Hitlary Says Lying Every Day Is Normal For Her, She Can't Stop!

P

Patriot Games

Guest
http://newsmax.com/headlines/clinton_bosnia_sniper/2008/03/25/82979.html

Clinton Calls Bosnia Account a Mistake

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

GREENSBURG, Pa. -- Hillary Rodham Clinton said Tuesday she made a mistake in
claiming that she came under hostile fire in Bosnia 12 years ago, as rival
Barack Obama's campaign continued to challenge her credibility.

In a recent speech and interviews, the New York senator described a
harrowing scene in Tuzla, Bosnia, in which she and her daughter, Chelsea,
had to run for cover as soon as they landed for a visit in 1996. But video
footage of the day showed a peaceful reception in which a young girl greeted
the first lady on the tarmac.

Clinton told reporters in Pennsylvania on Tuesday that she erred in
describing the scene, which she now realizes after talking with aides and
others.

"So I made a mistake," she said. "That happens. It proves I'm human, which
you know, for some people, is a revelation."

The more important issue, she said, is whether she would be a better
commander in chief than Obama or Republican presidential candidate John
McCain. Clinton and Obama are competing for votes in Pennsylvania's April 22
primary.

Clinton's aides had tried to control the Bosnia flap Monday, saying the New
York senator "misspoke."

But Clinton had to address the issue herself Tuesday, after repeated airings
of the 1996 video clips caused critics to ridicule her.

Reminded that she had said it was the first time she had misspoken in 12
years, Clinton told reporters: "I was joking. Lighten up, guys."

In a March 17 speech in Washington, Clinton said of the Bosnia trip: "I
remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a
greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads
down to get into the vehicles to get to our base."

That account was still posted on her campaign Web site Tuesday.

Clinton told CNN last week, "There was no greeting ceremony, and we
basically were told to run to our cars. Now, that is what happened."

Several news outlets disputed the claims.

Clinton began retracting the remarks in a series of private interviews
Monday and Tuesday before addressing about two dozen reporters here after a
speech.

She told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review: "I was sleep-deprived, and I
misspoke."

She told KDKA radio in Pittsburgh: "You know, I have written about this and
described it in many different settings, and I did misspeak the other day.
This has been a very long campaign."

The Obama campaign fueled the Bosnia brouhaha Tuesday, sponsoring a
conference call with Pennsylvania reporters that featured retired Maj. Gen.
Walter Stewart of the Pennsylvania Army National Guard. Stewart said he was
assigned to the Army's European headquarters when Clinton visited Bosnia as
first lady in 1996. He said her claim that she landed under enemy fire
insulted U.S. soldiers charged with her security.

Clinton's explanation that she misspoke was "really astonishing," said
Stewart, who supports Obama.

"She has no sense of what a statement like that does to soldiers," Stewart
said. "She is insulting the command in its entirety."

"Believe me, heads would have rolled all over" if the military put the first
lady and her daughter in a position of "unacceptable risk."

At her news conference, Clinton said, "the military and the Secret Service
did a terrific job" of handling the situation in Bosnia. "We did take
precautions," she said, noting that she was the first president's wife to
enter a war zone since Eleanor Roosevelt.

Clinton did her best to change the subject Tuesday. She launched her first
TV ad in Pennsylvania, in which she promises to "end $55 billion dollars in
giveaways to corporate special interests and invest it in middle class tax
cuts and creating new jobs." The ad aired in Ohio prior to its March 4
primary.

At a rally in Greensburg, east of Pittsburgh, she proposed ways to help
Americans save for retirement. She would offer up to $1,000 in matching tax
cuts to middle-income families who put money into retirement savings
accounts. About 3.4 million Pennsylvania families would qualify, she said.

Clinton's plan also would "close the loophole that allows companies to cut
their employees' pensions when they sell off subsidiaries," her campaign
said in a statement. She also called for bankruptcy law changes to reduce
companies' ability to evade pension obligations.

On another front, Obama campaign aides posted his tax returns from 2000 to
2006 on his campaign Web site, and called on Clinton to do the same. They
also called on Clinton to release full records of her daily schedule during
her eight years as first lady.

Clinton said she hoped to release her tax returns "within the next week."
 
Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:
"German women, German men !
It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the
Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.
Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not
forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National
Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily
politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very
unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic
intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not
respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the
woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different
value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German
woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best
sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other
areas than the man.

The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but
also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in
the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices
and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best
suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless
devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.

The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the
past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea
of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread
winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the
man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is
not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her
talents and abilities.
Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the
frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men
were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to
the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men
always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all
great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination
have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually
loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the
woman.

It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must
be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our
attitude toward women.

The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in
government, politics, economics and social relations has not left
women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought
impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some
good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that
are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations
have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set
in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a
distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with
former ideals.

A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary
and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most
suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious
duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can
continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of
the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the
builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's
source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place
for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,
in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that
those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in
the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their
abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other
ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially
reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to
fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.

The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.
It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no
intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer
and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.
But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in
motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the
living mother of a family who gives the state children.

German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning
to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more
rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected
to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and
her daily bread is not a good trade.

A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in
our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now
the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most
evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's
birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without
emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The
government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the
resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental
change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is
responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying
about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each
elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by
1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are
the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it
will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine
the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.

We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our
national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The
national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation
on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the
woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends
to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of
our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our
blood is assured..."


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
 
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:14:31 -0400, "Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote:

>http://newsmax.com/headlines/clinton_bosnia_sniper/2008/03/25/82979.html
>
>Clinton Calls Bosnia Account a Mistake
>

Mistake, or just another outright lie?....AAC


On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:45:44 -0400, "Harry Dope" <Dems-R-Vile@earthlink.net> wrote:

> What else has she lied about?


I asked the same question earlier and got this in-depth, knowledgeable reply:

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:47:43 -0700 (PDT), p62c61 <p62c61@gmail.com> wrote:

>> She's an absolute idiot....

>
>I recall during one of its the Clinton Administration's too many to
>count scandals one talking head commenting on the role of Harry
>Thomason, his wife Linda Bloodworth Thomason and other Hollywood
>supporters played in crafting the daily stream of lies about it that
>followed, said something to the effect of: I half expect that someday
>in the future former administration officials will be sitting around
>recollecting the day they stormed the beaches of Normandy with Tom
>Hanks to rescue Private Ryan...
>
>And that's just about where we are today; she's told so many lies,
>conjured up so many false events, fabricated so many tales in order to
>insert herself in to history and the accomplishments of others that
>she can no longer distinguish between reality and the fictions she has
>created for herself.
>
>I'm absolutely sure Hillary actually recalls being under sniper fire
>in Bosnia, participating in peace efforts in Northern Ireland, trying
>to join the Marines, that she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary,
>spending time duck hunting with friends and family, fretting over
>Chelsa's safety as she jogged near TWC on the morning of 9/11 and
>countless other things that never actually happened.
>
>And that's what should scare the crap out of everyone; she's not an
>idiot but a pathological liar who can't tell the manufactured
>fantasies in her head from reality.


.....and then he/she wrote:

>On Mar 26, 12:47 pm, p62c61 <p62...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Wow, this becomes more frightening by the minute! Just how sick in
>the mind in Hillary Clinton? Well I just got done listening to an
>interview with the Air Force pilot who flew Hillary and Chelsa into
>Bosnia, Colonel William "Goose" Changose, tackle each of her claims
>one by one and he makes an very interesting point; Hillary's
>description of being told by the crew to sit on a flak jacket is not
>only false, but it's similar to a scene where soldiers are getting
>ready to enter combat via helicopters in the movie Apocalypse now.
>
>http://www.breitbart.tv/html/68124.html
>
>Apparently the demented Senator from New York has woven scenes from
>movies she's seen into her own life experiences.
>
>Be afraid people, be very afraid.
 
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

Feminism: A Jewish Adversary Movement Against Gentile Culture.
Here is a list of some of the Jewish founders and leaders of the
modern feminist revolution. Keep in mind that this list is by no means
complete-these women are simply the more well-known within the
feminist movement; thousands of lesser-known Jewish women lead local
and obscure feminist groups

-Gloria Steinem (1934- ); founder, Ms. Magazine.

-Bella Abzug (1920-1998); Civil rights and labor attorney elected to
Congress (House of Rep.) from New York City; served 1971-1977.

-Betty Friedan (1921- ); feminist leader and author of the book "The
Feminine Mystique" (1963).

-Shulamith Firestone (1945- ); Canadian feminist. Wrote "The Dialectic
of Sex" (1970).

-Andrea Dworkin (1946- ); radical; apparent lesbian. Author of the
book "Intercourse" (1987).

-Susan Brownmiller (1935- ); U.S. feminist. Wrote the book "Against
Our Will" (1975).

-Susan Faludi (1959- ); author of the book "Backlash" (1992).

-Naomi Wolf (1962- ); advisor to Al Gore in the 2000 U.S.
presidential election.

-Emma Goldman (1869-1940); early U.S. feminist.

-Ernestine Rose (1810-1892); b. in Poland; early feminist.

-Phyllis Chesler (1941- ); U.S. feminist; author of the book "Woman's
Inhumanity to Woman" (2002).

-Judy Chicago (Cohen) (1939- ); U.S. feminist. Author of the book "The
Dinner Party" (1996).

-Robin Morgan (1941- ); U.S. feminist. Former editor-in-chief, Ms.
magazine.

-Letty Cottin Pogrebin (1939- ); U.S. feminist; co-founded Ms.
magazine.

-Gerda Lerner (1920- ); b. in Austria.

-Annie Nathan Meyer (1867-1951); U.S. feminist.

-Maud Nathan (1862-1946); sister of Annie Nathan Meyer; U.S. feminist.

-Geri Palast (1950- ); chair, Committee on Women in the Global
Economy; U.S. feminist.

-Rose Schneiderman (1882-1972); b. in Poland.

-Anita Pollitzer (1894-1975); U.S. feminist; pal of artist Georgia
O'Keeffe.

-Gene Boyer (no birthyear available); a founder of N.O.W.; president
of Jewish Feminists; U.S. feminist.

-Lucy Komisar (1942- ); author of the book "The New Feminism" (1971);
U.S. feminist.

-Karen Nussbaum (1950- ); (apparently Jewish); leader of 9to5-National
Association of Working Women.

-Eleanor Flexner (1908-1995); (apparently Jewish); U.S. feminist.

-Riane Eisler (1931- ); b. Vienna; author/feminist; (apparently
Jewish-fled Nazis). Author of the book "The Chalice and the Blade"
(1987).



http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
 
She's like the CLOCK that struck 13 -- how would one know if the other
times were accurate?
 
"AnAmericanCitizen" <NoAmnesty@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:vcilu3pri1kj0mkk2m8cd84u6ebldv39cb@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:14:31 -0400, "Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com>
> wrote:
>>http://newsmax.com/headlines/clinton_bosnia_sniper/2008/03/25/82979.html
>>Clinton Calls Bosnia Account a Mistake

> Mistake, or just another outright lie?....AAC


I've been shot at and shot before.

It NOT something you EVER forget or "mis-speak."

She's sick and need professional help.
 
In article
<5ab342a5-c5d4-41c2-8aa0-439e9f69afac@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Mack the Knife <bulldog101750@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Mar 28, 8:18
 
Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:
"German women, German men !
It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the
Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.
Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not
forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National
Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily
politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very
unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic
intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not
respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the
woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different
value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German
woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best
sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other
areas than the man.

The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but
also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in
the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices
and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best
suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless
devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.

The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the
past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea
of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread
winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the
man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is
not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her
talents and abilities.
Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the
frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men
were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to
the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men
always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all
great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination
have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually
loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the
woman.

It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must
be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our
attitude toward women.

The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in
government, politics, economics and social relations has not left
women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought
impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some
good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that
are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations
have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set
in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a
distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with
former ideals.

A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary
and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most
suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious
duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can
continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of
the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the
builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's
source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place
for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,
in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that
those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in
the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their
abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other
ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially
reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to
fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.

The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.
It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no
intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer
and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.
But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in
motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the
living mother of a family who gives the state children.

German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning
to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more
rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected
to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and
her daily bread is not a good trade.

A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in
our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now
the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most
evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's
birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without
emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The
government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the
resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental
change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is
responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying
about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each
elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by
1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are
the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it
will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine
the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.

We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our
national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The
national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation
on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the
woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends
to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of
our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our
blood is assured..."


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
 
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:17:21 -0700 (PDT), Mack the Knife
<bulldog101750@yahoo.com> wrote:


>You don't need to keep talented, highly motivated women out of any
>field of endeavor.


Of course you do. We should have a straight society. We should not
have male nurses of female firemen. We should stop all liberal
sickness.


> What you shouldn't do, however, is to pass laws
>that, in effect, force a majority of women to seek a public role they
>neither want nor are especially well-suited for embracing. It is
>feminism, the push for women as a group to take over the leadership of
>society, that has caused all the mayhem, not the fact that some women
>do very well in the workforce and always have. Women in the workforce
>who lack intelligence, competence, balance, and good sound judgement
>are only taking jobs away from men who possess those qualities. No
>matter how you slice it, all the upheaval that resulted from
>Affirmative Action and feminism is not a recipe for the health or the
>ultimate success of any society. If we don't face this fact, then we
>are doomed.


That may be well and good. But men and women are different are they
not? Are we going to have a society that acknowledges that or a
society that denies it? I say the former. We should have a straight
society.


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
 
"Mack the Knife" <bulldog101750@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:5ab342a5-c5d4-41c2-8aa0-439e9f69afac@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 28, 8:18 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> "AnAmericanCitizen" <NoAmne...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>> news:vcilu3pri1kj0mkk2m8cd84u6ebldv39cb@4ax.com...
>> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:14:31 -0400, "Patriot Games"
>> > <Patr...@America.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>http://newsmax.com/headlines/clinton_bosnia_sniper/2008/03/25/82979.html
>> >>Clinton Calls Bosnia Account a Mistake
>> > Mistake, or just another outright lie?....AAC

>> I've been shot at and shot before.
>> It NOT something you EVER forget or "mis-speak."
>> She's sick and need professional help.

>Bingo. Must we watch her fall apart psychologically in front of the
>entire country?


Yep, she refuses to quit.

>When Hillary finally goes down, it's going to be as
>bad or worse than when it happened to Nixon.


I predict the actual moment of meltdown will happen in public. Probably
while giving a speech, maybe while being interviewed.

It'll be extremely messy.
 
"Jean Smith" <go_termite@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:go_termite-76AD93.13332028032008@newsgroups.bellsouth.net...
> In article
> <5ab342a5-c5d4-41c2-8aa0-439e9f69afac@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> Mack the Knife <bulldog101750@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 28, 8:18 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> > "AnAmericanCitizen" <NoAmne...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>> > news:vcilu3pri1kj0mkk2m8cd84u6ebldv39cb@4ax.com...
>> > > On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:14:31 -0400, "Patriot Games"
>> > > <Patr...@America.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >>http://newsmax.com/headlines/clinton_bosnia_sniper/2008/03/25/82979.html
>> > >>Clinton Calls Bosnia Account a Mistake
>> > > Mistake, or just another outright lie?....AAC
>> > I've been shot at and shot before.
>> > It NOT something you EVER forget or "mis-speak."
>> > She's sick and need professional help.

>> Bingo. Must we watch her fall apart psychologically in front of the
>> entire country? When Hillary finally goes down, it's going to be as
>> bad or worse than when it happened to Nixon.

> A story on lies quoting newsmax. How ironic that is.


Yet you FAILED to cite JUST ONE NewsMax lie.......

How PATHETIC is that?
 
<lorad474@cs.com> wrote in message
news:8abddc85-bb29-4e60-9611-4b8f50a29707@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 26, 3:14 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> It's really Sad.


Yes it is!
 
"Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote in message
news:47efc76f$0$12577$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> "Mack the Knife" <bulldog101750@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:5ab342a5-c5d4-41c2-8aa0-439e9f69afac@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 28, 8:18 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>>> "AnAmericanCitizen" <NoAmne...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>>> news:vcilu3pri1kj0mkk2m8cd84u6ebldv39cb@4ax.com...
>>> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:14:31 -0400, "Patriot Games"
>>> > <Patr...@America.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>http://newsmax.com/headlines/clinton_bosnia_sniper/2008/03/25/82979.html
>>> >>Clinton Calls Bosnia Account a Mistake
>>> > Mistake, or just another outright lie?....AAC
>>> I've been shot at and shot before.
>>> It NOT something you EVER forget or "mis-speak."
>>> She's sick and need professional help.

>>Bingo. Must we watch her fall apart psychologically in front of the
>>entire country?

>
> Yep, she refuses to quit.
>
>>When Hillary finally goes down, it's going to be as
>>bad or worse than when it happened to Nixon.

>
> I predict the actual moment of meltdown will happen in public. Probably
> while giving a speech, maybe while being interviewed.
>
> It'll be extremely messy.
>
>
>
>


Both he and she have been lying to the public since at least 1980. I had to
live in Arkansas 1980-1991 so I got to see a lot of it first hand. Elected
President? Why she should be taken out and shot for committing high
treason. Bill, too.

Charles the Curmudgeon.
 
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

Feminism: A Jewish Adversary Movement Against Gentile Culture.
Here is a list of some of the Jewish founders and leaders of the
modern feminist revolution. Keep in mind that this list is by no means
complete-these women are simply the more well-known within the
feminist movement; thousands of lesser-known Jewish women lead local
and obscure feminist groups

-Gloria Steinem (1934- ); founder, Ms. Magazine.

-Bella Abzug (1920-1998); Civil rights and labor attorney elected to
Congress (House of Rep.) from New York City; served 1971-1977.

-Betty Friedan (1921- ); feminist leader and author of the book "The
Feminine Mystique" (1963).

-Shulamith Firestone (1945- ); Canadian feminist. Wrote "The Dialectic
of Sex" (1970).

-Andrea Dworkin (1946- ); radical; apparent lesbian. Author of the
book "Intercourse" (1987).

-Susan Brownmiller (1935- ); U.S. feminist. Wrote the book "Against
Our Will" (1975).

-Susan Faludi (1959- ); author of the book "Backlash" (1992).

-Naomi Wolf (1962- ); advisor to Al Gore in the 2000 U.S.
presidential election.

-Emma Goldman (1869-1940); early U.S. feminist.

-Ernestine Rose (1810-1892); b. in Poland; early feminist.

-Phyllis Chesler (1941- ); U.S. feminist; author of the book "Woman's
Inhumanity to Woman" (2002).

-Judy Chicago (Cohen) (1939- ); U.S. feminist. Author of the book "The
Dinner Party" (1996).

-Robin Morgan (1941- ); U.S. feminist. Former editor-in-chief, Ms.
magazine.

-Letty Cottin Pogrebin (1939- ); U.S. feminist; co-founded Ms.
magazine.

-Gerda Lerner (1920- ); b. in Austria.

-Annie Nathan Meyer (1867-1951); U.S. feminist.

-Maud Nathan (1862-1946); sister of Annie Nathan Meyer; U.S. feminist.

-Geri Palast (1950- ); chair, Committee on Women in the Global
Economy; U.S. feminist.

-Rose Schneiderman (1882-1972); b. in Poland.

-Anita Pollitzer (1894-1975); U.S. feminist; pal of artist Georgia
O'Keeffe.

-Gene Boyer (no birthyear available); a founder of N.O.W.; president
of Jewish Feminists; U.S. feminist.

-Lucy Komisar (1942- ); author of the book "The New Feminism" (1971);
U.S. feminist.

-Karen Nussbaum (1950- ); (apparently Jewish); leader of 9to5-National
Association of Working Women.

-Eleanor Flexner (1908-1995); (apparently Jewish); U.S. feminist.

-Riane Eisler (1931- ); b. Vienna; author/feminist; (apparently
Jewish-fled Nazis). Author of the book "The Chalice and the Blade"
(1987).



http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
 
Back
Top