Why is it we did not have an overwhelming problem
We did Hugo, you need to brush up on history a little bit before saying such uneducated ****.
People were addicted to drugs but society was a very unforgiving thing in the "good ole" days and peopel more often than not died from their addictions instead of having a long prolonged life of abuse that our current society makes possible.
with cocaine addiction when coke was in cola? Idiots never learn, the black market causes more harm than any potential increase in drug use.
Again, you obviously are only parroting liberal talking points and have no idea what your talking about. The black market is only possible if there is a need for something that is restricted that is big enough to risk the legal troubles that go with that risk.
If people want it so bad they are willing to risk jail, what makes liberals believe that desire will simply go away if you remove the illegal element from it? Alcohol is legal and people abuse it millions of times a day, the same will be true of any other recreational drug that suddenly is made legal.
I am sure drug use went up quite a bit when Sarah gave every Alaskan a welfare check. The fact is it is easier for a kid to but marijuana than it is for him to buy beer.
As Snaf pointed out, Sarah did not begin the process of Alaskans all benefitting from their shared resources, so your wrong about Sarah, she certainly continued the program and even got an increase just like my taxes for everything went up, but I am curious about something:
Explain how it is welfare for the people of Alaska to get a share of the profit from Alaska's resources?
Here in Florida I do not pay a State income tax because my State has higher taxes on the vacation industry, this is how all Floridians get to benefit from things like Disney World being in our State. I don't consider this to be welfare but instead part of the benefits that go with the downside of having so many dumb assed northern idiots clogging up my roads when I want to go somewhere.
So let's take this step by step and you tell me where you see a problem starting in the process:
1 - Alaska has a lot of oil in the ground.
2 - The people of Alaska through their State Government owns and controls access to that oil.
3 - The State negotiates with companies who want the oil to give the people of Alaska some compensation for their State resource being taken away and sold.
4 - The companies can say no if they feel the deal is not fair.
5 - The oil companies get the oil and the people of Alaska get compensated for the loss of the resource.
Where do you see the problem Hugo?
Do you believe a private company should get all that oil for free?