GOV OFFICIAL Sheriff Arpaio undermines the Civil Rights Act 1964,he's a embarrasment, Liability to t

April 13, 2008

On Apr 13, 2:04 pm, b...@barrk.net (B1ackwater) wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:03:36 -0700 (PDT), American Patriot

>

> <kcajye...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> >Why is Sheriff Joe/mcpa cty Arizona allowed to sidestep the Civil

> >Rights Act of 1964??

> >Someone in the Federal Government has got to step up to the plate and

> >stop this madness;

> >it is no more than a continuation of the anti-IndioHispano

> >discrimination in the southwestern

> >states. This loonatic has the klan types behind him; it's time for

> >the Feds to Get this cretin off the streets.

>

> >The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, July 2,

> >1964) was a landmark legislation in the United States that outlawed

> >segregation in the U.S. schools and public places. First conceived to

> >help African Americans, the bill was amended prior to passage to

> >protect women in courts, and explicitly included white people for the

> >first time. It also started the Equal Employment Opportunity

> >Commission.

>

> >In order to circumvent limitations on the federal use of the Equal

> >Protection Clause handed down by the Civil Rights Cases, the law was

> >passed under the Commerce Clause. Once it was implemented, its effects

> >were far reaching and had tremendous long-term impacts on the whole

> >country. It prohibited discrimination in public facilities, in

> >government, and in employment, invalidating the Jim Crow laws in the

> >southern US. It became illegal to compel segregation of the races in

> >schools, housing, or hiring. Powers given to enforce the bill were

> >initially weak, but were supplemented during later yea

The world looks and we're the laughing stock. "Civil Rights"

what civil rights does the USofA have for it the Indiohispano.

How can we ask China, Korea, ect to enact Civil Rights for its

people when we have a GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL suppressing

the Civil Rights of the INDIOHISPANO?

>

> Anybody IN the USA or its territories deserves the protection

> of the CRA. Indeed, the CRA was a "statement to the world" about

> race/ethic/gender affairs and we have and should extend its

> influence abroad as well as within our borders. It's more than

> just a domestic law, it's a philosophical statement every nation

> should take notice of.

>

> Anytime WE ignore our own best ideals by sidestepping the CRA

> should be seen as a major national embarassment - and one

> which undermines all the "Freedom & Democracy" talk we've

> been using for decades to judge and/or reform other nations.

Well somehow the sheriff of maricopa county has managed to enact

laws (with the Cty Attorney's help) which undermine the credibility

of the laws of our country, and which spit in the face of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964. It's ashame that the Feds have not stopped him by

now.

>

> What would our position and actions relative to, say, the

> apartheid in old S.Africa have meant unless we ourselves

> abided by the letter and spirit of the CRA ? How could we

> have criticized Saddam for his ethnic persecutions or the

> Taliban for their treatment of women ?

>

> Other nations are quick to note and exploit US hypocricy. We

> must not give them such opportunities. Part of claiming to

> be a "better" country means we have to ACT better ourselves,

> not just emit endless clouds of hot air.

>

> "Mexicans" are not devils, not a 'disease', not monsters to

> be sealed away in the attic. Treat people as WE would expect

> to be treated.

>

> Doesn't mean we can't deport illegals or say that too many

> illegals are a bad thing - but it's the phenomena that's the

> bad thing, not the individual 'Mexicans' themselves. They're

> just regular folks trying to earn a buck.- Hide quoted text -

>

> - Show quoted text -

April 13, 2008

"American Patriot" <kcajyer_x@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:3c1e9b5d-b4a2-415d-9fc2-e7feb920f941@t12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...

> On Apr 13, 2:04 pm, b...@barrk.net (B1ackwater) wrote:

>> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:03:36 -0700 (PDT), American Patriot

>>

>> <kcajye...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> >Why is Sheriff Joe/mcpa cty Arizona allowed to sidestep the Civil

>> >Rights Act of 1964??

>> >Someone in the Federal Government has got to step up to the plate and

>> >stop this madness;

>> >it is no more than a continuation of the anti-IndioHispano

>> >discrimination in the southwestern

>> >states. This loonatic has the klan types behind him; it's time for

>> >the Feds to Get this cretin off the streets.

>>

>> >The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, July 2,

>> >1964) was a landmark legislation in the United States that outlawed

>> >segregation in the U.S. schools and public places. First conceived to

>> >help African Americans, the bill was amended prior to passage to

>> >protect women in courts, and explicitly included white people for the

>> >first time. It also started the Equal Employment Opportunity

>> >Commission.

>>

>> >In order to circumvent limitations on the federal use of the Equal

>> >Protection Clause handed down by the Civil Rights Cases, the law was

>> >passed under the Commerce Clause. Once it was implemented, its effects

>> >were far reaching and had tremendous long-term impacts on the whole

>> >country. It prohibited discrimination in public facilities, in

>> >government, and in employment, invalidating the Jim Crow laws in the

>> >southern US. It became illegal to compel segregation of the races in

>> >schools, housing, or hiring. Powers given to enforce the bill were

>> >initially weak, but were supplemented during later yea

>

> The world looks and we're the laughing stock. "Civil Rights"

> what civil rights does the USofA have for it the Indiohispano.

> How can we ask China, Korea, ect to enact Civil Rights for its

> people when we have a GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL suppressing

> the Civil Rights of the INDIOHISPANO?

>

>>

>> Anybody IN the USA or its territories deserves the protection

>> of the CRA. Indeed, the CRA was a "statement to the world" about

>> race/ethic/gender affairs and we have and should extend its

>> influence abroad as well as within our borders. It's more than

>> just a domestic law, it's a philosophical statement every nation

>> should take notice of.

>>

>> Anytime WE ignore our own best ideals by sidestepping the CRA

>> should be seen as a major national embarassment - and one

>> which undermines all the "Freedom & Democracy" talk we've

>> been using for decades to judge and/or reform other nations.

>

> Well somehow the sheriff of maricopa county has managed to enact

> laws (with the Cty Attorney's help) which undermine the credibility

> of the laws of our country, and which spit in the face of the Civil

> Rights Act of 1964. It's ashame that the Feds have not stopped him by

> now.

>

>>

>> What would our position and actions relative to, say, the

>> apartheid in old S.Africa have meant unless we ourselves

>> abided by the letter and spirit of the CRA ? How could we

>> have criticized Saddam for his ethnic persecutions or the

>> Taliban for their treatment of women ?

>>

>> Other nations are quick to note and exploit US hypocricy. We

>> must not give them such opportunities. Part of claiming to

>> be a "better" country means we have to ACT better ourselves,

>> not just emit endless clouds of hot air.

>>

>> "Mexicans" are not devils, not a 'disease', not monsters to

>> be sealed away in the attic. Treat people as WE would expect

>> to be treated.

>>

>> Doesn't mean we can't deport illegals or say that too many

>> illegals are a bad thing - but it's the phenomena that's the

>> bad thing, not the individual 'Mexicans' themselves. They're

>> just regular folks trying to earn a buck.- Hide quoted text -

>>

>> - Show quoted text -

Since when have the republicans supported the Civil Rights Act?

It was they who fought it tooth and nail back in 1964 until Lyndon

Johnson stuffed it down their racist throats.

BB

April 13, 2008

On Apr 13, 2:40

April 13, 2008

American Patriot <kcajyer_x@yahoo.com> writes:

> SUPER THICK MASSIVE DICK