Death From Above - Video

[Rama G]

"The sky is falling!" Yes, Chicken Little, this time you got it right.
Besides him, the proponents of 'Star Wars' are also likely to have
one of those smug "I told you so!" expressions on their faces.

It appears that a US spy satellite has quit on the job and decided
to return home to earth. Although the vast majority of this planets
surface is covered with water, the Pentagon has no idea where
this thing is going to land ... or on whose head.

The really nasty part is that even if it doesn't hit anyone, the 1,000
pounds
of toxic Hydrazine fuel aboard will make a convincing chemical weapon.

The plan is for the U.S. Navy to strike the target while it is still
in space - 130 miles above the earth. Points will be awarded for
a direct hit on the fuel tank or for altering the course of the
resultant debris to land over water.

What will happen if one of those fancy anti-missle missles
misses its target? Ah, think positive ... they are not 'likely'
to miss, right? Just to be sure I'm going to call my insurance
company and see if I'm covered for this. Space Defender.
The suspense is killing me.

Video:
http://newswindow.blogspot.com/2008/02/death-from-above.html

 

[MaryKate]

Death From Above - Video"


Video:
http://newswindow.blogspot.com/2008/02/death-from-above.html




Although he didn't dare utter any strong words in opposition, your
WHITE HOUSE WAR CRIMINAL and his cabalists were LIVID when they
learned of China's missile-to-satellite shootdown On January 11,
2008. Apparently, it was successful.

So now, under the guise of "safety" and global "concern,"' the U.S.
believes it is now prepared to do the same thing to a purported
disabled satellite in the next couple of weeks.

But make no mistake, this is another attempt to perpetuate the
unworkable-but-contractor-enriching Reagan Star Wars "program."

 

[Docky Wocky]

I just hope the accuracy of the shoot down is such that they really can drop
that sucker right on Hillary.

 

[rst0wxyz]

On Feb 16, 10:41

 

[Bob]

"rst0wxyz" <rst0wxyz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:488f11bd-2e79-409b-9101-2700b1c5baea@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 16, 10:41 am, MaryKate <clitte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Death From Above - Video"
>
> Video:http://newswindow.blogspot.com/2008/02/death-from-above.html
>
>
>
> Although he didn't dare utter any strong words in opposition, your
> WHITE HOUSE WAR CRIMINAL and his cabalists were LIVID when they
> learned of China's missile-to-satellite shootdown On January 11,
> 2008. Apparently, it was successful.
>
> So now, under the guise of "safety" and global "concern,"' the U.S.
> believes it is now prepared to do the same thing to a purported
> disabled satellite in the next couple of weeks.
>
> But make no mistake, this is another attempt to perpetuate the
> unworkable-but-contractor-enriching Reagan Star Wars "program."


Aren't we also taking a propaganda bombshell risk if our "Star-War"
weapon misses the Satellite, while China had a successful test of
theirs?

Lets think about this. "It has absolutely no aerodynamic properties,
so it's path is completely unpredictable once it hits the atmosphere".
They want to "try" to shoot it down just before it hits the atmosphere.
Hmm, if they hit it, the pieces will then be more aredynamic,
so now have a predictable path for however many pieces?
We will be able to predict the path of a lot of pieces?
Yeah, I buy that, don't you!

 

[HarryNadds]

On Feb 16, 8:23

 

[Bob]

"HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ebd28dea-c88e-44ec-9882-4c10e8cae79c@j28g2000hsj.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 16, 8:23 pm, "Bob" <t...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "rst0wxyz" <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:488f11bd-2e79-409b-9101-2700b1c5baea@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 16, 10:41 am, MaryKate <clitte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> > Death From Above - Video"
>
> > Video:http://newswindow.blogspot.com/2008/02/death-from-above.html
>
> >
>
> > Although he didn't dare utter any strong words in opposition, your
> > WHITE HOUSE WAR CRIMINAL and his cabalists were LIVID when they
> > learned of China's missile-to-satellite shootdown On January 11,
> > 2008. Apparently, it was successful.
>
> > So now, under the guise of "safety" and global "concern,"' the U.S.
> > believes it is now prepared to do the same thing to a purported
> > disabled satellite in the next couple of weeks.
>
> > But make no mistake, this is another attempt to perpetuate the
> > unworkable-but-contractor-enriching Reagan Star Wars "program."
>
> Aren't we also taking a propaganda bombshell risk if our "Star-War"
> weapon misses the Satellite, while China had a successful test of
> theirs?
>
> Lets think about this. "It has absolutely no aerodynamic properties,
> so it's path is completely unpredictable once it hits the atmosphere".
> They want to "try" to shoot it down just before it hits the atmosphere.
> Hmm, if they hit it, the pieces will then be more aredynamic,
> so now have a predictable path for however many pieces?
> We will be able to predict the path of a lot of pieces?
> Yeah, I buy that, don't you!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

You think a 20 lb. piece will travel as fast and far as a 2000 lb.
piece?

NO

 

[rst0wxyz]

On Feb 16, 6:23

 

[TellMeLies]

"rst0wxyz" <rst0wxyz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:50b81369-1beb-4e8e-99e1-c8cd98a13c06@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 16, 6:23 pm, "Bob" <t...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "rst0wxyz" <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:488f11bd-2e79-409b-9101-2700b1c5baea@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 16, 10:41 am, MaryKate <clitte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> > Death From Above - Video"
>
> > Video:http://newswindow.blogspot.com/2008/02/death-from-above.html
>
> >
>
> > Although he didn't dare utter any strong words in opposition, your
> > WHITE HOUSE WAR CRIMINAL and his cabalists were LIVID when they
> > learned of China's missile-to-satellite shootdown On January 11,
> > 2008. Apparently, it was successful.
>
> > So now, under the guise of "safety" and global "concern,"' the U.S.
> > believes it is now prepared to do the same thing to a purported
> > disabled satellite in the next couple of weeks.
>
> > But make no mistake, this is another attempt to perpetuate the
> > unworkable-but-contractor-enriching Reagan Star Wars "program."
>
> Aren't we also taking a propaganda bombshell risk if our "Star-War"
> weapon misses the Satellite, while China had a successful test of
> theirs?
>
> Lets think about this. "It has absolutely no aerodynamic properties,
> so it's path is completely unpredictable once it hits the atmosphere".
> They want to "try" to shoot it down just before it hits the atmosphere.
> Hmm, if they hit it, the pieces will then be more aredynamic,
> so now have a predictable path for however many pieces?
> We will be able to predict the path of a lot of pieces?
> Yeah, I buy that, don't you!

Small pieces will burn up complete before hitting ground. It's the
big pieces we have to worry about.

How big and how many?

 

[ltlee1@hotmail.com]

On Feb 16, 9:23

 

[Ronald Moshki]

Where did you get your Degree in Physics, LTLee ? S.C.C. ?


On Feb 17, 7:25