FatAss Hitlary Savagely Attacks Young Buckwheak Clinton For Small-Town Voter Remarks

[Patriot Games]

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Clinton_Small_town/2008/04/12/87443.html

Clinton Hits Obama For Small-Town Voter Remarks

Saturday, April 12, 2008

Democrat Hillary Clinton criticized presidential rival Barack Obama on
Friday for describing small-town Pennsylvania residents as bitter and said
she would help economically struggling communities, not look down on them.

Clinton, whose big Pennsylvania lead over Obama in opinion polls has been
shrinking before their April 22 primary election showdown, said residents in
small towns suffering from job losses across the state were resilient and
optimistic.

"Pennsylvania doesn't need a president who looks down on them," she said at
a rally in Philadelphia. "They need a president who stands up for them, who
fights for them, who works hard for your futures, your jobs, your families."

Obama, an Illinois senator, told a crowd in San Francisco this week he
understood why residents of towns hard hit by manufacturing job losses would
feel bitter.

"You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small
towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's
replaced them," Obama was quoted as saying by the Huffington Post.

"And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or
religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant
sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

At a town hall meeting on Friday, Obama said he made the comment because
some supporters heard he was having trouble attracting working-class voters.
He was trying to say he empathized with them.

Clinton, a New York senator and former first lady, once led Obama by double
digits in Pennsylvania, the next battleground in their bruising battle for
the Democratic nomination to face Republican John McCain in November's
presidential election.

That lead has slowly dwindled to about 4 to 6 points in recent polls.
Clinton's biggest backers in Pennsylvania have been blue-collar voters, but
the state has sustained job losses.

A loss in Pennsylvania would almost surely doom Clinton's uphill race to
catch Obama, who leads in delegates who will select the nominee at the
August convention.

The McCain campaign also criticized Obama for the comments, saying that "it
shows an elitism and condescension towards hard-working Americans that is
nothing short of breathtaking."

'I'M IN TOUCH'

In Indiana, Obama bristled at the suggestion he did not understand voters'
concerns.

"Out of touch? Out of touch? I mean, John McCain -- it took him three tries
to finally figure out that the home foreclosure crisis was a problem and to
come up with a plan for it, and he's saying I'm out of touch?" Obama said.

"Senator Clinton voted for a credit card-sponsored bankruptcy bill that made
it harder for people to get out of debt after taking money from the
financial services companies, and she says I'm out of touch?" he told a
crowd in Terre Haute, Indiana. "No, I'm in touch. I know exactly what's
going on. ... People are fed up. They're angry and they're frustrated and
they're bitter."

Clinton, whose father was from Pennsylvania, said in Philadelphia she had a
lot of affection for the state and enjoyed traveling through it.

"It's being reported that my opponent said that the people of Pennsylvania
who faced hard times are bitter. Well, that's not my experience," she said.

"As I travel around Pennsylvania, I meet people who are resilient, who are
optimistic, who are positive, who are rolling up their sleeves. They are
working hard everyday for a better future, for themselves and their
children," she said.

 

[Topaz]

Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:
"German women, German men !
It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the
Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.
Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not
forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National
Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily
politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very
unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic
intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not
respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the
woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different
value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German
woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best
sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other
areas than the man.

The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but
also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in
the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices
and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best
suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless
devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.

The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the
past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea
of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread
winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the
man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is
not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her
talents and abilities.
Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the
frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men
were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to
the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men
always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all
great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination
have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually
loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the
woman.

It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must
be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our
attitude toward women.

The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in
government, politics, economics and social relations has not left
women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought
impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some
good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that
are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations
have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set
in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a
distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with
former ideals.

A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary
and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most
suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious
duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can
continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of
the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the
builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's
source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place
for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,
in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that
those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in
the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their
abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other
ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially
reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to
fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.

The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.
It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no
intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer
and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.
But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in
motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the
living mother of a family who gives the state children.

German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning
to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more
rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected
to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and
her daily bread is not a good trade.

A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in
our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now
the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most
evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's
birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without
emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The
government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the
resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental
change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is
responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying
about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each
elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by
1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are
the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it
will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine
the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.

We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our
national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The
national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation
on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the
woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends
to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of
our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our
blood is assured..."


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html