Guest Patriot Games Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/31563.html Why have Clinton and Obama ducked gun control issue? Tuesday, March 25, 2008 WASHINGTON - When Supreme Court justices debate the legality of the District of Columbia's ban on handguns in coming weeks, their file will include a legal brief from Vice President Dick Cheney, Arizona Sen. John McCain and 54 other senators asking that the law be overturned. But they won't find anything from Democratic Sens. Hillary Clinton of New York or Barack Obama of Illinois. They didn't sign the rival brief from other members of Congress who back the tough handgun restrictions. The Democratic presidential candidates' silence is part of a pattern. For years, the national party has downplayed its historic sympathy for gun control for fear that emphasizing it would be politically costly. Democratic politicians are "nervous about the gun issue, so they stay away from it," said Paul Helmke, the president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Gun-rights advocates described the Democrats' dilemma in starker terms. "The fact is that politicians have discovered there are 80 million law-abiding gun owners, and they're mad as all get out at politicians who want to take their guns away," said John Snyder, a spokesman for the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. Democrats have been skittish about gun control since 1994. Their support for a strong anti-crime bill that summer, which included a ban on 19 types of assault weapons, was later seen by many party strategists as one reason that the party that year lost control of both houses of Congress for the first time in 40 years. Six years later, after Vice President Al Gore lost states with large numbers of gun-rights advocates, many Democrats again saw gun control as a key reason he lost the presidential election. "The NRA (National Rifle Association) had enough votes in New Hampshire, in Arkansas, maybe in Tennessee and Missouri to beat us," Bill Clinton said after the election, "and they whipped us in a few other places." In 2004, Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts touted his credentials as a hunter. Current Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean has said that guns are a state issue. The Brady group counters that in 2006 Democrats won five gubernatorial and four Senate races against tough-on-guns advocates endorsed by the NRA. But in every case, the winning Democrat already was a popular figure, and most were running in states where most residents were sympathetic to gun restrictions. The gun issue this year is being driven by the District of Columbia case. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments last week and will issue a decision by late June. McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, joined a group that included Cheney as well as 46 other Republican and eight Democratic senators, most from rural or Southern states, in signing a brief that seeks to bring Congress' "unique perspective to this court's attention." The brief explains "the historical meaning of the Second Amendment as understood by the Congress," and argues that the handgun ban infringes on "the rights of law-abiding citizens . . . as guaranteed by the Second Amendment." The amendment, in its entirety, says: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." A rival brief, signed by 18 Democratic members of Congress, counters that lawmakers long have had the right to regulate - and ban - "the use and possession of certain weapons." Clinton and Obama have long histories of sympathy for that view. When Obama first ran for the Illinois Senate 12 years ago, he answered "yes" to whether he backed banning the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns in the state. He's softened that position in recent years. When she was asked why Obama didn't sign one of the Supreme Court briefs, campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki said, "Barack Obama believes the Second Amendment creates an individual right, and he greatly respects the constitutional right of Americans to bear arms." But, she added, "he also believes that the Constitution permits state and local governments to adopt reasonable and commonsense gun-safety measures." She didn't specify what such measures might entail. Clinton has a long history as an outspoken supporter of tough gun-control measures, but she, too, has moderated in recent months; last month in Wisconsin, she described how she once went hunting in Arkansas and shot a banded duck. At a January debate, she called herself a "political realist, and I understand that the political winds are very powerful against doing enough to try to get guns off the street." Her words were almost identical to those of Obama; "I believe in the Second Amendment," she said. "People have a right to bear arms. But I also believe that we can commonsensically approach this." Gun control advocates hear comments such as these and figure that 2008 will be another year when their cause will be hard to notice. Politicians "don't want to have that rock in their knapsack," said Roy Romer, a former Colorado governor and former Democratic Party general chairman. "I've seen the National Rifle Association guys sit in the front row of their town hall meetings. It's a tough thing." In case Clinton or Obama forgets the gun owners' message, gun-advocate Snyder is ready to offer them a vivid reminder. "This is going to be a big issue, because when people keep worrying about the situation in the world, they will worry about their ability to defend themselves," he said. Not all is hopeless, though, gun-controller Helmke said, because guns are an issue that can erupt into the nation's conscience at any time. Wait until May or June, when the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the Washington case, he said. "When that decision comes down," Helmke said, "candidates will be asked to say something, and to say something concrete." ON THE WEB Obama's and Clinton's responses to a gun control question at a January candidates debate: A video clip of Clinton talking about her duck-hunting experience: http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/18/good-hill-hunting/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Neolibertarian Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 In article <47ea3cb1$0$30679$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>, "Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote: > http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/31563.html > > Why have Clinton and Obama ducked gun control issue? Because you can't have a socialist state if the population is well armed. -- NeoLibertarian http://www.elihu.envy.nu/NeoPics/UncleHood.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sid9 Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 "Neolibertarian" <cognac756@gmail.com> wrote in message news:cognac756-CFD06D.10525326032008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com... > In article <47ea3cb1$0$30679$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>, > "Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote: > >> http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/31563.html >> >> Why have Clinton and Obama ducked gun control issue? > > Because you can't have a socialist state if the population is well armed. > > -- > NeoLibertarian > > http://www.elihu.envy.nu/NeoPics/UncleHood.jpg The USSC will decide shortly. That will put the controversy to bed once and for all. Be patient. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Topaz Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 Feminism is Jewish. Gloria Steinem was a Jew. Bella Abzug was a Jew. Betty Friedan was a Jew. Friedan, as the writer of "The Feminen Mystique" and founder of NOW, really started the modern feminist movement. "THE JEWISH 100: A Ranking Of the Most Influential Jews Of All Time" By Michael Shaprio # 56 Betty Friedan (b. 1921) Born Betty Naomi Goldstein to Harry and Miriam (Horowitz) Goldstein in Peoria, Illinois, educated at Smith College, married in 1947 to Carl Friedan, the mother of three children, divorced in 1969, activist, best-selling author, professor, a founder of the National Organization for Women (NOW), the National Women's Political Caucus, and the First Women's Bank, researcher, journalist, Democrat, clinical psychologist, and grandmother, Betty Friedan was the most influential feminist of the postwar era. Deemed by Marilyn French and others as an "initiator of the 'second wave' of feminism, " Friedan's writings and lectures, including the highly influential books THE FEMININE MYSTIQUE and THE SECOND STAGE, synthesized women's views on what equality meant and how to live and work... When the war against fascism ended two decades later, four million women lost their jobs to returning GIs. Women were again told that their place was in the home. The freedom to work to build up and defend their nation was over. Men would earn the family's bread. What the boys needed was a warm place to come home to every night. Ironically, American soldiers had accepted some of the values toward women (Kinder, Kuche, Kirche - children, kitchen, church) as the Nazis they thought they had defeated... http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/ http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Neolibertarian Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 In article <vBvGj.26295$vr3.3545@bignews2.bellsouth.net>, "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote: > "Neolibertarian" <cognac756@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:cognac756-CFD06D.10525326032008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com... > > In article <47ea3cb1$0$30679$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>, > > "Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote: > > > >> http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/31563.html > >> > >> Why have Clinton and Obama ducked gun control issue? > > > > Because you can't have a socialist state if the population is well armed. > > > > -- > > NeoLibertarian > > > > http://www.elihu.envy.nu/NeoPics/UncleHood.jpg > > The USSC will decide shortly. > That will put the controversy > to bed once and for all. > What the SCOTUS will decide is the fictions we'll have to live with for some time to come. -- NeoLibertarian http://www.elihu.envy.nu/NeoPics/UncleHood.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Topaz Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 FACT: The Jews have been expelled from almost every Western country at one time or another, including Britain, Spain, France, Portugal and Germany. FACT: Virtually all the major media outlets, including TV networks, newspapers, movie studios and book publishers, are owned or controlled by Jews. FACT: The major media incessantly harps on any white-on-black crime (such as the Jasper TX dragging), yet ignores the much greater number of black- on-white crimes which are equally horrific yet happen FAR MORE FREQUENTLY. FACT: Communism was a largely-Jewish phenomenon. Almost all the top communists of the Russian Revolution were Jews, as well as almost all the atomic spies, and the Revolution was financed in large measure by Wall Street Jews. FACT: In the late 1920s the Communist Party USA decided on a policy of destroying American society by pushing 'racial equality'. FACT: The NAACP was founded principally by Jews, and Jews remained in charge of the organization till 1970. FACT: Most of the 'Orthodox Jewish version' of the Holocaust is false, (and in fact is significantly based on 'confessions' of Germans at the Nuremberg Military Tribunal obtained under torture), and numerous Jewish scholars have actually acknowledged this. (The stories acknowledged by Jewish scholars to be false include the existence of homicidal gas chambers, the use of Jewish skin for lampshade coverings and Jewish body fat for soap, and the assertion that there were 'Six Million' Jews killed by the nazis.) But questioning these widely-believed but false stories is illegal in most countries of the Western world, and 8,000 people are in jail in Germany alone for questioning these and similar dogmas. Can you figure out what powerful international ethnic group was responsible for causing these laws to be passed? FACT: Sympathy and guilt for the (largely false) story of the Holocaust has resulted in the payment of close to a hundred billion dollars to Israel by the German government. Furthermore, Jews everywhere continue to use the Holocaust as a tool for extracting money from gentiles, whether thru the movies (more than 400 have been made on this subject), Holocaust museums, 'reparations' (more than a billion from the Swiss, billions from German companies, etc) and the like. There is a saying widely used among Jews which goes, "There's no business like Shoah [Holocaust] business." Can you figure out why the Jewish establishment has been so eager to suppress questioning of the Holocau$$$t dogma? FACT: Israel is the only 'Western' country to legally sanction torture, and the Israeli Defense Forces use bone-breaking and shoot-to-maim policies against Palestinians, and even reporters. FACT: Jewish political influence has been the principal force attempting to nullify our Constitution, and particularly the freedoms enjoyed under the Bill of Rights. For example, Jews have been the major force behind 'gun control' (ie, the attempt to nullify the Second Amendment), integration and affirmative action (to nullify freedom of association), 'hate crimes' (laying the foundation for suppressing freedom of speech), immigration (introducing large numbers of unassimilable nonwhites which will effectively destroy American culture and ideals), anti-militia statutes and similar efforts. Source http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Lbl/Lbl-VitalFactsYouNeedToKnow.html http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/ http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bret Cahill Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 > >> Why have Clinton and Obama ducked gun control issue? > > > Because you can't have a socialist state if the population is well armed. > > > -- > > NeoLibertarian > > >http://www.elihu.envy.nu/NeoPics/UncleHood.jpg > > The USSC will decide shortly. > That will put the controversy > to bed once and for all. The last thing the Scalito Court wants is anything put to rest. There will be some meaningless dicta about "individualists" and no decision whatsoever on how much stoppin' power is to much to be constitutional. Bret Cahill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Neolibertarian Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 In article <7daa35ce-6a74-4725-aca3-53802603462c@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Bret Cahill <BretCahill@aol.com> wrote: > > >> Why have Clinton and Obama ducked gun control issue? > > > > > Because you can't have a socialist state if the population is well armed. > > > > > -- > > > NeoLibertarian > > > > >http://www.elihu.envy.nu/NeoPics/UncleHood.jpg > > > > The USSC will decide shortly. > > That will put the controversy > > to bed once and for all. > > The last thing the Scalito Court wants is anything put to rest. There > will be some meaningless dicta about "individualists" and no decision > whatsoever on how much stoppin' power is to much to be constitutional. > You haven't been following along at all if you think the current SCOTUS is the "Scalito Court." -- NeoLibertarian http://www.elihu.envy.nu/NeoPics/UncleHood.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patriot Games Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 "Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@aol.com> wrote in message news:7daa35ce-6a74-4725-aca3-53802603462c@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com... >> >> Why have Clinton and Obama ducked gun control issue? >> > Because you can't have a socialist state if the population is well >> > armed. >> The USSC will decide shortly. >> That will put the controversy >> to bed once and for all. > The last thing the Scalito Court wants is anything put to rest. There > will be some meaningless dicta about "individualists" No. Their decision will be plain and simple. > and no decision > whatsoever on how much stoppin' power is to much to be constitutional. Which has NOTHING to do with the Right anyway.... Try to pay attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Topaz Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 In addition to that below, Jews have funded and run most anti-RTKBA organizations. Their plans for globalist dictator-ship cannot be implemented so long as patriotic Americans have the means to resist - as guaranteed them by the Founders. Jews and U.S. Gun Control Legislation, 1968-Present Note: this webpage is a work-in-progress. More information will be added later. This information shows that, contrary to some claims, Jews have sponsored or co-sponsored most modern anti-gun legislation. 1968: The Gun Control Act of 1968 comes from Jewish Rep. Emanuel Celler's House bill H.R. 17735. It expands legislation already attempted by the non-Jewish Sen. Thomas Dodd. America's biggest and most far-reaching gun law came from a Jew [1]. 1988: Senate bill S. 1523 is sponsored by Jewish Senator Howard Metzenbaum. It proposes legislation turning every violation of the Gun Control Act of 1968 into a RICO predicate offense, allowing a gun owner to be charged with federal racketeering offenses. 1988: Senator Metzenbaum co-sponsors a bill-S. 2180 -- to ban, or limit/restrict, so-called "plastic guns." 1990: Jewish Senator Herbert Kohl introduces bill S.2070, the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, which bans gun possession in a school zone. The law will later be struck down in court as unconstitutional. 1993: Senate bill S.653 is sponsored by Sen. Howard Metzenbaum. It bans specific semiautomatic rifles, but also gives the Secretary of the Treasury the power to add any semiautomatic firearm to the list at a later date. February, 1994: The Brady Law, which requires waiting periods to buy handguns, becomes effective. Senator Metzenbaum wrote the Brady Bill. Metzenbaum sponsored the bill in the Senate. The sponsor of the bill in the House was Jewish Rep. Charles Schumer [2]. 1994: Senator Metzenbaum introduces S.1878, the Gun Violence Prevention Act of 1994, aka "Brady II." Rep. Schumer sponsored "Brady II" sister legislation [H.R. 1321] in the U.S. House of Representatives. September, 1994: The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 goes into effect, including a provision that bans the manufacture and possession of semiautomatic rifles described as "assault weapons." [Note: true assault weapons are fully automatic, not semiautomatic]. That gun-ban provision was authored in the Senate by Jewish Senator Dianne Feinstein and authored in the House by Congressman Schumer. 1995: Jewish Senators Kohl, Specter, Feinstein, Lautenberg and others introduce the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1995, an amended version of the 1990 school-zone law which was struck down in court as being unconstitutional. September, 1996: The Lautenberg Domestic Confiscation provision becomes law. It is part of a larger omnibus appropriations bill. It was sponsored by Jewish Senator Frank Lautenberg. It bans people convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence from ever owning a gun. 1997: Senate bill S. 54, the Federal Gang Violence Act of 1997, proposes much harsher sentences for people violating minor gun laws, including mandatory prison sentences and forfeiture of property. It was introduced by Dianne Feinstein and a non-Jewish Senator [Hatch], among others. It returns the idea of turning every violation of the Gun Control Act of 1968 into a RICO predicate offense. January, 1999: Jewish Senator Barbara Boxer introduces bill S.193, the American Handgun Standards Act of 1999. January, 1999: Senator Kohl introduces bill S.149, the Child Safety Lock Act of 1999. It would to require a child safety lock in connection with transfer of a handgun. February, 1999: Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces bill S.407, the Stop Gun Trafficking Act of 1999. February, 1999: Senator Lautenberg introduces S.443, the Gun Show Accountability Act of 1999. March, 1999: Senator Lautenberg introduces bill S.560, the Gun Industry Accountability Act of 1999. March, 1999: Senator Feinstein introduces bill S.594, the Large Capacity Ammunition Magazine Import Ban Act of 1999. May, 2000: Senate bill S. 2515, Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2000, is submitted by Senators Feinstein, Senator Barbara Boxer, Sen. Lautenberg and Sen. Schumer. It is a plan for a national firearms licensing system. January, 2001: Senate bill S.25, Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2001, is sponsored by Feinstein, Schumer, and Boxer. It is a nation-wide gun registration plan [apparently there were two versions of that Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act bill]. May, 2003: Senators Feinstein, Schumer, Boxer and others introduce legislation that would reauthorize the 1994 federal assault weapons ban, and, close a loophole in the law that allows large-capacity ammunition magazines to be imported into the U.S. The ban is scheduled to expire in September, 2004. October, 2003: Senators Feinstein, Lautenberg, Levin [also Jewish] and Schumer co-sponsor bill S.1774, designed to stop the sunset [ending] of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988. March, 2005: Senator Lautenberg introduces bill S.645, "to reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act," in other words, to reinstate the 1994 assault-rifle ban [also known as the "Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994"] which expired in late 2004. March, 2005: Senator Feinstein introduces bill S.620, "to reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act," in other words, to reinstate the 1994 assault-rifle ban [also known as the "Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994"] which expired in late 2004. [1] Celler's bill as the base or foundation of the Gun Control Act of 1968: Here or Here http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/lopez/5thcir.htm http://www.guncite.com/journals/hardfopa.html#fn102 [2] a long list of the anti-gun bills sponsored by Schumer, Here [footnote #36] http://www.saf.org/LawReviews/Healey1.htm http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/ http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.