Hitlary Loses EIGHT IN A ROW! Time for Her to GO AWAY!

[Patriot Games]

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/campaign_dems_analysis/2008/02/12/72228.html

Obama Cuts Into Clinton Base

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

WASHINGTON -- Memo to Hillary Rodham Clinton: Barack Obama is stealing your
faithful.

The Illinois senator racked up sizable wins in the District of Columbia,
Maryland and Virginia, besting the former first lady by a margin of 2-to-1
in both places. He also narrowly pulled ahead among delegates for the first
time in the contest.

He did so by winning over many of the voters who form the core of Clinton's
political base.

The Democratic rivals have waged a close battle for votes and delegates thus
far, in part because they have appealed to different constituencies. Clinton
has been strong among traditional Democratic base voters, such as Hispanics
and working-class whites. Obama has run strongest among young people,
independents, affluent voters and blacks.

Tuesday's results changed that dynamic, in a way that should trouble the
Clinton team.

In Virginia and Maryland, Obama and Clinton were splitting whites almost
evenly, according to an exit survey conducted for The Associated Press. Even
white women were beginning to move toward the Illinois senator _ Clinton won
sixty percent of their votes, a much lower percentage than in contests past.
Clinton has based her candidacy in large part on her appeal to white women.

In addition to his usual strong showing among young voters, Obama was also
running about even among those over 65, a group Clinton usually dominates.

"This is the new American majority. This is what change looks like when it
happens from the bottom up," Obama said to supporters at a campaign rally in
Madison, Wis., Tuesday night.

Obama's resounding wins Tuesday followed a five-contest sweep last weekend
in Washington state, Nebraska, Louisiana, Maine and the Virgin Islands.

Clinton has struggled to explain her string of losses to Obama, finding
reasons to justify her poor showing in so many contests.

Caucus states, the former first lady says, are undemocratic and cater only
to party activists. Southern states, like Louisiana, have "a very strong and
very proud African-American electorate," naturally predisposed to favor a
black candidate.

And so-called "red" states like North Dakota, Idaho and Kansas _ all of
which Obama won on Super Tuesday _ will never choose a Democrat in the
general election anyway.

By this logic, only certain states really matter, such as New Hampshire and
New Jersey, states that Clinton has won. Or Texas and Ohio, states she must
capture to stay in the race.

The list of excuses is long, but the justifications are wearing thin. One by
one, all the contests Clinton has suggested don't count are proving in size
and scope that they do.

The Clinton campaign has tried gamely to recalibrate expectations _
signaling loudly that February would not be a good month for the New York
senator. Her strategists even are discounting the power of Obama's momentum
and are instead framing the contest as a drawn-out hunt for delegates that
might not conclude until the party's national convention in Denver this
August.

They are also hoping Clinton will outperform Obama in debates later this
month. Clinton had recently pushed for as many debates as possible, but
Obama agreed to just two.

"Senator Obama is running from debates. If he really believes in openness,
it's time to give voters what they deserve," Clinton strategist Mark Penn
said.

But to do so is to ignore all the other measures of campaign success _ all
of which now favor Obama. His campaign has brought in more than $1 million
per day from more than 650,000 contributors, allowing him to flood the
primary states with television ads and staff. Clinton, meanwhile, is still
climbing out of a financial hole that forced her to make a $5 million
personal loan to the campaign.

Obama also continues to draw arena-sized crowds to his rallies, dwarfing
Clinton's smaller but still enthusiastic gatherings.

In the face of such numbers, Clinton strategists have taken a risk _ all but
pinning her candidacy to the outcome of primaries in Texas and Ohio on March
4. The two states are large and delegate-rich, and their demographics _
working-class white voters in Ohio, a large Hispanic population in Texas _
have so far favored her candidacy.

Clinton was in Texas Tuesday while Obama campaigned in Wisconsin, whose
primary is Feb. 19.

"The Clinton campaign can't have it be about states won or lost or delegates
won," said Democratic strategist Jenny Backus. "It needs to be about
electability in the fall, strength against John McCain, and the key issues
voters are facing."

 

[Topaz]

Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:
"German women, German men !
It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the
Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.
Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not
forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National
Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily
politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very
unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic
intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not
respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the
woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different
value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German
woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best
sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other
areas than the man.

The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but
also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in
the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices
and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best
suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless
devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.

The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the
past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea
of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread
winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the
man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is
not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her
talents and abilities.
Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the
frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men
were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to
the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men
always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all
great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination
have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually
loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the
woman.

It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must
be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our
attitude toward women.

The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in
government, politics, economics and social relations has not left
women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought
impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some
good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that
are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations
have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set
in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a
distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with
former ideals.

A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary
and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most
suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious
duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can
continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of
the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the
builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's
source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place
for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,
in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that
those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in
the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their
abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other
ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially
reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to
fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.

The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.
It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no
intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer
and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.
But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in
motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the
living mother of a family who gives the state children.

German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning
to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more
rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected
to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and
her daily bread is not a good trade.

A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in
our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now
the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most
evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's
birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without
emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The
government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the
resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental
change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is
responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying
about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each
elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by
1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are
the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it
will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine
the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.

We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our
national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The
national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation
on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the
woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends
to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of
our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our
blood is assured..."


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html