Guest Patriot Games Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Back to the Future: Carville & Begala to join Clinton campaign by Major Garrett MANCHESTER, N.H. - It's back to the future at Hillary Clinton's campaign as some of the top advisers to former President Clinton are set to return to Hillary's faltering campaign as early as tomorrow. Senior Clinton sources tell Fox that Hillary intends to bring in as top day-to-day advisers James Carville and Paul Begala. The campaign could also add other strategists from Clinton's presidential years, but Carville and Begala are the biggest names and are set to join the campaign after a post-New Hampshire strategy meeting tomorrow.Carville and Begala will serve as top strategists on politics and communication and likely overshadow the current role of Mark Penn, Hillary's senior strategist, and Patty Solis Doyle, Hillary's current campaign manager. Top sources tell Fox Hillary won't fire anyone but will merely seek to "enlarge" her pool of advisers. One Democratic described it as "addition by subtraction." The subtraction won't come in the form of lost jobs, but lost influence, meaning Carville and Begala's strategic advise will now carry greater weight than that of the original team that devised a strategy that has led to a defeat in the Iowa caucuses and a likely defeat in tonight's New Hampshire primary. The Clinton team fully expects to lose New Hampshire tonight and will attempt to argue that anything less than a 10-point loss will constitute a "moral victory." Hillary's surrogates will try to persuade the public that if Hillary loses by less than 10 points she will have withstood the affect of Obama's massive post-Iowa momentum - momentum, by the way, the Clinton campaign asserted as recently as Saturday did not exist. Obviously, a loss is a loss and a loss in a state the Clinton campaign guaranteed it would wn less than four days ago, any defeat is a huge blow - no matter the magnitude. As for the future strategy, top Clinton advisers say Hillary will attempt to compete aggressively in Nevada's Jan. 19 caucus though she expects to lose the vital endorsement of the culinary union in Las Vegas, a vital cog in the state's Democratic machinery. Rory Reid, son of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, has urged Hillary not to give up on Nevada, arguing he can keep her competitive. Even so, Clinton's camp has begun to reconcile itself to defeat there too. A crucial decision, therefore, awaits the campaign on the Jan. 26 South Carolina primary. Hillary may skip the state in order to save money for the Feb. 5 primaries in more than 20 states. In essence, Hillary now finds herself having to fight a rear-guard battle until the national prmary, even though less than two weeks ago she was regarded as a nearly unbeatable national front-runner. Financially, top advisers say the campaign has enough to carry on, with staff in all states between now and February 5th paid in full and with at least $28 million in the bank. But Hllary's campaign hasn't purchased TV commercials in any of the Feb. 5th states, meaning resources could prove scarce as Hillary tries to move her TV message in expensive media markets in New York, California, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Topaz Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 http://wsi.matriots.com/political_correctness.html The Racial Origins of Political Correctness "Political Correctness" (PC) is, of course, the policing or censorship of certain language and ideas in the White, Western countries. An example of PC would be the banning of an essay which a Black, Mexican or female citizen might find "offensive." It appears that Jewish communist Georg Lukacs (1885-1971; in top photo at right) probably created the first hands-on, working program in which PC was used to indoctrinate the citizenry of a White country. That occurred just a bit before the Jewish-led Frankfurt School began its own journey towards creating PC ideas with the help of the School's Max Horkheimer (1895-1973; in bottom photo at right), who was also a Jew and who invented the concept of "critical theory," which amounted to criticizing White, Western culture and values (Lukacs himself was a fringe Frankfurt Schooler). "Critical theory" paved the way for modern PC by portraying White culture as something oppressive and foul. Interestingly, "critical theory" borrowed some ideas from yet another Jew: Sigmund Freud's psychoanalysis. However, sometimes several historical events happen at the same time. While Lukacs (as commissar of culture in Jewish communist Bela Kun's Hungarian regime in 1919) was creating a Marxist-based PC program to indoctrinate Hungarian schoolchildren with using politically left-wing propaganda, other Jews, such as Franz Boas, were also creating ideology based wholly or partly on Marxism. Whether their creations were social, economic, racial or a combination of all three, they were all rooted in Marxism, or very similarly, egalitarianism/universalism (i.e., the historically-new idea that all humans and cultures are, or can be, "equal" in importance, and that White/Western culture is oppressive and evil). Marxism and egalitarianism/universalism are very nearly the same thing, except one is based more on economics while the other is based more on social/cultural matters. (It can be argued that Marxism was an attempt to use economic ideas to transform the social, and, by default, racial features of society, so in that sense Marxism wasn't only economics-based). But no matter the type of Marxist/universalist programs that those men created, they all amounted to the same thing: cleverly-disguised Jewish attacks upon traditional, White culture. Their programs were designed to end White control of most of the world for the benefit of the Jewish people. Theirs were racial programs masquerading as mere political or social movements. Jews instinctively know that movements that "equalize" the cultures of White countries in one way or another are good for the Jews, since that equalizing helps to ensure that nationalist movements cannot rise up and "oppress" the Jews, such as happened in Nazi Germany in the 1930s. (Note that those disguised cultural attacks by the Jews often use confusing words and phrases, and are often made to appear scientific, in order to give the attacks an air of legitimacy and sophistication). Marxism, feminism, leftism, egalitarianism, PC - they are all Jewish-created assaults upon White, Western culture. And they have all been embraced by many Westerners as legitimate, with few exceptions. All of those ideas employ "equality" as a main argument and main goal. All of them are unnatural and universalist, and all require governmental or bureaucratic force to make the public accept them. Starting with Karl Marx, and moving on to Sigmund Freud, V. I. Lenin, Leon Trotsky, Georg Lukacs, Franz Boas, the Frankfurt School theorists, Ashley Montagu, and Stephen J. Gould, we can see the roots of the movement(s) that led directly to today's PC movement. All of those men were racially-Jewish (Lenin was part-Jewish), all held non-traditional ideas that could be called anti-Western, all were socially and politically influential, and all played vital roles in first creating, and then paving the way for the acceptance of, PC. Even though non-Jews push PC ideas today, they are actually only unwitting helpers of the Jews who created PC. Without the Jews, it is very likely that Political Correctness, as we know it today, wouldn't exist. http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/ http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.