CHILD MURDERED BY JACKASS BASTARD ALL-POWERFUL MORON CHRISTIAN GOD

http://www.wlky.com/news/15796602/detail.html

MARION, Ky. -- A western Kentucky toddler died after she and her mother

became stuck in flood waters.

Kentucky State Police said Kate Hearod of Hampton died Friday morning at the

Livingston County Hospital, about three hours after she and her mother

became trapped in high water just south of Marion, located in Crittenden

County.

State police said Heather Hearod was southbound on Kentucky 855 around 5:30

a.m. when she drove into high waters and lost control of her vehicle.

She grabbed her daughter and got out of the vehicle, but the pair became

separated as Hearod tried to reach higher ground.

The 2-year-old was pronounced dead at the Livingston County Hospital

"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message

news:Nd-dnY-78ZMWNGvanZ2dnUVZ_ruqnZ2d@earthlink.com...

> http://www.wlky.com/news/15796602/detail.html

>

> MARION, Ky. -- A western Kentucky toddler died after she and her mother

> became stuck in flood waters.

>

> Kentucky State Police said Kate Hearod of Hampton died Friday morning at

> the Livingston County Hospital, about three hours after she and her mother

> became trapped in high water just south of Marion, located in Crittenden

> County.

>

> State police said Heather Hearod was southbound on Kentucky 855 around

> 5:30 a.m. when she drove into high waters and lost control of her vehicle.

>

>

> She grabbed her daughter and got out of the vehicle, but the pair became

> separated as Hearod tried to reach higher ground.

>

> The 2-year-old was pronounced dead at the Livingston County Hospital

>

It seems when people call god the creator they may be referring to his

creativity in finding cruel and unusual ways for people to die.

"Lee" <me@localhost> wrote in message

news:47f8be15$0$32053$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...

>

> "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message

> news:Nd-dnY-78ZMWNGvanZ2dnUVZ_ruqnZ2d@earthlink.com...

>> http://www.wlky.com/news/15796602/detail.html

>>

>> MARION, Ky. -- A western Kentucky toddler died after she and her mother

>> became stuck in flood waters.

>>

>> Kentucky State Police said Kate Hearod of Hampton died Friday morning at

>> the Livingston County Hospital, about three hours after she and her

>> mother became trapped in high water just south of Marion, located in

>> Crittenden County.

>>

>> State police said Heather Hearod was southbound on Kentucky 855 around

>> 5:30 a.m. when she drove into high waters and lost control of her

>> vehicle.

>>

>>

>> She grabbed her daughter and got out of the vehicle, but the pair became

>> separated as Hearod tried to reach higher ground.

>>

>> The 2-year-old was pronounced dead at the Livingston County Hospital

>>

>

> It seems when people call god the creator they may be referring to his

> creativity in finding cruel and unusual ways for people to die.

the christian god certainly is ONE SICK SADISTIC COLD-HEARTED BASTARD

On 2008-04-06 13:12:10 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>

> "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message

> news:Nd-dnY-78ZMWNGvanZ2dnUVZ_ruqnZ2d@earthlink.com...

>> http://www.wlky.com/news/15796602/detail.html

>>

>> MARION, Ky. -- A western Kentucky toddler died after she and her mother

>> became stuck in flood waters.

>>

>> Kentucky State Police said Kate Hearod of Hampton died Friday morning at

>> the Livingston County Hospital, about three hours after she and her mother

>> became trapped in high water just south of Marion, located in Crittenden

>> County.

>>

>> State police said Heather Hearod was southbound on Kentucky 855 around

>> 5:30 a.m. when she drove into high waters and lost control of her vehicle.

>>

>>

>> She grabbed her daughter and got out of the vehicle, but the pair became

>> separated as Hearod tried to reach higher ground.

>>

>> The 2-year-old was pronounced dead at the Livingston County Hospital

>>

>

> It seems when people call god the creator they may be referring to his

> creativity in finding cruel and unusual ways for people to die.

Or they may be referring to an idea of God about which you have little

or no idea.

"Andrew" <thecroft@macunlimited.net> wrote in message

news:2008040615511016807-thecroft@macunlimitednet...

> On 2008-04-06 13:12:10 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>

>>

>> "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message

>> news:Nd-dnY-78ZMWNGvanZ2dnUVZ_ruqnZ2d@earthlink.com...

>>> http://www.wlky.com/news/15796602/detail.html

>>>

>>> MARION, Ky. -- A western Kentucky toddler died after she and her mother

>>> became stuck in flood waters.

>>>

>>> Kentucky State Police said Kate Hearod of Hampton died Friday morning at

>>> the Livingston County Hospital, about three hours after she and her

>>> mother

>>> became trapped in high water just south of Marion, located in Crittenden

>>> County.

>>>

>>> State police said Heather Hearod was southbound on Kentucky 855 around

>>> 5:30 a.m. when she drove into high waters and lost control of her

>>> vehicle.

>>>

>>>

>>> She grabbed her daughter and got out of the vehicle, but the pair became

>>> separated as Hearod tried to reach higher ground.

>>>

>>> The 2-year-old was pronounced dead at the Livingston County Hospital

>>>

>>

>> It seems when people call god the creator they may be referring to his

>> creativity in finding cruel and unusual ways for people to die.

>

> Or they may be referring to an idea of God about which you have little or

> no idea.

>

God 1, vengeful, angry, jealous, in human terms a complete psycho decides to

turn over a new leaf and show that he loves everybody really then turns

into....

God 2, Loving, selfless, kind, but as sheBlew points out is still doing what

god one was famous for in that he kills people in pretty nasty unusual and

sadistic ways.

As you probably realise I don't believe in either version but if I did would

give serious misgivings about hiring it as a baby sitter.

On 2008-04-06 16:32:15 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>

> "Andrew" <thecroft@macunlimited.net> wrote in message

> news:2008040615511016807-thecroft@macunlimitednet...

>> On 2008-04-06 13:12:10 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>>

>>>

>>> "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message

>>> news:Nd-dnY-78ZMWNGvanZ2dnUVZ_ruqnZ2d@earthlink.com...

>>>> http://www.wlky.com/news/15796602/detail.html

>>>>

>>>> MARION, Ky. -- A western Kentucky toddler died after she and her mother

>>>> became stuck in flood waters.

>>>>

>>>> Kentucky State Police said Kate Hearod of Hampton died Friday morning at

>>>> the Livingston County Hospital, about three hours after she and her

>>>> mother

>>>> became trapped in high water just south of Marion, located in Crittenden

>>>> County.

>>>>

>>>> State police said Heather Hearod was southbound on Kentucky 855 around

>>>> 5:30 a.m. when she drove into high waters and lost control of her

>>>> vehicle.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> She grabbed her daughter and got out of the vehicle, but the pair became

>>>> separated as Hearod tried to reach higher ground.

>>>>

>>>> The 2-year-old was pronounced dead at the Livingston County Hospital

>>>>

>>>

>>> It seems when people call god the creator they may be referring to his

>>> creativity in finding cruel and unusual ways for people to die.

>>

>> Or they may be referring to an idea of God about which you have little or

>> no idea.

>>

>

> God 1, vengeful, angry, jealous, in human terms a complete psycho decides to

> turn over a new leaf and show that he loves everybody really then turns

> into....

>

> God 2, Loving, selfless, kind, but as sheBlew points out is still doing what

> god one was famous for in that he kills people in pretty nasty unusual and

> sadistic ways.

I rather gathered the impression from the tirade that the water killed

the little girl. Did I miss the smiting bit in some way? As to your God

1 to God 2 transition, you have a point. The way I see it, the Bible is

not a single document; it describes the growing and developing

understanding that human beings had of God. The 'vengeful angry

(jealous, as a word is prone to misunderstanding) God' makes little

sense to us, but then we don't live the kinds of lives those who wrote

about him lived.

>

> As you probably realise I don't believe in either version but if I did would

> give serious misgivings about hiring it as a baby sitter.

"Andrew" <thecroft@macunlimited.net> wrote in message

news:2008040617325775249-thecroft@macunlimitednet...

> On 2008-04-06 16:32:15 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>

>>

>> "Andrew" <thecroft@macunlimited.net> wrote in message

>> news:2008040615511016807-thecroft@macunlimitednet...

>>> On 2008-04-06 13:12:10 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>>>

>>>>

>>>> "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message

>>>> news:Nd-dnY-78ZMWNGvanZ2dnUVZ_ruqnZ2d@earthlink.com...

>>>>> http://www.wlky.com/news/15796602/detail.html

>>>>>

>>>>> MARION, Ky. -- A western Kentucky toddler died after she and her

>>>>> mother

>>>>> became stuck in flood waters.

>>>>>

>>>>> Kentucky State Police said Kate Hearod of Hampton died Friday morning

>>>>> at

>>>>> the Livingston County Hospital, about three hours after she and her

>>>>> mother

>>>>> became trapped in high water just south of Marion, located in

>>>>> Crittenden

>>>>> County.

>>>>>

>>>>> State police said Heather Hearod was southbound on Kentucky 855 around

>>>>> 5:30 a.m. when she drove into high waters and lost control of her

>>>>> vehicle.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> She grabbed her daughter and got out of the vehicle, but the pair

>>>>> became

>>>>> separated as Hearod tried to reach higher ground.

>>>>>

>>>>> The 2-year-old was pronounced dead at the Livingston County Hospital

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> It seems when people call god the creator they may be referring to his

>>>> creativity in finding cruel and unusual ways for people to die.

>>>

>>> Or they may be referring to an idea of God about which you have little

>>> or

>>> no idea.

>>>

>>

>> God 1, vengeful, angry, jealous, in human terms a complete psycho decides

>> to

>> turn over a new leaf and show that he loves everybody really then turns

>> into....

>>

>> God 2, Loving, selfless, kind, but as sheBlew points out is still doing

>> what

>> god one was famous for in that he kills people in pretty nasty unusual

>> and

>> sadistic ways.

>

> I rather gathered the impression from the tirade that the water killed the

> little girl. Did I miss the smiting bit in some way?

Probably something like if a god sets up a cycle in which people live, then

die, then live again the dying part is more than just an inconvinience for

most people. Then to add insult to injury the god makes an endless variety

of ways to die some of them horrendously painfull and in the case of some

diseases and old age there is the added factor of humiliating death.

The little girl drowned which was a very unpleasant experience for the kid,

choking on cold water and gasping for air while she probably tried to scream

for her mother. She never really had a chance to sin or do anything to

deserve such a fate. Yet god is quite happy with this set up or he would do

something about it.

As to your God

> 1 to God 2 transition, you have a point. The way I see it, the Bible is

> not a single document; it describes the growing and developing

> understanding that human beings had of God. The 'vengeful angry (jealous,

> as a word is prone to misunderstanding) God' makes little sense to us, but

> then we don't live the kinds of lives those who wrote about him lived.

God supposingly knows the future yet shows remarkably little foresight in

creating a 'book for all time'.

On 2008-04-06 19:19:03 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>> I rather gathered the impression from the tirade that the water killed the

>> little girl. Did I miss the smiting bit in some way?

>

> Probably something like if a god sets up a cycle in which people live, then

> die, then live again the dying part is more than just an inconvinience for

> most people. Then to add insult to injury the god makes an endless variety

> of ways to die some of them horrendously painfull and in the case of some

> diseases and old age there is the added factor of humiliating death.

I think you have a concept of a "creating God" that is at odds both

with the facts of the world and with Christian theology. Bad things

happen - it's a consequence of the universe behaving in predictable

ways that we call 'laws of nature'.

>

> The little girl drowned which was a very unpleasant experience for the kid,

> choking on cold water and gasping for air while she probably tried to scream

> for her mother. She never really had a chance to sin or do anything to

> deserve such a fate. Yet god is quite happy with this set up or he would do

> something about it.

Well so you say. But what? Change the nature of water when little girls

fall into it? Supply her with gills?

>

>

> As to your God

>> 1 to God 2 transition, you have a point. The way I see it, the Bible is

>> not a single document; it describes the growing and developing

>> understanding that human beings had of God. The 'vengeful angry (jealous,

>> as a word is prone to misunderstanding) God' makes little sense to us, but

>> then we don't live the kinds of lives those who wrote about him lived.

>

> God supposingly knows the future yet shows remarkably little foresight in

> creating a 'book for all time'.

God didn't create a book.

"Andrew" <thecroft@macunlimited.net> wrote in message

news:2008040615511016807-thecroft@macunlimitednet...

> On 2008-04-06 13:12:10 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>

>>

>> "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message

>> news:Nd-dnY-78ZMWNGvanZ2dnUVZ_ruqnZ2d@earthlink.com...

>>> http://www.wlky.com/news/15796602/detail.html

>>>

>>> MARION, Ky. -- A western Kentucky toddler died after she and her mother

>>> became stuck in flood waters.

>>>

>>> Kentucky State Police said Kate Hearod of Hampton died Friday morning at

>>> the Livingston County Hospital, about three hours after she and her

>>> mother

>>> became trapped in high water just south of Marion, located in Crittenden

>>> County.

>>>

>>> State police said Heather Hearod was southbound on Kentucky 855 around

>>> 5:30 a.m. when she drove into high waters and lost control of her

>>> vehicle.

>>>

>>>

>>> She grabbed her daughter and got out of the vehicle, but the pair became

>>> separated as Hearod tried to reach higher ground.

>>>

>>> The 2-year-old was pronounced dead at the Livingston County Hospital

>>>

>>

>> It seems when people call god the creator they may be referring to his

>> creativity in finding cruel and unusual ways for people to die.

>

> Or they may be referring to an idea of God about which you have little or

> no idea.

and where exactly was your horseshit sky pixie when that child was dying?

was your ALL-POWERFUL JACKASS sky pixie christian god busy as usual ,

sitting on his/her/it's FAT, LAZY ASS, LAUGHING HIS/HER/ITS SICK SADISTIC

ASS OFF as another child was dying?

"Andrew" <thecroft@macunlimited.net> wrote in message

news:2008040617325775249-thecroft@macunlimitednet...

> On 2008-04-06 16:32:15 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>

>>

>> "Andrew" <thecroft@macunlimited.net> wrote in message

>> news:2008040615511016807-thecroft@macunlimitednet...

>>> On 2008-04-06 13:12:10 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>>>

>>>>

>>>> "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message

>>>> news:Nd-dnY-78ZMWNGvanZ2dnUVZ_ruqnZ2d@earthlink.com...

>>>>> http://www.wlky.com/news/15796602/detail.html

>>>>>

>>>>> MARION, Ky. -- A western Kentucky toddler died after she and her

>>>>> mother

>>>>> became stuck in flood waters.

>>>>>

>>>>> Kentucky State Police said Kate Hearod of Hampton died Friday morning

>>>>> at

>>>>> the Livingston County Hospital, about three hours after she and her

>>>>> mother

>>>>> became trapped in high water just south of Marion, located in

>>>>> Crittenden

>>>>> County.

>>>>>

>>>>> State police said Heather Hearod was southbound on Kentucky 855 around

>>>>> 5:30 a.m. when she drove into high waters and lost control of her

>>>>> vehicle.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> She grabbed her daughter and got out of the vehicle, but the pair

>>>>> became

>>>>> separated as Hearod tried to reach higher ground.

>>>>>

>>>>> The 2-year-old was pronounced dead at the Livingston County Hospital

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> It seems when people call god the creator they may be referring to his

>>>> creativity in finding cruel and unusual ways for people to die.

>>>

>>> Or they may be referring to an idea of God about which you have little

>>> or

>>> no idea.

>>>

>>

>> God 1, vengeful, angry, jealous, in human terms a complete psycho decides

>> to

>> turn over a new leaf and show that he loves everybody really then turns

>> into....

>>

>> God 2, Loving, selfless, kind, but as sheBlew points out is still doing

>> what

>> god one was famous for in that he kills people in pretty nasty unusual

>> and

>> sadistic ways.

>

> I rather gathered the impression from the tirade that the water killed the

> little girl.

and who created the water, or are you admitting that your god is a bunch of

horse manure and that he/she/it doesn't create things after all?

"Andrew" <thecroft@macunlimited.net> wrote in message

news:2008040619272016807-thecroft@macunlimitednet...

> On 2008-04-06 19:19:03 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>

>>> I rather gathered the impression from the tirade that the water killed

>>> the

>>> little girl. Did I miss the smiting bit in some way?

>>

>> Probably something like if a god sets up a cycle in which people live,

>> then

>> die, then live again the dying part is more than just an inconvinience

>> for

>> most people. Then to add insult to injury the god makes an endless

>> variety

>> of ways to die some of them horrendously painfull and in the case of some

>> diseases and old age there is the added factor of humiliating death.

>

> I think you have a concept of a "creating God" that is at odds both with

> the facts of the world and with Christian theology. Bad things happen -

> it's a consequence of the universe behaving in predictable ways that we

> call 'laws of nature'.

>

>>

>> The little girl drowned which was a very unpleasant experience for the

>> kid,

>> choking on cold water and gasping for air while she probably tried to

>> scream

>> for her mother. She never really had a chance to sin or do anything to

>> deserve such a fate. Yet god is quite happy with this set up or he would

>> do

>> something about it.

>

> Well so you say. But what? Change the nature of water when little girls

> fall into it? Supply her with gills?

or maybe better yet, maybe this ALL-POWERFUL JACKASS christian god of yours

could get off of his FAT, LAZY ASS for once and SAVE THE LITTLE GIRL FROM

DROWNING?

was your horseshit sky pixie too busy taking a dump to help that little

girl?

is your god all-powerful or is your god a USELESS PILE OF CRAP? which is it?

>

>>

>>

>> As to your God

>>> 1 to God 2 transition, you have a point. The way I see it, the Bible is

>>> not a single document; it describes the growing and developing

>>> understanding that human beings had of God. The 'vengeful angry

>>> (jealous,

>>> as a word is prone to misunderstanding) God' makes little sense to us,

>>> but

>>> then we don't live the kinds of lives those who wrote about him lived.

>>

>> God supposingly knows the future yet shows remarkably little foresight in

>> creating a 'book for all time'.

>

> God didn't create a book.

your god didn't create anything, the christian bible and the christian god

are nothing more than the bullshit ramblings of some superstitious cave

dwellers and goat fuckers

..

"Andrew" <thecroft@macunlimited.net> wrote in message

news:2008040619272016807-thecroft@macunlimitednet...

> On 2008-04-06 19:19:03 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>

>>> I rather gathered the impression from the tirade that the water killed

>>> the

>>> little girl. Did I miss the smiting bit in some way?

>>

>> Probably something like if a god sets up a cycle in which people live,

>> then

>> die, then live again the dying part is more than just an inconvinience

>> for

>> most people. Then to add insult to injury the god makes an endless

>> variety

>> of ways to die some of them horrendously painfull and in the case of some

>> diseases and old age there is the added factor of humiliating death.

>

> I think you have a concept of a "creating God" that is at odds both with

> the facts of the world and with Christian theology. Bad things happen -

> it's a consequence of the universe behaving in predictable ways that we

> call 'laws of nature'.

>

>>

>> The little girl drowned which was a very unpleasant experience for the

>> kid,

>> choking on cold water and gasping for air while she probably tried to

>> scream

>> for her mother. She never really had a chance to sin or do anything to

>> deserve such a fate. Yet god is quite happy with this set up or he would

>> do

>> something about it.

>

> Well so you say. But what? Change the nature of water when little girls

> fall into it? Supply her with gills?

Perhaps it would have been better just not to have created a system where

little girls drown in the first place, humans manage to take the pain out of

death for pets and occaisionally people who are close to a distressing death

by the magic of euthenasia.

This would give the impression that humans can empathise more for instance

with a person dying in agony with an incurable cancer than the god acredited

with creating both the disease and the sufferer in the first place.

>> As to your God

>>> 1 to God 2 transition, you have a point. The way I see it, the Bible is

>>> not a single document; it describes the growing and developing

>>> understanding that human beings had of God. The 'vengeful angry

>>> (jealous,

>>> as a word is prone to misunderstanding) God' makes little sense to us,

>>> but

>>> then we don't live the kinds of lives those who wrote about him lived.

>>

>> God supposingly knows the future yet shows remarkably little foresight in

>> creating a 'book for all time'.

>

> God didn't create a book.

Does that imply from a believers point of view that he had no control over

its content?

On 2008-04-06 20:00:09 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>

> "Andrew" <thecroft@macunlimited.net> wrote in message

> news:2008040619272016807-thecroft@macunlimitednet...

>> On 2008-04-06 19:19:03 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>>

>>>> I rather gathered the impression from the tirade that the water killed

>>>> the

>>>> little girl. Did I miss the smiting bit in some way?

>>>

>>> Probably something like if a god sets up a cycle in which people live,

>>> then

>>> die, then live again the dying part is more than just an inconvinience

>>> for

>>> most people. Then to add insult to injury the god makes an endless

>>> variety

>>> of ways to die some of them horrendously painfull and in the case of some

>>> diseases and old age there is the added factor of humiliating death.

>>

>> I think you have a concept of a "creating God" that is at odds both with

>> the facts of the world and with Christian theology. Bad things happen -

>> it's a consequence of the universe behaving in predictable ways that we

>> call 'laws of nature'.

>>

>>>

>>> The little girl drowned which was a very unpleasant experience for the

>>> kid,

>>> choking on cold water and gasping for air while she probably tried to

>>> scream

>>> for her mother. She never really had a chance to sin or do anything to

>>> deserve such a fate. Yet god is quite happy with this set up or he would

>>> do

>>> something about it.

>>

>> Well so you say. But what? Change the nature of water when little girls

>> fall into it? Supply her with gills?

>

> Perhaps it would have been better just not to have created a system where

> little girls drown in the first place, humans manage to take the pain out of

> death for pets and occaisionally people who are close to a distressing death

> by the magic of euthenasia.

Again, you seem to be missing the point - I suspect because you have a

very naive grasp of what Christians mean by "God". Do you mean a

universe in which drowning is impossible in some way? or a universe

where the properties of water change depending on who or what falls

into it? Or a universe where there is no water to drown in?

>

> This would give the impression that humans can empathise more for instance

> with a person dying in agony with an incurable cancer than the god acredited

> with creating both the disease and the sufferer in the first place.

It may give that impression to you, but I don't see it myself

>

>

>>> As to your God

>>>> 1 to God 2 transition, you have a point. The way I see it, the Bible is

>>>> not a single document; it describes the growing and developing

>>>> understanding that human beings had of God. The 'vengeful angry

>>>> (jealous,

>>>> as a word is prone to misunderstanding) God' makes little sense to us,

>>>> but

>>>> then we don't live the kinds of lives those who wrote about him lived.

>>>

>>> God supposingly knows the future yet shows remarkably little foresight in

>>> creating a 'book for all time'.

>>

>> God didn't create a book.

>

>

> Does that imply from a believers point of view that he had no control over

> its content?

It means that inspired people describe their inspiration in ways that

make sense to them. God does not use people as dictaphones. At least

from this believer's point of view

"Andrew" <thecroft@macunlimited.net> wrote in message

news:2008040620212575249-thecroft@macunlimitednet...

> On 2008-04-06 20:00:09 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>

>>

>> "Andrew" <thecroft@macunlimited.net> wrote in message

>> news:2008040619272016807-thecroft@macunlimitednet...

>>> On 2008-04-06 19:19:03 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

<SpaceSnip>

>> This would give the impression that humans can empathise more for

>> instance

>> with a person dying in agony with an incurable cancer than the god

>> acredited

>> with creating both the disease and the sufferer in the first place.

>

> It may give that impression to you, but I don't see it myself

It is pretty basic in that if the entity loves the little girl as claimed

then drowning her is not a good way to show it, if he decided his need for

her soul was greater than the mothers for her kid then why not just take it

with the gentlness that most humans show to children.

>>>> As to your God

>>>>> 1 to God 2 transition, you have a point. The way I see it, the Bible

>>>>> is

>>>>> not a single document; it describes the growing and developing

>>>>> understanding that human beings had of God. The 'vengeful angry

>>>>> (jealous,

>>>>> as a word is prone to misunderstanding) God' makes little sense to us,

>>>>> but

>>>>> then we don't live the kinds of lives those who wrote about him lived.

>>>>

>>>> God supposingly knows the future yet shows remarkably little foresight

>>>> in

>>>> creating a 'book for all time'.

>>>

>>> God didn't create a book.

>>

>>

>> Does that imply from a believers point of view that he had no control

>> over

>> its content?

>

> It means that inspired people describe their inspiration in ways that make

> sense to them. God does not use people as dictaphones. At least from this

> believer's point of view

It may be the inspiration came from a more earthly source, as with many

other religions early Christians apparently included psychotropic drugs in

their ceremonies.

http://cannabisculture.com/backissues/cc11/christ.html

On 2008-04-06 21:25:26 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>>> This would give the impression that humans can empathise more for

>>> instance

>>> with a person dying in agony with an incurable cancer than the god

>>> acredited

>>> with creating both the disease and the sufferer in the first place.

>>

>> It may give that impression to you, but I don't see it myself

>

>

> It is pretty basic in that if the entity loves the little girl as claimed

> then drowning her is not a good way to show it, if he decided his need for

> her soul was greater than the mothers for her kid then why not just take it

> with the gentlness that most humans show to children.

Again, I think you have a very naive, Sunday School image of God -

which is not necessarily to say that you yourself are either naive or

immature. The world proceeds in accordance with the laws of nature God

has set up - the question of God "wanting" a soul is, I fear, very

old-fashioned.

>

>

>>>>> As to your God

>>>>>> 1 to God 2 transition, you have a point. The way I see it, the Bible

>>>>>> is

>>>>>> not a single document; it describes the growing and developing

>>>>>> understanding that human beings had of God. The 'vengeful angry

>>>>>> (jealous,

>>>>>> as a word is prone to misunderstanding) God' makes little sense to us,

>>>>>> but

>>>>>> then we don't live the kinds of lives those who wrote about him lived.

>>>>>

>>>>> God supposingly knows the future yet shows remarkably little foresight

>>>>> in

>>>>> creating a 'book for all time'.

>>>>

>>>> God didn't create a book.

>>>

>>>

>>> Does that imply from a believers point of view that he had no control

>>> over

>>> its content?

>>

>> It means that inspired people describe their inspiration in ways that make

>> sense to them. God does not use people as dictaphones. At least from this

>> believer's point of view

>

>

> It may be the inspiration came from a more earthly source, as with many

> other religions early Christians apparently included psychotropic drugs in

> their ceremonies.

Neither you, nor I, nor anybody else can tell.

"Andrew" <thecroft@macunlimited.net> wrote in message

news:2008040621442575249-thecroft@macunlimitednet...

> On 2008-04-06 21:25:26 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>

>>>> This would give the impression that humans can empathise more for

>>>> instance

>>>> with a person dying in agony with an incurable cancer than the god

>>>> acredited

>>>> with creating both the disease and the sufferer in the first place.

>>>

>>> It may give that impression to you, but I don't see it myself

>>

>>

>> It is pretty basic in that if the entity loves the little girl as claimed

>> then drowning her is not a good way to show it, if he decided his need

>> for

>> her soul was greater than the mothers for her kid then why not just take

>> it

>> with the gentlness that most humans show to children.

>

> Again, I think you have a very naive, Sunday School image of God - which

> is not necessarily to say that you yourself are either naive or immature.

> The world proceeds in accordance with the laws of nature God has set up -

> the question of God "wanting" a soul is, I fear, very old-fashioned.

Yet I go on to discuss the possibility that originally the Christian

religion had shamenist beginings in common with other beliefs of the time

and provide possible evidence for it. That I would think is not on the usual

Sunday school curriculum.

>>>>>> As to your God

>>>>>>> 1 to God 2 transition, you have a point. The way I see it, the Bible

>>>>>>> is

>>>>>>> not a single document; it describes the growing and developing

>>>>>>> understanding that human beings had of God. The 'vengeful angry

>>>>>>> (jealous,

>>>>>>> as a word is prone to misunderstanding) God' makes little sense to

>>>>>>> us,

>>>>>>> but

>>>>>>> then we don't live the kinds of lives those who wrote about him

>>>>>>> lived.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> God supposingly knows the future yet shows remarkably little

>>>>>> foresight

>>>>>> in

>>>>>> creating a 'book for all time'.

>>>>>

>>>>> God didn't create a book.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Does that imply from a believers point of view that he had no control

>>>> over

>>>> its content?

>>>

>>> It means that inspired people describe their inspiration in ways that

>>> make

>>> sense to them. God does not use people as dictaphones. At least from

>>> this

>>> believer's point of view

>>

>>

>> It may be the inspiration came from a more earthly source, as with many

>> other religions early Christians apparently included psychotropic drugs

>> in

>> their ceremonies.

>

> Neither you, nor I, nor anybody else can tell.

>

On 2008-04-06 22:16:35 +0100, "Lee" <me@localhost> said:

>>> It is pretty basic in that if the entity loves the little girl as claimed

>>> then drowning her is not a good way to show it, if he decided his need

>>> for

>>> her soul was greater than the mothers for her kid then why not just take

>>> it

>>> with the gentlness that most humans show to children.

>>

>> Again, I think you have a very naive, Sunday School image of God - which

>> is not necessarily to say that you yourself are either naive or immature.

>> The world proceeds in accordance with the laws of nature God has set up -

>> the question of God "wanting" a soul is, I fear, very old-fashioned.

>

>

> Yet I go on to discuss the possibility that originally the Christian

> religion had shamenist beginings in common with other beliefs of the time

> and provide possible evidence for it. That I would think is not on the usual

> Sunday school curriculum.

It's entirely possible, but probably not very relevant.