treaties and its testing of nuclear
> weapons.
>
> But Communist parties key to the survival of Prime Minister Manmohan
> Singh's government argue against closer ties with the United States."http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20071017.WORLD17-3/T...
>
> http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/arti...om/news/wn_report/2007/10/16/2007-10-16_putin...