Hitlary Trying to Steal Buckwheat's Delegates!

[Patriot Games]

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,329072,00.html

Clinton, Obama Duel Over Delegates After Super Tuesday, Each Claiming
Majority
Wednesday, February 06, 2008

WASHINGTON - Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama found themselves in an
airtight duel over delegates Wednesday, each laying claim to a majority of
the Super Tuesday spoils.

John McCain enjoyed a clearer victory Tuesday night on the GOP side, as he
took wins coast-to-coast and declared himself the front-runner. By claiming
several winner-take-all victories, the Arizona senator was able to put more
distance between himself and his closest rival Mitt Romney, who lost ground
to Mike Huckabee Tuesday in southern states. McCain's staff issued a memo
Wednesday suggesting that based on their numbers, Romney would have to win
nearly all the remaining 963 delegates in the contests still to be fought in
order to defeat McCain and win the Republican presidential nomination.

But because all 22 Democratic primaries and caucuses Tuesday award delegates
proportionally, those tallies were fluid and tight going well into Wednesday
afternoon. While Clinton won delegate-rich Democratic goldmines like New
York, New Jersey and California, Obama scored victory in 13 states to
Clinton's eight.

Whoever comes out on top in the delegate race with not be leading by much,
and the hairline margins only set the stage for a contentious Democratic
battle in post-Feb. 5 states like Maryland, Virginia, Ohio and even
Pennsylvania, which votes in April.

Each campaign tried to spin the results Wednesday.

Just hours after preliminary counts showed Clinton coming away with a
majority on Super Tuesday, Obama's campaign issued a bold claim that once
all delegates are tallied, they will not only have a majority from Super
Tuesday, but a majority of delegates to date.

"By winning a majority of delegates and a majority of the states, Barack
Obama won an important Super Tuesday victory over Senator Clinton in the
closest thing we have to a national primary," campaign manager David Plouffe
said in the statement. "Obama showed that he can win the support of
Americans of every race, gender, and political party in every region of the
country."

The campaign released a detailed Excel chart with state-by-state Super
Tuesday projections, showing Obama with 845 delegates and Clinton with 836.
That would bring the pledged delegates to date to 908 for Obama and 884 for
Clinton.

Obama later attempted to retain his underdog status - a front-running
underdog, if his tallies are correct.

"If I were writing this story, what I would say would be, 'Senator Obama
came in as a challenger who two weeks ago, I think, nobody thought would
come out of Feb. 5 standing," he said. "I think the Clinton camp's basic
attitude was that the whole calendar was set up to deliver the knockout blow
on Feb. 5. And not only did we play them to a draw, we won more delegates
and we won more states.

"What that means, then, is that we are in a fierce competition and we've got
a lot more - many more rounds to fight . I think that Senator Clinton
remains the favorite (because of institutional support and familiarity)."

But Clinton's campaign claimed they were ahead by a hair in a conference
call Wednesday morning with reporters.

Chief strategist Mark Penn said Clinton won the popular vote, and by the
latest estimates was still ahead in delegates.

"We predicted we would be ahead in total delegates today. And we are ahead
in total delegates today," he said.

Political director Guy Cecil said Clinton leads in overall delegates to
date, and "right now, we are projecting that we are currently in the lead of
yesterday's delegates by one."

The campaign seemed less confident about the Super Tuesday tallies than
Obama's. Cecil said as results stream in, the campaign expects "that either
candidate will be within five or six delegates of one another, essentially
bringing yesterday to a draw in delegates."

Penn said, "This is going to be a long contest - as we said, a hunt for
delegates."

A Democratic candidate needs 2,025 delegates to clinch the nomination, and
1,681 were at stake Tuesday. Incomplete Associated Press tallies showed
Obama with 902 delegates and Clinton with 1,000 delegates overall. Super
Tuesday wins gave Obama 700 and Clinton 739 delegates, The Associated Press
estimated.

One race was still too close to call well into Wednesday. In New Mexico, FOX
News affiliate KASA reported that results won't be known until at least
midday Wednesday. The Associated Press reported that provisional ballots won't
be counted until noon local time, or 2 p.m. ET.

The latest numbers from the Land of Enchantment had Clinton and Obama with
little more than 100 votes separating them after 98 percent of precincts
reported early Wednesday morning. More than 6,000 provisional ballots were
being kept for a review.

In Missouri, Clinton was thought to have pulled out a win until Obama
managed to scrape out a victory in late vote tallies. Seventy of Missouri's
72 delegates were split evenly between the two candidates, with two yet to
be determined Wednesday afternoon.

With the race moving forward, the weekend brings Democratic races in
Louisiana and Nebraska. Tight polling in coming primary states of Virginia,
Maryland and the District of Columbia next Tuesday make predictions
frivolous.

The upside for Clinton, said former Texas Rep. Martin Frost, is that her
lead "is made up almost entirely by the superdelegates, but she has a real
advantage among superdelegates, among party officials, elected officials,
and if she can kind of play this out, if she can break even, come close to
break even in this next round of primaries . and if she can then run the
table in Ohio, Texas and Pennsylvania, she'll be the nominee. And it's Obama's
job to prevent her from doing that."

 

[Topaz]

Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:
"German women, German men !
It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the
Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.
Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not
forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National
Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily
politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very
unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic
intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not
respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the
woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different
value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German
woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best
sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other
areas than the man.

The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but
also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in
the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices
and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best
suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless
devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.

The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the
past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea
of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread
winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the
man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is
not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her
talents and abilities.
Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the
frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men
were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to
the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men
always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all
great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination
have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually
loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the
woman.

It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must
be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our
attitude toward women.

The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in
government, politics, economics and social relations has not left
women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought
impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some
good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that
are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations
have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set
in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a
distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with
former ideals.

A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary
and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most
suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious
duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can
continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of
the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the
builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's
source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place
for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,
in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that
those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in
the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their
abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other
ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially
reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to
fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.

The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.
It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no
intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer
and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.
But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in
motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the
living mother of a family who gives the state children.

German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning
to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more
rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected
to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and
her daily bread is not a good trade.

A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in
our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now
the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most
evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's
birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without
emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The
government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the
resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental
change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is
responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying
about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each
elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by
1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are
the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it
will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine
the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.

We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our
national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The
national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation
on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the
woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends
to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of
our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our
blood is assured..."


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html