Guest Latrodectus Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark the water level with the cubes in it. Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to some, the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you found? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Peter Principle Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Latrodectus wrote: > Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a > pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark the > water level with the cubes in it. > Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave > oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. > Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to some, > the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you > found? BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat left in the house. Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly because only an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the scientific method could possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, stupidly designed, uncontrolled "experiment" to be in any way, shape or form meaningful. Congratulations! Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology that ISN'T incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding the ice to the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, as, moron, the fact is the VAST majority of surface ice is locked up well ABOVE the water level, not floating on the surface. Duh, duh, duh, you stupid fuck. It would still be clumsy and not terribly smart, to be sure, just not nearly as. Of course, you'd never suggest such an experiment because clumsy as it is, it would STILL too closely mirror reality for a ideological stupid asshole like you. Now, perhaps you're not lying or shilling. Perhaps you're just an incredible imbecile without the slightest clue about that which you fart asinine nonsense. I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. BTW, I've correct your subject line. You're welcome. Jaybus Freaking Crisco... -- Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit. Slow thinkers keep right. ------ Why are so many not smart enough to know they're not smart enough? http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Latrodectus Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 On Jul 29, 7:12 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> wrote: > Latrodectus wrote: > > Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a > > pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark the > > water level with the cubes in it. > > Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave > > oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. > > Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to some, > > the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you > > found? > > BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat left in > the house. > > Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! > > BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... > > Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly because only > an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the scientific method could > possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, stupidly designed, uncontrolled > "experiment" to be in any way, shape or form meaningful. Congratulations! > > Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology that ISN'T > incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding the ice to > the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, You don't read very well. I said do exactly that. Measure the water level without the ice in it, then measure it with the ice in it, then measure it after the ice has melted. The arctic ice is already displacing water simply by existing in the ocean. When that ice melts sea level does not rise. In fact some of it melts every summer and is reestablished in winter. Overall, the ice is melting more and more, but the liquid created is simply no longer displacing as the ice does. If the ice in Antarctica melted it would then be a different story, as it is on land. as, moron, the fact > is the VAST majority of surface ice is locked up well ABOVE the water level, > not floating on the surface. Duh, duh, duh, you stupid fuck. > "The vast majority of ice is locked up well above the water level, not floating on the surface", eh? So you're saying that the arctic ice is floating in the air. Actually if you put ice cubes in the water you'll see that most of the ice is UNDER the surface, which means it is displacing water. Ice doesn't hover on the surface, you fucking Jetsons reject. > It would still be clumsy and not terribly smart, to be sure, just not nearly > as. Of course, you'd never suggest such an experiment because clumsy as it > is, it would STILL too closely mirror reality for a ideological stupid > asshole like you. > "...a ideological stupid..." > Now, perhaps you're not lying or shilling. Perhaps you're just an incredible > imbecile without the slightest clue about that which you fart asinine > nonsense. I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. > > BTW, I've correct your subject line. You're welcome. > You've correct my subject line? > Jaybus Freaking Crisco... > > -- > Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit. Slow thinkers keep right. > ------ > Why are so many not smart enough to know they're not smart enough? > > http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jose Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 On Jul 29, 7:39 pm, Latrodectus <e...@elcmedia.com> wrote: > On Jul 29, 7:12 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Latrodectus wrote: > > > Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a > > > pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark the > > > water level with the cubes in it. > > > Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave > > > oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. > > > Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to some, > > > the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you > > > found? > > > BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat left in > > the house. > > > Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! > > > BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... > > > Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly because only > > an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the scientific method could > > possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, stupidly designed, uncontrolled > > "experiment" to be in any way, shape or form meaningful. Congratulations! > > > Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology that ISN'T > > incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding the ice to > > the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, > > You don't read very well. I said do exactly that. Measure the water > level without the ice in it, then measure it with the ice in it, then > measure it after the ice has melted. The arctic ice is already > displacing water simply by existing in the ocean. When that ice melts > sea level does not rise. In fact some of it melts every summer and is > reestablished in winter. Overall, the ice is melting more and more, > but the liquid created is simply no longer displacing as the ice does. > If the ice in Antarctica melted it would then be a different story, > as it is on land. > > as, moron, the fact > > > is the VAST majority of surface ice is locked up well ABOVE the water level, > > not floating on the surface. Duh, duh, duh, you stupid fuck. > > "The vast majority of ice is locked up well above the water level, > not floating on the surface", eh? So you're saying that the arctic > ice is floating in the air. Actually if you put ice cubes in the water > you'll see that most of the ice is UNDER the surface, which means it > is displacing water. Ice doesn't hover on the surface, you fucking > Jetsons reject. > > > It would still be clumsy and not terribly smart, to be sure, just not nearly > > as. Of course, you'd never suggest such an experiment because clumsy as it > > is, it would STILL too closely mirror reality for a ideological stupid > > asshole like you. > > "...a ideological stupid..." > > > Now, perhaps you're not lying or shilling. Perhaps you're just an incredible > > imbecile without the slightest clue about that which you fart asinine > > nonsense. I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. > > > BTW, I've correct your subject line. You're welcome. > > You've correct my subject line? > > > > > Jaybus Freaking Crisco... > > > -- > > Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit. Slow thinkers keep right. > > ------ > > Why are so many not smart enough to know they're not smart enough? > > >http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nebuchadnezzar II Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 "Peter Principle" <petesfeats@CUTITOUTgmail.com> wrote in message news:46ad3abe$0$12187$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... > Latrodectus wrote: >> Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a >> pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark >> the >> water level with the cubes in it. >> Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave >> oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. >> Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to some, >> the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you >> found? > > BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat > left in the house. > > Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! > > BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... > > Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly because > only an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the scientific > method could possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, stupidly > designed, uncontrolled "experiment" to be in any way, shape or form > meaningful. Congratulations! > > Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology that > ISN'T incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding > the ice to the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, as, > moron, the fact is the VAST majority of surface ice is locked up well > ABOVE the water level, not floating on the surface. Duh, duh, duh, you > stupid fuck. > > It would still be clumsy and not terribly smart, to be sure, just not > nearly as. Of course, you'd never suggest such an experiment because > clumsy as it is, it would STILL too closely mirror reality for a > ideological stupid asshole like you. > > Now, perhaps you're not lying or shilling. Perhaps you're just an > incredible imbecile without the slightest clue about that which you > fart asinine nonsense. I'm willing to give you the benefit of the > doubt. > > BTW, I've correct your subject line. You're welcome. > > Jaybus Freaking Crisco... I laughed so hard I almost pissed my pants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Latrodectus Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 On Jul 29, 7:49 pm, Deathbringer <Deathbringer.2ui...@wpyo.bbs.local> wrote: > Latrodectus;1589140 Wrote: > > > Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a > > pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark the > > water level with the cubes in it. > > Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave > > oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. > > Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to some, > > the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you > > found? > > Out of morbid curiosity, are you parodying every mindless Bushbot out > there on purpose or do you really not see why people question your > methodology? It can be hard to tell good acting from an honest lack of > brainpower over the net. > It was a simple and controlled experiment, just for fun. I keep hearing that if the arctic ice melts then our coastal cities will be flooded. Forget politics. Try my experiment and see how the water level does not rise when the ice melts. It's because the ice is already displacing the water. That is to say, the water level would be lower without the ice in it. It's as high as it's getting, unless of course the ice on land, say in Antarctica, melts and enters the ocean. > -- > Deathbringer > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Deathbringer's Profile:http://Off Topic Forum.com/member.php?userid=2753 > View this thread:http://Off Topic Forum.com/showthread.php?t=237935 > > Posted via Forum to Usenet Gateway athttp://Off Topic Forum.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nebuchadnezzar II Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Latrodectus wrote: > On Jul 29, 7:12 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> > wrote: >> Latrodectus wrote: >>> Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a >>> pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark the >>> water level with the cubes in it. >>> Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave >>> oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. >>> Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to some, >>> the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you >>> found? >> BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat left in >> the house. >> >> Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! >> >> BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... >> >> Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly because only >> an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the scientific method could >> possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, stupidly designed, uncontrolled >> "experiment" to be in any way, shape or form meaningful. Congratulations! >> >> Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology that ISN'T >> incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding the ice to >> the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, > > You don't read very well. I said do exactly that. Measure the water > level without the ice in it, then measure it with the ice in it, then > measure it after the ice has melted. The arctic ice is already > displacing water simply by existing in the ocean. When that ice melts > sea level does not rise. In fact some of it melts every summer and is > reestablished in winter. Overall, the ice is melting more and more, > but the liquid created is simply no longer displacing as the ice does. Holy shit you are a riot. This is not garden variety stupidity you demonstrate. It's truly a work of art and doesn't happen all that often. Please continue, if only for the entertainment value. > If the ice in Antarctica melted it would then be a different story, > as it is on land. > > as, moron, the fact >> is the VAST majority of surface ice is locked up well ABOVE the water level, >> not floating on the surface. Duh, duh, duh, you stupid fuck. >> > > "The vast majority of ice is locked up well above the water level, > not floating on the surface", eh? So you're saying that the arctic > ice is floating in the air. Actually if you put ice cubes in the water > you'll see that most of the ice is UNDER the surface, which means it > is displacing water. Ice doesn't hover on the surface, you fucking > Jetsons reject. Here you go again, shit I can't keep from laughing. You are truly a world class imbecile. There's lots of land in the Arctic, moron. I've been there and seen it. I suppose now you're going to tell me that the dirt I walked on was really just some form of brown ice and all the glaciers that exist in the Arctic are really just sitting on top of more ice. > >> It would still be clumsy and not terribly smart, to be sure, just not nearly >> as. Of course, you'd never suggest such an experiment because clumsy as it >> is, it would STILL too closely mirror reality for a ideological stupid >> asshole like you. >> > > "...a ideological stupid..." > >> Now, perhaps you're not lying or shilling. Perhaps you're just an incredible >> imbecile without the slightest clue about that which you fart asinine >> nonsense. I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. >> >> BTW, I've correct your subject line. You're welcome. >> > > You've correct my subject line? > > >> Jaybus Freaking Crisco... >> >> -- >> Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit. Slow thinkers keep right. >> ------ >> Why are so many not smart enough to know they're not smart enough? >> >> http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Peter Principle Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Latrodectus wrote: > On Jul 29, 7:12 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> > wrote: >> Latrodectus wrote: >>> Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a >>> pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark >>> the water level with the cubes in it. >>> Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave >>> oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. >>> Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to >>> some, the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what >>> you found? >> >> BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat >> left in the house. >> >> Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! >> >> BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... >> >> Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly >> because only an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the >> scientific method could possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, >> stupidly designed, uncontrolled "experiment" to be in any way, shape >> or form meaningful. Congratulations! >> >> Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology that >> ISN'T incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding >> the ice to the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, > > You don't read very well. I said do exactly that. <snip of incredible idiocy, lagniappe> You don't think very well, much less read well, Ms. Latella. My suggestion was NOT, repeat, you stupid asshole, NOT what you said AT ALL. Not even close, you stupid asshole. Now, pay attention, you stupid asshole, and use your finger to follow along. I suggested... 1. Measure water level without ice. 2. Add ice, allow to melt. 3. Measure water level again. Now, you stupid asshole, as anyone with a triple digit IQ can easily see, your experiment was NOT the above detailed experiment. Your, er "experiment" is nothing more than an experiment in terminal stupidity. And you've demonstrated it beyond any possible doubt, you stupid fuck. Congratulations! FYI, you stupid fuck, arctic ice DOES NOT float at water level, hence, you stupid fuck, the terms PACK ice and PANCAKE ice. You see, you stupid fuck, the fact of the matter is the ice PACK is, in many places, twenty fucking meters thick, ALL of it above sea level. It is formed over YEARS, mainly through snowfall. In point of fact, arctic ice rests in a PACK suspended ON TOP of the water, you stupid fuck, not, repeat, you stupid fuck, NOT floating IN the water like an ice cube. The density of arctic ice, you see, moron, is MUCH LESS than that of an ice cube and spread over a huge area. Ergo, you stupid fuck, when the PACK ice melts, water levels do, indeed, go UP. This is what is known in technical circles as an undisputed, long observed, unanimously corroborated FACT. Duh, duh, duh, you stupid fuck. Jaybus Freaking Crisco... You could be more of an incredible idiot, but it's going to take a lot of hard work and dedication. -- Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit. Slow thinkers keep right. ------ Why are so many not smart enough to know they're not smart enough? http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Vandar Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Peter Principle wrote: > Latrodectus wrote: > >>On Jul 29, 7:12 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>Latrodectus wrote: >>> >>>>Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a >>>>pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark >>>>the water level with the cubes in it. >>>> Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave >>>>oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. >>>> Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to >>>>some, the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what >>>>you found? >>> >>>BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat >>>left in the house. >>> >>>Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! >>> >>>BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... >>> >>>Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly >>>because only an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the >>>scientific method could possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, >>>stupidly designed, uncontrolled "experiment" to be in any way, shape >>>or form meaningful. Congratulations! >>> >>>Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology that >>>ISN'T incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding >>>the ice to the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, >> >>You don't read very well. I said do exactly that. > > > <snip of incredible idiocy, lagniappe> > > You don't think very well, much less read well, Ms. Latella. My suggestion > was NOT, repeat, you stupid asshole, NOT what you said AT ALL. Not even > close, you stupid asshole. > > Now, pay attention, you stupid asshole, and use your finger to follow along. > I suggested... > > 1. Measure water level without ice. > 2. Add ice, allow to melt. > 3. Measure water level again. > > Now, you stupid asshole, as anyone with a triple digit IQ can easily see, > your experiment was NOT the above detailed experiment. Which, in and of itself, is a rather stupid experiment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Peter Principle Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Latrodectus wrote: > On Jul 29, 7:49 pm, Deathbringer <Deathbringer.2ui...@wpyo.bbs.local> > wrote: >> Latrodectus;1589140 Wrote: >> >>> Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a >>> pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark >>> the water level with the cubes in it. >>> Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave >>> oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. >>> Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to some, >>> the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you >>> found? >> >> Out of morbid curiosity, are you parodying every mindless Bushbot out >> there on purpose or do you really not see why people question your >> methodology? It can be hard to tell good acting from an honest lack >> of brainpower over the net. >> > > It was a simple and controlled experiment, just for fun. I keep > hearing that if the arctic ice melts then our coastal cities will be > flooded. Forget politics. Try my experiment and see how the water > level does not rise when the ice melts. It's because the ice is > already displacing the water. That is to say, the water level would > be lower without the ice in it. It's as high as it's getting, unless > of course the ice on land, say in Antarctica, melts and enters the > ocean. <snort> Yep, he really is every bit THAT fucking stupid, as unlikely as that may be... -- Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit. Slow thinkers keep right. ------ Why are so many not smart enough to know they're not smart enough? http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gene Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Latrodectus <eric@elcmedia.com> wrote in news:1185756361.405047.19570 @z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com: > Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a > pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark the > water level with the cubes in it. > Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave > oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. > Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to some, > the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you > found? > Last I looked a lot ot the ice is on land masses like the antartic and greenland and the sea is salt water - not fresh water - while much of the ice is freshwater and rides high in the water and displaces much less water. Thus endith the lesson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Latrodectus Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 On Jul 29, 8:05 pm, Nebuchadnezzar II <Nebuchadnez...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Latrodectus wrote: > > On Jul 29, 7:12 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> > > wrote: > >> Latrodectus wrote: > >>> Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a > >>> pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark the > >>> water level with the cubes in it. > >>> Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave > >>> oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. > >>> Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to some, > >>> the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you > >>> found? > >> BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat left in > >> the house. > > >> Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! > > >> BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... > > >> Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly because only > >> an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the scientific method could > >> possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, stupidly designed, uncontrolled > >> "experiment" to be in any way, shape or form meaningful. Congratulations! > > >> Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology that ISN'T > >> incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding the ice to > >> the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, > > > You don't read very well. I said do exactly that. Measure the water > > level without the ice in it, then measure it with the ice in it, then > > measure it after the ice has melted. The arctic ice is already > > displacing water simply by existing in the ocean. When that ice melts > > sea level does not rise. In fact some of it melts every summer and is > > reestablished in winter. Overall, the ice is melting more and more, > > but the liquid created is simply no longer displacing as the ice does. > > Holy shit you are a riot. This is not garden variety stupidity you > demonstrate. It's truly a work of art and doesn't happen all that > often. Please continue, if only for the entertainment value. > > > If the ice in Antarctica melted it would then be a different story, > > as it is on land. > > > as, moron, the fact > >> is the VAST majority of surface ice is locked up well ABOVE the water level, > >> not floating on the surface. Duh, duh, duh, you stupid fuck. > > > "The vast majority of ice is locked up well above the water level, > > not floating on the surface", eh? So you're saying that the arctic > > ice is floating in the air. Actually if you put ice cubes in the water > > you'll see that most of the ice is UNDER the surface, which means it > > is displacing water. Ice doesn't hover on the surface, you fucking > > Jetsons reject. > > Here you go again, shit I can't keep from laughing. You are truly a > world class imbecile. There's lots of land in the Arctic, moron. I've > been there and seen it. I suppose now you're going to tell me that the > dirt I walked on was really just some form of brown ice and all the > glaciers that exist in the Arctic are really just sitting on top of more > ice. > Here is a map of the Arctic region: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/Arctic.svg How much is land, how much is water, how much ice on the ocean? Please note that I said 'arctic ice" in relation to the water it is in. I did say that if we were talking about ice melting on land, such as in Antarctica, that it would be a different story. You chose to ignore that, as you saw an opportunity to call somebody an imbecile and a moron. Was I wrong for pointing out that if ice from land melted it would have a different effect than from ice on water melting? Nope. I have seen the evidence of evolution, too. I guess that makes me a moron and an imbecile, and a 'rightard idiot", as well, according to Peter Principle. I never said global warming wasn't real, you fucking jackass. I never said that the human species didn't have an influence, you fucking jackass. I said that ice displaces water, you fucking jackass, and I was right, you fucking jackass. > > > >> It would still be clumsy and not terribly smart, to be sure, just not nearly > >> as. Of course, you'd never suggest such an experiment because clumsy as it > >> is, it would STILL too closely mirror reality for a ideological stupid > >> asshole like you. > > > "...a ideological stupid..." > > >> Now, perhaps you're not lying or shilling. Perhaps you're just an incredible > >> imbecile without the slightest clue about that which you fart asinine > >> nonsense. I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. > > >> BTW, I've correct your subject line. You're welcome. > > > You've correct my subject line? > > >> Jaybus Freaking Crisco... > > >> -- > >> Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit. Slow thinkers keep right. > >> ------ > >> Why are so many not smart enough to know they're not smart enough? > > >>http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf > >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Latrodectus Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 On Jul 29, 8:07 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> wrote: > Latrodectus wrote: > > On Jul 29, 7:12 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> > > wrote: > >> Latrodectus wrote: > >>> Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a > >>> pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark > >>> the water level with the cubes in it. > >>> Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave > >>> oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. > >>> Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to > >>> some, the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what > >>> you found? > > >> BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat > >> left in the house. > > >> Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! > > >> BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... > > >> Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly > >> because only an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the > >> scientific method could possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, > >> stupidly designed, uncontrolled "experiment" to be in any way, shape > >> or form meaningful. Congratulations! > > >> Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology that > >> ISN'T incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding > >> the ice to the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, > > > You don't read very well. I said do exactly that. > > <snip of incredible idiocy, lagniappe> > > You don't think very well, much less read well, Ms. Latella. My suggestion > was NOT, repeat, you stupid asshole, NOT what you said AT ALL. Not even > close, you stupid asshole. > > Now, pay attention, you stupid asshole, and use your finger to follow along. > I suggested... > > 1. Measure water level without ice. I did that. > 2. Add ice, allow to melt. I did that. > 3. Measure water level again. I did that. The level was higher. It was also the same level as with the ice in it before the ice had melted. > > Now, you stupid asshole, as anyone with a triple digit IQ can easily see, > your experiment was NOT the above detailed experiment. It was exactly that experiment. Your, er "experiment" > is nothing more than an experiment in terminal stupidity. And you've > demonstrated it beyond any possible doubt, you stupid fuck. Congratulations! > > FYI, you stupid fuck, arctic ice DOES NOT float at water level, hence, you > stupid fuck, the terms PACK ice and PANCAKE ice. You see, you stupid fuck, > the fact of the matter is the ice PACK is, in many places, twenty fucking > meters thick, ALL of it above sea level. It is formed over YEARS, mainly > through snowfall. > > In point of fact, arctic ice rests in a PACK suspended ON TOP of the water, > you stupid fuck, not, repeat, you stupid fuck, NOT floating IN the water > like an ice cube. The density of arctic ice, you see, moron, is MUCH LESS > than that of an ice cube and spread over a huge area. > Wikipedia pack ice: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pack_ice You say it is not floating in the water, here is what the article says which agrees with you: "Drift ice consists of sea ice that floats on the surface of the water...When the drift ice is driven together into a large single mass, it is called pack ice. Typically areas of pack ice are identified by high percentage of surface coverage by ice: e.g., 80-100%." Look at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_ice_packs Scroll down and see the two images on the right that show the extent of the ice pack, September 78-2002 vs February for the same range. That's quite a difference. Where are the flooded cities? BTW did your dad beat your or something? You sure are negative. I'm trying to learn this stuff and even do experiments and your reaction is spewing hate. If I told you that evolution was real you'd still find some way to spew your filth. > Ergo, you stupid fuck, when the PACK ice melts, water levels do, indeed, go > UP. This is what is known in technical circles as an undisputed, long > observed, unanimously corroborated FACT. Duh, duh, duh, you stupid fuck. > > Jaybus Freaking Crisco... > > You could be more of an incredible idiot, but it's going to take a lot of > hard work and dedication. > > -- > Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit. Slow thinkers keep right. > ------ > Why are so many not smart enough to know they're not smart enough? > > http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Latrodectus Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 On Jul 29, 8:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Peter Principle wrote: > > Latrodectus wrote: > > >>On Jul 29, 7:12 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> > >>wrote: > > >>>Latrodectus wrote: > > >>>>Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a > >>>>pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark > >>>>the water level with the cubes in it. > >>>> Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave > >>>>oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. > >>>> Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to > >>>>some, the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what > >>>>you found? > > >>>BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat > >>>left in the house. > > >>>Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! > > >>>BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... > > >>>Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly > >>>because only an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the > >>>scientific method could possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, > >>>stupidly designed, uncontrolled "experiment" to be in any way, shape > >>>or form meaningful. Congratulations! > > >>>Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology that > >>>ISN'T incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding > >>>the ice to the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, > > >>You don't read very well. I said do exactly that. > > > <snip of incredible idiocy, lagniappe> > > > You don't think very well, much less read well, Ms. Latella. My suggestion > > was NOT, repeat, you stupid asshole, NOT what you said AT ALL. Not even > > close, you stupid asshole. > > > Now, pay attention, you stupid asshole, and use your finger to follow along. > > I suggested... > > > 1. Measure water level without ice. > > 2. Add ice, allow to melt. > > 3. Measure water level again. > > > Now, you stupid asshole, as anyone with a triple digit IQ can easily see, > > your experiment was NOT the above detailed experiment. > > Which, in and of itself, is a rather stupid experiment. It's stupid for people like you who know everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Latrodectus Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 On Jul 29, 8:11 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> wrote: > Latrodectus wrote: > > On Jul 29, 7:49 pm, Deathbringer <Deathbringer.2ui...@wpyo.bbs.local> > > wrote: > >> Latrodectus;1589140 Wrote: > > >>> Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a > >>> pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark > >>> the water level with the cubes in it. > >>> Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave > >>> oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. > >>> Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to some, > >>> the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you > >>> found? > > >> Out of morbid curiosity, are you parodying every mindless Bushbot out > >> there on purpose or do you really not see why people question your > >> methodology? It can be hard to tell good acting from an honest lack > >> of brainpower over the net. > > > It was a simple and controlled experiment, just for fun. I keep > > hearing that if the arctic ice melts then our coastal cities will be > > flooded. Forget politics. Try my experiment and see how the water > > level does not rise when the ice melts. It's because the ice is > > already displacing the water. That is to say, the water level would > > be lower without the ice in it. It's as high as it's getting, unless > > of course the ice on land, say in Antarctica, melts and enters the > > ocean. > > <snort> > > Yep, he really is every bit THAT fucking stupid, as unlikely as that may > be... > Just because you know about pack ice doesn't mean everybody does. Sheesh. > -- > Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit. Slow thinkers keep right. > ------ > Why are so many not smart enough to know they're not smart enough? > > http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Latrodectus Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 On Jul 29, 8:25 pm, Gene <Ch...@home.net> wrote: > Latrodectus <e...@elcmedia.com> wrote in news:1185756361.405047.19570 > @z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com: > > > Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a > > pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark the > > water level with the cubes in it. > > Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave > > oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. > > Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to some, > > the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you > > found? > > Last I looked a lot ot the ice is on land masses like the antartic and > greenland and the sea is salt water - not fresh water - while much of the > ice is freshwater and rides high in the water and displaces much less > water. > > Thus endith the lesson. Thanks for not calling me an idiot. And I DID point out that there was ice on land. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Latrodectus Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 On Jul 29, 6:46 pm, Latrodectus <e...@elcmedia.com> wrote: > Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a > pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark the > water level with the cubes in it. > Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave > oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. > Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to some, > the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you > found? OK, dumb experiment. Is it normal to suffer such abuse when learning something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Vandar Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Latrodectus wrote: > On Jul 29, 8:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>Peter Principle wrote: >> >>>Latrodectus wrote: >> >>>>On Jul 29, 7:12 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> >>>>wrote: >> >>>>>Latrodectus wrote: >> >>>>>>Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a >>>>>>pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark >>>>>>the water level with the cubes in it. >>>>>>Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave >>>>>>oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. >>>>>>Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to >>>>>>some, the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what >>>>>>you found? >> >>>>>BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat >>>>>left in the house. >> >>>>>Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! >> >>>>>BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... >> >>>>>Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly >>>>>because only an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the >>>>>scientific method could possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, >>>>>stupidly designed, uncontrolled "experiment" to be in any way, shape >>>>>or form meaningful. Congratulations! >> >>>>>Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology that >>>>>ISN'T incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding >>>>>the ice to the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, >> >>>>You don't read very well. I said do exactly that. >> >>><snip of incredible idiocy, lagniappe> >> >>>You don't think very well, much less read well, Ms. Latella. My suggestion >>>was NOT, repeat, you stupid asshole, NOT what you said AT ALL. Not even >>>close, you stupid asshole. >> >>>Now, pay attention, you stupid asshole, and use your finger to follow along. >>>I suggested... >> >>>1. Measure water level without ice. >>>2. Add ice, allow to melt. >>>3. Measure water level again. >> >>>Now, you stupid asshole, as anyone with a triple digit IQ can easily see, >>>your experiment was NOT the above detailed experiment. >> >>Which, in and of itself, is a rather stupid experiment. > > > It's stupid for people like you who know everything. It's stupid, period. 1. Measure water level 2. Add water 3. Measure water level Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Latrodectus Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 On Jul 29, 9:13 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Latrodectus wrote: > > On Jul 29, 8:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>Peter Principle wrote: > > >>>Latrodectus wrote: > > >>>>On Jul 29, 7:12 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> > >>>>wrote: > > >>>>>Latrodectus wrote: > > >>>>>>Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a > >>>>>>pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark > >>>>>>the water level with the cubes in it. > >>>>>>Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave > >>>>>>oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. > >>>>>>Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to > >>>>>>some, the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what > >>>>>>you found? > > >>>>>BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat > >>>>>left in the house. > > >>>>>Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! > > >>>>>BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... > > >>>>>Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly > >>>>>because only an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the > >>>>>scientific method could possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, > >>>>>stupidly designed, uncontrolled "experiment" to be in any way, shape > >>>>>or form meaningful. Congratulations! > > >>>>>Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology that > >>>>>ISN'T incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding > >>>>>the ice to the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, > > >>>>You don't read very well. I said do exactly that. > > >>><snip of incredible idiocy, lagniappe> > > >>>You don't think very well, much less read well, Ms. Latella. My suggestion > >>>was NOT, repeat, you stupid asshole, NOT what you said AT ALL. Not even > >>>close, you stupid asshole. > > >>>Now, pay attention, you stupid asshole, and use your finger to follow along. > >>>I suggested... > > >>>1. Measure water level without ice. > >>>2. Add ice, allow to melt. > >>>3. Measure water level again. > > >>>Now, you stupid asshole, as anyone with a triple digit IQ can easily see, > >>>your experiment was NOT the above detailed experiment. > > >>Which, in and of itself, is a rather stupid experiment. > > > It's stupid for people like you who know everything. > > It's stupid, period. > > 1. Measure water level > 2. Add water > 3. Measure water level That's what I did. I made the mistake of assuming displacement would be the same with salt water. Do you know everything? You don't? Then don't call me stupid for making the efforts to find things out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Latrodectus Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 On Jul 29, 7:47 pm, jose <josefsop...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jul 29, 7:39 pm, Latrodectus <e...@elcmedia.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 29, 7:12 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > Latrodectus wrote: > > > > Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a > > > > pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark the > > > > water level with the cubes in it. > > > > Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave > > > > oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. > > > > Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to some, > > > > the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you > > > > found? > > > > BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat left in > > > the house. > > > > Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! > > > > BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... > > > > Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly because only > > > an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the scientific method could > > > possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, stupidly designed, uncontrolled > > > "experiment" to be in any way, shape or form meaningful. Congratulations! > > > > Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology that ISN'T > > > incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding the ice to > > > the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, > > > You don't read very well. I said do exactly that. Measure the water > > level without the ice in it, then measure it with the ice in it, then > > measure it after the ice has melted. The arctic ice is already > > displacing water simply by existing in the ocean. When that ice melts > > sea level does not rise. In fact some of it melts every summer and is > > reestablished in winter. Overall, the ice is melting more and more, > > but the liquid created is simply no longer displacing as the ice does. > > If the ice in Antarctica melted it would then be a different story, > > as it is on land. > > > as, moron, the fact > > > > is the VAST majority of surface ice is locked up well ABOVE the water level, > > > not floating on the surface. Duh, duh, duh, you stupid fuck. > > > "The vast majority of ice is locked up well above the water level, > > not floating on the surface", eh? So you're saying that the arctic > > ice is floating in the air. Actually if you put ice cubes in the water > > you'll see that most of the ice is UNDER the surface, which means it > > is displacing water. Ice doesn't hover on the surface, you fucking > > Jetsons reject. > > > > It would still be clumsy and not terribly smart, to be sure, just not nearly > > > as. Of course, you'd never suggest such an experiment because clumsy as it > > > is, it would STILL too closely mirror reality for a ideological stupid > > > asshole like you. > > > "...a ideological stupid..." > > > > Now, perhaps you're not lying or shilling. Perhaps you're just an incredible > > > imbecile without the slightest clue about that which you fart asinine > > > nonsense. I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. > > > > BTW, I've correct your subject line. You're welcome. > > > You've correct my subject line? > > > > Jaybus Freaking Crisco... > > > > -- > > > Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit. Slow thinkers keep right. > > > ------ > > > Why are so many not smart enough to know they're not smart enough? > > > >http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gene Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Latrodectus <eric@elcmedia.com> wrote in news:1185764736.959389.234230@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > On Jul 29, 8:25 pm, Gene <Ch...@home.net> wrote: >> Latrodectus <e...@elcmedia.com> wrote in news:1185756361.405047.19570 >> @z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com: >> >> > Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with >> > a pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then >> > mark the water level with the cubes in it. >> > Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave >> > oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. >> > Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to >> > some, >> > the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you >> > found? >> >> Last I looked a lot ot the ice is on land masses like the antartic >> and greenland and the sea is salt water - not fresh water - while >> much of the ice is freshwater and rides high in the water and >> displaces much less water. >> >> Thus endith the lesson. > > Thanks for not calling me an idiot. And I DID point out that there > was ice on land. > > No sweat. That you tried an experiment is great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Vandar Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Latrodectus wrote: > On Jul 29, 9:13 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>Latrodectus wrote: >> >>>On Jul 29, 8:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>>Peter Principle wrote: >> >>>>>Latrodectus wrote: >> >>>>>>On Jul 29, 7:12 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> >>>>>>wrote: >> >>>>>>>Latrodectus wrote: >> >>>>>>>>Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a >>>>>>>>pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark >>>>>>>>the water level with the cubes in it. >>>>>>>>Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave >>>>>>>>oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. >>>>>>>>Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to >>>>>>>>some, the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what >>>>>>>>you found? >> >>>>>>>BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat >>>>>>>left in the house. >> >>>>>>>Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! >> >>>>>>>BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... >> >>>>>>>Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly >>>>>>>because only an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the >>>>>>>scientific method could possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, >>>>>>>stupidly designed, uncontrolled "experiment" to be in any way, shape >>>>>>>or form meaningful. Congratulations! >> >>>>>>>Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology that >>>>>>>ISN'T incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding >>>>>>>the ice to the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, >> >>>>>>You don't read very well. I said do exactly that. >> >>>>><snip of incredible idiocy, lagniappe> >> >>>>>You don't think very well, much less read well, Ms. Latella. My suggestion >>>>>was NOT, repeat, you stupid asshole, NOT what you said AT ALL. Not even >>>>>close, you stupid asshole. >> >>>>>Now, pay attention, you stupid asshole, and use your finger to follow along. >>>>>I suggested... >> >>>>>1. Measure water level without ice. >>>>>2. Add ice, allow to melt. >>>>>3. Measure water level again. >> >>>>>Now, you stupid asshole, as anyone with a triple digit IQ can easily see, >>>>>your experiment was NOT the above detailed experiment. >> >>>>Which, in and of itself, is a rather stupid experiment. >> >>>It's stupid for people like you who know everything. >> >>It's stupid, period. >> >>1. Measure water level >>2. Add water >>3. Measure water level > > > That's what I did. Are you serious? You actually needed to add water to see if adding water would cause there to be more water? > I made the mistake of assuming displacement would > be the same with salt water. Do you know everything? No. But I know that adding water will cause the water level to rise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lamont Cranston Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 "Peter Principle" <petesfeats@CUTITOUTgmail.com> wrote in message news:46ad3abe$0$12187$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... > Latrodectus wrote: >> Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with >> a >> pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark >> the >> water level with the cubes in it. >> Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave >> oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. >> Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to >> some, >> the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what you >> found? > > BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat > left in the house. > > Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! > > BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... > > Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly > because only an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the > scientific method could possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, > stupidly designed, uncontrolled "experiment" to be in any way, shape > or form meaningful. Congratulations! > > Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology that > ISN'T incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding > the ice to the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, > as, moron, the fact is the VAST majority of surface ice is locked up > well ABOVE the water level, not floating on the surface. Duh, duh, > duh, you stupid fuck. > > It would still be clumsy and not terribly smart, to be sure, just > not nearly as. Of course, you'd never suggest such an experiment > because clumsy as it is, it would STILL too closely mirror reality > for a ideological stupid asshole like you. > > Now, perhaps you're not lying or shilling. Perhaps you're just an > incredible imbecile without the slightest clue about that which you > fart asinine nonsense. I'm willing to give you the benefit of the > doubt. > > BTW, I've correct your subject line. You're welcome. > > Jaybus Freaking Crisco... Antarctica contains more than 90% of the world's ice and that ice is not floating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Latrodectus Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 On Jul 30, 4:57 am, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Latrodectus wrote: > > On Jul 29, 9:13 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>Latrodectus wrote: > > >>>On Jul 29, 8:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>>>Peter Principle wrote: > > >>>>>Latrodectus wrote: > > >>>>>>On Jul 29, 7:12 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> > >>>>>>wrote: > > >>>>>>>Latrodectus wrote: > > >>>>>>>>Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point with a > >>>>>>>>pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, then mark > >>>>>>>>the water level with the cubes in it. > >>>>>>>>Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave > >>>>>>>>oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. > >>>>>>>>Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to > >>>>>>>>some, the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that what > >>>>>>>>you found? > > >>>>>>>BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat > >>>>>>>left in the house. > > >>>>>>>Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! > > >>>>>>>BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... > > >>>>>>>Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly > >>>>>>>because only an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the > >>>>>>>scientific method could possibly consider such a wholly irrelevant, > >>>>>>>stupidly designed, uncontrolled "experiment" to be in any way, shape > >>>>>>>or form meaningful. Congratulations! > > >>>>>>>Now, if you wish to frame your facileexperimentin methodology that > >>>>>>>ISN'T incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE adding > >>>>>>>the ice to the water lever after the ice is added and has melted, > > >>>>>>You don't read very well. I said do exactly that. > > >>>>><snip of incredible idiocy, lagniappe> > > >>>>>You don't think very well, much less read well, Ms. Latella. My suggestion > >>>>>was NOT, repeat, you stupid asshole, NOT what you said AT ALL. Not even > >>>>>close, you stupid asshole. > > >>>>>Now, pay attention, you stupid asshole, and use your finger to follow along. > >>>>>I suggested... > > >>>>>1. Measure water level without ice. > >>>>>2. Add ice, allow to melt. > >>>>>3. Measure water level again. > > >>>>>Now, you stupid asshole, as anyone with a triple digit IQ can easily see, > >>>>>yourexperimentwas NOT the above detailedexperiment. > > >>>>Which, in and of itself, is a rather stupidexperiment. > > >>>It's stupid for people like you who know everything. > > >>It's stupid, period. > > >>1. Measure water level > >>2. Add water > >>3. Measure water level > > > That's what I did. > > Are you serious? You actually needed to add water to see if adding water > would cause there to be more water? > I was assuming that sea ice displaced the same amount of water, I fucked up while trying to make a point. So I learned something. If you don't understand where I was coming from and where I made the mistake then oh well. "I know that adding water to water makes more water" or that type of simplistic observation doesn't really help. BTW, the Arctic ice shrinks and grows every year. This is not a sarcastic question, but when a significant amount melts each year, do we see evidence of that on our coasts? > > I made the mistake of assuming displacement would > > be the same with salt water. Do you know everything? > > No. But I know that adding water will cause the water level to rise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Peter Principle Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 Latrodectus wrote: > On Jul 29, 8:05 pm, Nebuchadnezzar II <Nebuchadnez...@microsoft.com> > wrote: >> Latrodectus wrote: >>> On Jul 29, 7:12 pm, "Peter Principle" <petesfe...@CUTITOUTgmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Latrodectus wrote: >>>>> Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Mark that point >>>>> with a pen or perhaps with some tape. Now add a few ice cubes, >>>>> then mark the water level with the cubes in it. >>>>> Please wait several minutes. You may optionally use a microwave >>>>> oven to help speed the melting if you are impatient. >>>>> Mark the level of the water after the ice melts. According to >>>>> some, the water level should rise when the ice melts. Is that >>>>> what you found? >>>> BWA HA HA HA HA, whew! Cut it out! There ain't gonna be a dry seat >>>> left in the house. >> >>>> Man, you rightard idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! >> >>>> BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... >> >>>> Nobody has done anything like that, conservadolt moron, mainly >>>> because only an incredible imbecile completely ignorant of the >>>> scientific method could possibly consider such a wholly >>>> irrelevant, stupidly designed, uncontrolled "experiment" to be in >>>> any way, shape or form meaningful. Congratulations! >> >>>> Now, if you wish to frame your facile experiment in methodology >>>> that ISN'T incredibly stupid, you'd compare the water lever BEFORE >>>> adding the ice to the water lever after the ice is added and has >>>> melted, >> >>> You don't read very well. I said do exactly that. Measure the >>> water level without the ice in it, then measure it with the ice in >>> it, then measure it after the ice has melted. The arctic ice is >>> already displacing water simply by existing in the ocean. When >>> that ice melts sea level does not rise. In fact some of it melts >>> every summer and is reestablished in winter. Overall, the ice is >>> melting more and more, but the liquid created is simply no longer >>> displacing as the ice does. >> >> Holy shit you are a riot. This is not garden variety stupidity you >> demonstrate. It's truly a work of art and doesn't happen all that >> often. Please continue, if only for the entertainment value. >> >>> If the ice in Antarctica melted it would then be a different >>> story, as it is on land. >> >>> as, moron, the fact >>>> is the VAST majority of surface ice is locked up well ABOVE the >>>> water level, not floating on the surface. Duh, duh, duh, you >>>> stupid fuck. >> >>> "The vast majority of ice is locked up well above the water level, >>> not floating on the surface", eh? So you're saying that the arctic >>> ice is floating in the air. Actually if you put ice cubes in the >>> water you'll see that most of the ice is UNDER the surface, which >>> means it is displacing water. Ice doesn't hover on the surface, >>> you fucking Jetsons reject. >> >> Here you go again, shit I can't keep from laughing. You are truly a >> world class imbecile. There's lots of land in the Arctic, moron. >> I've been there and seen it. I suppose now you're going to tell me >> that the dirt I walked on was really just some form of brown ice and >> all the glaciers that exist in the Arctic are really just sitting on >> top of more ice. >> > > Here is a map of the Arctic region: > http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/Arctic.svg > > How much is land, how much is water, how much ice on the ocean? > Please note that I said 'arctic ice" in relation to the water it is > in. <snip of incredible idiocy du jour> Please note, you incredible imbecile, that arctic "ice" is not ice like an ice cube. In point of fact, you incredible nincompoop, arctic ice is 99.99% SNOW. FYI, moron, arctic snow has between 1% and 5% the density of water. Now, you stupid fuck, crank up that one brain cell and riddle me this. If you put something only 1-5% the density of water on top of water, how much water is displaced? <tap, tap, tap> Well, genius? You know this incredible imbecile is some trailer park Southern goober, as anyone who's ever lived where there's a real winter knows damn good and well that the snow pack sits ON TOP of the surface of the water, not in the fucking water. Not only that, they all know that when it melts, the water level RISES. Jaybus Freaking Crisco... -- Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit. Slow thinkers keep right. ------ Why are so many not smart enough to know they're not smart enough? http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.