Did the USA really land on the moon?

Today in science we watched a TV show (shown in the USA Feb 15, 2001) about how the apollo moon landing was a fake. Never happened. As much as I love learning about the moon and space, even I thought the moon landing was 1969 bullshit!

So I want to know, do you think the US landed on the moon or not? If ya want, give your risen why or why not. (I might show my science teacher.)

i odnt htink it did, coz of the flag flying whereas there's no atmosphere on the moon.

 

Hey , cmlp, are ya inot physics and all?

i believe hyprocrisy......but not in stuff i don't give a damn about...

Kinda. Basically anything about space. astronamy is about the only part of science I'm into. I could spend HOURS just reading about that type of stuff.

yea, i was addicted ot it too, and black holes are ma specialty but im into more of physics and cosmolgy.

eh, im more into elemental stuff...

mabey.. if they did, why did they.

You people are funny....Of course it landed

who cares?

lol DS, I think that the flag thing is pretty freaky, but I believe it was a real landing

One thing I wonder about. That footage of Neil Armstrong first stepping on the moon and saying one small step for etc...

Who was holding the camera?

A robot silly man.

The flag is is waving because it is made of a velcro type material.

 

Read this:

http://batesmotel.8m.com/

 

I am convinced.

i clicked no because i could.......

i just dont give a damn anymore lol

Today in science we watched a TV show (shown in the USA Feb 15, 2001) about how the apollo moon landing was a fake. Never happened. As much as I love learning about the moon and space, even I thought the moon landing was 1969 bullshit!

So I want to know, do you think the US landed on the moon or not? If ya want, give your risen why or why not. (I might show my science teacher.)

 

 

First, go back to English class and learn proper context. You mean "reason", not "risen".

 

I am of the belief that they did not land on the moon, at least not at that time. In the 60's the amount of rocket fuel required to propel a space craft of that magnitude would be the reason it would never take off. See, at that time, rocket engine technology was not sophisticated enough to warrant a spacecraft that weighed thousands of pounds to break atmo. The sheer weight of the fuel would have not allowed it to lift off because it was too heavy.

 

The whole sequence of men "hopping" on the moon could be simulated in my backyard with any digital camera and a timer. Any footage of a man skipping can be slowed down and re-played to look like actual time space of normal motion.

 

Is it not like a zillion degrees below zero in space? Am I right to think that recording equipment would freeze before being useful?

 

The photographs of the moon display the index markers on the film in the forefront. They should be in the background or even not visible if they had not been altered.

 

Many of the "original" crew of the first moon landing have been "disappeared". When I say "disappeared" I mean killed by the government and no body was found. Could this be a government conspiracy to cover up the truth? NO SHIT!

 

 

Do you really think that if a planetoid of no gravity were the plains of a golfing game that the balls would leave orbit, or never come down? I mean come on. What does a golf ball weigh? An ounce? And the government wants me to believe that you can sink a 400 foot shot in a meteor hole in zero gravity? The damn ball does not weigh enough to come back down. Something anyone that knows anything about space and relativity and travel knows, that in zero gravity, speed remains constant. So, if a ball is shot at a vector of 45 degrees upward...the speed remains constant, that bloody ball is NEVER coming back.

 

 

 

Leave it to the Americans to try and fool the world. Was it not them who also tried to convince the world that Iraq was the focal point of terrorism, when the confirmed terrorists are in Afghanistan? Do not tell me oil money has nothing to do with it.

One thing I wonder about. That footage of Neil Armstrong first stepping on the moon and saying one small step for etc...

Who was holding the camera?

 

 

Buzz Alderan

One thing I wonder about. That footage of Neil Armstrong first stepping on the moon and saying one small step for etc...

Who was holding the camera?

 

Satelite? meh...

lmao how cute rusu if there were satellites back then i doubt it would work

 

mk...nice observations

mk...nice observations

 

 

Some would argue I read too much.

Some would argue I read too much.

isnt reading good?!

anyway u will become smarter from reading

isnt reading good?!

anyway u will become smarter from reading

You definatley will.

Don't all things have gravity though? I mean, the moon doesn't have "zero gravity." It just has a lot less gravity than Earth does. And I do think they would've had the technology to do it back then. There is even a lot of technology out today that could be used, but isn't. Like computer have been around for a while, but they have only recently become popular. I'm pretty sure we have landed on the moon.

First, go back to English class and learn proper context. You mean "reason", not "risen".

 

I am of the belief that they did not land on the moon, at least not at that time. In the 60's the amount of rocket fuel required to propel a space craft of that magnitude would be the reason it would never take off. See, at that time, rocket engine technology was not sophisticated enough to warrant a spacecraft that weighed thousands of pounds to break atmo. The sheer weight of the fuel would have not allowed it to lift off because it was too heavy.

 

The whole sequence of men "hopping" on the moon could be simulated in my backyard with any digital camera and a timer. Any footage of a man skipping can be slowed down and re-played to look like actual time space of normal motion.

 

Is it not like a zillion degrees below zero in space? Am I right to think that recording equipment would freeze before being useful?

 

The photographs of the moon display the index markers on the film in the forefront. They should be in the background or even not visible if they had not been altered.

 

Many of the "original" crew of the first moon landing have been "disappeared". When I say "disappeared" I mean killed by the government and no body was found. Could this be a government conspiracy to cover up the truth? NO SHIT!

 

 

Do you really think that if a planetoid of no gravity were the plains of a golfing game that the balls would leave orbit, or never come down? I mean come on. What does a golf ball weigh? An ounce? And the government wants me to believe that you can sink a 400 foot shot in a meteor hole in zero gravity? The damn ball does not weigh enough to come back down. Something anyone that knows anything about space and relativity and travel knows, that in zero gravity, speed remains constant. So, if a ball is shot at a vector of 45 degrees upward...the speed remains constant, that bloody ball is NEVER coming back.

 

 

 

Leave it to the Americans to try and fool the world. Was it not them who also tried to convince the world that Iraq was the focal point of terrorism, when the confirmed terrorists are in Afghanistan? Do not tell me oil money has nothing to do with it.

 

ROFL!

First of all, I did a report on this moon landing for history class. The original crew was not 'killed off' by the government as you claim. That is pure 'I see JFK in a UFO" bull****.

Second of all, the moon has gravity. If it has enough gravitational force to influence tides on Earth, you can bet the thing can hang on to a GOLF BALL.

As for the index markers, good point. But, look at the point right above it about how recording could freeze in space. Maybe, uh, they built special cameras that wouldn't sucumb to the elements? And if these cameras and video feeds were made for the moon landing, you can bet they weren't your standard Polariod, right? So out goes the index markers.

And last, he doesn't need to go back to English class. It is called a typo, and we all do it, all the time.

And, honestly, nothing you typed was that impressive. Just the rants of another person looking at the facts and only accepting a few, so they won't have to admit they are wrong.

ROFL!

First of all, I did a report on this moon landing for history class. The original crew was not 'killed off' by the government as you claim. That is pure 'I see JFK in a UFO" bull****.

Second of all, the moon has gravity. If it has enough gravitational force to influence tides on Earth, you can bet the thing can hang on to a GOLF BALL.

As for the index markers, good point. But, look at the point right above it about how recording could freeze in space. Maybe, uh, they built special cameras that wouldn't sucumb to the elements? And if these cameras and video feeds were made for the moon landing, you can bet they weren't your standard Polariod, right? So out goes the index markers.

And last, he doesn't need to go back to English class. It is called a typo, and we all do it, all the time.

And, honestly, nothing you typed was that impressive. Just the rants of another person looking at the facts and only accepting a few, so they won't have to admit they are wrong.

Yeah, what you said.

Well Azem needs to put his 2 cents before an argument starts and the thread gets closed. I personally think they didnt land wen they said they did. maybe month or years after but not exactly then. You must remmeber this happened when everyone was racing to get to the moon. So america probaly lied to get props or sumpthin of that matter. Im positive they've made it there now but just not exactly when they said they did.