Hitlary Continues Lies and Personal Attacks on Popular Buckwheat

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/democrats_rdp/2008/01/06/62150.html

Clinton, Obama Clash in Personal Terms

Sunday, January 6, 2008

Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton clashed Sunday in the slushy New

Hampshire homestretch, deriding each others' claims to be the true candidate

of change. Clinton told Democratic voters they should elect "a doer, not a

talker." Obama countered that his critics are stuck in the politics of the

past.

At a raucous rally in a high school gymnasium in Nashua, Clinton skewered

Obama for several votes he has cast in the Senate, such as his vote in favor

of the Patriot Act and for energy legislation she described as "Dick

Cheney's energy bill." She never mentioned Obama's name but left no doubt

about whom she was discussing.

"You campaign in poetry, you govern in prose," Clinton said.

Obama, speaking at a packed Manchester theater, took issue with Clinton's

criticism of him during Saturday's Democratic presidential debate.

"One of my opponents said we can't just, you know, offer the American people

false hopes about what we can get done," he said.

"The real gamble in this election is to do the same things, with the same

folks, playing the same games over and over and over again and somehow

expect a different result," he said. "That is a gamble we cannot afford,

that is a risk we cannot take. Not this time. Not now. It is time to turn

the page."

Tuesday's primary could be pivotal for the Democrats. Obama, the freshman

Illinois senator, is hoping to sustain momentum from his caucus victory in

Iowa, and Clinton is looking to recover from her stinging third place

finish.

A CNN/WMUR poll released Saturday found Clinton and Obama tied at 33 percent

each in the state, with John Edwards trailing at 20 percent.

Edwards, who barely beat Clinton for second place in Iowa, was joined Sunday

by three families who suffered medical tragedies as he made an emotional

case against insurance companies. Picking up on a theme from the debates,

the former North Carolina senator told reporters that he and Obama offer

real change to voters while Clinton represents "the status quo."

He also argued he has more passion for change and would be more willing than

Obama to fight for his goals. "He just believes you can negotiate with

people," Edwards said of his rival.

Obama aides found themselves on the defensive after Clinton said during

Saturday's debate that Obama's New Hampshire campaign co-chairman, Jim

Demers, is a lobbyist whose clients include pharmaceutical companies. The

Clinton campaign kept up the criticism Sunday morning in a teleconference

call with reporters, noting that Obama has repeatedly said he does not take

money from federal lobbyists or political action committees.

Obama communications director Robert Gibbs said Demers is a state lobbyist

and does not do business involving federal legislation or regulation. He

said the campaign has drawn a distinction between lobbyists who are

registered to work at the state level and those who lobby the federal

government.

"A ban on lobbying money and PACs is far from perfect," Gibbs said. "There

is a difference between a college football player and professional football

player," he added.

During the debate, while Clinton referred to Demers, the camera caught Obama

shaking his head, saying "not so."

"He was shaking his head because her implication was that it violated our

lobbyist pledge and his role quite clearly does not," Obama spokesman Bill

Burton said.

Obama sounded an upbeat tone throughout the day, telling New Hampshire

crowds their votes could propel him to the Democratic nomination.

"You will have the chance to change America in two days time," he said. "In

two days we can do what the cynics said could not be done. We will have the

chance to come together, Democrats, Republicans, independents and announce

that we are one nation, we are one people and it is time for change in

America. This is our moment, this is our time."

The former first lady was clearly elated to be greeted by a large,

enthusiastic audience of her own in the same Nashua high school that Obama

filled the day before. Both candidates had to use a second gym for the

overflow crowd.

She took questions from several audience members after delivering a short,

spirited stump speech _ a marked contrast to her final appearances in Iowa,

where she would give an hourlong campaign address and leave, generally

without taking questions.

Earlier, she and daughter Chelsea braved slushy sidewalks to go door to door

in Manchester for about an hour seeking votes.

After leaving one house, Clinton was asked by a TV reporter how she felt

about the Democratic debate the night before.

"Really good," the senator said. "We're starting to draw a contrast for New

Hampshire voters between talkers and doers."

Maura Labrie, a first grade teacher, said she was undecided but had told

Clinton she had liked her debate performance.

"I liked how you said it hurt your feelings," Labrie said, referring to a

question that said polls showed she lacked likability.

Husband Bill was campaigning in North Conway, N.H., sticking to the key word

"change."

"There's a different between talk and action. It makes a big difference if

you've actually changed people's lives, if it's the work of your life," the

former president said.

Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:

"German women, German men !

It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the

Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.

Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not

forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National

Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily

politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very

unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic

intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not

respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the

woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different

value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German

woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best

sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other

areas than the man.

The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but

also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in

the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices

and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best

suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless

devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.

The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the

past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea

of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread

winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the

man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is

not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her

talents and abilities.

Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the

frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men

were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to

the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men

always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all

great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination

have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually

loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the

woman.

It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must

be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our

attitude toward women.

The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in

government, politics, economics and social relations has not left

women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought

impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some

good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that

are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations

have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set

in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a

distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with

former ideals.

A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary

and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most

suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious

duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can

continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of

the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the

builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's

source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place

for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,

in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that

those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in

the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their

abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other

ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially

reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to

fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.

The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.

It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no

intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer

and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.

But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in

motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the

living mother of a family who gives the state children.

German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning

to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more

rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected

to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and

her daily bread is not a good trade.

A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in

our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now

the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most

evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's

birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without

emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The

government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the

resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental

change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is

responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying

about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each

elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by

1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are

the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it

will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine

the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.

We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our

national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The

national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation

on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the

woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends

to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of

our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our

blood is assured..."

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html