Here's a twist. House Repug Leaders Threaten To Vote Against Money For Troops

[Harry Hope]

http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/...ers_threaten_to_vote_against_money_for_troops

House GOP Leaders Threaten To Vote Against Money For Troops

By Greg Sargent


Okay, so here's the state of play in the House right now with regard
to the coming showdown between Congressional Dems and the White House
over the war.

The House GOP leadership has now unveiled its response to the news
this morning that House Dems are coming together behind an approach to
the soon-to-be-voted-on spending bill that would bring the troops home
if the Iraqi government fails to reduce violence there.

House GOP leaders say that if Dems try to attach any conditions to the
war spending bill, Republicans in the House may vote against it:


The House minority leader threatened Thursday to get his members to
vote against a $96.3 billion spending bill for the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan if Democrats persist in plans to attach conditions to the
money that would tell President Bush how to conduct the wars.


This is interesting -- now it's the House Republican leadership who is
threatening to vote against funding the troops.

The same Republican leadership which, behind House GOP leader John
Boehner, has been demanding that Dems show full support for funding
the troops, lest they be accused of not supporting them:


REP. BOEHNER:

Let

 

[Wayne H. Wilhelm]

"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:epjhu2h4t754g0nk42fq0j5o6pu0qr7rj7@4ax.com...
>
> http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/...ers_threaten_to_vote_against_money_for_troops
>
> House GOP Leaders Threaten To Vote Against Money For Troops
>
> By Greg Sargent
>
>
> Okay, so here's the state of play in the House right now with regard
> to the coming showdown between Congressional Dems and the White House
> over the war.
>
> The House GOP leadership has now unveiled its response to the news
> this morning that House Dems are coming together behind an approach to
> the soon-to-be-voted-on spending bill that would bring the troops home
> if the Iraqi government fails to reduce violence there.
>
> House GOP leaders say that if Dems try to attach any conditions to the
> war spending bill, Republicans in the House may vote against it:
>
>
> The House minority leader threatened Thursday to get his members to
> vote against a $96.3 billion spending bill for the wars in Iraq and
> Afghanistan if Democrats persist in plans to attach conditions to the
> money that would tell President Bush how to conduct the wars.
>
>
> This is interesting -- now it's the House Republican leadership who is
> threatening to vote against funding the troops.
>
> The same Republican leadership which, behind House GOP leader John
> Boehner, has been demanding that Dems show full support for funding
> the troops, lest they be accused of not supporting them:
>
>
> REP. BOEHNER:
>
> Let's have a real resolution on the floor. It's a bill that says, "We
> will not cut the funding for our troops in harms' way."
>
> ________________________________________________
>
> heh heh
>
> Harry

Keep on spreading your lies and distortion. No wonder no one with an IQ
over 50 believes anything you have to say, Harry.

 

[Kevin Cunningham]

"Wayne H. Wilhelm" <wwilhelm@neonospam.rr.com> wrote in message
news:45e906f9$0$4843$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> "Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
> news:epjhu2h4t754g0nk42fq0j5o6pu0qr7rj7@4ax.com...
>>
>> http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/...ers_threaten_to_vote_against_money_for_troops
>>
>> House GOP Leaders Threaten To Vote Against Money For Troops
>>
>> By Greg Sargent
>>
>>
>> Okay, so here's the state of play in the House right now with regard
>> to the coming showdown between Congressional Dems and the White House
>> over the war.
>>
>> The House GOP leadership has now unveiled its response to the news
>> this morning that House Dems are coming together behind an approach to
>> the soon-to-be-voted-on spending bill that would bring the troops home
>> if the Iraqi government fails to reduce violence there.
>>
>> House GOP leaders say that if Dems try to attach any conditions to the
>> war spending bill, Republicans in the House may vote against it:
>>
>>
>> The House minority leader threatened Thursday to get his members to
>> vote against a $96.3 billion spending bill for the wars in Iraq and
>> Afghanistan if Democrats persist in plans to attach conditions to the
>> money that would tell President Bush how to conduct the wars.
>>
>>
>> This is interesting -- now it's the House Republican leadership who is
>> threatening to vote against funding the troops.
>>
>> The same Republican leadership which, behind House GOP leader John
>> Boehner, has been demanding that Dems show full support for funding
>> the troops, lest they be accused of not supporting them:
>>
>>
>> REP. BOEHNER:
>>
>> Let's have a real resolution on the floor. It's a bill that says, "We
>> will not cut the funding for our troops in harms' way."
>>
>> ________________________________________________
>>
>> heh heh
>>
>> Harry
>
> Keep on spreading your lies and distortion. No wonder no one with an IQ
> over 50 believes anything you have to say, Harry.
Were's the lies? Were's the distortions?

Come on, tell us all the lies and distortions. Let your voice fill us all
with wonder.

 

[Wayne H. Wilhelm]

"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjv@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:IkAGh.8424$_73.4625@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Wayne H. Wilhelm" <wwilhelm@neonospam.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:45e906f9$0$4843$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> "Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
>> news:epjhu2h4t754g0nk42fq0j5o6pu0qr7rj7@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/...ers_threaten_to_vote_against_money_for_troops
>>>
>>> House GOP Leaders Threaten To Vote Against Money For Troops
>>>
>>> By Greg Sargent
>>>
>>>
>>> Okay, so here's the state of play in the House right now with regard
>>> to the coming showdown between Congressional Dems and the White House
>>> over the war.
>>>
>>> The House GOP leadership has now unveiled its response to the news
>>> this morning that House Dems are coming together behind an approach to
>>> the soon-to-be-voted-on spending bill that would bring the troops home
>>> if the Iraqi government fails to reduce violence there.
>>>
>>> House GOP leaders say that if Dems try to attach any conditions to the
>>> war spending bill, Republicans in the House may vote against it:
>>>
>>>
>>> The House minority leader threatened Thursday to get his members to
>>> vote against a $96.3 billion spending bill for the wars in Iraq and
>>> Afghanistan if Democrats persist in plans to attach conditions to the
>>> money that would tell President Bush how to conduct the wars.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is interesting -- now it's the House Republican leadership who is
>>> threatening to vote against funding the troops.
>>>
>>> The same Republican leadership which, behind House GOP leader John
>>> Boehner, has been demanding that Dems show full support for funding
>>> the troops, lest they be accused of not supporting them:
>>>
>>>
>>> REP. BOEHNER:
>>>
>>> Let's have a real resolution on the floor. It's a bill that says, "We
>>> will not cut the funding for our troops in harms' way."
>>>
>>> ________________________________________________
>>>
>>> heh heh
>>>
>>> Harry
>>
>> Keep on spreading your lies and distortion. No wonder no one with an IQ
>> over 50 believes anything you have to say, Harry.
> Were's the lies? Were's the distortions?
>
> Come on, tell us all the lies and distortions. Let your voice fill us all
> with wonder.
Common Kevin. You're one of the smarter ones here, smart enough to know
Harry's touting Republicans wanting to defund troops when he knows full well
Democrats are insistent on attaching conditions to the funding bill which
Dems know the Republicans won't be able to tolerate, forcing the Republicans
to vote the against the funding bill. You know full well that in such a
case you can't claim the Republicans are against funding the troops, yet
here Harry is promoting just such a thing, a full blown lie.