Hitlary's Failing Campaign Smashed, Again: Buckwheat, Breck Gurl Attacked

http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/las_vegas_debate_democrat/2007/11/15/49914.html

Hillary Rips Rivals in Democratic Debate

Thursday, November 15, 2007

LAS VEGAS -- Under pressure in a feisty debate, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton

accused her closest rivals Thursday night of slinging mud "right out of the

Republican playbook" and leveled her sharpest criticism of the campaign at

their records.

"People are not attacking me because I'm a woman, they're attacking me

because I'm ahead," Clinton said, striving to protect her standing as

front-runner in an increasingly competitive nominating campaign.

"What the American people are looking for right now is straight answers to

tough questions, and that is not what we have seen from Senator Clinton on a

host of issues," said Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois in the opening moments

of a debate seven weeks before the first contest of the race for the

Democratic presidential nomination.

"There's nothing personal about this," said former Sen. John Edwards of

North Carolina, who joined Obama in bluntly accusing Clinton of forever

switching positions on Social Security, driver's licenses for illegal

immigrants and other issues. turning aside the suggestion that she was

seeking to hide her positions. Long an advocate of universal health care,

she said Obama's current proposal leaves millions uncovered and that Edwards

did not support health care for all when he first ran for president in 2004.

The three-way confrontation at the beginning of a lengthy debate reduced the

other Democratic presidential hopefuls on the debate stage to the

uncomfortable role of spectator, yet it perfectly captured the race for the

party's nomination. Clinton leads in the nationwide polls, but recent

surveys in Iowa show she is in a virtual dead heat with Obama and Edwards.

For Richardson, Sens. Joseph Biden of Delaware and Chris Dodd of Connecticut

and Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio, the opening moments were frustrating - and

they repeatedly tried to break in.

"O, no, don't make me speak," Biden said in mock horror when moderator Wolf

Blitzer of CNN called on him roughly 15 minutes into the proceedings.

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, who has campaigned in Nevada more than any

other presidential hopeful, took verbal shots at Clinton and her two closest

pursuers in the polls.

"Let's stop the mudslinging," he said.

Yet Richardson, who has campaigned in Nevada more than any other

presidential hopeful, took verbal shots at Clinton and her two closest

pursuers in the polls.

He said Edwards is engaging in class warfare, Obama was trying to start a

generational war and Clinton, "with all due respect with her plan on Iraq

doesn't end the war. All I want to do is give peace a chance."

Richardson was in the minority when the candidates were asked whether human

rights could ever trump national security.

He said it could; Clinton said it could not, and Dodd said "obviously

national security." Obama challenged the question, saying "the concepts are

not contradictory."

Clinton seemed intent on redeeming what even she conceded was a sub-par

performance at the previous debate, turning aside criticism from her rivals

and answering questions with practiced ease.

Asked whether she was guilty of playing the "gender card" in her drive to

become the first female president, she said she had not.

"I'm not playing the gender card here in Las Vegas," a magnet for gamblers.

"I'm trying to play the winning card," she said.

Obama was the first to challenge Clinton, saying it took two weeks to "get a

clear answer" on whether she supports or opposes issuing driver's licenses

for illegal immigrants. "The same is true on Social Security," he said.

For the first time in a debate since the campaign began, Clinton swiftly

answered in kind. "When it came time to step up and decide whether or not he

would support universal health care coverage he chose not to do that," she

said of Obama. She added his plan would leave 15 million people without

coverage - the population of Iowa and three other early voting states in the

nominating campaign.

Edwards was next to accuse Clinton of trying to have it both ways - with the

war in Iraq, Social Security and defining the scope of President Bush's

power to use military force against Iran. "She says she will bring change to

Washington while she continues to defend a system that does not work, that

is broken, that is rigged, that is corrupt," added the former North Carolina

senator.

"I've just been personally attacked again," Clinton broke in. "I don't mind

taking hits on my record on issues, but when somebody starts throwing mud at

least we can hope it's accurate and not right out of the Republican

playbook."

The debate unfolded on a stage at the University of Nevada-Las Vegas. The

state holds caucuses on Jan. 19 - following Iowa on Jan. 3 and most likely

the New Hampshire primary several days later.

The focus on Clinton from the debate's opening moments was hardly

surprising.

The New York senator herself has conceded she turned in a sub-par

performance at the last debate, when she stumbled on a question about

driver's licenses for illegal immigrants. Her husband, the former president,

leapt to her defense in the interim, saying of her rivals: "Those boys have

been getting tough on her lately."

The setting underscored Nevada's newly prominent role in the nominating

process. The state is far more racially diverse than either Iowa or New

Hampshire, with a population that is about 22 percent Hispanic and 10

percent black.

Democrats in Nevada hoped the focus on their state would prompt candidates

to pay closer heed to Western issues like water, grazing and mining rights.

But it was more than an hour into the two-hour debate before the issue of

energy came up.

Instead, Clinton drew the first question - and moments later the first barb

from Obama.

Despite her critics, she said, "I think the American people know where I've

stood for 35 years," adding she had been fighting for children, workers,

families and universal health care.

More than an hour later, Dodd sought to turn the focus back onto Clinton,

saying she had changed positions on trade by announcing her support for a

deal with Peru at the same time she advocates a "time out" for such

agreements.

Moments earlier, Clinton gave a careful answer when asked whether she now

viewed the North American Free Trade Agreement - a product of her husband's

administration - to be a mistake.

"NAFTA is a mistake to the extent it did not deliver what we hoped it

would," she said.

And she fielded another question about NAFTA with a quip. Asked whether she

now believes Ross Perot when he argued against NAFTA in a 1993 debate with

her husband's vice president, Al Gore, she said: "All I can remember from

that is a bunch of charts," a reference to Perot's penchant for presenting

information in made-for-television format.

Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:

"German women, German men !

It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the

Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.

Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not

forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National

Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily

politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very

unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic

intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not

respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the

woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different

value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German

woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best

sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other

areas than the man.

The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but

also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in

the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices

and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best

suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless

devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.

The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the

past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea

of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread

winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the

man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is

not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her

talents and abilities.

Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the

frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men

were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to

the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men

always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all

great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination

have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually

loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the

woman.

It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must

be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our

attitude toward women.

The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in

government, politics, economics and social relations has not left

women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought

impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some

good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that

are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations

have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set

in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a

distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with

former ideals.

A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary

and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most

suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious

duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can

continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of

the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the

builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's

source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place

for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,

in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that

those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in

the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their

abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other

ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially

reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to

fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.

The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.

It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no

intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer

and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.

But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in

motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the

living mother of a family who gives the state children.

German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning

to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more

rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected

to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and

her daily bread is not a good trade.

A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in

our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now

the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most

evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's

birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without

emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The

government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the

resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental

change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is

responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying

about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each

elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by

1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are

the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it

will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine

the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.

We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our

national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The

national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation

on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the

woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends

to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of

our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our

blood is assured..."

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:16:28 -0500, "Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote:

>LAS VEGAS -- Under pressure in a feisty debate, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton

>accused her closest rivals Thursday night of slinging mud "right out of the

>Republican playbook" and leveled her sharpest criticism of the campaign at

>their records.

I guess "right out of the Republican playbook" is her new replacement for "right wing

conspiracy."

Is anybody else as tired of this woman as I am?.....AAC

Hillary is a Leona Helmsley - a woman driven by personal ambition and utterly

ruthless in achieving her goals. She's a micromanager and totally deaf to her

underlings - and you, the left, would be her underlings. I really think you'd enjoy

the experience even less than the right. We may wind up chained to the oars down

below in her personal barge on the Potomic just like you, but we can always say, "See

I Told You So!"....Clint Hunter

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:16:28 -0500, "Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote:

>http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/las_vegas_debate_democrat/2007/11/15/49914.html

>

>Hillary Rips Rivals in Democratic Debate

>

"Diamonds v. Pearls" Student Blasts CNN

16 Nov 2007 11:21 am

Maria Luisa, the UNLV student who asked Hillary Clinton whether she preferred

"diamonds or pearls" at last night's debate wrote on her MySpace page this morning

that CNN forced her to ask the frilly question instead of a pre-approved query about

the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository.

"Every single question asked during the debate by the audience had to be approved by

CNN," Luisa writes. "I was asked to submit questions including "lighthearted/fun"

questions. I submitted more than five questions on issues important to me. I did a

policy memo on Yucca Mountain a year ago and was the finalist for the Truman

Scholarship. For sure, I thought I would get to ask the Yucca question that was

APPROVED by CNN days in advance."

When hillary sits down her fat ass spreads all over the chair. Someone

should tell her to close her legs her breath stinks

Duke Of Earl <stingray66@earthlink.net> wrote:

> When hillary sits down her fat ass spreads all over the chair. Someone

> should tell her to close her legs her breath stinks

>

>

>

Her husband had consensual sex with a female. Later, respectable republicans

like Foley and Larry Craig spoke out and let the world be aware of their abject

revulsion over men having consensual sex acts, especially with wimminfolk.

Lefties have no decency.

Wednesday, May 11, 2005

Another Republican Animal Lover

Well sure, its easy to be against abortion if you only have sex with animals:

Last night, anti-abortion extremist Neal Horsley was a guest on The Alan

Colmes Show, a FOX News radio program. The topic was an interesting one -

whether or not an internet service provider should allow Horsley to post the

names of abortion doctors on his website. Horsley does that as a way of

targeting them and one doctor has been killed. In the course of the interview,

however, Colmes asked Horsley about his background, including a statement that

he had admitted to engaging in homosexual and bestiality sex.

At first, Horsley laughed and said, "Just because it's printed in the

media, people jump to believe it."

"Is it true?" Colmes asked.

"Hey, Alan, if you want to accuse me of having sex when I was a fool, I did

everything that crossed my mind that looked like I..."

AC: "You had sex with animals?"

NH: "Absolutely. I was a fool. When you grow up on a farm in Georgia, your

first girlfriend is a mule."

AC: "I'm not so sure that that is so."

NH: "You didn't grow up on a farm in Georgia, did you?"

AC: "Are you suggesting that everybody who grows up on a farm in Georgia

has a mule as a girlfriend?"

NH: It has historically been the case. You people are so far removed from

the reality... Welcome to domestic life on the farm..."

"AnAmericanCitizen" <NoAmnesty@earthlink.net> wrote in message

news:u04tj3dhn86q7q92v5tb7tu54n67u6csr7@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:16:28 -0500, "Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com>

> wrote:

>>LAS VEGAS -- Under pressure in a feisty debate, Sen. Hillary Rodham

>>Clinton

>>accused her closest rivals Thursday night of slinging mud "right out of

>>the

>>Republican playbook" and leveled her sharpest criticism of the campaign at

>>their records.

> I guess "right out of the Republican playbook" is her new replacement for

> "right wing

> conspiracy."

> Is anybody else as tired of this woman as I am?.....AAC

Apparently ANYONE who attacks her is a Republican!!!

Hahahahahhaha!!!!

I never expected to see eliteness carried to such ridiculous extremes.

On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:39:09 -0500, Nubs Barker <nubs.barker@cox.net> wrote:

>Her husband had consensual sex with a female.

Not to mention non-consensual sex and uncomsummated sex, with unwilling females. As

Governor of Arkansas and as president of the U.S., he forced himself on women. He's

a pervert and an embarrasment and disgrace to our country.

It's almost unbelievable that there are Americans willing to allow him back into the

white house along with the woman who made it her business to destroy any women that

tried to bring to light the truth about him. So much for the feminists who say they

are standing up for all women while at the same time they are supporting these

people.....AAC

Quote Of The Week

"The Clintons Are A Terminally Unethical And Vulgar Couple, And They've

Betrayed Everyone Who Has Ever Believed In Them."

- Bob Herbert, Columnist NY Times (Thanks, Harry)

Bill Clinton's extravagant post-presidency has cost the American taxpayer

far more than Bush 41 and more than Ford and Carter combined. Yet, this

elegant, taxpayer-provided lifestyle has not kept the luxury-obsessed boy

president from devoting himself to amassing a multi-million dollar fortune

through shameless money-grubbing across the globe, often from unsavory sources.

"Clinton Crack-Up: The Boy President's Life After the White House"

By: R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr.

Jewish Domination of Women's, Sex, and 'Gender Issue' Groups

Why are so many Jews at the helm of ostensibly non-Jewish

organizations?

from Jew Watch Research Library

EDITOR'S NOTE: What appears at first to be merely a list of names and

groups makes a powerful impression-when it gradually dawns upon the

reader that one particular Middle Eastern ethnic group has such a

powerful influence on almost every organization of consequence in the

fields that directly impact our genetic future.

You'll notice that both sides of some issues are represented here:

Just as with disproportionate Jewish influence on both Democrats and

Republicans, liberals and conservatives, we also find Jews managing

and chairing both "feminist" and "anti-feminist" groups, etc., in the

process making sure that Jewish interests are advanced no matter which

side wins the "public debate."

Planned Parenthood Federation of America,

President: Gloria Feldt

"At the tenth annual Power of One event, over 600 women gathered in

San Francisco to celebrate their commitment to the Jewish Community

Federation. They were inspired by messages from Jan Richer, Liki

Abrams, and keynote speaker Gloria Feldt, President of the Planned

Parenthood Federation of America, who spoke eloquently about her

Jewish roots, personal challenges and the importance of activism."

National Abortion Federation,

Chairman: Eric Schaff

Feminists for Free Expression,

Founder: Marcia Pally

Vice President: Marilyn Fitterman

Secretary: Jayme Waxman

"Jamye Waxman is a writer, producer, performer, sex educator and

outspoken advocate for women's sexual liberation. Jamye is currently

pursuing her masters in human sexuality education and teaches

sexuality classes at a well-know adult toyshop in downtown Manhattan.

She is the Associate Producer of the television show Naked New York

and a columnist for Playgirl Magazine. She produced 'Love Bytes' with

Bob Berkowitz and hosted her own show 'Aural Fixation' on WSEX Radio."

Member of Board of Directors: Abby Ehmann

"Abby describes herself as a 'Sexpert' and 'New York's preeminent

female smutmeister,' began a career in the adult entertainment

industry as an Associate Editor at Penthouse Forum. She has also

served as Consulting Editor of Masquerade Erotic Newsletter, Girls of

Outlaw Biker and Erotica Online. She has written for many sex-oriented

publications from Screw and Hustler to Forum and New Rave."

National Gay and Lesbian Task Force,

Co-Chair: Loren S. Ostrow

"Loren Ostrow ... is outgoing President of the Board of Congregation

Kol Ami, a predominately gay and lesbian synagogue in West Hollywood,

CA, and he previously served as Co-Chair of the L.A. Gay & Lesbian

Center's Board of Directors."

Queer Nation,

Co-founder: Alan Klein

"Mr. Klein's involvement in social issues and civil rights work has

been extensive. He was a founding member of the AIDS activist

organization ACT UP and organized several of the group's most

successful demonstrations. He also co-founded QUEER NATION ... In

1997, a year television critics will remember as the "Year of the

Lesbian," Mr. Klein played a pivotal role in the international media

frenzy that accompanied ELLEN DEGENERES' historic announcement. As

National Communications Director and chief spokesperson for the Gay &

Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD), he orchestrated the

media's Ellen coverage from day one. Mr. Klein also co-founded the

successful multimedia campaign STOPDRLAURA.COM. Alan Klein most

recently served as Communications Director for Rainbow25 ..."

Museum of Sex, (New York)

Executive Director and Founder: Daniel Gluck

Erotic Museum, (Los Angeles)

CEO: Boris Smorodinsky.

Director: Marina Smorodinsky

"A desire to make a better life for his family, motivated by the

discrimination he felt as a Jew in communist Russia, led Smorodinsky

to immigrated to Los Angeles in 1989 ..."

National Partnership for Women and Families,

President: Judith Lichtman

Population Action International,

President: Amy Coen

National Coalition for Sexual Freedom,

Chairperson of the Board of Directors: Vivienne Kramer

(Kramer is now confirmed as Jewish: The New Voices Web site states:

"[M]ost Jewish BDSM adherents don't mind interpreting halachah to

their advantage: Vivienne Kramer, an observant Jew and a fixture on

the Northeast fetish scene-she's chair of the New England Leather

Alliance and president of the National Coalition for Sexual

Freedom-has no problem reconciling her religion with her sexual

practices. 'I probably wouldn't play [engage in BDSM] on a Friday

night,' she says, merging the two practices into her own version of

religious observance.")

Children's Defense Fund,

Founder and President: Marian Wright Edelman

(Married to Peter Edelman).

Independent Women's Forum,

Chairman: R. Gaull Silberman

National Center for Policy Research for Women & Families,

President: Diana Zuckerman

National Organization for Women Legal Defense and Education Fund

(NOWLDEF),

Executive Vice-President, and Director of Family Initiative: Leslie J.

Calman Vice-President, and Director of National Judicial Education

Program: Lynn Hecht Schafran

Vice-President,and Director of Government Relations: Lisalyn Jacobs

Vice-Chairman of the Board: Stephen L. Hammerman

Equality Forum,

Executive Director: Malcolm Lazin

"Equality Forum presents the largest annual national and international

gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) civil rights forum."

"B.A.'s [Congregation Beth Ahavah's] own Malcolm Lazin was the

featured speaker during a lively and musical service led by David

Wise. Malcolm, [is] best known as the founder and executive director

of Pridefest America, now Equality Forum ...

Originally compiled by Jewish Tribal Review

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

"Duke Of Earl" <stingray66@earthlink.net> wrote in message

news:13ju27r6dspd71c@corp.supernews.com...

> When hillary sits down her fat ass spreads all over the chair. Someone

> should tell her to close her legs her breath stinks

N A S T Y !!!!

"Nubs Barker" <nubs.barker@cox.net> wrote in message

news:MPG.21a8d523239fecae989c54@news.individual.net...

> Duke Of Earl <stingray66@earthlink.net> wrote:

>> When hillary sits down her fat ass spreads all over the chair. Someone

>> should tell her to close her legs her breath stinks

> Her husband had consensual sex with a female.

Her husband committed adultry with a female nearly his daughter's age by

using the persuasive power of the Office of the President of the United

States as psychological leverage.

He is a sexual predator and a twisted pervert.

> Later, respectable republicans like Foley

Republicans EXPEL perverts. Foley.

Democrats PROTECT perverts. Barney.

On Nov 18, 8:07 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Jewish Domination of Women's, Sex, and 'Gender Issue' Groups

> Why are so many Jews at the helm of ostensibly non-Jewish

> organizations?

Nazis can not run anything except into the ground.

Michael

"Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:ac980de1-e854-442e-9475-63f44eabd8ec@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...

> On Nov 18, 8:07 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> Jewish Domination of Women's, Sex, and 'Gender Issue' Groups

>> Why are so many Jews at the helm of ostensibly non-Jewish

>> organizations?

> Nazis can not run anything except into the ground.

That didn't stop them from trying.

And it isn't stopping the Socialist democrats from trying.

On Nov 19, 5:09 pm, "Treasonous Games" <Patr...@Anti-America.com>

wrote:

> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote...

> > Nazis can not run anything except into the ground.

>

> That didn't stop them from trying.

> > And it isn't stopping the Socialist democrats from trying.

You fail understand the true political nature and behavior of Nazism.

You are blind to the truth.

You have no farther to look about what Nazi politics are then to read

your own posts, Patriot Games. You have no need to see a TRUE Nazi,

in all put the word, than to look in a mirror.

You are so blinded by your hatred for others and freedom, you will

never understand this.

-Tom Sr.

By Robert N. Proctor

The problem with the "science vs. fascism" thesis is that it fails to

take into account the eagerness with which many scientists and

physicians embraced the Reich, and the many scientific disciplines

which actually flourished under the Nazis. Anyone who has ever

examined

a V-2 engine will have few doubts about this, and there are numerous

other examples. During the Nazi era, German scientists and engineers

either developed or greatly improved television, jet-propelled

aircraft

(including the ejection seat), guided missiles, electronic computers,

the electron microscope, atomic fission, data-processing

technologies,

This web site explains what is going on with the "left" and the

"right" in the modern economic sense.

http://www.michaeljournal.org/myth.htm

The meaning of "right" and "left" has changed. I stay with the

original meaning for the same reason I refuse to call homosexual

perverts "gay". The word "gay" was originally a good thing.

The right is for outlawing homosexual perversion,

prostitution, abortions, heroin, and other bad things. It puts the

good of the nation first and ahead of the freedom of individuals to

corrupt the culture of the nation.

Leftists believe in the Rede of Witchcraft which states-- If it

harm none, do what will you will. This sounds nice, but like the apple

that the witch gave to Snow White it has poison within. The Rede of

Witchcraft is the Bible of liberalism. It would legalize homosexual

perversion, prostitution, drugs, etc.

The right is for building a great nation. Leftists care only

about individual freedom and are opposed to any laws that would make

the nation better. There are beaches where normal families will not go

because homosexual perverts practice their perversion on the beach.

When the liberals say they are for freedom this is kind of thing they

are talking about. Of course people should be free to do what they

want most of the time. There is no argument there. Liberals are

talking about being free to do things that many people object to and

want outlawed. Their philosophy, taken to its logical conclusion,

would not allow the law that says drivers have to stop at the red

lights. Their philosophy would allow heroin to be sold on grocery

store shelves and allow ads promoting heroin on TV. Their philosophy

would result in chaos and degeneracy.

Libertarians are liberals who want freedom for the Ebenezer

Scrooges to be as greedy as they want. They have the same philosophy

as other leftist who want to legalize heroin and prostitution, namely

that the state can't tell them what they can't do. People don't like

laws stopping them from doing things, and we should sympathize with

that, but sometimes that is not the most important thing. Capitalists

want freedom for greed, other liberals want freedom for degeneracy,

but good laws would make a nation good.

The Communists were leftist and they said they were fighting for

freedom. In Spain they sided with the anarchists. The Communists and

the anarchists were the same people or the same type of people. The

Communists were for having government but only temporarily. They said

that their government was necessary only until the whole world was

Communist. After the world was Communist they wanted to dissolve the

government and have an anarchy.

The right wing cares about the future. Leftists only care about the

present. If their philosophy results in a nightmare future like in

Soylent Green or some other futuristic nightmare they are not

interested and insist that nothing could be more important than the

freedom of individuals to be as decadent as they want. To see the kind

of society

libertarians are fighting for see the movie "8MM", they aren't for the

snuff part, but

other than that it shows liberalism in action.

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html