Democrats Need to Jettison Lieberman As a Troublesome Traitor

J

John

Guest
Published on Monday, December 24, 2007
by The Cincinnati Enquirer
http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071223/EDIT01/712230349/1020/EDIT
Democrats Need to Jettison Lieberman As a Troublesome Traitor
by Dewayne Wickham
Joseph Lieberman is a political bad penny.

The Connecticut senator and pseudo-Democrat just won't go away - or stop
undermining the political party that he clings to like a barnacle to the
side of a ship. Since Al Gore selected him as his vice presidential running
mate in 2000, Lieberman has been more contemptuous than caring about the
Democratic Party's claim to national leadership.

By seeking re-election to the Senate at the same time he was running for
vice president, Lieberman signaled to the nation a half-hearted support for
the Democrats' chances of winning the White House in 2000.

Last year he sought re-election as an independent after losing the
Democratic Party's primary to Ned Lamont, a political newcomer who waged a
largely anti-war campaign against the three-term senator.

"I am in this race to the end," Lieberman said at the time. "For me, it is a
cause, and it is a cause not to let this Democratic Party that I joined with
the inspiration of President Kennedy in 1960 to be taken over by people who
are far from the mainstream of American life that I fear we will not elect
Democrats in the numbers that we should in the future."

Electing Democrats was his goal then. Now, it's foisting a Republican into
the White House.

"I know it's unusual for a Democrat to be endorsing a Republican," he said
recently in announcing his support for GOP Sen. John McCain in the
presidential race. "It's even unusual for an independent Democrat like me to
be endorsing a Republican.

"You know, political parties are important in our country, but they're not
more important than what's best for our country. They're not more important
than friendship. They're not more important than our future. And that's why
I'm proudly here to urge Republicans and independents in New Hampshire to
come out on Jan. 8 and make John McCain the next president of the United
States," Lieberman said.

In endorsing McCain, Lieberman effectively opposes all eight Democrats vying
for their party's presidential nomination - including fellow Connecticut
Sen. Christopher Dodd.

Of course, Lieberman is free to back whomever he wants. But if he feels the
entire field of Democratic candidates is unacceptable - from Dennis Kucinich
on the far left to Dodd and Delaware Sen. Joseph Biden closer to the
center - then he ought to cut his thin ties to the Democratic Party.

Sure, such a move would put control of the Senate back in the hands of
Republicans, but it would also help Democrats regain their soul.

Currently, Democrats and Republicans each hold 49 seats in the Senate. The
other two seats are held by Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent, and
Lieberman, who calls himself an independent Democrat. By aligning themselves
with Democrats, Sanders and Lieberman have given Democrats a one-vote
majority - and thus control of the Senate.

It's this thin margin that likely caused Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid,
D-Nev., to soft-peddle his objections to Lieberman's endorsement of McCain.

"I have the greatest respect for Joe, but I simply have to disagree with his
decision to endorse Sen. McCain," Reid told CNN in a written statement.

Lieberman is a fifth-columnist whom Democrats should chase from their ranks.
The short-term consequences would be to lose control of the Senate. (In a
50-50 split, Vice President Dick Cheney would use his vote as Senate
president to give the GOP a majority.)

But in the long-term, this political house-cleaning might help Democrats win
a comfortable majority in 2008 - if voters believe Democrats will push their
political agenda as aggressively as Republicans have pushed theirs the past
seven years.

That won't happen if Democrats are seen as hostages of Lieberman's whimsical
political behavior - and afraid to get rid of a bad penny.

DeWayne Wickham is a columnist for Gannett News Service.
 
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:27:39 GMT, in alt.politics, in thread Democrats
Need to Jettison Lieberman As a Troublesome Traitor, "John"
<JohnDsena@nmail.comx>, wrote

>Published on Monday, December 24, 2007
>by The Cincinnati Enquirer
>http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071223/EDIT01/712230349/1020/EDIT
>Democrats Need to Jettison Lieberman As a Troublesome Traitor
>by Dewayne Wickham
>Joseph Lieberman is a political bad penny.


We need more democrats like Joe Lieberman.

FACE
 
Funny...Considering Lieberman is the only one voting like he
promised.


No end to the war, no socialized medicine, no tax hikes on the rich,
no spending cuts, no cheap gas, more corruption...Everything the
Democrats promised was a lie and they will be held accountable.
 
FACE <AFaceInTheCrowd@today.net> wrote in
news:7j75n3p6kqphh5pvefo118ongjkuota3d2@4ax.com:

> On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:27:39 GMT, in alt.politics, in thread
> Democrats Need to Jettison Lieberman As a Troublesome Traitor, "John"
> <JohnDsena@nmail.comx>, wrote
>
>>Published on Monday, December 24, 2007
>>by The Cincinnati Enquirer
>>http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071223/EDIT01/712
>>230349/1020/EDIT Democrats Need to Jettison Lieberman As a Troublesome
>>Traitor by Dewayne Wickham
>>Joseph Lieberman is a political bad penny.

>
> We need more democrats like Joe Lieberman.
>
> FACE


Why should Israel get more than one Senator?
 
On Dec 26, 10:33 am, FACE <AFaceInTheCr...@today.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:27:39 GMT, in alt.politics, in thread Democrats
> Need to Jettison Lieberman As a Troublesome Traitor, "John"
> <JohnDs...@nmail.comx>, wrote
>
> >Published on Monday, December 24, 2007
> >by The Cincinnati Enquirer
> >http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071223/EDIT01/7...
> >Democrats Need to Jettison Lieberman As a Troublesome Traitor
> >by Dewayne Wickham
> >Joseph Lieberman is a political bad penny.

>
> We need more democrats like Joe Lieberman.
>
> FACE


Lieberman isn't a Democrat and never was one. Also, he no longer
belongs to the Democratic party. He ran and won as an independent in
'06.
 
Back
Top