Guest - Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 fucken ******s ... ==================================================== http://www.halturnershow.com/index.html Published January 23, 2007 10:00 AM EST CANADIAN PIG FARMER ADMITS MURDERING 49 WOMEN! CHOPPED THEM UP AND FED THEM TO HIS PIGS! Last week, we read stories about how pigs have become infected with "brain worms" which can spread to humans! Now, we get this story about a malfunctioning White man who fed his pigs the bodies of women he murdered. Still think eating ham and bacon is a good idea? I don't. Click Here http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2561059,00.html -------------------------------------------------------- The Times January 23, 2007 Pig farmer admitted killing 49 women, say prosecutors James Bone in New York Pickton: allegedly wanted to push his murder tally to 50 A Canadian pig farmer on trial for killing dozens of women and feeding them to his animals told police that he was planning one final murder to bring his tally to an "even 50", the prosecutor said. At the start of what promises to be a gory year-long trial, Derrill Prevett, representing the Crown, told the court in Vancouver that Robert "Willie" Pickton had confessed to killing 49 women. Mr Pickton told police, including an undercover officer planted in his cell, that he was plotting his last kill to reach a half-century before he "shut it down", the prosecutor said. "I was going to do one more and make it an even 50," Mr Prevett quoted the pig farmer as telling investigators. "I made my own grave by being sloppy." Mr Pickton, 56, has pleaded not guilty to 26 counts of first-degree murder in Canada's worst serial-killing case. Prosecutors said that he lured the women - mostly prostitutes and drug addicts from Vancouver's red-light district - to his family's 17-acre pig farm, nicknamed the Piggy Palace, where he threw wild parties. Among the women Mr Pickton is accused of killing is Sarah de Vries, a prostitute who disappeared in 1998 when she was 28. A 1995 entry in her diary revealed that she feared for her life after women began disappearing. "Am I next," she wrote. "Is he watching me now? Is he stalking me like a predator and his prey?" "The Crown will say that over the course of several years he had these women to his farm," Mr Prevett told the court. "There he murdered them, butchered their remains and disposed of them. He had the expertise and the equipment for the task. He had the means of transportation available and the means for the disposal of the remains." Mr Pickton was arrested in February 2002 when police visited his farm to search for an unlicensed shotgun and found an asthma inhaler and identification cards belonging to some of the missing women. Investigators believed that Mr Pickton disposed of most of the bodies in a wood-chipper and fed them to his pigs. Police were said to have discovered the severed hands and feet, as well as the heads of two women, in buckets in the freezer. "The heads of the individuals had been cut in two, vertically," Mr Prevett said. "With the skulls were left and right hands and the front parts of the left and right feet." Both skulls had bullet wounds caused by .22-calibre bullets, he said. Investigators found a Smith & Wesson rifle covered in plastic. Attached was a sex toy that had traces of DNA from Mr Pickton and one of the victims. Mr Pickton is being tried on the first six counts, after Justice James Williams ruled that the other 20 charges should be heard in a later trial to avoid overburdening the jury. Peter Ritchie, for the defence, told the jury that Mr Pickton did not kill or participate in the murders of any of the six women. 2007 Times Newspapers Ltd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Captain Compassion Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:44:51 GMT, jazzerciser@hotmail.com (-) wrote: > > fucken ******s ... > >==================================================== > >http://www.halturnershow.com/index.html > >Published January 23, 2007 10:00 AM EST > >CANADIAN PIG FARMER ADMITS MURDERING 49 WOMEN! >CHOPPED THEM UP AND FED THEM TO HIS PIGS! > >Last week, we read stories about how pigs have become infected with >"brain worms" which can spread to humans! Now, we get this story about >a malfunctioning White man who fed his pigs the bodies of women he >murdered. Still think eating ham and bacon is a good idea? I don't. > I certainly will lay off the eggs benedict for a while. > >Click Here >http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2561059,00.html >-------------------------------------------------------- > > >The Times January 23, 2007 > > >Pig farmer admitted killing 49 women, say prosecutors >James Bone in New York > > > > > Pickton: allegedly wanted to push his murder tally to 50 > > >A Canadian pig farmer on trial for killing dozens of women and feeding >them to his animals told police that he was planning one final murder >to bring his tally to an "even 50", the prosecutor said. At the start >of what promises to be a gory year-long trial, Derrill Prevett, >representing the Crown, told the court in Vancouver that Robert >"Willie" Pickton had confessed to killing 49 women. > >Mr Pickton told police, including an undercover officer planted in his >cell, that he was plotting his last kill to reach a half-century >before he "shut it down", the prosecutor said. > > > >"I was going to do one more and make it an even 50," Mr Prevett quoted >the pig farmer as telling investigators. "I made my own grave by being >sloppy." Mr Pickton, 56, has pleaded not guilty to 26 counts of >first-degree murder in Canada's worst serial-killing case. Prosecutors >said that he lured the women - mostly prostitutes and drug addicts >from Vancouver's red-light district - to his family's 17-acre pig >farm, nicknamed the Piggy Palace, where he threw wild parties. > >Among the women Mr Pickton is accused of killing is Sarah de Vries, a >prostitute who disappeared in 1998 when she was 28. A 1995 entry in >her diary revealed that she feared for her life after women began >disappearing. "Am I next," she wrote. "Is he watching me now? Is he >stalking me like a predator and his prey?" "The Crown will say that >over the course of several years he had these women to his farm," Mr >Prevett told the court. "There he murdered them, butchered their >remains and disposed of them. He had the expertise and the equipment >for the task. He had the means of transportation available and the >means for the disposal of the remains." > >Mr Pickton was arrested in February 2002 when police visited his farm >to search for an unlicensed shotgun and found an asthma inhaler and >identification cards belonging to some of the missing women. > >Investigators believed that Mr Pickton disposed of most of the bodies >in a wood-chipper and fed them to his pigs. Police were said to have >discovered the severed hands and feet, as well as the heads of two >women, in buckets in the freezer. "The heads of the individuals had >been cut in two, vertically," Mr Prevett said. "With the skulls were >left and right hands and the front parts of the left and right feet." > >Both skulls had bullet wounds caused by .22-calibre bullets, he said. >Investigators found a Smith & Wesson rifle covered in plastic. >Attached was a sex toy that had traces of DNA from Mr Pickton and one >of the victims. > >Mr Pickton is being tried on the first six counts, after Justice James >Williams ruled that the other 20 charges should be heard in a later >trial to avoid overburdening the jury. > >Peter Ritchie, for the defence, told the jury that Mr Pickton did not >kill or participate in the murders of any of the six women. > > > > > > >2007 Times Newspapers Ltd. > > > > > > -- Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS "There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is impossible." -- Jack Vance "Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant. "Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life. --Will Durant Joseph R. Darancette daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest z Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 - wrote: > fucken ******s ... > > ==================================================== > > http://www.halturnershow.com/index.html Not to rain on the parade of you or the inimitable mr. turner, but this guy looks like a good Aryan Master Race type. <http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/articlenews.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2007-01-23T001038Z_01_N22406556_RTRUKOC_0_UK-KILLINGS.xml> <http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2561059,00.html> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Scotius Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:44:51 GMT, jazzerciser@hotmail.com (-) wrote: > > fucken ******s ... > You are such an imbecile. Do you know what the ratio of Black serial killers to White ones is? Do a little research you fuckwit. And how did you discern that the guy is Black? Even the racist Hal Turner called him a "malfunctioning White man". What an imbecile, just like you ... no wonder you listen to his show. How is it that when it's a White guy he "malfunctioned", and when it's a Black guy he's a "******", moron? >==================================================== > >http://www.halturnershow.com/index.html > >Published January 23, 2007 10:00 AM EST > >CANADIAN PIG FARMER ADMITS MURDERING 49 WOMEN! >CHOPPED THEM UP AND FED THEM TO HIS PIGS! > >Last week, we read stories about how pigs have become infected with >"brain worms" which can spread to humans! Now, we get this story about >a malfunctioning White man who fed his pigs the bodies of women he >murdered. Still think eating ham and bacon is a good idea? I don't. > > >Click Here >http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2561059,00.html >-------------------------------------------------------- > > >The Times January 23, 2007 > > >Pig farmer admitted killing 49 women, say prosecutors >James Bone in New York > > > > > Pickton: allegedly wanted to push his murder tally to 50 > > >A Canadian pig farmer on trial for killing dozens of women and feeding >them to his animals told police that he was planning one final murder >to bring his tally to an "even 50", the prosecutor said. At the start >of what promises to be a gory year-long trial, Derrill Prevett, >representing the Crown, told the court in Vancouver that Robert >"Willie" Pickton had confessed to killing 49 women. > >Mr Pickton told police, including an undercover officer planted in his >cell, that he was plotting his last kill to reach a half-century >before he "shut it down", the prosecutor said. > > > >"I was going to do one more and make it an even 50," Mr Prevett quoted >the pig farmer as telling investigators. "I made my own grave by being >sloppy." Mr Pickton, 56, has pleaded not guilty to 26 counts of >first-degree murder in Canada's worst serial-killing case. Prosecutors >said that he lured the women - mostly prostitutes and drug addicts >from Vancouver's red-light district - to his family's 17-acre pig >farm, nicknamed the Piggy Palace, where he threw wild parties. > >Among the women Mr Pickton is accused of killing is Sarah de Vries, a >prostitute who disappeared in 1998 when she was 28. A 1995 entry in >her diary revealed that she feared for her life after women began >disappearing. "Am I next," she wrote. "Is he watching me now? Is he >stalking me like a predator and his prey?" "The Crown will say that >over the course of several years he had these women to his farm," Mr >Prevett told the court. "There he murdered them, butchered their >remains and disposed of them. He had the expertise and the equipment >for the task. He had the means of transportation available and the >means for the disposal of the remains." > >Mr Pickton was arrested in February 2002 when police visited his farm >to search for an unlicensed shotgun and found an asthma inhaler and >identification cards belonging to some of the missing women. > >Investigators believed that Mr Pickton disposed of most of the bodies >in a wood-chipper and fed them to his pigs. Police were said to have >discovered the severed hands and feet, as well as the heads of two >women, in buckets in the freezer. "The heads of the individuals had >been cut in two, vertically," Mr Prevett said. "With the skulls were >left and right hands and the front parts of the left and right feet." > >Both skulls had bullet wounds caused by .22-calibre bullets, he said. >Investigators found a Smith & Wesson rifle covered in plastic. >Attached was a sex toy that had traces of DNA from Mr Pickton and one >of the victims. > >Mr Pickton is being tried on the first six counts, after Justice James >Williams ruled that the other 20 charges should be heard in a later >trial to avoid overburdening the jury. > >Peter Ritchie, for the defence, told the jury that Mr Pickton did not >kill or participate in the murders of any of the six women. > > > > > > >2007 Times Newspapers Ltd. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest - Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 >> fucken ******s ... Scotius <wolvzbro@mnsi.net> wrote: > You are such an imbecile. Do you know what the ratio of Black > serial killers to White ones is? Do a little research you fuckwit. What the fuck does any of that have to do with this? > And how did you discern that the guy is Black? Ever try clicking on a link to the news webpage with his photo? > Even the racist Hal Turner called him a "malfunctioning White man". > What an imbecile, just like you ... no wonder you listen to his show. His show is "pay to listen" (which I don't) unless he gets cyberattacked by malfunctioning gay homosexual semites. > How is it that when it's a White guy he "malfunctioned", and > when it's a Black guy he's a "******", moron? Well, if he were white he'd be a "wigger", you lesson. - regards - jb ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Click Here ( 4 foto o' da bleck niggah who dun it ... ) >> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2561059,00.html ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrick Keenan Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 "-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:45b6a4e8.2362066101@news.isomedia.com... > >>> fucken ******s ... .... said in reference to a White man. > > Scotius <wolvzbro@mnsi.net> wrote: >> You are such an imbecile. Do you know what the ratio of Black >> serial killers to White ones is? Do a little research you fuckwit. > > > What the fuck does any of that have to do with this? > > > >> And how did you discern that the guy is Black? > > > Ever try clicking on a link to the news webpage with his photo? Yes. He's a White man, and his White family has owned land there since at least 1905. Of course, if you base your racial criteria on one bad photo ... it's no wonder racialists have such a hard time defining who's White and who isn't. >> Even the racist Hal Turner called him a "malfunctioning White man". >> What an imbecile, just like you ... no wonder you listen to his show. > > > His show is "pay to listen" (which I don't) unless he gets > cyberattacked by malfunctioning gay homosexual semites. > > > >> How is it that when it's a White guy he "malfunctioned", and >> when it's a Black guy he's a "******", moron? > > > Well, if he were white he'd be a "wigger", you lesson. And he is White, as is his family. -pk > > - regards > - jb > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Click Here ( 4 foto o' da bleck niggah who dun it ... ) >>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2561059,00.html > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Scotius Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:20:02 GMT, jazzerciser@hotmail.com (-) wrote: > >>> fucken ******s ... > >Scotius <wolvzbro@mnsi.net> wrote: >> You are such an imbecile. Do you know what the ratio of Black >> serial killers to White ones is? Do a little research you fuckwit. > > > What the fuck does any of that have to do with this? > > > >> And how did you discern that the guy is Black? > > > Ever try clicking on a link to the news webpage with his photo? > > > >> Even the racist Hal Turner called him a "malfunctioning White man". >> What an imbecile, just like you ... no wonder you listen to his show. > > > His show is "pay to listen" (which I don't) unless he gets > cyberattacked by malfunctioning gay homosexual semites. > > > >> How is it that when it's a White guy he "malfunctioned", and >> when it's a Black guy he's a "******", moron? > > > Well, if he were white he'd be a "wigger", you lesson. > > > > - regards > - jb > >----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Click Here ( 4 foto o' da bleck niggah who dun it ... ) >>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2561059,00.html >----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well, pardon me if I missed something, but then I'm not the guy who writes "fucken Jews" at the top of many posts that have nothing to do with Jews, am I? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Scotius Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:05:42 -0500, "Patrick Keenan" <test@dev.null> wrote: >"-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:45b6a4e8.2362066101@news.isomedia.com... >> >>>> fucken ******s ... > >... said in reference to a White man. > >> >> Scotius <wolvzbro@mnsi.net> wrote: >>> You are such an imbecile. Do you know what the ratio of Black >>> serial killers to White ones is? Do a little research you fuckwit. >> >> >> What the fuck does any of that have to do with this? >> >> >> >>> And how did you discern that the guy is Black? >> >> >> Ever try clicking on a link to the news webpage with his photo? > >Yes. He's a White man, and his White family has owned land there since at >least 1905. > >Of course, if you base your racial criteria on one bad photo ... it's no >wonder racialists have such a hard time defining who's White and who isn't. > > >>> Even the racist Hal Turner called him a "malfunctioning White man". >>> What an imbecile, just like you ... no wonder you listen to his show. >> >> >> His show is "pay to listen" (which I don't) unless he gets >> cyberattacked by malfunctioning gay homosexual semites. >> >> >> >>> How is it that when it's a White guy he "malfunctioned", and >>> when it's a Black guy he's a "******", moron? >> >> >> Well, if he were white he'd be a "wigger", you lesson. > >And he is White, as is his family. > Looks like I wasn't wrong then, and " - " is as much of a f kwit as I thought. Glad to see someone else notices. >-pk > >> >> - regards >> - jb >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Click Here ( 4 foto o' da bleck niggah who dun it ... ) >>>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2561059,00.html >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sorcerer Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 "Scotius" <wolvzbro@mnsi.net> wrote in message news:7k2dr2pkchh6rsh4h8ufubo1sfrocqtrp8@4ax.com... > On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:44:51 GMT, jazzerciser@hotmail.com (-) wrote: > >> >> fucken ******s ... >> > > You are such an imbecile. Do you know what the ratio of Black > serial killers to White ones is? Do a little research you fuckwit. And > how did you discern that the guy is Black? Even the racist Hal Turner > called him a "malfunctioning White man". What an imbecile, just like > you ... no wonder you listen to his show. > How is it that when it's a White guy he "malfunctioned", and > when it's a Black guy he's a "******", moron? > He is a white, sadistic, pig farmer. He dismembered all of his victims. In court yesterday it was revealed that he had cut 3 human heads in half. Hands and feet were found in the freezer. I am sure the black folks he will meet in prison will give him a hand in the shower! I live here in Vancouver and everyone here wants a piece of him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest - Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 >>> Scotius <wolvzbro@mnsi.net> wrote: >>>> And how did you discern that the guy is Black? >> "-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> Ever try clicking on a link to the news webpage with his photo? > "Patrick Keenan" <test@dev.null> wrote: >> Yes. He's a White man, and his White family has owned land >> there since at least 1905. What does having a "White family" with "land ownership" since 1905 have to do with his own skin color? He could have been a slave. >> Of course, if you base your racial criteria on one bad photo ... it's no >> wonder racialists have such a hard time defining who's White and who isn't. Why do you say it is a "bad photo" ? Is that because you hate ******s? >>>> How is it that when it's a White guy he "malfunctioned", and >>>> when it's a Black guy he's a "******", moron? >>> Well, if he were white he'd be a "wigger", you lesson. >> And he is White, as is his family. Strong sepia tones in the published photo -proved- his brown skin. > Looks like I wasn't wrong then, and " - " is as much of a > f kwit as I thought. Glad to see someone else notices. You'd be -proud- the guy is a "wigger" ? Who the fuck is a fuckwit? ----------------------------------------------------- "Scotius" <wolvzbro@mnsi.net> wrote: > Well, pardon me if I missed something, but then I'm not the > guy who writes "fucken Jews" at the top of many posts that have > nothing to do with Jews, am I? Cite ? He's a Nasty Wicked Pigger: makes him a "Nigger Wigger." - regards - jb ---------------------------------------------------------------- -( Official -brown- skinned photo ... )- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Pickton ---------------------------------------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:44:51 GMT, jazzerciser@hotmail.com (-) wrote: |> |>A Canadian pig farmer on trial for killing dozens of women and feeding |>them to his animals told police that he was planning one final murder |>to bring his tally to an "even 50", the prosecutor said. At the start |>of what promises to be a gory year-long trial, Derrill Prevett, |>representing the Crown, told the court in Vancouver that Robert |>"Willie" Pickton had confessed to killing 49 women. All pigs are like that...."real swingers"...."Wille" had a lot of Connections with the VPD, concerning vehicle transfers and other related aspects that led to the exchange of who had the DNA in 1st place....there's tons more in that can-o-worms.... |>Mr Pickton told police, including an undercover officer planted in his |>cell, that he was plotting his last kill to reach a half-century |>before he "shut it down", the prosecutor said. Another Gary "Green River" Ridgeway copy for all I care, although "Willie's" Cookie Jar full of his victim's eyeballs are an interesting touch of some strange macabre eccentricity.....they would look kewl if it was a glass jar of frozen eyeballs and held up to the sunlight....trippy colors???!??No? Some people live a very carefree life and I get hassled for having a gun permit...gimme a break...what next... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Vandar Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 - wrote: >>>>Scotius <wolvzbro@mnsi.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>And how did you discern that the guy is Black? > > >>>"-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>Ever try clicking on a link to the news webpage with his photo? > > >>"Patrick Keenan" <test@dev.null> wrote: >> >>>Yes. He's a White man, and his White family has owned land >>>there since at least 1905. > > > > What does having a "White family" with "land ownership" since > 1905 have to do with his own skin color? He could have been a slave. See a lot of white slaves in Canada, dumbass? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrick Keenan Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 "-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:45b6eef8.2381026254@news.isomedia.com... > >>>> Scotius <wolvzbro@mnsi.net> wrote: >>>>> And how did you discern that the guy is Black? > >>> "-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> Ever try clicking on a link to the news webpage with his photo? > >> "Patrick Keenan" <test@dev.null> wrote: >>> Yes. He's a White man, and his White family has owned land >>> there since at least 1905. > > > What does having a "White family" with "land ownership" since > 1905 have to do with his own skin color? He could have been a slave. Oh please. You don't know anything at all about Canada, either, do you? >>> Of course, if you base your racial criteria on one bad photo ... it's no >>> wonder racialists have such a hard time defining who's White and who >>> isn't. > > > Why do you say it is a "bad photo" ? Is that because you hate > ******s? Because it's a bad photo. It's carefully selected to not make you think of him as an upright, innocent, intelligent, wronged man. I've seem many other photos and courtroom sketches of him over the years this trial has been in preparation. This case may be news to you. It isn't to us or to the many people who have worked on the site sifting through the debris. They hired many archaeology students for it. Lots of people know about it - but you obviously aren't one of them. >>>>> How is it that when it's a White guy he "malfunctioned", and >>>>> when it's a Black guy he's a "******", moron? > >>>> Well, if he were white he'd be a "wigger", you lesson. > >>> And he is White, as is his family. > > > Strong sepia tones in the published photo -proved- his brown skin. One bad photo is all it takes for you to make a determination of "race". Looks like your racialist identification kit needs some updating. But then, this seems usual; claimed racialists will often exclude the children of accepted members of their group if they don't like their looks. This means they are not basing selection on race: their criteria is really aesthetics. And that makes them decorators, not racialists. > >> Looks like I wasn't wrong then, and " - " is as much of a >> f kwit as I thought. Glad to see someone else notices. > > > You'd be -proud- the guy is a "wigger" ? Who the fuck is a fuckwit? He's White, you called him a "******" based on one bad photo, and you have to ask who the fuckwit is? Always ready to reject one of your own, aren't you? -pk > ----------------------------------------------------- > "Scotius" <wolvzbro@mnsi.net> wrote: >> Well, pardon me if I missed something, but then I'm not the >> guy who writes "fucken Jews" at the top of many posts that have >> nothing to do with Jews, am I? > > > Cite ? He's a Nasty Wicked Pigger: makes him a "Nigger Wigger." > > > > > - regards > - jb > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > -( Official -brown- skinned photo ... )- > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Pickton > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrick Keenan Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 "Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:pALth.1258$ya1.1119@news02.roc.ny... >- wrote: > >>>>>Scotius <wolvzbro@mnsi.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>And how did you discern that the guy is Black? >> >> >>>>"-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Ever try clicking on a link to the news webpage with his photo? >> >> >>>"Patrick Keenan" <test@dev.null> wrote: >>> >>>>Yes. He's a White man, and his White family has owned land there since >>>>at least 1905. >> >> >> >> What does having a "White family" with "land ownership" since >> 1905 have to do with his own skin color? He could have been a >> slave. > > See a lot of white slaves in Canada, dumbass? Since slavery was finally abolished in the Empire in 1834, it's unlikely he'd see any slaves at all. One more example of his desperate ignorance. But typical of these racialists who base their judgements on aesthetics - they're really just decorators. -pk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest - Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote: > See a lot of white slaves in Canada, dumbass? A bit late for that today, aren't you? "Patrick Keenan" <test@dev.null> wrote: > You don't know anything at all about Canada, either, do you? I know that Canada does not tolerate diversity and multiculturalism. I know that Canada -persecuted- Ernest Zundel, an entrepreneur. >> Why do you say it is a "bad photo" ? Is that because you hate ******s? > Because it's a bad photo. It's carefully selected to not make you think > of him as an upright, innocent, intelligent, wronged man. Why would Canadian media agree to publish a "bad photo" ? Is that because they're concerned Canadians might arrive at the the wrong (politically incorrect) opinion? Obviously the Canadian media wants us to think of Robert "Willie" Pickton as a sepia ******. > I've seem many other photos and courtroom sketches of him over the > years this trial has been in preparation. > > This case may be news to you. It isn't to us or to the many people > who have worked on the site sifting through the debris. They hired > many archaeology students for it. Lots of people know about it - but > you obviously aren't one of them. How long does it take to figger out that the ****** fed bodies of his killed women to the pigs? This occurred in the TV series Deadwood. >> Strong sepia tones in the published photo -proved- his brown skin. > One bad photo is all it takes for you to make a determination of "race". > Looks like your racialist identification kit needs some updating. One bad photo is all it takes for Canadian media to create for us the impression that his skin is sepia-toned. So "Go to the Soruce." > But then, this seems usual; claimed racialists will often exclude the > children of accepted members of their group if they don't like their looks. > This means they are not basing selection on race: their criteria is really > aesthetics. > > And that makes them decorators, not racialists. So it's a bad idea to be an aestheticist ? What's your point ? >> You'd be -proud- the guy is a "wigger" ? Who the fuck is a fuckwit? > He's White, you called him a "******" based on one bad photo, > and you have to ask who the fuckwit is? > > Always ready to reject one of your own, aren't you? Nigger or wigger, one thing is for sure: he's a Canadian. - regards - jb ----------------------------------------------------------------- Windows is better than Linux ... http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/window-on-windows/?p=386&tag=nl.e103 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrick Keenan Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 "-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:45b7a06a.2426451873@news.isomedia.com... > > Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote: >> See a lot of white slaves in Canada, dumbass? > > > A bit late for that today, aren't you? > > > > "Patrick Keenan" <test@dev.null> wrote: >> You don't know anything at all about Canada, either, do you? > > > I know that Canada does not tolerate diversity and multiculturalism. You've obviously never been here. > I know that Canada -persecuted- Ernest Zundel, an entrepreneur. Apparently you don't know anything about that, either. And E.Z. made himself one of the things you rail against so often - an illegall alien in the USA. Are you going to celebrate his expulsion from the US and laud the INS for enforcing the law now? > > >>> Why do you say it is a "bad photo" ? Is that because you hate ******s? > >> Because it's a bad photo. It's carefully selected to not make you >> think >> of him as an upright, innocent, intelligent, wronged man. > > > Why would Canadian media agree to publish a "bad photo" ? Apparently you can't read. > Is that because they're concerned Canadians might arrive at the > the wrong (politically incorrect) opinion? What, that he's White? > Obviously the Canadian > media wants us to think of Robert "Willie" Pickton as a sepia ******. Yet, he's White. >> I've seem many other photos and courtroom sketches of him over the >> years this trial has been in preparation. >> >> This case may be news to you. It isn't to us or to the many people >> who have worked on the site sifting through the debris. They hired >> many archaeology students for it. Lots of people know about it - but >> you obviously aren't one of them. > > > How long does it take to figger out that the ****** fed bodies of his > killed women to the pigs? This occurred in the TV series Deadwood. And you rely on television for all of your information, do you? >>> Strong sepia tones in the published photo -proved- his brown skin. > >> One bad photo is all it takes for you to make a determination of "race". >> Looks like your racialist identification kit needs some updating. > > > One bad photo is all it takes for Canadian media to create for us > the impression that his skin is sepia-toned. So "Go to the Soruce." Which isn't that one photo. > >> But then, this seems usual; claimed racialists will often exclude the >> children of accepted members of their group if they don't like their >> looks. >> This means they are not basing selection on race: their criteria is >> really >> aesthetics. >> >> And that makes them decorators, not racialists. > > > So it's a bad idea to be an aestheticist ? What's your point ? Went right by you, I see. > > >>> You'd be -proud- the guy is a "wigger" ? Who the fuck is a fuckwit? > >> He's White, you called him a "******" based on one bad photo, >> and you have to ask who the fuckwit is? >> >> Always ready to reject one of your own, aren't you? > > > Nigger or wigger, one thing is for sure: he's a Canadian. And, he's White. -pk > > > - regards > - jb > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Windows is better than Linux ... > http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/window-on-windows/?p=386&tag=nl.e103 > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Vandar Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 - wrote: > Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>See a lot of white slaves in Canada, dumbass? > > > > A bit late for that today, aren't you? A bit ignorant every day, aren't you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Eric Blair Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 - jazzerciser@hotmail.com said: > I know that Canada does not tolerate diversity and multiculturalism. > I know that Canada -persecuted- Ernest Zundel, an entrepreneur. > Zundel is a Jew. You must be a Jew lover. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Way Back Jack Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 Scotius wolvzbro@mnsi.net said: > On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:44:51 GMT, jazzerciser@hotmail.com (-) wrote: > > > > > fucken ******s ... > > > > You are such an imbecile. Do you know what the ratio of Black > serial killers to White ones is? Do a little research you fuckwit. And > how did you discern that the guy is Black? Even the racist Hal Turner > called him a "malfunctioning White man". What an imbecile, just like > you ... no wonder you listen to his show. > How is it that when it's a White guy he "malfunctioned", and > when it's a Black guy he's a "******", moron? > hal turner is widely regarded as the smartest, most intelligent and best educated white man in the world. He doesn't make mistakes and he never lies. That's why thousands hang off his every utterance and look up to him as a role model for the white race. If Hal Turner says that the guy's a ******, he's got to be a ******. Hal says so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Binge Drinker Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 Patrick Keenan test@dev.null said: > > I know that Canada does not tolerate diversity and multiculturalism. > > You've obviously never been here. > > Hal Turner's never been anywhere either, and he knows all there is to know about everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest - Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 >> "Patrick Keenan" <test@dev.null> wrote: >>> You don't know anything at all about Canada, either, do you? > "-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote: >> I know that Canada does not tolerate diversity and multiculturalism. "Patrick Keenan" <test@dev.null> wrote: > You've obviously never been here. I'm always "here." And, by the way, I've been "there," too. >> I know that Canada -persecuted- Ernest Zundel, an entrepreneur. > Apparently you don't know anything about that, either. > And E.Z. made himself one of the things you rail against so often - > an illegall alien in the USA. Oh, how does one "make himself" an illegal alien? The U.S. Government decided what his status would be, not Ernest Zundel. > Are you going to celebrate his expulsion from the US and laud the > INS for enforcing the law now? Hey, Zundel was 42 years in Canada. His US visa was overdue. He could have returned to Canada to obtain another visa or extension. After 42 years Canada could have realized that Zundel was their own. Talk about Canada's "Statement of Human Rights and Freedoms" ! Canada wanted him back for more persecution, and the USA complied. >>>> Why do you say it is a "bad photo" ? Is that because you hate ******s? >>> Because it's a bad photo. It's carefully selected to not make you >>> think of him as an upright, innocent, intelligent, wronged man. >> Why would Canadian media agree to publish a "bad photo" ? > Apparently you can't read. Why would Canadian media agree to publish a "bad photo" ? >> Is that because they're concerned Canadians might arrive at the >> the wrong (politically incorrect) opinion? > What, that he's White? Why would Canadian media not want Pickton to be white ? >> Obviously the Canadian >> media wants us to think of Robert "Willie" Pickton as a sepia ******. > Yet, he's White. So the Canadian media wants us to view a sepia wigger? >> How long does it take to figger out that the ****** fed bodies of his >> killed women to the pigs? This occurred in the TV series Deadwood. > And you rely on television for all of your information, do you? Bzzzt. In Deadwood the pig owner was chinese, not a wigger or ******. >>>> Strong sepia tones in the published photo -proved- his brown skin. >>> One bad photo is all it takes for you to make a determination of "race". >>> Looks like your racialist identification kit needs some updating. >> One bad photo is all it takes for Canadian media to create for us >> the impression that his skin is sepia-toned. So "Go to the Soruce." > Which isn't that one photo. Hmmm. I thought that Canadian media might be your news source. >>> But then, this seems usual; claimed racialists will often exclude >>> the children of accepted members of their group if they don't like >>> their looks. This means they are not basing selection on race: >>> their criteria is really aesthetics. >>> And that makes them decorators, not racialists. >> So it's a bad idea to be an aestheticist ? What's your point ? > Went right by you, I see. What's your point ? >>>> You'd be -proud- the guy is a "wigger" ? Who the fuck is a fuckwit? >>> He's White, you called him a "******" based on one bad photo, >>> and you have to ask who the fuckwit is? >>> Always ready to reject one of your own, aren't you? >> Nigger or wigger, one thing is for sure: he's a Canadian. > And, he's White. Guess that you're -proud- of that fact, are you? -------------------------------------------------------------- > "-" jazzerciser@hotmail.com said: >> I know that Canada does not tolerate diversity and multiculturalism. >> I know that Canada -persecuted- Ernest Zundel, an entrepreneur. "Eric Blair" <blairian999@gmail.com> wrote: > Zundel is a Jew. You must be a Jew lover. Jews are persecuting Zundel. Is this what Jews do to themselves? ----------------------------------------------------------------- "Way Back Jack" <waybackjerk@aol.com> wrote: > If Hal Turner says that the guy's a ******, he's got to be a ******. > Hal says so. Where and when did Hal Turner say that ? ----------------------------------------------------------------- "Binge Drinker" <bingedrinker@aol.com> wrote: > Hal Turner's never been anywhere either, and he knows > all there is to know about everything. Hal Turner cites news media sources. What do you do? - regards - jb ---------------------------------------------------------------- Will Turkey Invade Iraq? http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=11402 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrick Keenan Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 "-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:45b7f5c3.2448301581@news.isomedia.com... > >>> "Patrick Keenan" <test@dev.null> wrote: >>>> You don't know anything at all about Canada, either, do you? > >> "-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> I know that Canada does not tolerate diversity and multiculturalism. > > "Patrick Keenan" <test@dev.null> wrote: >> You've obviously never been here. > > > I'm always "here." And, by the way, I've been "there," too. > > > >>> I know that Canada -persecuted- Ernest Zundel, an entrepreneur. > >> Apparently you don't know anything about that, either. >> And E.Z. made himself one of the things you rail against so often - >> an illegall alien in the USA. > > > Oh, how does one "make himself" an illegal alien? So you didn't pass the rocket science course. One does this by violating terms of entry into a country. In EZ's case, it was staying for nearly two years past the time he was permitted. > The U.S. > Government decided what his status would be, not Ernest Zundel. Ah, no. EZ decided to break US immigration law. He promised to leave within 90 days - and stayed. Just like many another illegal alien. Did the US government force him to stay? No, he chose to break the law and made himself an illegal alien, knowing that he'd agreed to summary deportation on apprehension. >> Are you going to celebrate his expulsion from the US and laud the >> INS for enforcing the law now? > > > Hey, Zundel was 42 years in Canada. So what? Does this somehow excuse his disregard of US law? He was and is a German citizen, not Canadian. He has the same obligations as any other German citizen at the US border. > His US visa was overdue. So you don't know about this either. He didn't have a US visa. He entered the US as a German citizen on the Visa Waiver program, and did not have a visa. And under the terms of a Visa Waiver, his status could not be changed and his stay could not be extended. He had to leave within 90 days or become illegal. The penalty for violation is summary deportation. EZ knew this because it's printed on the form he signed. > He could have returned to Canada to obtain another visa or extension. He said when leaving that he'd never return to Canada. Extensions are not available on the Visa Waiver program. This rule is clear. But since you don't know the circumstances around his expulsion for breaking US law, you might not know this. Yes, he should have left the US and gotten a proper visa. He chose not to; if he'd made the choice to respect US law, he could be living there now. He chose not to do this, he chose to violate the terms he agreed to; he chose to break US law, he chose to become an illegal alien. He wasn't forced. He agreed on entry to the consequences, and then told the INS where to pick him up. He was as illegal as any of the other people whose presence you resent. Perhaps not quite as smart, though. Are you going to laud the INS for enforcing your immigration law now? > After 42 years Canada could have realized that Zundel was their own. Why? He's a German citizen, not Canadian. > Talk about Canada's "Statement of Human Rights and Freedoms" ! What about it? And by the way, that's not the name of the document. > Canada wanted him back for more persecution, and the USA complied. Thanks for demonstrating your ignorance of the case. EZ was stupid enough to contact the INS and tell them where he was. Canada didn't want him at all. EZ wanted in. He asked for our protection, and that pretty much exludes the chance that he felt he would be persecuted here. The US just didn't want to pay to ship him to the country he's a citizen of - so they sent him to his port of entry, Canada. EZ could have walked across the border and gotten in a cab. He could then have gone to any country where he has friends... say, Libya. But instead, he chose to claim refugee status, which means automatic detention. He was detained, yes, but that is normal for refugee claimants, particularly post 9/11, particularly those with ties to violent groups and individuals, especially groups and individuals who have been involved in attempting the armed overthrow of governments, and having just been ejected from the US and barred re-entry for 20 years for breaking their laws doesn't help demonstrate good character either. And while he could have withdrawn his claim and walked, he chose to drag it out as long as he could. He stayed in detention much longer than necessary. It's odd that people claim that EZ was persecuted in Canada. Why would he seek refugee status in the very same country he allegedly suffered persecution? -pk <snippage> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest - Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 >>>> I know that Canada -persecuted- Ernest Zundel, an entrepreneur. >>> Apparently you don't know anything about that, either. >>> And E.Z. made himself one of the things you rail against so often - >>> an illegall alien in the USA. > "-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Oh, how does one "make himself" an illegal alien? "Patrick Keenan" <test@dev.null> wrote: > So you didn't pass the rocket science course. Something you don't understand about the U.S. Government. Quite possibly, Zundel (maybe "educated" by Canada), didn't understand, as well. Individuals before INS do not determine their own legal status. >> The U.S. >> Government decided what his status would be, not Ernest Zundel. > Ah, no. EZ decided to break US immigration law. He promised to leave > within 90 days - and stayed. Just like many another illegal alien. Whether EZ knowlingly broke US immigration law is beside the point. A determination, whether the law was broken or not, was made by INS and not by EZ. > Did the US government force him to stay? No, he chose to break the > law and made himself an illegal alien, knowing that he'd agreed to > summary deportation on apprehension. According to EZ's statements there was no intention to break a law. Instead it was determined by INS that EZ had broken a law, not by EZ. >> Hey, Zundel was 42 years in Canada. > So what? Does this somehow excuse his disregard of US law? Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Yet even the ignorant have rights. > He was and is a German citizen, not Canadian. He has the same > obligations as any other German citizen at the US border. That's your opinion, however there is a difference (also in law) between a German citizen recently arriving from Germany and a German citizen who has been residing in Canada for 42 years. >> His US visa was overdue. > So you don't know about this either. He didn't have a US visa. Sigh. We've been over this point in past discussions. The "visa waiver program" is not the waiver of a visa; it's a type of visa under the "visa waiver program" (all three words are the phrase). In other words EZ was granted temporary entry without satisfying other more stringent requirements for the ordinary visa. The term "visa" refers to the category of visitation granted. > He entered the US as a German citizen on the Visa Waiver program, > and did not have a visa. And under the terms of a Visa Waiver, his > status could not be changed and his stay could not be extended. > He had to leave within 90 days or become illegal. The penalty for > violation is summary deportation. EZ knew this because it's printed > on the form he signed. EZ did not become automatically illegal after 90 days. He became illegal after a determination by administrative law when his case came up for review. Perhaps in Canada your government acts in a non-thinking manner however that simply isn't the case for INS in the United States. There is no "summary deportation." There is an additional procedure for appeal, which EZ lost. >> He could have returned to Canada to obtain another visa or extension. > He said when leaving that he'd never return to Canada. He changed his mind. Surely that's not against the law, is it? > Extensions are not available on the Visa Waiver program. This rule is > clear. But since you don't know the circumstances around his expulsion > for breaking US law, you might not know this. I'll grant that, even after reading Zundel's statements and the statements by INS, one still doesn't -know- the "circumstances around his explusion." A lot of hand-waving and fluff, disguising something. Canada's concern with Zundel was related to claims of violence, albeit rather threadbare-to-nonexistent. Obviously, with situations like this Canadian Bacon farmer, Canada is rife with an underbelly of violence even without Zundel. So you can't blame Canadian Bacon on Zundel. > Yes, he should have left the US and gotten a proper visa. He chose not to; > if he'd made the choice to respect US law, he could be living there now. His early return to Canada seems to be greeted by the same reception as his return after forced explusion. Because Canada chose to keep persecuting Zundel, it's understandable why Zundel delays the dubious experience of being persecuted. Zundel could have gone to Mexico to obtain another entry permit (a visa under the "visa waiver program"). > He chose not to do this, he chose to violate the terms he agreed to; he > chose to break US law, he chose to become an illegal alien. He wasn't > forced. He agreed on entry to the consequences, and then told the INS > where to pick him up. He chose to be with his wife. Canada wanted to persecute him, so at INS Zundel became the object of international trade agreements. > He was as illegal as any of the other people whose presence you resent. > Perhaps not quite as smart, though. No. Unlike Hispanic illegals, Zundel was documented. That doesn't make -him- illegal; it merely makes his overstay illegal. If Zundel were never documented, like those Mexican illegals, he might stay in country. Why only some should be granted amnesty, but not all, is the contention. Canada is invited to accept the undocumented Hispanic illegals. > Are you going to laud the INS for enforcing your immigration law now? I'm going to point out the "obvious advantages" of being undocumented. Selective enforcement of immigration law against documented aliens is certainly not preferable to immigration law enforcement upon undocumented aliens. By not being documented they violated provisions more serious. The Zundel case sent a message to others never to become documented. >> After 42 years Canada could have realized that Zundel was their own. > Why? He's a German citizen, not Canadian. Well, the entire distinction between citizens and persons is at the heart of violating human rights and freedoms. Where somebody lives most of their life is a criterion more just and proper, perhaps. >> Talk about Canada's "Statement of Human Rights and Freedoms" ! > What about it? > And by the way, that's not the name of the document. If I don't know its magic words are rights and freedoms denied? >> Canada wanted him back for more persecution, and the USA complied. > Thanks for demonstrating your ignorance of the case. EZ was stupid > enough to contact the INS and tell them where he was. Canada didn't > want him at all. EZ wanted in. He asked for our protection, and that > pretty much exludes the chance that he felt he would be persecuted here. I see, by your account, that you regard it as stupid to contact the government. Which explains why Canadians live apart from the realities of government, and why so many Canadians feed dead women to pigs? INS was not too much concerned with Zundel until Canada made a big stink about having him back. You say Zundel was German. Why did INS take him to the Canadian border instead of sending him direct to Germany? Fact of the matter: Canada wanted more political persecution of Zundel. > The US just didn't want to pay to ship him to the country he's a citizen > of - so they sent him to his port of entry, Canada. EZ could have walked > across the border and gotten in a cab. He could then have gone to any > country where he has friends... say, Libya. But instead, he chose to claim > refugee status, which means automatic detention. So he's a mental case? Give him a straightjacket and a psychiatrist. A statement of human rights & freedoms does not persecute crazy people. If he's trying to misrepresent himself as crazy, then he's too clever. > He was detained, yes, but that is normal for refugee claimants, particularly > post 9/11, particularly those with ties to violent groups and individuals, > especially groups and individuals who have been involved in attempting the > armed overthrow of governments, and having just been ejected from the US > and barred re-entry for 20 years for breaking their laws doesn't help > demonstrate good character either. Bzzzzt! Zundel's website isn't causing rebellion and insurrection. You and I "have ties" to Zundel because we are discussing his case. > And while he could have withdrawn his claim and walked, he chose to > drag it out as long as he could. He stayed in detention much longer > than necessary. There's a prison industry, so what? Big bucks for the contractors. > It's odd that people claim that EZ was persecuted in Canada. Why would > he seek refugee status in the very same country he allegedly suffered > persecution? Well, he's appealing for the persecution to stop. Wasn't that obvious? - regards - jb ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes, it's true. Aluminum Foil helmets actually amplify government reserved radio bands! Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals. We investigate the efficacy of three aluminum helmet designs on a sample group of four individuals. Using a $250,000 network analyser, we find that although on average all helmets attenuate invasive radio frequencies in either directions (either emanating from an outside source, or emanating from the cranium of the subject), certain frequencies are in fact greatly amplified. These amplified frequencies coincide with radio bands reserved for government use according to the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). Statistical evidence suggests the use of helmets may in fact enhance the government's invasive abilities. We speculate that the government may in fact have started the helmet craze for this reason. http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.