California is ****ED! USGS Says 99.7% Chance of Big Earthquake in Next 30 Years!

P

Patriot Games

Guest
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,351252,00.html

USGS: California Has 99.7 Percent Chance of Big Earthquake in Next 30 Years
Monday, April 14, 2008

LOS ANGELES - California - the land of sun, beaches and earthquakes - faces
an almost certain risk of being rocked by a strong temblor by 2037,
scientists said Monday in the first statewide forecast of the seismic
threat.

New calculations reveal there is a 99.7 percent chance a magnitude 6.7 quake
or larger will hit the Golden State in the next 30 years.

The odds of such an event are higher in Southern California than Northern
California, 97 percent versus 93 percent.

The last time a jolt this size rattled California was the 1994 Northridge
disaster, which measured 6.7 on the Richter scale, killed 72 people, injured
more than 9,000 and caused $25 billion in damage.

"It basically guarantees it's going to happen," said Ned Field, a
seismologist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Pasadena and lead author of
the report.

[That in itself's kind of a no-brainer. There have been at least five major
California earthquakes since 1970. The strongest, the 1993 Landers quake,
measured 7.3 but occurred in a remote area, as did the 7.1 Hector Mine quake
in the Mojave Desert. The 1989 Loma Prieta quake in the Bay Area, which
killed 67 people, also measured 7.1.]

Despite the new results, scientists still cannot predict exactly where in
the state such a quake will occur or when. But they say it should be a
wake-up call for residents to prepare for a natural disaster in earthquake
country.

"A big earthquake can happen tomorrow or it can happen 10 years from now,"
said Tom Jordan, director of the Southern California Earthquake Center at
the University of Southern California, who was part of the research.

California is one of the most seismically active regions in the world. More
than 300 faults crisscross the state, which sits atop two of the Earth's
major tectonic plates, the Pacific and North American plates.

About 10,000 quakes each year rattle Southern California alone, although
most of them are too small to be felt.

Knowing the likelihood of a strong earthquake is the first step in allowing
scientists to draw up hazard maps that show the severity of ground shaking
to an area.

The information can also help with updating building codes and emergency
plans and setting earthquake insurance rates.

The latest analysis is the first comprehensive effort by the USGS, SCEC and
California Geological Survey to calculate earthquake probabilities for the
entire state using newly available data.

Previous quake probabilities focused on specific regions and used various
methodologies that made it difficult to compare.

In the study, researchers computed the likelihood of a fault rupture using
new information about where past quakes have struck, location of
hard-to-spot faults and their slip rates as well as satellite-based GPS data
of the Earth's crustal movement.

Scientists determined a Northridge-size shock occurs on average once every
five years. The chance of a temblor that size striking the Los Angeles Basin
is 67 percent compared to 63 percent for the San Francisco Bay Area.

The San Francisco figure is similar to a 2003 analysis that put the
probability at 62 percent. There is no past comparison that exists for Los
Angeles.

Given California's seismic history, the new results should come as no
surprise, said David Schwartz, a USGS geologist in Menlo Park who was not
part of the study.

Researchers also calculated the statewide probabilities for larger temblors
over the same time period. Among their findings: There is a 94 percent
chance of a magnitude 7 shock or higher; a 46 percent chance of a magnitude
7.5 and a 4.5 percent chance of a magnitude 8.

Of all the faults in the state, the southern San Andreas, which runs from
Parkfield to the Salton Sea, appears most primed to break, scientists found.

There is a 59 percent chance in the next three decades that a
Northridge-size quake will occur on the fault compared to 21 percent for the
northern section.

The northern San Andreas produced the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, a
recent disaster in geologic time compared to the southernmost segment, which
has not popped in more than three centuries.

Scientists are also concerned about the Hayward and San Jacinto faults,
which have a 31 percent chance of producing a Northridge-size temblor in the
next 30 years.

The Hayward fault runs through densely populated cities in the San Francisco
Bay Area. The San Jacinto fault bisects the fast-growing city of San
Bernardino.
 
On Apr 14, 3:53 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,351252,00.html
>
> USGS: California Has 99.7 Percent Chance of Big Earthquake in Next 30 Years
> Monday, April 14, 2008
>
> LOS ANGELES - California - the land of sun, beaches and earthquakes - faces
> an almost certain risk of being rocked by a strong temblor by 2037,
> scientists said Monday in the first statewide forecast of the seismic
> threat.
>
> New calculations reveal there is a 99.7 percent chance a magnitude 6.7 quake
> or larger will hit the Golden State in the next 30 years.
>
> The odds of such an event are higher in Southern California than Northern
> California, 97 percent versus 93 percent.
>
> The last time a jolt this size rattled California was the 1994 Northridge
> disaster, which measured 6.7 on the Richter scale, killed 72 people, injured
> more than 9,000 and caused $25 billion in damage.
>
> "It basically guarantees it's going to happen," said Ned Field, a
> seismologist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Pasadena and lead author of
> the report.
>
> [That in itself's kind of a no-brainer. There have been at least five major
> California earthquakes since 1970. The strongest, the 1993 Landers quake,
> measured 7.3 but occurred in a remote area, as did the 7.1 Hector Mine quake
> in the Mojave Desert. The 1989 Loma Prieta quake in the Bay Area, which
> killed 67 people, also measured 7.1.]
>
> Despite the new results, scientists still cannot predict exactly where in
> the state such a quake will occur or when. But they say it should be a
> wake-up call for residents to prepare for a natural disaster in earthquake
> country.
>
> "A big earthquake can happen tomorrow or it can happen 10 years from now,"
> said Tom Jordan, director of the Southern California Earthquake Center at
> the University of Southern California, who was part of the research.
>
> California is one of the most seismically active regions in the world. More
> than 300 faults crisscross the state, which sits atop two of the Earth's
> major tectonic plates, the Pacific and North American plates.
>
> About 10,000 quakes each year rattle Southern California alone, although
> most of them are too small to be felt.
>
> Knowing the likelihood of a strong earthquake is the first step in allowing
> scientists to draw up hazard maps that show the severity of ground shaking
> to an area.
>
> The information can also help with updating building codes and emergency
> plans and setting earthquake insurance rates.
>
> The latest analysis is the first comprehensive effort by the USGS, SCEC and
> California Geological Survey to calculate earthquake probabilities for the
> entire state using newly available data.
>
> Previous quake probabilities focused on specific regions and used various
> methodologies that made it difficult to compare.
>
> In the study, researchers computed the likelihood of a fault rupture using
> new information about where past quakes have struck, location of
> hard-to-spot faults and their slip rates as well as satellite-based GPS data
> of the Earth's crustal movement.
>
> Scientists determined a Northridge-size shock occurs on average once every
> five years. The chance of a temblor that size striking the Los Angeles Basin
> is 67 percent compared to 63 percent for the San Francisco Bay Area.
>
> The San Francisco figure is similar to a 2003 analysis that put the
> probability at 62 percent. There is no past comparison that exists for Los
> Angeles.
>
> Given California's seismic history, the new results should come as no
> surprise, said David Schwartz, a USGS geologist in Menlo Park who was not
> part of the study.
>
> Researchers also calculated the statewide probabilities for larger temblors
> over the same time period. Among their findings: There is a 94 percent
> chance of a magnitude 7 shock or higher; a 46 percent chance of a magnitude
> 7.5 and a 4.5 percent chance of a magnitude 8.
>
> Of all the faults in the state, the southern San Andreas, which runs from
> Parkfield to the Salton Sea, appears most primed to break, scientists found.
>
> There is a 59 percent chance in the next three decades that a
> Northridge-size quake will occur on the fault compared to 21 percent for the
> northern section.
>
> The northern San Andreas produced the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, a
> recent disaster in geologic time compared to the southernmost segment, which
> has not popped in more than three centuries.
>
> Scientists are also concerned about the Hayward and San Jacinto faults,
> which have a 31 percent chance of producing a Northridge-size temblor in the
> next 30 years.
>
> The Hayward fault runs through densely populated cities in the San Francisco
> Bay Area. The San Jacinto fault bisects the fast-growing city of San
> Bernardino.


I hope you're not thrilled by that, as CA has a gigantic economy by
itself and also contributes a lot to the defense industry.
 
"Osiris88" <indexai@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cbf1d542-2ba6-445a-8b32-84d7e2390a02@a9g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 14, 3:53 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,351252,00.html
>> USGS: California Has 99.7 Percent Chance of Big Earthquake in Next 30
>> Years
>> Monday, April 14, 2008

> I hope you're not thrilled by that


Not quite. If the earthquake could be configured to take out Marin County,
San Francisco, Berkeley, etc. while leaving other parts untouched I'd then
be thrilled.

Right now I'd have to say I'm pleasantly surprised.

> as CA has a gigantic economy by itself


And "by itself" is the key point. How much does that economy help the rest
of America?

> and also contributes a lot to the defense industry.


That's easy to relocate. And given this USGS report we'll probably start
doing that soon.
 
On Apr 15, 8:06 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> "Osiris88" <inde...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:cbf1d542-2ba6-445a-8b32-84d7e2390a02@a9g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Apr 14, 3:53 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> >>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,351252,00.html
> >> USGS: California Has 99.7 Percent Chance of Big Earthquake in Next 30
> >> Years
> >> Monday, April 14, 2008

> > I hope you're not thrilled by that

>
> Not quite. If the earthquake could be configured to take out Marin County,
> San Francisco, Berkeley, etc. while leaving other parts untouched I'd then
> be thrilled.
>
> Right now I'd have to say I'm pleasantly surprised.
>
> > as CA has a gigantic economy by itself

>
> And "by itself" is the key point. How much does that economy help the rest
> of America?
>
> > and also contributes a lot to the defense industry.

>
> That's easy to relocate. And given this USGS report we'll probably start
> doing that soon.


You know those people in San Francisco that you hate? They are fellow
Americans, too. Maybe they are confused about whatever politics in
our minds, but they are still Americans.
 
"Osiris88" <indexai@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e7d5c1ed-7135-458f-89c1-82d551ecb697@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 15, 8:06 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> "Osiris88" <inde...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:cbf1d542-2ba6-445a-8b32-84d7e2390a02@a9g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
>> > On Apr 14, 3:53 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> >>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,351252,00.html
>> >> USGS: California Has 99.7 Percent Chance of Big Earthquake in Next 30
>> >> Years
>> >> Monday, April 14, 2008
>> > I hope you're not thrilled by that

>> Not quite. If the earthquake could be configured to take out Marin
>> County,
>> San Francisco, Berkeley, etc. while leaving other parts untouched I'd
>> then
>> be thrilled.
>> Right now I'd have to say I'm pleasantly surprised.
>> > as CA has a gigantic economy by itself

>> And "by itself" is the key point. How much does that economy help the
>> rest
>> of America?
>> > and also contributes a lot to the defense industry.

>> That's easy to relocate. And given this USGS report we'll probably start
>> doing that soon.

> You know those people in San Francisco that you hate?


Not personally, but I know who you're talking about.

> They are fellow Americans, too.


So was Jeffrey Dahmer.

So was the Unibomber.

> Maybe they are confused about whatever politics in
> our minds, but they are still Americans.


So?
 
On Apr 15, 4:21 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> "Osiris88" <inde...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:e7d5c1ed-7135-458f-89c1-82d551ecb697@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Apr 15, 8:06 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> >> "Osiris88" <inde...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:cbf1d542-2ba6-445a-8b32-84d7e2390a02@a9g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
> >> > On Apr 14, 3:53 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> >> >>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,351252,00.html
> >> >> USGS: California Has 99.7 Percent Chance of Big Earthquake in Next 30
> >> >> Years
> >> >> Monday, April 14, 2008
> >> > I hope you're not thrilled by that
> >> Not quite. If the earthquake could be configured to take out Marin
> >> County,
> >> San Francisco, Berkeley, etc. while leaving other parts untouched I'd
> >> then
> >> be thrilled.
> >> Right now I'd have to say I'm pleasantly surprised.
> >> > as CA has a gigantic economy by itself
> >> And "by itself" is the key point. How much does that economy help the
> >> rest
> >> of America?
> >> > and also contributes a lot to the defense industry.
> >> That's easy to relocate. And given this USGS report we'll probably start
> >> doing that soon.

> > You know those people in San Francisco that you hate?

>
> Not personally, but I know who you're talking about.
>
> > They are fellow Americans, too.

>
> So was Jeffrey Dahmer.
>
> So was the Unibomber.
>
> > Maybe they are confused about whatever politics in
> > our minds, but they are still Americans.

>
> So?


You're not actually comparing liberals and homosexuals to Dahmer, are
you?
 
"Osiris88" <indexai@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24fe1c6b-2699-4463-a7b7-eade45ff6eeb@q1g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 15, 4:21 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> "Osiris88" <inde...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:e7d5c1ed-7135-458f-89c1-82d551ecb697@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> > On Apr 15, 8:06 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> >> "Osiris88" <inde...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>news:cbf1d542-2ba6-445a-8b32-84d7e2390a02@a9g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
>> >> > On Apr 14, 3:53 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> >> >>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,351252,00.html
>> >> >> USGS: California Has 99.7 Percent Chance of Big Earthquake in Next
>> >> >> 30
>> >> >> Years
>> >> >> Monday, April 14, 2008
>> >> > I hope you're not thrilled by that
>> >> Not quite. If the earthquake could be configured to take out Marin
>> >> County,
>> >> San Francisco, Berkeley, etc. while leaving other parts untouched I'd
>> >> then
>> >> be thrilled.
>> >> Right now I'd have to say I'm pleasantly surprised.
>> >> > as CA has a gigantic economy by itself
>> >> And "by itself" is the key point. How much does that economy help the
>> >> rest
>> >> of America?
>> >> > and also contributes a lot to the defense industry.
>> >> That's easy to relocate. And given this USGS report we'll probably
>> >> start
>> >> doing that soon.
>> > You know those people in San Francisco that you hate?

>> Not personally, but I know who you're talking about.
>> > They are fellow Americans, too.

>> So was Jeffrey Dahmer.
>> So was the Unibomber.
>> > Maybe they are confused about whatever politics in
>> > our minds, but they are still Americans.

>> So?

> You're not actually comparing liberals and homosexuals to Dahmer, are
> you?


Why not? You did. (And he was a fag.)

You seem to think that being an American is without DUTY, without
OBLIGATION, without responsibilities.

This is where you're wrong. You cease being a full-fledged American when
you become a criminal. We prove that by taking away their right to vote.

You also cease to be a full-fledged American when your actions (even
including your words) are ANTI-American. Every Democrat who supported
Amnesty for Criminal Illegals was directly and personally violating the Rule
of Law in America. That IS anti-American. They should ALL be striped of
their right to vote.

When America's military is in a foreign country in harm's way, no matter how
it started, no matter why it started, if you DO NOT support our troops you
are directly and personally fighting against America. That IS
anti-American. They should ALL be striped of their right to vote.

Millions of foreigners never had to be told what duties and obligations and
responsibilities came WITH being an American. They left their homeland to
come here to BE Americans. They didn't just want to be IN our country they
wanted to be US. And they did. And we're the most powerful nation that has
ever existed for it.

Today, tens of millions of foreigners don't want to be Americans, they just
want to be here, and they're supported by tens of millions of Americans WHO
HAVE NO IDEA who or what America is because they are essentially
ANTI-Americans.

If it takes an earthquake to get rid of some of them I'm all for it!

(I'm NOT missing them already.)
 
Back
Top