Guest Go Mavs Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,291788,00.html WASHINGTON - Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's Democratic presidential rivals slammed him Wednesday, calling it a sign of inexperience to suggest sending GIs to Pakistan to hunt down Al Qaeda terrorists, declaring that, "if President Musharraf won't act, we will." "Frankly, I am not sure what Barack is calling for in his speech this morning. But it is dangerous and irresponsible to leave even the impression the United States would needlessly and publicly provoke a nuclear power," said Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn. In his speech at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars in Washington, D.C., - billed as a major foreign policy address - Obama said that as commander in chief he would remove troops from Iraq and put them "on the right battlefield in Afghanistan and Pakistan." He offered harsh words to Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, who has been the target of assassination attempts for his efforts to aid the United States in rooting out terrorist havens in the northwestern region of his country. "I understand that President Musharraf has his own challenges. But let me make this clear. There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again," Obama said. "If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will." Obama said he would place heavy conditions on the hundreds of millions of dollars in U.S. military aid if Pakistan isn't up to the task of combating terrorists. "Pakistan must make substantial progress in closing down the training camps, evicting foreign fighters, and preventing the Taliban from using Pakistan as a staging area for attacks in Afghanistan," he said. Obama's critics said being confrontational toward Pakistan doesn't help fight the War on Terror. Hunting down Usama bin Laden and stopping terrorists from acquiring nuclear weapons is a priority, Dodd said. "But I will not declare my intentions for specific military action to the media in the context of a political campaign." "My international experience tells me that we should address this problem with tough diplomacy with General Musharraf first, leaving the military as a last resort. It is important to reach out to moderate Muslim states and allies to ensure we do not unnecessarily inflame the Muslim world," said New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, another 2008 Democratic presidential candidate. Sen. Joe Biden said he wrote the recently passed law that conditions aid to Pakistan on its cooperation with the United States in combating Al Qaeda and the Taliban. "Before writing the law, Biden wrote to President Musharraf and Secretary (of State Condoleezza) Rice making clear his intent to do so," a statement from Biden's campaign reads. The statement then went on to ridicule Obama for not asking Amb. John Negroponte at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing in January anything about Afghanistan or the Taliban, and quoted him discussing the "stunning level of mercury in fish." "It's good to see Sen. Obama has finally arrived at the right position, but this can hardly be considered bold leadership." said Biden campaign manager Luis Navarro. In his remarks, Obama had plenty of criticism of President Bush for his handling of the War on Terror. "The president would have us believe that every bomb in Baghdad is part of Al Qaeda's war against us, not an Iraqi civil war. He elevates Al Qaeda in Iraq - which didn't exist before our invasion - and overlooks the people who hit us on 9/11, who are training new recruits in Pakistan," Obama said, adding: "He confuses our mission." Bush has said he would order military action if intelligence showed top terror leaders were hiding in Afghanistan, but the relationship with Musharraf has been friendly and cooperative. White House spokesman Tony Snow said none of the administration's policies about keeping military options open to respond to actionable intelligence precludes working with the Pakistanis. He cited the capture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as an example of an important joint operation that yielded successful results. "Our approach to Pakistan is one that not only respects the sovereignty of Pakistan as a sovereign government, but is also designed to work in a way where we are working in cooperation with the local government," he said. In his remarks, Obama made no mention of Democratic frontrunner Sen. Hillary Clinton. She called his foreign policy views last week naive and has continued to build a growing lead in the polls amid increasingly vocal concerns among Democratic voters about Obama's relative lack of experience. While she and other Democrats say the United States is safer since Sept. 11, 2001, Obama continues to disagree. "Because of a war in Iraq that should never have been authorized and should never have been waged, we are now less safe than we were before 9/11," he said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 On Aug 1, 6:40 pm, "Go Mavs" <M...@ericks.com> wrote: > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,291788,00.html > > WASHINGTON - Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's Democratic presidential rivals > slammed him Wednesday, calling it a sign of inexperience to suggest sending > GIs to Pakistan to hunt down Al Qaeda terrorists, declaring that, "if > President Musharraf won't act, we will." > > "Frankly, I am not sure what Barack is calling for in his speech this > morning. But it is dangerous and irresponsible to leave even the impression > the United States would needlessly and publicly provoke a nuclear power," > said Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn. > > In his speech at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars in > Washington, D.C., - billed as a major foreign policy address - Obama said > that as commander in chief he would remove troops from Iraq and put them "on > the right battlefield in Afghanistan and Pakistan." > > He offered harsh words to Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, who has been > the target of assassination attempts for his efforts to aid the United > States in rooting out terrorist havens in the northwestern region of his > country. > > "I understand that President Musharraf has his own challenges. But let me > make this clear. There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who > murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again," Obama said. > "If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and > President Musharraf won't act, we will." > > Obama said he would place heavy conditions on the hundreds of millions of > dollars in U.S. military aid if Pakistan isn't up to the task of combating > terrorists. > > "Pakistan must make substantial progress in closing down the training camps, > evicting foreign fighters, and preventing the Taliban from using Pakistan as > a staging area for attacks in Afghanistan," he said. > > Obama's critics said being confrontational toward Pakistan doesn't help > fight the War on Terror. > > Hunting down Usama bin Laden and stopping terrorists from acquiring nuclear > weapons is a priority, Dodd said. "But I will not declare my intentions for > specific military action to the media in the context of a political > campaign." > > "My international experience tells me that we should address this problem > with tough diplomacy with General Musharraf first, leaving the military as a > last resort. It is important to reach out to moderate Muslim states and > allies to ensure we do not unnecessarily inflame the Muslim world," said New > Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, another 2008 Democratic presidential candidate. > > Sen. Joe Biden said he wrote the recently passed law that conditions aid to > Pakistan on its cooperation with the United States in combating Al Qaeda and > the Taliban. > > "Before writing the law, Biden wrote to President Musharraf and Secretary > (of State Condoleezza) Rice making clear his intent to do so," a statement > from Biden's campaign reads. > > The statement then went on to ridicule Obama for not asking Amb. John > Negroponte at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing in January > anything about Afghanistan or the Taliban, and quoted him discussing the > "stunning level of mercury in fish." > > "It's good to see Sen. Obama has finally arrived at the right position, but > this can hardly be considered bold leadership." said Biden campaign manager > Luis Navarro. > > In his remarks, Obama had plenty of criticism of President Bush for his > handling of the War on Terror. > > "The president would have us believe that every bomb in Baghdad is part of > Al Qaeda's war against us, not an Iraqi civil war. He elevates Al Qaeda in > Iraq - which didn't exist before our invasion - and overlooks the people who > hit us on 9/11, who are training new recruits in Pakistan," Obama said, > adding: "He confuses our mission." > > Bush has said he would order military action if intelligence showed top > terror leaders were hiding in Afghanistan, but the relationship with > Musharraf has been friendly and cooperative. > > White House spokesman Tony Snow said none of the administration's policies > about keeping military options open to respond to actionable intelligence > precludes working with the Pakistanis. He cited the capture of Khalid Sheikh > Mohammed as an example of an important joint operation that yielded > successful results. > > "Our approach to Pakistan is one that not only respects the sovereignty of > Pakistan as a sovereign government, but is also designed to work in a way > where we are working in cooperation with the local government," he said. > > In his remarks, Obama made no mention of Democratic frontrunner Sen. Hillary > Clinton. She called his foreign policy views last week naive and has > continued to build a growing lead in the polls amid increasingly vocal > concerns among Democratic voters about Obama's relative lack of experience. > > While she and other Democrats say the United States is safer since Sept. 11, > 2001, Obama continues to disagree. > > "Because of a war in Iraq that should never have been authorized and should > never have been waged, we are now less safe than we were before 9/11," he > said. it is like the inexperience of bush and his losing quagmire in iraq? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Go Mavs Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 "BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA" <bongblaster54@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1186019255.396089.189640@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com... > it is like the inexperience of bush and his losing quagmire in iraq? The current administration has the best history of experience against the current crisis.. with that said, this has nothing to do with bush and everything to do with Obama... I bet you invoke Bush's name when your girl wont sleep with you because she is on her period? You probablly attribute it to her not being able to get birth control for cycle stoppage using government funds... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 On Aug 1, 6:53 pm, "Go Mavs" <M...@ericks.com> wrote: > "BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA" <bongblaste...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:1186019255.396089.189640@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com... > > > it is like the inexperience of bush and his losing quagmire in iraq? > > The current administration has the best history of experience against the > current crisis.. > > with that said, this has nothing to do with bush and everything to do with > Obama... > > I bet you invoke Bush's name when your girl wont sleep with you because she > is on her period? You probablly attribute it to her not being able to get > birth control for cycle stoppage using government funds... I invoke Bush's name when his failure comes up, which for the most part is everything he touches, I dare you to name one thing he has done that has benefitted the 98% of americans who are not Billionaires, Put what good he has done Here________________________________________. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Go Mavs Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 "BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA" <bongblaster54@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1186019834.901079.251330@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > I invoke Bush's name when his failure comes up A traditional liberal ploy. > which for the most > part is everything he touches, Your brain? > I dare you to name one thing he has > done that has benefitted the 98% of americans who are not > Billionaires, Put what good he has done > Here________________________________________. I am doing fine and most people I know who arent billionaires are doing fine. I would hardly call 4thousand dead comparable to the 50 plus thousand dead in Vietnam and in North Korea. I think you are over reacting by way of political convenience. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 On Aug 1, 7:14 pm, "Go Mavs" <M...@ericks.com> wrote: > "BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA" <bongblaste...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:1186019834.901079.251330@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > > > I invoke Bush's name when his failure comes up > > A traditional liberal ploy. > > > which for the most > > part is everything he touches, > > Your brain? > > > I dare you to name one thing he has > > done that has benefitted the 98% of americans who are not > > Billionaires, Put what good he has done > > Here________________________________________. > > I am doing fine and most people I know who arent billionaires are doing > fine. I would hardly call 4thousand dead comparable to the 50 plus thousand > dead in Vietnam and in North Korea. > > I think you are over reacting by way of political convenience. I asked you to name the good he has done, you came up with a big Zero. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Eat Crack Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 "Go Mavs" <Mav@ericks.com> wrote in message news:U5bsi.1654$vW.686@trnddc08... > > "BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA" <bongblaster54@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:1186019834.901079.251330@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com... >> I invoke Bush's name when his failure comes up > > A traditional liberal ploy. Traditional AMERICAN question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bokonon Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 "Go Mavs" <Mav@ericks.com> wrote in message news:aOasi.1447$BQ.779@trnddc03... > The current administration has the best history of experience against the > current crisis.. The current administration CREATED the current crisis you fucking nitwit. -- "History! Read it and weep!" -Bokonon _______________________________________________ When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Neolibertarian Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 In article <8Casi.1444$BQ.539@trnddc03>, "Go Mavs" <Mav@ericks.com> wrote: > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,291788,00.html > > > > WASHINGTON - Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's Democratic presidential rivals > slammed him Wednesday, calling it a sign of inexperience to suggest sending > GIs to Pakistan to hunt down Al Qaeda terrorists, declaring that, "if > President Musharraf won't act, we will." > > "Frankly, I am not sure what Barack is calling for in his speech this > morning. But it is dangerous and irresponsible to leave even the impression > the United States would needlessly and publicly provoke a nuclear power," > said Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn. > > In his speech at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars in > Washington, D.C., - billed as a major foreign policy address - Obama said > that as commander in chief he would remove troops from Iraq and put them "on > the right battlefield in Afghanistan and Pakistan." Yawell, he'd be missing the "right battlefield" too. The "right battlefield" is Iran. And the way to Iran is through those things she covets the most. And, of course, she's always most coveted Iraq. -- NeoLibertarian "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'" ---Ronald Reagan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Go Mavs Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 "BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA" <bongblaster54@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1186021218.260726.9320@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com... > On Aug 1, 7:14 pm, "Go Mavs" <M...@ericks.com> wrote: >> "BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA" <bongblaste...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1186019834.901079.251330@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com... >> >> > I invoke Bush's name when his failure comes up >> >> A traditional liberal ploy. >> >> > which for the most >> > part is everything he touches, >> >> Your brain? >> >> > I dare you to name one thing he has >> > done that has benefitted the 98% of americans who are not >> > Billionaires, Put what good he has done >> > Here________________________________________. >> >> I am doing fine and most people I know who arent billionaires are doing >> fine. I would hardly call 4thousand dead comparable to the 50 plus >> thousand >> dead in Vietnam and in North Korea. >> >> I think you are over reacting by way of political convenience. > > I asked you to name the good he has done, you came up with a big Zero. Your idea of good, is socialism... What good would it do me to point out the good if you are going to yell "thats not for the good of the people." Its like telling a member of the KKK that many black people I have met have always been nice and good people. Its pointless to tell you the good. You would deny it or tell me why its evil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Slo Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 On Aug 1, 6:53 pm, "Go Mavs" <M...@ericks.com> wrote: > "BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA" <bongblaste...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:1186019255.396089.189640@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com... > > > it is like the inexperience of bush and his losing quagmire in iraq? > > The current administration has the best history of experience against the > current crisis.. WTF? 9/11 happened on Bush's watch and after he was warned that it would happen! Terrorism has mushroomed since he was sworn in (sworn at by me). > > with that said, this has nothing to do with bush and everything to do with > Obama... 6 years after 9/11, OBL is still at large. Heckuva job, Bushie. > > I bet you invoke Bush's name.... He is president, ya know. I'll bet you're sorry Clinton didn't screw up this badly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest z Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA wrote: > On Aug 1, 6:53 pm, "Go Mavs" <M...@ericks.com> wrote: >> "BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA" <bongblaste...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1186019255.396089.189640@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com... >> >>> it is like the inexperience of bush and his losing quagmire in iraq? >> The current administration has the best history of experience against the >> current crisis.. >> >> with that said, this has nothing to do with bush and everything to do with >> Obama... >> >> I bet you invoke Bush's name when your girl wont sleep with you because she >> is on her period? You probablly attribute it to her not being able to get >> birth control for cycle stoppage using government funds... > > I invoke Bush's name when his failure comes up, which for the most > part is everything he touches, I dare you to name one thing he has > done that has benefitted the 98% of americans who are not > Billionaires, Put what good he has done Here_ Federal No Call List. I was amazed when Bush didn't stop the federal no call list. In fact it seems to work pretty well and everybody likes it (but for the telemarketers). So thats the one good thing I can think of .. otherwise, not so much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jim E Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 "Go Mavs" <Mav@ericks.com> wrote in message news:8Casi.1444$BQ.539@trnddc03... > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,291788,00.html > > > > WASHINGTON - Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's Democratic presidential rivals > slammed him Wednesday, calling it a sign of inexperience to suggest > sending GIs to Pakistan to hunt down Al Qaeda terrorists, declaring that, > "if President Musharraf won't act, we will." > He guy is a kitten being thrown to the wolves. He deserves it for being presumptuousness to enter the big leagues as a rank amateur. Jim E Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deaf Power Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 00:04:55 -0700, "Jim E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote: > >"Go Mavs" <Mav@ericks.com> wrote in message >news:8Casi.1444$BQ.539@trnddc03... >> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,291788,00.html >> >> >> >> WASHINGTON - Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's Democratic presidential rivals >> slammed him Wednesday, calling it a sign of inexperience to suggest >> sending GIs to Pakistan to hunt down Al Qaeda terrorists, declaring that, >> "if President Musharraf won't act, we will." >> > > >He guy is a kitten being thrown to the wolves. >He deserves it for being presumptuousness to enter the big leagues as a rank >amateur. You voted for a drunken crook! > Jim E > -- The Rising Corporate Military Monster http://www.counterpunch.org/mokhiber04232004.html http://www.iraqwar.org/micomplex.htm "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist." - Dwight D. Eisenhower Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deaf Power Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:53:47 GMT, "Go Mavs" <Mav@ericks.com> wrote: > >"BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA" <bongblaster54@yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:1186021218.260726.9320@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com... >> On Aug 1, 7:14 pm, "Go Mavs" <M...@ericks.com> wrote: >>> "BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA" <bongblaste...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> >>> news:1186019834.901079.251330@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com... >>> >>> > I invoke Bush's name when his failure comes up >>> >>> A traditional liberal ploy. >>> >>> > which for the most >>> > part is everything he touches, >>> >>> Your brain? >>> >>> > I dare you to name one thing he has >>> > done that has benefitted the 98% of americans who are not >>> > Billionaires, Put what good he has done >>> > Here________________________________________. >>> >>> I am doing fine and most people I know who arent billionaires are doing >>> fine. I would hardly call 4thousand dead comparable to the 50 plus >>> thousand >>> dead in Vietnam and in North Korea. >>> >>> I think you are over reacting by way of political convenience. >> >> I asked you to name the good he has done, you came up with a big Zero. > > >Your idea of good, is socialism... What good would it do me to point out the >good if you are going to yell "thats not for the good of the people." Your idea of good is fascism, to give more money to Halliburton and billionaires to make them richer. >Its like telling a member of the KKK that many black people I have met have >always been nice and good people. Its pointless to tell you the good. You >would deny it or tell me why its evil. Are you that one who yelled "porch ******"? -- The Rising Corporate Military Monster http://www.counterpunch.org/mokhiber04232004.html http://www.iraqwar.org/micomplex.htm "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist." - Dwight D. Eisenhower Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deaf Power Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:32:44 GMT, "Eat Crack" <Crackheads@Crawford.net> wrote: >"Go Mavs" <Mav@ericks.com> wrote in message >news:U5bsi.1654$vW.686@trnddc08... >> >> "BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA" <bongblaster54@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:1186019834.901079.251330@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com... >>> I invoke Bush's name when his failure comes up >> >> A traditional liberal ploy. > >Traditional AMERICAN question. GoMavs is a Bush worshipper who hates America and loves fascism. -- The Rising Corporate Military Monster http://www.counterpunch.org/mokhiber04232004.html http://www.iraqwar.org/micomplex.htm "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist." - Dwight D. Eisenhower Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deaf Power Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 01:53:10 GMT, "Go Mavs" <Mav@ericks.com> wrote: >"BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA" <bongblaster54@yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:1186019255.396089.189640@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com... >> it is like the inexperience of bush and his losing quagmire in iraq? > >The current administration has the best history of experience against the >current crisis.. Bush made terrorism worse. >with that said, this has nothing to do with bush and everything to do with >Obama... Wrong. It has everything to do with Bush: U.S. Warns Of Stronger Al-Qaeda Administration Report Cites Havens in Pakistan By Spencer S. Hsu and Walter Pincus July 12, 2007 Six years after the Bush administration declared war on al-Qaeda, the terrorist network is gaining strength and has established a safe haven in remote tribal areas of western Pakistan for training and planning attacks, according to a new Bush administration intelligence report to be discussed today at a White House meeting. The report, a five-page threat assessment compiled by the National Counterterrorism Center, is titled "Al-Qaida Better Positioned to Strike the West," intelligence officials said. It concludes that the group has significantly rebuilt itself despite concerted U.S. attempts to smash the network. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/11/AR2007071102443.html Spy Agencies Say Iraq War Hurting U.S. Terror Fight By Karen DeYoung September 24, 2006 The war in Iraq has become a primary recruitment vehicle for violent Islamic extremists, motivating a new generation of potential terrorists around the world whose numbers may be increasing faster than the United States and its allies can reduce the threat, U.S. intelligence analysts have concluded. A 30-page National Intelligence Estimate completed in April cites the "centrality" of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and the insurgency that has followed, as the leading inspiration for new Islamic extremist networks and cells that are united by little more than an anti-Western agenda. It concludes that, rather than contributing to eventual victory in the global counterterrorism struggle, the situation in Iraq has worsened the U.S. position, according to officials familiar with the classified document. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/23/AR2006092301130.html -- The Rising Corporate Military Monster http://www.counterpunch.org/mokhiber04232004.html http://www.iraqwar.org/micomplex.htm "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist." - Dwight D. Eisenhower Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingssman1@hotmail.com Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 There's been news upon news about Al-Quada being within it's last throws along the mountain line in Pakistan. Currenty Pakistan is becoming a safe haven for terrorists It's logical to enact the military there. If folks are worried about nuclear superpowers, then they should really fear Iran! Iran has an airforce and a Navy! On Aug 1, 8:40 pm, "Go Mavs" <M...@ericks.com> wrote: > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,291788,00.html > > WASHINGTON - Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's Democratic presidential rivals > slammed him Wednesday, calling it a sign of inexperience to suggest sending > GIs to Pakistan to hunt down Al Qaeda terrorists, declaring that, "if > President Musharraf won't act, we will." > > "Frankly, I am not sure what Barack is calling for in his speech this > morning. But it is dangerous and irresponsible to leave even the impression > the United States would needlessly and publicly provoke a nuclear power," > said Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn. > > In his speech at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars in > Washington, D.C., - billed as a major foreign policy address - Obama said > that as commander in chief he would remove troops from Iraq and put them "on > the right battlefield in Afghanistan and Pakistan." > > He offered harsh words to Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, who has been > the target of assassination attempts for his efforts to aid the United > States in rooting out terrorist havens in the northwestern region of his > country. > > "I understand that President Musharraf has his own challenges. But let me > make this clear. There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who > murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again," Obama said. > "If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and > President Musharraf won't act, we will." > > Obama said he would place heavy conditions on the hundreds of millions of > dollars in U.S. military aid if Pakistan isn't up to the task of combating > terrorists. > > "Pakistan must make substantial progress in closing down the training camps, > evicting foreign fighters, and preventing the Taliban from using Pakistan as > a staging area for attacks in Afghanistan," he said. > > Obama's critics said being confrontational toward Pakistan doesn't help > fight the War on Terror. > > Hunting down Usama bin Laden and stopping terrorists from acquiring nuclear > weapons is a priority, Dodd said. "But I will not declare my intentions for > specific military action to the media in the context of a political > campaign." > > "My international experience tells me that we should address this problem > with tough diplomacy with General Musharraf first, leaving the military as a > last resort. It is important to reach out to moderate Muslim states and > allies to ensure we do not unnecessarily inflame the Muslim world," said New > Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, another 2008 Democratic presidential candidate. > > Sen. Joe Biden said he wrote the recently passed law that conditions aid to > Pakistan on its cooperation with the United States in combating Al Qaeda and > the Taliban. > > "Before writing the law, Biden wrote to President Musharraf and Secretary > (of State Condoleezza) Rice making clear his intent to do so," a statement > from Biden's campaign reads. > > The statement then went on to ridicule Obama for not asking Amb. John > Negroponte at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing in January > anything about Afghanistan or the Taliban, and quoted him discussing the > "stunning level of mercury in fish." > > "It's good to see Sen. Obama has finally arrived at the right position, but > this can hardly be considered bold leadership." said Biden campaign manager > Luis Navarro. > > In his remarks, Obama had plenty of criticism of President Bush for his > handling of the War on Terror. > > "The president would have us believe that every bomb in Baghdad is part of > Al Qaeda's war against us, not an Iraqi civil war. He elevates Al Qaeda in > Iraq - which didn't exist before our invasion - and overlooks the people who > hit us on 9/11, who are training new recruits in Pakistan," Obama said, > adding: "He confuses our mission." > > Bush has said he would order military action if intelligence showed top > terror leaders were hiding in Afghanistan, but the relationship with > Musharraf has been friendly and cooperative. > > White House spokesman Tony Snow said none of the administration's policies > about keeping military options open to respond to actionable intelligence > precludes working with the Pakistanis. He cited the capture of Khalid Sheikh > Mohammed as an example of an important joint operation that yielded > successful results. > > "Our approach to Pakistan is one that not only respects the sovereignty of > Pakistan as a sovereign government, but is also designed to work in a way > where we are working in cooperation with the local government," he said. > > In his remarks, Obama made no mention of Democratic frontrunner Sen. Hillary > Clinton. She called his foreign policy views last week naive and has > continued to build a growing lead in the polls amid increasingly vocal > concerns among Democratic voters about Obama's relative lack of experience. > > While she and other Democrats say the United States is safer since Sept. 11, > 2001, Obama continues to disagree. > > "Because of a war in Iraq that should never have been authorized and should > never have been waged, we are now less safe than we were before 9/11," he > said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gogarty Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 In article <8Casi.1444$BQ.539@trnddc03>, Mav@ericks.com says... > > >http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,291788,00.html > > > >WASHINGTON - Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's Democratic presidential rivals >slammed him Wednesday, calling it a sign of inexperience to suggest sending >GIs to Pakistan to hunt down Al Qaeda terrorists, declaring that, "if >President Musharraf won't act, we will." > (Snip) I think this is the end of Obama's candidacy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Docky Wocky Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 slo sez: "6 years after 9/11, OBL is still at large. Heckuva job, Bushie..." ______________________________ Please list the things you have done when it comes to killing or capturing OBL, as you say? Take your time... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest the_blogologist Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Sex education for al Qaeda!!! Just say it with confidence and people will think you actually know what you're doing. Go Mavs <Mav@ericks.com> wrote: > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,291788,00.html > > > > WASHINGTON - Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's Democratic presidential rivals > slammed him Wednesday, calling it a sign of inexperience to suggest sending > GIs to Pakistan to hunt down Al Qaeda terrorists, declaring that, "if > President Musharraf won't act, we will." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Slo Posted August 3, 2007 Share Posted August 3, 2007 On Aug 2, 10:08 am, "Docky Wocky" <mrch...@lst.net> wrote: > slo sez: > > "6 years after 9/11, OBL is still at large. Heckuva job, Bushie..." > ______________________________ > Please list the things you have done when it comes to killing or capturing > OBL, as you say? > > Take your time... Well, maybe this isn't obvious to you but...., I'M NOT THE FREAKEEN PRESIDENT OF THE USA!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Where_Was_George Posted August 3, 2007 Share Posted August 3, 2007 "Jim E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote in news:5hde0qF3ji2ulU1@mid.individual.net: > > "Go Mavs" <Mav@ericks.com> wrote in message > news:8Casi.1444$BQ.539@trnddc03... >> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,291788,00.html >> >> >> >> WASHINGTON - Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's Democratic presidential >> rivals slammed him Wednesday, calling it a sign of inexperience to >> suggest sending GIs to Pakistan to hunt down Al Qaeda terrorists, >> declaring that, "if President Musharraf won't act, we will." >> > > > He guy is a kitten being thrown to the wolves. > He deserves it for being presumptuousness to enter the big leagues as > a rank amateur. > > Jim E Keep believing that. But speaking of rank amateurs, that's what Bush was and still is. His only political experience was as Gov. of Texas. Texas's governor has less political power than probably Rhode Island's. He ran all of the businesses he was involved with into the ground. Kinda like Daddy Warbucks Bush and Zapata Energy, the company he founded. It's now a fish oil monger. Hey, at least it's still in the earl bidnezz. -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Governor Swill Posted August 3, 2007 Share Posted August 3, 2007 On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 04:37:20 GMT, "Where_Was_George" <wherewasgeorge@netscape.net> wrote: >> He guy is a kitten being thrown to the wolves. >> He deserves it for being presumptuousness to enter the big leagues as >> a rank amateur. >> >> Jim E > >Keep believing that. But speaking of rank amateurs, that's what Bush was >and still is. > >His only political experience was as Gov. of Texas. Texas's governor has >less political power than probably Rhode Island's. blink I don't believe you said such a stupid thing in public. Oil? Johnson Space Center? You think the Governor of Texas has no political power? >He ran all of the businesses he was involved with into the ground. No, he didn't. He never got them off the ground except that time he managed it at the taxpayer's expense. >Kinda like Daddy Warbucks Bush and Zapata Energy, the company he >founded. It's now a fish oil monger. Doesn't look like fish oil to me. http://www.zapata.ca/ >Hey, at least it's still in the earl bidnezz. And you've proven both bias and unreliability. Swill -- Picture of the day http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Where_Was_George Posted August 5, 2007 Share Posted August 5, 2007 On Aug 3, 12:54 am, Governor Swill <governor.sw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 04:37:20 GMT, "Where_Was_George" > > <wherewasgeo...@netscape.net> wrote: > >> He guy is a kitten being thrown to the wolves. > >> He deserves it for being presumptuousness to enter the big leagues as > >> a rank amateur. > > >> Jim E > > >Keep believing that. But speaking of rank amateurs, that's what Bush was > >and still is. > > >His only political experience was as Gov. of Texas. Texas's governor has > >less political power than probably Rhode Island's. > > blink > > I don't believe you said such a stupid thing in public. Oil? Johnson > Space Center? You think the Governor of Texas has no political power? Feel free to cite those powers. > >He ran all of the businesses he was involved with into the ground. > > No, he didn't. He never got them off the ground except that time he > managed it at the taxpayer's expense. Harken Energy, Cateraire etc. Even the Ranger's stadium was someone else's project. He was just a "name" who's purpose was to help persuade the state to take other people's property to build a privately-owned stadium. > >Kinda like Daddy Warbucks Bush and Zapata Energy, the company he > >founded. It's now a fish oil monger. > > Doesn't look like fish oil to me.http://www.zapata.ca/ Zapata Takes Over Bianca's Smut Shack Former fish-oil firm hopes recent spree of Web-site buys will make it a Net contender Jon Swartz, Chronicle Staff Writer Friday, July 17, 1998 Ay Caramba! The Houston company named after the movie ``Viva Zapata!'' yesterday bought its 24th Web site since April. Zapata Corp., a fish processor that is reinventing itself as an online contender, has purchased San Francisco-based BiancaTroll Productions Inc., best known for Smut Shack, a sex-oriented chat room. Zapata said 80,000 people a day visit Bianca's chat rooms, which also feature topics such as religion, family and hobbies. Bianca is considered a crucial piece in Zapata's newfound strategy to create an online community to rival America Online and cash in on the Internet boom. ``From what we can tell, (Zapata) seems to have a good grasp on what they want to do online,'' Bianca co-founder Dave Thau said. Terms of the deal were not disclosed. ``We've been laughed at before as a fish-oil company going high tech, but we don't take it personally,'' Zapata CEO Avie Glazer said. ``And let me assure you, no one is laughing anymore.'' ... Started by former President George Bush in 1953, Zapata has taken strategic detours before. It began as an oil exploration and currently makes most of its money selling fish meal and sausage casings. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/1998/07/17/BU75152.DTL > >Hey, at least it's still in the earl bidnezz. > > And you've proven both bias and unreliability. Wishful thinking. -- > > Swill > -- > Picture of the dayhttp://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.