Hitlary The Fraud - Part 1 of a 7 Part Series

October 27, 2007

http://www.newmediajournal.us/staff/swirsky/03132006.htm

Hillary Clinton's Culture of Corruption: The Scandal Queen

The Fraudulent Senator: Part 1 of a 7 Part Series

Joan Swirsky

March 13, 2006

Once upon a time the woman who former Democrat House Ways and Means

Committee Chairman and convicted felon Dan Rostenkowski was credited with

calling "the smartest woman in the world'' decided that departing the

pinnacle of world power at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue - where she was

co-president of the U.S. for eight years - was unacceptable.

In no time, she decided that the fastest route to regaining that power was

to spend as few years as possible as the junior senator from New York and

then move onward and upward to reclaim what she believes is her rightful

place in history as the first female president of the United States of

America.

Hillary Rodham Clinton promptly relocated to the Empire State and moved into

an upscale house financed by the former chairman of the Democratic National

Committee.

Her senatorial campaign involved spinning the yarn that she was a long-time

NY Yankees fan, assuring upstate conservative voters that she "cared" about

their jobs, informing the large liberal base of NY City Jewish voters that

she was part Jewish (endearing coming from the wife of the first black

president), and convincing the Chasidic New Square community in Rockland

County (that had formerly voted overwhelmingly for arch-conservative Sen.

Alfonse D'Amato) to vote 99 to 1 for her.

Never mind that two months after her election she pardoned four residents of

New Square who had been convicted of defrauding the federal government, an

act not quite as egregious as her husband's attempt to win her New York's

Hispanic vote by pardoning 16 members of the FALN terrorist group who had

planted over 130 bombs in the U.S., killed six people and injured 70.

All that added to the sympathy of New York's bleeding-heart liberals for the

woman wronged by her predatory husband and his paramour Monica Lewinsky, and

Hillary ran up enough votes to elect her to the U.S. Senate.

The Past as Prologue

In preparation for her unchallenged role as America's Scandal Queen, Hillary

navigated the shoals of Arkansas politics for 12 years as the

then-governor's wife - years that included scandals of her own, among them:

? A $100,000 windfall from cattle futures after a $1,000 investment.

.. The Castle Grande real estate scam.

.. Her role as attorney for the Rose law firm in what would become the

endlessly controversial-cum-criminal Whitewater affair that would follow her

to the White House.

.. The serial philandering of her husband, which cast her - depending on

one's viewpoint - as a clench-jawed stoic, a perpetual victim, or a willing

collaborator.

According to veteran journalist Richard Poe: "During Bill Clinton's tenure

as attorney general and then governor of Arkansas, the state became a

veritable Dixie Casablanca, a hotbed of global intrigue, in which shady

operators ranging from Columbian drug lords and BCCI money launderers to

Chinese intelligence agents took part." And there, in the thick of it, was

Clinton's "stand by your man's" wife, Hillary.

Chicago-born Hillary - who by way of education, career, marriage and

circumstance had already migrated to Wellesley, New Haven, Washington D.C.,

and Little Rock - had learned a lot in "The Natural State," specifically how

to supernaturally evade responsibility, deny accountability, and dodge law

enforcement, all the perfect preparation for her lengthy stay in White

House - at the lofty address she now wants to reoccupy.

Don't Throw Me in That Briar Patch!

By the time she moved into the White House in 1993, Hillary was so

accustomed to - and comfortable with - her husband's and her own

self-created scandals that living a straight-and-narrow, law-abiding life

appeared to be alien to her.

Like Brer Rabbit, Hillary practically begged for scandal. To recount the

Joel Chandler Harris classic, Brer Rabbit was despised by Brer Fox, who

decided to teach a lesson to the uppity rabbit. He created a tar baby and,

sure enough, Brer Rabbit struck up a conversation with the sticky statue,

but to no avail. Frustrated, he punched the baby and his paw got stuck in

the tar. Infuriated, he struck him again and his other paw got stuck. Then

he kicked the tar baby with both feet and butted it with his head and they

too got stuck.

Finally, Brer Fox appeared to taunt his captive. "I'm going to barbecue you

today, for sure."

"I don't care what you do with me, roast me," Brer Rabbit said. "Just so you

don't fling me in that briar patch." Then Brer Fox threatened to hang the

critter, drown him or skin him. But those horrible prospects didn't daunt

Brer Rabbit. "Snatch out my eyeballs, tear out my ears by the roots," he

pleaded with his antagonist, "but please, Brer Fox, don't fling me in that

briar patch!

Finally Brer Fox decided to do the worst of all possible things: hurl Brer

Rabbit in the briar patch. In no time, the fox saw Brer Rabbit sitting on a

chinquapin log combing the tar pitch out of his hair. "Born and bred in the

briar patch," Brer Rabbit gleefully called out to the fox. "It's my favorite

place in the whole world!"

An Expert at Scandal

Unlike Brer Rabbit, Hillary wasn't born and bred in the world of political

scandal - far from it. In fact her family were Republicans and young Hillary

supported the1964 presidential bid of Barry Goldwater, the archconservative

senator from Arizona. Unphased by his loss, she continued her conservative

ways by becoming the president of the Wellesley College chapter of College

Republicans.

But with her exposure at Wellesley to the radical leftist Saul Alinsky and

her subsequent introduction to Yale Law School's draft-dodging leftist Bill

Clinton, the die was cast for her

hate-America's-military-intelligence-defense establishment. To the smartest

woman in the world and her then-boyfriend, the path to changing what they

hated was clear: Get power and hold onto it no matter what it takes!

What it took in Arkansas was first learning and then becoming a scandal

expert. Within months of taking up residence in the White House, Hillary put

her expertise to work.

In May 1993, the co-president was accused of having a central hand in firing

several long-time employees of the White House Travel Office, the better to

give the pricey travel business to her Hollywood pals, Linda Bloodworth

Thomason and Harry Thomason. In true scandal-mode form, Hillary denied

everything and when Whitewater Independent Counsel Robert Ray investigated

Travelgate, he concluded that there was substantial evidence that involved

Hillary but not enough to warrant an indictment.

A couple of months later, in July 1993, White House Deputy Counsel Vince

Foster was said to have committed suicide, although the case for his murder

has been made persuasively by, among others, Christopher Ruddy, in his 1993

book, "The Strange Death of Vincent Foster: An Investigation."

But the case didn't end there. In 1996, Hillary was accused by the Senate

Special Whitewater Committee of ordering the removal of potentially damaging

files related to Whitewater from Foster's office on the night of his death.

Hillary denied everything, once again proving her adeptness in the scandal

briar patch.

In June 1996, White House security head Craig Livingstone, a political

operative and former bouncer, illegally obtained over 700 FBI files of

mostly White House personnel from former Republican administrations. Hillary

was accused of requesting the files and, in fact, hiring Mr. Livingstone,

but she denied everything to yet another Independent Counsel, and Filegate

became one more notch in her briar patch scandal belt.

Ultimately, her co-presidency brought about the fall of more elected and

appointed members of her regime, as well as "friends" who met untimely

deaths, were indicted, pleaded the fifth, fled the country, and were

imprisoned, than in any administration in American history.

Staggering Numbers

Keeping in mind that Hillary - in her own "two for the price of one"

pronouncement - told the nation that she would be sharing the presidency

with her husband, it would beg the imaginations of even her most fervent

acolytes that the tsunami of scandals that inundated the Clinton tenure

somehow escaped either the notice or personal involvement of Hillary

herself.

To see the shocking Scandal Index of the Clinton years, as compiled by the

liberal Progressive Review (http://prorev.com) is to appreciate the

Clinton's 24/7/365 belief that any progress in their leftist domestic and

foreign affairs agenda could only be realized through the most nefarious

activity - much of which fit neatly into the criminal category. Under the

listing of "Records Set'" by the Clinton administration (read:

co-presidency), Progressive Review cites the following, of which I will only

list a sampling:

? Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates.

? Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation.

? Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify.

? Most number of witnesses to die suddenly.

? First president sued for sexual harassment.

? First president accused of rape.

? First president to be held in contempt of court.

? First president to be impeached for personal malfeasance.

? First first lady to come under criminal investigation.

? Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign-contribution case.

? Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions.

? Number of Starr-Ray investigation convictions or guilty pleas to date: one

governor, one associate attorney general and two Clinton business partners:

14.

? Number of Cabinet members who came under criminal investigation: 5.

? Number of individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine

that were convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes: 47.

? Number of these convictions during Clinton's presidency: 33.

? Number of indictments/misdemeanor charges: 61.

? Number of congressional witnesses who pleaded the Fifth Amendment, fled

the country to avoid testifying, or (in the case of foreign witnesses)

refused to be interviewed: 122.

? Guilty pleas and convictions obtained by Donald Smaltz in cases involving

charges of bribery and fraud against former Agriculture Secretary Mike Espy

and associated individuals and businesses: 15; acquitted or overturned cases

(including Espy): 6.

? Clinton machine crimes for which convictions were obtained: drug

trafficking, 3; racketeering, extortion, bribery, 4; tax evasion, kickbacks,

embezzlement, 2; fraud, 12; conspiracy, 5; fraudulent loans, illegal gifts,

1; illegal campaign contributions, 5; money laundering, 6; perjury, et al.

? Number of times that Clinton figures who testified in court or before

Congress said that they didn't remember, didn't know, or something similar:

Bill Kennedy, 116; Harold Ickes, 148; Ricki Seidman, 160; Bruce Lindsey,

161; Bill Burton, 191; Mark Gearan, 221; Mack McLarty, 233; Neil Egglseston,

250; John Podesta, 264; Jennifer O'Connor, 343; Dwight Holton 348; Patsy

Thomasson, 420; Jeff Eller, 697; and Hillary Clinton, 250.

Believe it or not, this exhaustive list omits even lengthier lists - on

public record - of crimes investigated, public officials and reporters

intimidated, threatened and muzzled, and the raft of dead people associated

with the Clintons who died by guns, knives, alleged suicides, etc. See

http://members.tripod.com/~rcjustice/pres.html and

http://prorev.com/legacy.htm.

Apparently, the Clinton Scandal Squad enforcers believed that nothing was

more important than protecting the co-presidents from realizing their

relentlessly leftwing agenda - this in spite of the fact that by 1998 under

the Clinton co-presidency, the GOP gained 48 seats in the House, 8 seats in

the Senate, 11 governorships, and 1,254 seats in state legislatures, and

that during their tenure, 439 (out of 1,998 Democrats) became Republicans as

opposed to 3 Republicans who became Democrats.

Hillary's.Um.Character

Throughout her scandal-contaminated eight years in the White House,

Hillary - having refined her skills in deflection, dissimulation and

denial - became comfortably entrenched in her self-created briar patch. With

increasing audacity and a confidence borne of "beating the system," she also

displayed behavior that didn't quite rise to the level of scandal but

certainly occupied other, rather lowly, categories:

Megalomania: Hillary refused to acknowledge - publicly or in print - the

woman who in essence wrote her 1996 book, "It Takes a Village."

Lying: Hillary gave false testimony about her co-defendant Ira Magaziner,

who helped her conduct secret meetings about her failed plan to socialize

U.S. medicine.

Obstruction of Justice: the "smartest woman in the world" couldn't remember

where she placed the Rose law firm billing records that were subpoenaed in

1994, until they magically reappeared two years later in the White House

library.

Tastelessness: In 1999, after the wife of terrorist Yasir Arafat told the

co-president that Israel was deliberately poisoning Palestinians, Hillary

saw fit to embrace her. And that is not to omit what Pulitzer Prize winning

journalist Michael Goodwin called her "rancid race baiting" remarks at a

recent Martin Luther King Jr. celebration about Republicans running "the

House" like a "plantation." Significantly, she omitted mention of the

holiday that Arkansans celebrated during her years in the state house that

honored Dr. King while at the same time honoring Robert E. Lee, the

Confederate general who fought to allow the South to keep blacks enslaved.

Selective Amnesia: In her 2004 book, "Living History," Hillary strangely

omitted mention of her own and her husband's key associates, men with whom

she took numerous photographs and who donated millions of dollars to her

husband's campaigns, going back to their Arkansas days. These include -

among dozens of other shady characters and outright criminals - Moctar

Riady, the Indonesian billionaire owner of the Lippo banking company (the

partner of which is the Chinese communist government and reputedly a front

for Chinese espionage), and his son James, who eventually pleaded guilty to

campaign violations.

Contempt for Women: The world got its first glimpse of Hillary's shabby

character when she was co-running for the co-presidency in 1992 and - with

what turned out to be supreme irony - told Steve Kroft on "60 Minutes" that

she "wouldn't be some 'stand by your man' woman like [country-music icon]

Tammy Wynette."

Her low regard for women continued through the 1990s as the White House went

after many but certainly not all of the president's women - Gennifer

Flowers, Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, and Elizabeth

Ward Gracen - by auditing their tax returns, and, in 1997, leaking Paula

Jones' confidential tax returns to the press.

According to Candace E. Jackson in her book, "The Women Targeted by the

Clinton Machine," Hillary "was right there in the inner circle taking a lead

in giving these women zero credibility, in attacking them in public and

through the press and in participating in all of these scare tactics, like

hiring private investigators to threaten them and follow them.[she] is

either as misogynistic as her husband or she is simply willing to conspire

to mistreat women if that's what it takes to preserve their political

careers."

In "Hillaryland," Ryan Lizza writes in TheNewRepublicOnline, the New York

senator has many Kool-Aid-drinking "crawl-across-broken-glass-for-Hillary"

types [and] a "vast political empire based in Washington and New York.she

has made every effort to change her image from far-left liberal by enacting

legislation with Republicans.the more right-wing the co-sponsor, the better;

extra points for anyone involved with her husband's impeachment."

But will her extreme makeover work? According to columnist Jonah Goldberg,

Hillary's recent return of a campaign contribution from Wal-Mart, on whose

board she sat from 1986 until 1992, "is a perfect illustration not merely of

her hypocrisy but of the quicksand she is now in. She thinks it's a winning

message to say she's too good for Wal-Mart's money but not Hollywood's.

That's not exactly red-state savvy."

"The amazing thing about [Hillary]," Goldberg says, "is that she's so

unappealing. Even liberals don't like what they see.at every turn, [her]

Zelig-like public persona has been a fabrication - either by her fans, her

enemies or herself."

All of which may explain a recent CNN-Gallup poll in which 51 percent of

respondents said they definitely would "not vote" for Hillary in a

presidential race.

Indeed, according to an online conservative site, even "media liberals are

starting to jump ship" on Hillary, with "one CNN veteran [Ken Bode] calling

her a `certain loser,' a Newsweek scribe [Jonathan Alter] warning that

she'll take Democrats on a `kamikaze' mission in 2008," and arch-leftist

Maureen Dowd of the Clinton-fawning New York Times batting her away as one

would an irritating gnat.

Hillary's.Um.Style

Equally difficult to overcome, however, are unfortunate personality traits

that Hillary has none-too-convincingly tried to conceal from the public.

While decades have passed since she was labeled "Sister Frigidaire" in her

high school newspaper, her image of being cold, robotic and inaccessible

continues to this day.

Some critics have called her angry, impatient, given to temper outbursts,

calculating, opportunistic, and a chronic victim, but Tim Cavanaugh of

http://www.reason.com said, "Plainly put, it's her personality... She still lacks a

key quality that a politician can't achieve through hard work: likeability."

Indeed, it's difficult to like someone who constantly patronizes her

audiences, speaking ever so slowly so that the stupid masses will "get" what

the smartest woman in the world is saying. Or when she uses her alienating

alternative oratorical style, which consists solely of the strident, the

screechy and the preachy.

Expanding on the Zelig multiple-personality comparison, author and political

commentator Kate O'Beirne calls Hillary a "skilled poseur," enumerating the

ways in which she takes positions "entirely at odds with the words she

proclaims from the housetops." Not the least being her advocacy for the

little guy, when in fact Hillary is the second-biggest spender in the Senate

after New Jersey's Sen. Jon Corzine.

Mrs. O'Beirne cites Hillary's "Liberal Quotient" from the Americans for

Democratic Action, which was 95 last year, tied with far-left Senators

Barbara Boxer and Richard Durbin, and her lifetime ADA rating of 95, which

outscores both Senators Ted Kennedy (89.16) and John Kerry (88.7). NARAL

scored her a perfect 100 percent since her election to the senate, and the

National Rifle Association gave her the grade of "F."

Although Hillary would like the public to believe that she is a born-again

hawk when it comes to the military, O'Beirne reports that the conservative

American Security Council gave her "a measly 20 percent on national-security

issues" and states that "her ersatz hawkishness is one of tepid gestures and

hollow speechifying."

Another example of her counterfeit hawkishness was demonstrated when she

denounced the recent election of the terrorist group Hamas in Palestinian

parliamentary elections, which led terrorism expert Steven Emerson to remind

the public that, while co-president, Hillary met repeatedly with "groups

that had openly supported Hamas, Hezbollah and other foreign terrorist

organizations," including, among many others, the militant Islamic Relief

Association and The American Muslim Council, whose followers carried out the

1993 World Trade Center bombings."

"A review of the statements, publications and conferences of the groups Mrs.

Clinton embraced," said Mr. Emerson, "shows unambiguously that they have

long advocated or justified violence. By meeting with these groups, the

first lady lent them legitimacy."

Today, John Spencer, the former Mayor of Yonkers, NY, and a Vietnam combat

veteran who will challenge Hillary in the November senate race

(http://www.joinspencer.com) has accused the smartest woman in the world of

accepting money from wealthy businessmen Hassan Nemazee and Faraj Aalaei,

who are both associated with the American Iranian Council, a

pro-Iranian-regime.

"Senator Clinton voted against the very munitions necessary to avoid a

nuclear confrontation with Iran," Mr. Spencer said, "while at the same time

accepting money from supporters of the Iranian mullahs.she lacks the

credibility to keep New York safe and she should return this tainted money."

Then there is Hillary's paranoid streak, as evidenced, O'Beirne states, by

"her modus operandi [which] has always been to rally troops against the

enemy - whether the Clintons' Arkansas enemies, the Gingrich forces in the

House, Ken Starr and `the vast right-wing conspiracy,' George W. Bush and

his band of ideologues, or whoever will bear the Republican mantle in 2008."

A Worm Under Every Rock

No matter where you look, Hillary's name is associated with scandal. For one

thing, she has acknowledged accepting contributions from the influence

peddling, recently indicted, uber-lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

There is also, according to Carl Limbacher at NewsMax.com, the Clinton

campaign-finance scandal of the late 1990s, where millions of dollars of

illegal Chinese campaign cash found its way into Democratic Party and

Clinton legal defense fund coffers. Worse, American missile- guidance

technology was given to Beijing. This outrage may be blamed on the senator's

husband, but that won't wash for the "two for the price of one" Scandal

Queen.

That is not to omit the recently released 400-page Barrett Report. In 1995,

while Independent Counsel David Barrett was investigating the president's

Housing Secretary Henry Cisneros for various crimes, he discovered that the

president had used the Internal Revenue Service (headed by Hillary's college

friend, Margaret Milner Richardson), the Justice Department (headed by

Clinton puppet Janet Reno), and the White House (headed by co-presidents

Bill and Hillary) to audit political enemies, particularly the women who had

accused the president of sexual harassment and even rape.

Clintonista Democrats have tried for 10 years to have the parts of the

Barrett Report that dealt with these matters redacted, and they succeeded.

But Republican Senators Charles Grassley, Chairman of the House Finance

Committee, and James Sensenbrenner, Chairman of the House Judiciary

Committee, have both stated publicly that they are determined to get the

entire report released.

The redacted portions must be pretty explosive because as columnist Tony

Snow has noted, the "report is a bombshell, capable possibly of wiping out

Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential prospects."

The Nemesis Who Won't Go Away

Increasingly, Hillary and company have projected onto Republicans the "the

culture of corruption" mantra and, onto President Bush, the "I" word -

impeachment. This is to deflect attention away from Hillary's latest

scandal, one in which she will undoubtedly deny everything to escape

accountability or even criminal indictment.

In short, Hillary's current nemesis, Peter Paul - the largest single

campaign contributor to her 2000 Senatorial campaign - has filed a suit

against her and President Clinton - among many others.

According to Mr. Paul, the suit is "for committing a series of business

frauds against me that involved me spending more than $1.2 million for

Hillary's Senate campaign; having a Clinton front man go into business with

my Japanese investor partner, causing the collapse of my public company; and

filing fraudulent reports to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) in the

amount of nearly three-quarters-of-a-million dollars."

Today, all of the many codefendants in the case - except Hillary - have

exhausted their appeals and are now poised for discovery and trial, the

schedule for which will be set by the court after a hearing on Hillary's

anti-SLAPP motion in Los Angeles in March.

NOTE: SLAPP suits, or Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation, are

recognized in California as lawsuits that are brought against individuals,

corporations or organizations in an attempt to silence defendants who speak

out on matters of public concern. An anti-SLAPP motion seeks to strike all

claims against a defendant - in this case, Hillary herself!

Initially, Hillary's anti-SLAPP motion appeal was denied by both trial and

appellate courts but then sent back to the trial court to clarify a

discrepancy. But on February 3, 2006, the judge changed his original ruling.

He ignored the tardiness of Hillary's original filing and agreed to allow

her to argue that her 1st Amendment rights (to conduct her senatorial

campaign) included her own and her husband's right to defraud her largest

contributor. This action will allow Mr. Paul's lawyers to depose Hillary.

[Read more about this case in Part II of this series].

As the disposition of Hillary's appeal approaches, the Clintons, their

lawyers and spinners, as well as their echo chamber in what used to be the

"mainstream" media - but is now known as the Old Media and even the Antique

Media - are using all of their formidable resources to make sure that

Hillary dodges yet another scandal.

Sound familiar? This is exactly what the leftwing media did when they tried

to smear Paula Jones when she accused the Philander-in-Chief of sexual

harassment. What they didn't count on, however, was that Mrs. Jones had the

truth on her side and believed so fervently that justice would be served

that she refused to knuckle under to their unceasing assaults.

Today, Peter Paul (http://www.hillcap.org) also refuses to be intimidated by

the Clinton machine and is equally assured that justice will out. He has

become yet another Clinton nemesis who won't go away.

October 27, 2007

Patriot Games wrote:

> http://www.newmediajournal.us/staff/swirsky/03132006.htm

>

> Hillary Clinton's Culture of Corruption: The Scandal Queen

> The Fraudulent Senator: Part 1 of a 7 Part Series

>

> Joan Swirsky

> March 13, 2006

Not to mention the now quarter of a trillion (that's right, TRILLION)

murders they have on their hands. The Clinton Body Count shows no

signs of slowing down.

BLP

October 28, 2007

Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:

"German women, German men !

It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the

Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.

Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not

forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National

Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily

politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very

unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic

intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not

respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the

woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different

value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German

woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best

sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other

areas than the man.

The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but

also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in

the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices

and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best

suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless

devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.

The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the

past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea

of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread

winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the

man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is

not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her

talents and abilities.

Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the

frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men

were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to

the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men

always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all

great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination

have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually

loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the

woman.

It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must

be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our

attitude toward women.

The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in

government, politics, economics and social relations has not left

women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought

impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some

good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that

are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations

have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set

in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a

distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with

former ideals.

A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary

and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most

suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious

duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can

continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of

the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the

builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's

source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place

for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,

in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that

those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in

the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their

abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other

ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially

reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to

fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.

The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.

It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no

intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer

and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.

But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in

motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the

living mother of a family who gives the state children.

German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning

to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more

rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected

to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and

her daily bread is not a good trade.

A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in

our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now

the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most

evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's

birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without

emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The

government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the

resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental

change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is

responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying

about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each

elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by

1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are

the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it

will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine

the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.

We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our

national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The

national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation

on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the

woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends

to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of

our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our

blood is assured..."

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

October 28, 2007