P
Patriot Games
Guest
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Nov16/0,4670,CongressFarmBill,00.html
Farm Bill Falls Short in Senate
Friday, November 16, 2007
WASHINGTON - The Senate blocked a $286 billion farm bill Friday, a blow to
farm-state lawmakers who wanted to give their constituents expanded
subsidies before next year's elections.
Though politically popular, the bill stalled in a dispute between the
parties over unrelated amendments that Republicans wanted to add. Democrats
failed to get the 60 votes they needed to cut off debate on the measure. The
final vote was 55-42.
The vote could push consideration of the legislation into 2008 or beyond.
Senate Agriculture Chairman Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, said Thursday that the bill
may fare better after next year's elections, with a new Congress and a new
president.
The Bush administration has issued a veto threat against the bill, saying it
is too expensive and would pay wealthy farmers too much.
Harkin speculated on the floor Friday that the White House is pressuring
Republicans to stop the bill because President Bush doesn't want to veto
legislation that is so popular in farm states.
"I certainly hope the situation is not a deliberate, or orchestrated,
attempt to stop the farm bill dead in its tracks, but I'm beginning to
wonder," Harkin said.
Farm state Democrats headed home for the Thanksgiving recess are preparing
to blame Republicans for slowing down the legislation. Some Republicans
wanted to offer amendments dealing with the alternative minimum tax,
immigration and other nonagricultural issues.
"I need to explain why the farm bill has been obstructed," said South Dakota
Sen. Tim Johnson, a Democrat who is up for re-election next year. "That is
no harm to me. I'm afraid the Republicans have some explaining to do."
Republicans blamed Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., for attempting
to limit the amendments.
"The Senate will pass a farm bill _ that is certain _ but only after an open
and fair debate on the Senate floor," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch
McConnell, R-Ky.
Four Republicans voted with Democrats to end debate: South Dakota Sen. John
Thune, Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley, Minnesota Sen. Norm Coleman and Oregon
Sen. Gordon Smith. Coleman and Smith are up for re-election next year.
The five-year bill would extend the 2002 law that governs farm subsidies and
nutrition programs, including food stamps. Most of those programs are
operating under a temporary extension now.
The Senate legislation, like a similar bill passed by the House in July, has
come under fire from taxpayer and government watchdog groups because it
would expand subsidies for some crops and still allow some wealthy farmers
to receive government checks.
It would also include $5 billion for farmers who have suffered
weather-related disasters, a provision authored by Montana Sen. Max Baucus,
a Democrat up for re-election next year.
Supporters of the bill point to an attempt to scale back some subsidy
programs, including limits on the amount of money paid to those who don't
make a large portion of their income on farming. The bill also increases
nutrition benefits for the poor and for rural communities, and adds dollars
that protect environmentally sensitive farm land.
As the Senate bill languished, the top Republican on the House Agriculture
Committee said Thursday that he would support extending current law until
Sept. 30, the end of the current budget year.
"The consequences of the Senate's inaction are already impacting the
planning decisions of our farmers and ranchers," said GOP Rep. Bob Goodlatte
of Virginia.
But House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson, D-Minn., said it
is too early to talk about extending the law.
"The budget situation isn't getting any better, and a year from now, we may
have less money available to write the farm bill," he said.
The Department of Agriculture agreed.
"There is still time for Congress to pass a new farm bill," Acting
Agriculture Secretary Charles Conner said in a statement.
Farm Bill Falls Short in Senate
Friday, November 16, 2007
WASHINGTON - The Senate blocked a $286 billion farm bill Friday, a blow to
farm-state lawmakers who wanted to give their constituents expanded
subsidies before next year's elections.
Though politically popular, the bill stalled in a dispute between the
parties over unrelated amendments that Republicans wanted to add. Democrats
failed to get the 60 votes they needed to cut off debate on the measure. The
final vote was 55-42.
The vote could push consideration of the legislation into 2008 or beyond.
Senate Agriculture Chairman Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, said Thursday that the bill
may fare better after next year's elections, with a new Congress and a new
president.
The Bush administration has issued a veto threat against the bill, saying it
is too expensive and would pay wealthy farmers too much.
Harkin speculated on the floor Friday that the White House is pressuring
Republicans to stop the bill because President Bush doesn't want to veto
legislation that is so popular in farm states.
"I certainly hope the situation is not a deliberate, or orchestrated,
attempt to stop the farm bill dead in its tracks, but I'm beginning to
wonder," Harkin said.
Farm state Democrats headed home for the Thanksgiving recess are preparing
to blame Republicans for slowing down the legislation. Some Republicans
wanted to offer amendments dealing with the alternative minimum tax,
immigration and other nonagricultural issues.
"I need to explain why the farm bill has been obstructed," said South Dakota
Sen. Tim Johnson, a Democrat who is up for re-election next year. "That is
no harm to me. I'm afraid the Republicans have some explaining to do."
Republicans blamed Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., for attempting
to limit the amendments.
"The Senate will pass a farm bill _ that is certain _ but only after an open
and fair debate on the Senate floor," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch
McConnell, R-Ky.
Four Republicans voted with Democrats to end debate: South Dakota Sen. John
Thune, Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley, Minnesota Sen. Norm Coleman and Oregon
Sen. Gordon Smith. Coleman and Smith are up for re-election next year.
The five-year bill would extend the 2002 law that governs farm subsidies and
nutrition programs, including food stamps. Most of those programs are
operating under a temporary extension now.
The Senate legislation, like a similar bill passed by the House in July, has
come under fire from taxpayer and government watchdog groups because it
would expand subsidies for some crops and still allow some wealthy farmers
to receive government checks.
It would also include $5 billion for farmers who have suffered
weather-related disasters, a provision authored by Montana Sen. Max Baucus,
a Democrat up for re-election next year.
Supporters of the bill point to an attempt to scale back some subsidy
programs, including limits on the amount of money paid to those who don't
make a large portion of their income on farming. The bill also increases
nutrition benefits for the poor and for rural communities, and adds dollars
that protect environmentally sensitive farm land.
As the Senate bill languished, the top Republican on the House Agriculture
Committee said Thursday that he would support extending current law until
Sept. 30, the end of the current budget year.
"The consequences of the Senate's inaction are already impacting the
planning decisions of our farmers and ranchers," said GOP Rep. Bob Goodlatte
of Virginia.
But House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson, D-Minn., said it
is too early to talk about extending the law.
"The budget situation isn't getting any better, and a year from now, we may
have less money available to write the farm bill," he said.
The Department of Agriculture agreed.
"There is still time for Congress to pass a new farm bill," Acting
Agriculture Secretary Charles Conner said in a statement.
