Go Vote

No matter what way you lean on the political spectrum, you should go out and vote. Don't sit at home complaining, get out there and be part of the process.

 

No matter what way you vote, you are a great American.

 

 

 

If you don't vote, then don't complain.

Vote? Voting? Sounds like COMMIE TALK TO ME!

Vote? Voting? Sounds like COMMIE TALK TO ME!

Sorry Joker, I forgot California was ruled by a Queen:

[attach=full]3053[/attach]

My link

 

yes Vote!!! or one of these shining stars COULD win!!

 

This was really funny!

The fewer people who vote the better off this nation is.

The fewer people who vote the better off this nation is.

Yeah. Now that I've bought a house, we should go back to the way it was originally - only property owners can vote.

The fewer people who vote the better off this nation is.

Yeah. Now that I've bought a house, we should go back to the way it was originally - only property owners can vote.

 

Or how the Republicans tried to keep it, where only those who could afford their mortgage, could buy a house?

I do have to somewhat agree with Hugo and not with TJ.

 

Not everyone should vote.

 

Everyone should have the right to vote, but uninformed, ignorant people should stay home.

I decided to get my election results from MSNBC. It's quite funny how as the night goes on, the ethusiasm and snarkyness of the on air talent has deminished at a measurably consistent rate.

I've been watching MSLSD, so I'm drunk...

 

RULES: Take a drink every time you hear an anchor, pundit, or other TV talking head...

 

• [ ]Say "Anti-incumbent." No, this isn't an anti-incumbent year. The only Republican Senator even remotely close to losing her seat Tuesday is Lisa Murkowski, a write-in candidate who lost her primary for being too liberal. Somewhere from zero to three House Republicans will lose, and those include Hawaii and New Orleans. There might be one or two Republican governors fall, but in all likelihood, this an anti-Democrat year.
  Suggested drink: A Hurricane or a Mai Tai, local drinks of New Orleans and Hawaii, respectively -- the only districts where GOP congressmen (Joe Cao and Charles Djou) are likely to fall.[ ]Say "temper-tantrum." Recall

this Peter Jennings gem from 1994: "Some thoughts on those angry voters. Ask parents of any two-year-old and they can tell you about those temper tantrums: the stomping feet, the rolling eyes, the screaming. It's clear that the anger controls the child and not the other way around. It's the job of the parent to teach the child to control the anger and channel it in a positive way. Imagine a nation full of uncontrolled two-year-old rage. The voters had a temper tantrum last week....Parenting and governing don't have to be dirty words: the nation can't be run by an angry two-year-old."
Suggested drink: A Jello Shot. Two-year-olds love jello.[ ]Say "blind rage" Remember, rebuking Bush and throwing out Republicans was about finding our better angels. Rebuking Obama and throwing out Democrats is about blind range.
Suggested drink: Irish Whiskey[ ]Blame Obama for not "getting his message out" Both sides do this: if my side is losing, it must be only because we didn't communicate our ideas and plans well enough -- it can't be because people didn't like what we were doing! With Obama, it's even more absurd. The man, famous for his eloquence, was constantly campaigning.
Suggested drink: spiked Slurpee[ ]Chalk it up to voter racism: Americans figured out a black guy was running the country, and they freaked out, deciding to "take back America" for the white guys.
Suggested drink: White Russian.[ ]Mention that one guy who owns a McDonalds who (possibly inappropriately) told his employees to vote Republican. Because we're sure that tipped the balance of the election.
Suggested drink: Spiked (flavorless) milkshake[ ]Say "secret money" Because it doesn't matter that Democrats outraised Republicans from the most politically active industries in America, including Wall Street. It doesn't matter that K Street favored Dems 2-to-1 with campaign contributions. The public-employee unions don't count as a special interest. It's just that secret Republican money that's insidious.
Suggested drink: Rum-and-Koch[ ]Drink for every block in which Christine O'Donnell is the most-mentioned candidate. Talking about Christine O'Donnell is very important therapy for liberals. First, it allows them to feel smarter than conservatives -- O'Donnell says a lot of silly things, and is a conservative woman, both of which make her a prime target of smug liberal mockery. Also, this is a rare open seat Democrats will win. Combine those two points, and it gives liberal anchors a chance to say their favorite line: Republicans need to be moderate to win.
Suggested drink: Witch's Wit ale.

I watched MSNBC too. Didn't see any of that. I guess you need to be drunk before starting the game.

.

.

Vote? Voting? Sounds like COMMIE TALK TO ME!

Sorry Joker, I forgot California was ruled by a Queen:

[attach=full]3054[/attach]

 

God save the Queen, eh?

I do have to somewhat agree with Hugo and not with TJ.

 

Not everyone should vote.

 

Everyone should have the right to vote, but uninformed, ignorant people should stay home.

 

I remember you one time saying I was a bad person for saying only people who pay taxes should be allowed to vote. You claimed I was trying to advocate a "ruling class" and limiting who can vote was very bad.

 

 

So I agree with you and want everyone to vote and suddenly "YOU" are advocating a "ruling class" and wanting to limit who is allowed to vote? Flip flop much?

 

 

 

 

I want everyone to vote to show that more people are paying attention to what is happening in politics, as long as we have low numbers of people voting that tells both sides (republicans and Democrats) that the people are not paying attention and they can do whatever they want because nobody cares. If we suddenly had 70% turnout, sh!t would be hitting the fan. Politicians need to be reminded they work for us, not themselves.

I watched MSNBC too. Didn't see any of that. I guess you need to be drunk before starting the game.

.

.

 

I guess you weren't watching before the results were in.

 

They acted like Harry Reid's victory was all that mattered.

I do have to somewhat agree with Hugo and not with TJ.

 

Not everyone should vote.

 

Everyone should have the right to vote, but uninformed, ignorant people should stay home.

 

I remember you one time saying I was a bad person for saying only people who pay taxes should be allowed to vote. You claimed I was trying to advocate a "ruling class" and limiting who can vote was very bad.

 

 

So I agree with you and want everyone to vote and suddenly "YOU" are advocating a "ruling class" and wanting to limit who is allowed to vote? Flip flop much?

 

 

This is why the ignorant should be seen and not heard.

 

This isn't the same thing and I never said everyone should vote. I said everyone should have the right to vote, you only want property owners to have the right to vote. Big difference.

 

Dumbass.

I do have to somewhat agree with Hugo and not with TJ.

 

Not everyone should vote.

 

Everyone should have the right to vote, but uninformed, ignorant people should stay home.

 

I remember you one time saying I was a bad person for saying only people who pay taxes should be allowed to vote. You claimed I was trying to advocate a "ruling class" and limiting who can vote was very bad.

 

 

So I agree with you and want everyone to vote and suddenly "YOU" are advocating a "ruling class" and wanting to limit who is allowed to vote? Flip flop much?

 

 

This is why the ignorant should be seen and not heard.

 

This isn't the same thing and I never said everyone should vote. I said everyone should have the right to vote, you only want property owners to have the right to vote. Big difference.

 

Dumbass.

 

Don't play the Bender two step Joe, you just said some people should not vote. You are now playing semantics, either everyone should vote or they should not, you say some people should not vote, the reason for your vote restriction was different than mine but the concept is exactly the same only this time it is you who is saying some people should not vote so I guess that makes it okay, lol

 

 

 

Not everyone should vote.

 

Your words, not mine Joe........................hypocrite.

I do have to somewhat agree with Hugo and not with TJ.

 

Not everyone should vote.

 

Everyone should have the right to vote, but uninformed, ignorant people should stay home.

 

I remember you one time saying I was a bad person for saying only people who pay taxes should be allowed to vote. You claimed I was trying to advocate a "ruling class" and limiting who can vote was very bad.

 

 

So I agree with you and want everyone to vote and suddenly "YOU" are advocating a "ruling class" and wanting to limit who is allowed to vote? Flip flop much?

 

 

This is why the ignorant should be seen and not heard.

 

This isn't the same thing and I never said everyone should vote. I said everyone should have the right to vote, you only want property owners to have the right to vote. Big difference.

 

Dumbass.

 

Don't play the Bender two step Joe, you just said some people should not vote. You are now playing semantics, either everyone should vote or they should not, you say some people should not vote, the reason for your vote restriction was different than mine but the concept is exactly the same only this time it is you who is saying some people should not vote so I guess that makes it okay, lol

 

 

Not everyone should vote.

 

Your words, not mine Joe........................hypocrite.

 

Dumbass.

 

You want to take the "RIGHT" to vote from people. I said that uninformed, ignorant people shouldn't vote, not that they should lose the right to do so.

 

The fact that you can't or won't see the difference is why I lump you in the category of those who shouldn't vote.

I do have to somewhat agree with Hugo and not with TJ.

 

Not everyone should vote.

 

Everyone should have the right to vote, but uninformed, ignorant people should stay home.

 

I remember you one time saying I was a bad person for saying only people who pay taxes should be allowed to vote. You claimed I was trying to advocate a "ruling class" and limiting who can vote was very bad.

 

 

So I agree with you and want everyone to vote and suddenly "YOU" are advocating a "ruling class" and wanting to limit who is allowed to vote? Flip flop much?

 

 

This is why the ignorant should be seen and not heard.

 

This isn't the same thing and I never said everyone should vote. I said everyone should have the right to vote, you only want property owners to have the right to vote. Big difference.

 

Dumbass.

 

Don't play the Bender two step Joe, you just said some people should not vote. You are now playing semantics, either everyone should vote or they should not, you say some people should not vote, the reason for your vote restriction was different than mine but the concept is exactly the same only this time it is you who is saying some people should not vote so I guess that makes it okay, lol

 

 

Not everyone should vote.

 

Your words, not mine Joe........................hypocrite.

 

Dumbass.

 

You want to take the "RIGHT" to vote from people. I said that uninformed, ignorant people shouldn't vote, not that they should lose the right to do so.

 

The fact that you can't or won't see the difference is why I lump you in the category of those who shouldn't vote.

 

If "some" people in your opinion should not be allowed to vote, it is the exact same thing no matter what semantics you try to play Joe. The only difference is what reasons we each use to justify limiting their ability to vote.

 

You say you would restrict the ability to vote based on what you see as "stupid" while I said voting should be limited to those who pay taxes (I never said anything about property by the way, just to keep you on track, not sure where you got that). So the "ruling class" according to IWS is those who IWS believes is smart while my idea of the "ruling class" are those who pay for Government to function. Same thing, different justifications.

 

 

 

Not everyone should vote.

 

Your words Joe, not mine, lol

I do have to somewhat agree with Hugo and not with TJ.

 

Not everyone should vote.

 

Everyone should have the right to vote, but uninformed, ignorant people should stay home.

 

I remember you one time saying I was a bad person for saying only people who pay taxes should be allowed to vote. You claimed I was trying to advocate a "ruling class" and limiting who can vote was very bad.

 

 

So I agree with you and want everyone to vote and suddenly "YOU" are advocating a "ruling class" and wanting to limit who is allowed to vote? Flip flop much?

 

 

This is why the ignorant should be seen and not heard.

 

This isn't the same thing and I never said everyone should vote. I said everyone should have the right to vote, you only want property owners to have the right to vote. Big difference.

 

Dumbass.

 

Don't play the Bender two step Joe, you just said some people should not vote. You are now playing semantics, either everyone should vote or they should not, you say some people should not vote, the reason for your vote restriction was different than mine but the concept is exactly the same only this time it is you who is saying some people should not vote so I guess that makes it okay, lol

 

 

Not everyone should vote.

 

Your words, not mine Joe........................hypocrite.

 

Dumbass.

 

You want to take the "RIGHT" to vote from people. I said that uninformed, ignorant people shouldn't vote, not that they should lose the right to do so.

 

The fact that you can't or won't see the difference is why I lump you in the category of those who shouldn't vote.

 

If "some" people in your opinion should not be allowed to vote, it is the exact same thing no matter what semantics you try to play Joe. The only difference is what reasons we each use to justify limiting their ability to vote.

 

You say you would restrict the ability to vote based on what you see as "stupid" while I said voting should be limited to those who pay taxes (I never said anything about property by the way, just to keep you on track, not sure where you got that). So the "ruling class" according to IWS is those who IWS believes is smart while my idea of the "ruling class" are those who pay for Government to function. Same thing, different justifications.

 

 

 

Not everyone should vote.

 

Your words Joe, not mine, lol

 

I never said "some" people should not be allowed to vote. I said some people shouldn't vote. Kinda like fat people shouldn't wear spandex. Doesn't mean I think they shouldn't be allowed, they just shouldn't do it.

 

Nice lie, Dumbass.

What? I like my spandex...it's so stretchy.. it keeps all my rolls snuggly. What's wrong with that?

What? I like my spandex...it's so stretchy.. it keeps all my rolls snuggly. What's wrong with that?

 

 

How about a fat guy in a speedo?

 

 

[attach=full]3055[/attach]

Mmmmmm..he has some sweet moves. He's so fleshy....but I think he's too young for me.

I've lost weight since then.

 

 

 

 

and I wear my hat the right way now too...

Oh Eddo..why do you tease me so?

Anyone with half a brain knows that the higher the turnout the higher the percentage of liberal voters. High turnouts are not good.