Disgusting Clintons make $109 million and make $10 million incharitable donations (TO THEIR OWN FOUN

  • Thread starter PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com
  • Start date
P

PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com

Guest
Disgusting Clintons make $109 million and make $10 million in
charitable donations (TO THEIR OWN FOUNDATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/05/u...&ex=1208059200&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and former President Bill Clinton
released tax data Friday showing they earned $109 million over the
last eight years, an ascent into the uppermost tier of American
taxpayers that seemed unimaginable in 2001, when they left the White
House with little money and facing millions in legal bills.

The bulk of their wealth has come from speaking and book-writing,
which together account for almost $92 million, including a $15 million
advance -- larger than previously thought -- from Mr. Clinton's 2004
autobiography, "My Life." The former president's vigorous lecture
schedule, where his speeches command upwards of $250,000, brought in
almost $52 million.

During that time, the Clintons paid $33.8 million in federal taxes and
claimed deductions for $10.2 million in charitable contributions. The
contributions went to a family foundation run by the Clintons that has
given away only about half of the money they put into it, and most of
that was last year, after Mrs. Clinton declared her candidacy.
 
But you stripped Bill of his lawyer license.
(snicker)


<PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com> wrote in message
news:536d16e3-e85c-4cd0-941d-3e0968740be7@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
> Disgusting Clintons make $109 million and make $10 million in
> charitable donations (TO THEIR OWN FOUNDATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
>
>

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/05/u...&ex=1208059200&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
>
> Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and former President Bill Clinton
> released tax data Friday showing they earned $109 million over the
> last eight years, an ascent into the uppermost tier of American
> taxpayers that seemed unimaginable in 2001, when they left the White
> House with little money and facing millions in legal bills.
>
> The bulk of their wealth has come from speaking and book-writing,
> which together account for almost $92 million, including a $15 million
> advance -- larger than previously thought -- from Mr. Clinton's 2004
> autobiography, "My Life." The former president's vigorous lecture
> schedule, where his speeches command upwards of $250,000, brought in
> almost $52 million.
>
> During that time, the Clintons paid $33.8 million in federal taxes and
> claimed deductions for $10.2 million in charitable contributions. The
> contributions went to a family foundation run by the Clintons that has
> given away only about half of the money they put into it, and most of
> that was last year, after Mrs. Clinton declared her candidacy.
>
 
PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com wrote in
news:536d16e3-e85c-4cd0-941d-3e0968740be7@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com:

> Disgusting Clintons make $109 million and make $10 million in
> charitable donations (TO THEIR OWN FOUNDATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/05/us/politics/05clintons.html?ei=5065&e
> n=170b1b4a81cb317b&ex=1208059200&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
>
> Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and former President Bill Clinton
> released tax data Friday showing they earned $109 million over the
> last eight years, an ascent into the uppermost tier of American
> taxpayers that seemed unimaginable in 2001, when they left the White
> House with little money and facing millions in legal bills.
>
> The bulk of their wealth has come from speaking and book-writing,
> which together account for almost $92 million, including a $15 million
> advance -- larger than previously thought -- from Mr. Clinton's 2004
> autobiography, "My Life." The former president's vigorous lecture
> schedule, where his speeches command upwards of $250,000, brought in
> almost $52 million.
>
> During that time, the Clintons paid $33.8 million in federal taxes and
> claimed deductions for $10.2 million in charitable contributions. The
> contributions went to a family foundation run by the Clintons that has
> given away only about half of the money they put into it, and most of
> that was last year, after Mrs. Clinton declared her candidacy.
>
>


If they made the money from books and lectures, well this is not so bad..
it is not bad at all! Thank you for enlightening me 'cos I was thinking
badly of the Clintons... sincerely, thank you!

Lots better than the way the Bush's made THIER money with blood and scams.
 
Itchy wrote:
> PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com wrote in
> news:536d16e3-e85c-4cd0-941d-3e0968740be7@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com:
>
>> Disgusting Clintons make $109 million and make $10 million in
>> charitable donations (TO THEIR OWN FOUNDATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
>>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/05/us/politics/05clintons.html?ei=5065&e
>> n=170b1b4a81cb317b&ex=1208059200&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
>>
>> Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and former President Bill Clinton
>> released tax data Friday showing they earned $109 million over the
>> last eight years, an ascent into the uppermost tier of American
>> taxpayers that seemed unimaginable in 2001, when they left the White
>> House with little money and facing millions in legal bills.
>>
>> The bulk of their wealth has come from speaking and book-writing,
>> which together account for almost $92 million, including a $15
>> million advance -- larger than previously thought -- from Mr.
>> Clinton's 2004 autobiography, "My Life." The former president's
>> vigorous lecture schedule, where his speeches command upwards of
>> $250,000, brought in almost $52 million.
>>
>> During that time, the Clintons paid $33.8 million in federal taxes
>> and claimed deductions for $10.2 million in charitable
>> contributions. The contributions went to a family foundation run by
>> the Clintons that has given away only about half of the money they
>> put into it, and most of that was last year, after Mrs. Clinton
>> declared her candidacy.
>>
>>

>
> If they made the money from books and lectures, well this is not so
> bad.. it is not bad at all! Thank you for enlightening me 'cos I was
> thinking badly of the Clintons... sincerely, thank you!
>
> Lots better than the way the Bush's made THIER money with blood and
> scams.
>

An excellent point.
 
"Mr.Smartypants" <bcpg@canada.com> wrote in
news:2b95b28e-d26b-4840-903a-5d0a7ec25614@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com:

> On Apr 5, 2:24
 
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT), PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com wrote:

>Disgusting Clintons make $109 million and make $10 million in
>charitable donations (TO THEIR OWN FOUNDATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/05/u...&ex=1208059200&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
>
>Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and former President Bill Clinton
>released tax data Friday showing they earned $109 million over the
>last eight years, an ascent into the uppermost tier of American
>taxpayers that seemed unimaginable in 2001, when they left the White
>House with little money and facing millions in legal bills.
>
>The bulk of their wealth has come from speaking and book-writing,
>which together account for almost $92 million, including a $15 million
>advance -- larger than previously thought -- from Mr. Clinton's 2004
>autobiography, "My Life." The former president's vigorous lecture
>schedule, where his speeches command upwards of $250,000, brought in
>almost $52 million.
>
>During that time, the Clintons paid $33.8 million in federal taxes and
>claimed deductions for $10.2 million in charitable contributions. The
>contributions went to a family foundation run by the Clintons that has
>given away only about half of the money they put into it, and most of
>that was last year, after Mrs. Clinton declared her candidacy.



Goodness donating 10% of one's income to charity rates a disgusting? They
paid 33% of their income to the IRS in taxes. This story doesn't do anything
for your cause pissant.

You Suck.
 
In article <2ddgv31tpp74nn86aqfg7iv9fcgpg6dl48@4ax.com>,
internationalman@mystery.co.uk says...
> On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT), PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com wrote:
>
> >Disgusting Clintons make $109 million and make $10 million in
> >charitable donations (TO THEIR OWN FOUNDATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
> >
> >http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/05/u...&ex=1208059200&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
> >
> >Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and former President Bill Clinton
> >released tax data Friday showing they earned $109 million over the
> >last eight years, an ascent into the uppermost tier of American
> >taxpayers that seemed unimaginable in 2001, when they left the White
> >House with little money and facing millions in legal bills.
> >
> >The bulk of their wealth has come from speaking and book-writing,
> >which together account for almost $92 million, including a $15 million
> >advance -- larger than previously thought -- from Mr. Clinton's 2004
> >autobiography, "My Life." The former president's vigorous lecture
> >schedule, where his speeches command upwards of $250,000, brought in
> >almost $52 million.
> >
> >During that time, the Clintons paid $33.8 million in federal taxes and
> >claimed deductions for $10.2 million in charitable contributions. The
> >contributions went to a family foundation run by the Clintons that has
> >given away only about half of the money they put into it, and most of
> >that was last year, after Mrs. Clinton declared her candidacy.

>
>
> Goodness donating 10% of one's income to charity rates a disgusting? They
> paid 33% of their income to the IRS in taxes. This story doesn't do anything
> for your cause pissant.


Donating to charity is commendable.
Donating to one's own foundation is, scummy...
 
No wonder she had the money to LOAN to Herself in her campaign. I wish I
could LEND money to a campaign. The last I heard everyone else had to DONATE
money to a campaign, but she LOANS money the her campaign. I guess that
means that she will be paying herself back for the LOAN. While everyone
elses DONATIONS are gone forever.
 
tankfixer <paul.carrier@us.kat.army.mil> used a stick in the sand to
babble
>> Goodness donating 10% of one's income to charity rates a disgusting? They
>> paid 33% of their income to the IRS in taxes. This story doesn't do anything
>> for your cause pissant.

>
>Donating to charity is commendable.
>Donating to one's own foundation is, scummy...


A time honored tradition in western culture for centuries. Many such
foundations provide positive contributions for society.

Swill
--
Daily thought: Some people are like a Slinky, not really
good for anything, but they bring a smile to your lips
when pushed down the stairs.
Picture of the day: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
 
> Not as much as the Bush's did I would wager, and not Cheney..and this
> does not count the money they made from machinations such as the Texas
> Ranger stadium.


Your ignorance is showing.

On Apr 5, 7:38
 
> Wow 10% of their income, what % do the Bushes give?

Why don't you look it up?

On Apr 7, 8:28
 
In article <774c06d2-c27e-4a50-924e-e79e636a8ff2
@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>, mancmanc@googlemail.com says...
> Hi,
>
> Wow 10% of their income, what % do the Bushes give?
>


The 2004 tax return for President and First Lady Bush shows nearly
$78,000 in charitable contributions on just under $673,000 of taxable
income.

%11.58 ...
 
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 19:50:27 -0700, tankfixer <paul.carrier@us.kat.army.mil>
wrote:

>In article <2ddgv31tpp74nn86aqfg7iv9fcgpg6dl48@4ax.com>,
>internationalman@mystery.co.uk says...
>> On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT), PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com wrote:
>>
>> >Disgusting Clintons make $109 million and make $10 million in
>> >charitable donations (TO THEIR OWN FOUNDATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
>> >
>> >http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/05/u...&ex=1208059200&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
>> >
>> >Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and former President Bill Clinton
>> >released tax data Friday showing they earned $109 million over the
>> >last eight years, an ascent into the uppermost tier of American
>> >taxpayers that seemed unimaginable in 2001, when they left the White
>> >House with little money and facing millions in legal bills.
>> >
>> >The bulk of their wealth has come from speaking and book-writing,
>> >which together account for almost $92 million, including a $15 million
>> >advance -- larger than previously thought -- from Mr. Clinton's 2004
>> >autobiography, "My Life." The former president's vigorous lecture
>> >schedule, where his speeches command upwards of $250,000, brought in
>> >almost $52 million.
>> >
>> >During that time, the Clintons paid $33.8 million in federal taxes and
>> >claimed deductions for $10.2 million in charitable contributions. The
>> >contributions went to a family foundation run by the Clintons that has
>> >given away only about half of the money they put into it, and most of
>> >that was last year, after Mrs. Clinton declared her candidacy.

>>
>>
>> Goodness donating 10% of one's income to charity rates a disgusting? They
>> paid 33% of their income to the IRS in taxes. This story doesn't do anything
>> for your cause pissant.

>
>Donating to charity is commendable.
>Donating to one's own foundation is, scummy...


It's good enough for Bill Gates, good enough for the various Ford families,
good enough for the Rockefellers, the Carnagies, the Morgans and on and on and
on.
 
tankfixer <paul.carrier@us.kat.army.mil> used a stick in the sand to
babble
>In article <774c06d2-c27e-4a50-924e-e79e636a8ff2
>@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>, mancmanc@googlemail.com says...
>> Hi,
>>
>> Wow 10% of their income, what % do the Bushes give?
>>

>
>The 2004 tax return for President and First Lady Bush shows nearly
>$78,000 in charitable contributions on just under $673,000 of taxable
>income.
>
>%11.58 ...


Could you possibly pull a credible source out of your ass too while
you're in there?

Swill
--
Daily thought: Some people are like a Slinky, not really
good for anything, but they bring a smile to your lips
when pushed down the stairs.
Picture of the day: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
 
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:08:16 -0400, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

>tankfixer <paul.carrier@us.kat.army.mil> used a stick in the sand to
>babble
>>> Goodness donating 10% of one's income to charity rates a disgusting? They
>>> paid 33% of their income to the IRS in taxes. This story doesn't do anything
>>> for your cause pissant.

>>
>>Donating to charity is commendable.
>>Donating to one's own foundation is, scummy...

>
>A time honored tradition in western culture for centuries. Many such
>foundations provide positive contributions for society.
>
>Swill


Didn't I read somewhere that Clinton's library had a massage parlor?....AAC
 
In article <v7nlv39sp1chu75l5vegpmok6o7gmudr5g@4ax.com>,
NoAmnesty@earthlink.net says...
> On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:08:16 -0400, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >tankfixer <paul.carrier@us.kat.army.mil> used a stick in the sand to
> >babble
> >>> Goodness donating 10% of one's income to charity rates a disgusting? They
> >>> paid 33% of their income to the IRS in taxes. This story doesn't do anything
> >>> for your cause pissant.
> >>
> >>Donating to charity is commendable.
> >>Donating to one's own foundation is, scummy...

> >
> >A time honored tradition in western culture for centuries. Many such
> >foundations provide positive contributions for society.
> >
> >Swill

>
> Didn't I read somewhere that Clinton's library had a massage parlor?....AAC



Not has, Is
 
In article <a0dlv3l9gm7802uu31ee2bht1cnce2j28r@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> tankfixer <paul.carrier@us.kat.army.mil> used a stick in the sand to
> babble
> >In article <774c06d2-c27e-4a50-924e-e79e636a8ff2
> >@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>, mancmanc@googlemail.com says...
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Wow 10% of their income, what % do the Bushes give?
> >>

> >
> >The 2004 tax return for President and First Lady Bush shows nearly
> >$78,000 in charitable contributions on just under $673,000 of taxable
> >income.
> >
> >%11.58 ...

>
> Could you possibly pull a credible source out of your ass too while
> you're in there?
>


You got different numbers then postem
 

Similar threads

Back
Top