How Does It Feel To Be A 'Human Commodity?

How Does It Feel To Be A 'Human Commodity?

2008-01-01

True wealth lies in the scarcity of one's wants-as opposed to the

abundance of one's possessions.

by Chris Maser

We, as a society, are losing sight of one another as human

beings-witness the Wall-Street money chase in which numerous, large

corporations discount human value as they increasingly convert people

into faceless commodities that are bought and sold on a whim to

improve the corporate standing in the competitive marketplace. After

all, market share translates into political power, which translates

into higher profit margins, both of which exacerbate the corporate

disregard for people, the rampant destruction of Nature, and the

squandering of natural resources.

There was a time when people were valued for what they were as

individuals. Although American workers have long had an enforced

workweek of 40 hours, there currently is an insidious infringement

into personal life due to pagers and cell phones, which allow

corporations to "own" employees 24 hours a day. Businesses seem to

have no moral compunctions about calling employees whenever they

choose-"for the good of the company." For those who would choose to

live by the corporate proverb, "for the good of the company," the

Families and Work Institute said that in 2001 employees are more

likely to:

lose sleep

have physical and emotional health problems

make mistakes on the job

feel and express anger at employers

resent co-workers who they perceive are not pulling their weight

look for different jobs

Because consumption and consumerism dominate social discourse and

political agendas of all parties, consumerism hogs the limelight at

center stage as the prime objective of Western industrialized

societies, which, in the collective, are known as "consumer

societies." Within these consumer societies, the purpose of

consumption is: variety, distraction from daily stresses, pleasure,

power, and the status that one hopes will bring with them a measure of

happiness and social security. None of this comes to pass, however,

because people themselves are increasingly seen as economic

commodities. How can a commodity find security from another commodity?

In this sense, the marketplace satisfies only temporarily our

collective neuroses, while hiding the values that give true meaning to

human life.9

Author James B. Twitchell puts it nicely: "Once we are fed and

sheltered, our needs are and have always been cultural, not natural.

Until there is some other system to codify and satisfy those needs and

yearnings, commercialism [consumerism]-and the culture it carries with

it-will continue not just to thrive but to triumph."

Continue...

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18977.htm

While benefitting from one's efforts cannot be said to be inherently

evil, and can actually be quite just; corporations are not individuals

and the decisions they make are totally devoid of the considerations

of an individual; serving only to further profit at any price. In

other words, while an individual's ethical system may hold any number

of things as a supreme value, a corporation's supreme value has to be

profit; because that is its precondition for survival.

Two notable examples of this are the fact that many corporations that

notoriously pollute the environment will move manufacturing facilities

to countries with fewer environmental regulations rather than invest

the money to comply with stricter regulations in their home country.

Likewise, corporations have no loyalty to the people of the nation in

which they were formed, and seek to reduce the cost of labor through

any legal method, which increasingly puts the people in Western

nations in direct competition with low wage or even slave labor in the

Third World; with devastating long term effects in terms of both

national wealth and labor displacements. Corporations even sponsor the

importation of alien labor, forcing domestic wages lower, stressing

social service systems, and placing the genetic continuity of the

domestic population at risk. All for a profit.

These examples, again, show no difference between Capitalism and

Bolshevism in that, in the end, both systems have the same effects and

therefore only differ in methodology. Legislation in Capitalist

systems serves to create de-facto state enterprises in important

sectors such as media and electricity, while pollution, wage

depression and globalization without regard to cultural preservation

or preservation of human bio-diversity work the same in both

instances. -- John Young, EAU

On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:56:13 -0800 (PST), Sentinel

<yaxcozv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:

>

>How Does It Feel To Be A 'Human Commodity?

>

>2008-01-01

>

>True wealth lies in the scarcity of one's wants-as opposed to the

>abundance of one's possessions.

>

>by Chris Maser

>

>We, as a society, are losing sight of one another as human

>beings-witness the Wall-Street money chase in which numerous, large

>corporations discount human value as they increasingly convert people

>into faceless commodities that are bought and sold on a whim to

>improve the corporate standing in the competitive marketplace.

MOST corporations do this, and a certain percentage of turnover in

the employee pool is _expected_. Nothing new going on here. It's

been that way for as long as I can remember (and that is a long time).

> After

>all, market share translates into political power, which translates

>into higher profit margins, both of which exacerbate the corporate

>disregard for people, the rampant destruction of Nature, and the

>squandering of natural resources.

>

>There was a time when people were valued for what they were as

>individuals.

I'm 62, and I can't remember when that was; when people were valued

for what they were as individuals. For me, it's always been a case of

"how much money can this moke make for the company, vs. how much are

we paying him for salary"

> Although American workers have long had an enforced

>workweek of 40 hours, there currently is an insidious infringement

>into personal life due to pagers and cell phones, which allow

>corporations to "own" employees 24 hours a day. Businesses seem to

>have no moral compunctions about calling employees whenever they

>choose-"for the good of the company."

When I was in the workforce, we called them electronic dog leashes.

> For those who would choose to

>live by the corporate proverb, "for the good of the company," the

>Families and Work Institute said that in 2001 employees are more

>likely to:

>

> lose sleep

> have physical and emotional health problems

> make mistakes on the job

> feel and express anger at employers

> resent co-workers who they perceive are not pulling their weight

> look for different jobs

Too true

>Because consumption and consumerism dominate social discourse and

>political agendas of all parties, consumerism hogs the limelight at

>center stage as the prime objective of Western industrialized

>societies, which, in the collective, are known as "consumer

>societies." Within these consumer societies, the purpose of

>consumption is: variety, distraction from daily stresses, pleasure,

>power, and the status that one hopes will bring with them a measure of

>happiness and social security. None of this comes to pass, however,

>because people themselves are increasingly seen as economic

>commodities. How can a commodity find security from another commodity?

You can't. My boss told me "If you want a paycheck, come to work. If

you want Love, buy a dog." and that's a direct quote.

>In this sense, the marketplace satisfies only temporarily our

>collective neuroses, while hiding the values that give true meaning to

>human life.9

I have all I could want and then some, except for some pistols that

I've been looking at for too many years now. I want a Desert Eagle in

..50 caliber. Stainless Steel thank you. And IIRC, it is about $1,000

US

I will have that money inside the next couple/few years, as a

settlement arrives for a certain medical issue.

>Author James B. Twitchell puts it nicely: "Once we are fed and

>sheltered, our needs are and have always been cultural, not natural.

>Until there is some other system to codify and satisfy those needs and

>yearnings, commercialism [consumerism]-and the culture it carries with

>it-will continue not just to thrive but to triumph."

>

>Continue...

>

>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18977.htm

>

> While benefitting from one's efforts cannot be said to be inherently

>evil, and can actually be quite just; corporations are not individuals

>and the decisions they make are totally devoid of the considerations

>of an individual; serving only to further profit at any price.

Welcome to the Real World

> In

>other words, while an individual's ethical system may hold any number

>of things as a supreme value, a corporation's supreme value has to be

>profit; because that is its precondition for survival.

and always has been

>Two notable examples of this are the fact that many corporations that

>notoriously pollute the environment will move manufacturing facilities

>to countries with fewer environmental regulations rather than invest

>the money to comply with stricter regulations in their home country.

They've been doing this for decades.

>Likewise, corporations have no loyalty to the people of the nation in

>which they were formed, and seek to reduce the cost of labor through

>any legal method, which increasingly puts the people in Western

>nations in direct competition with low wage or even slave labor in the

>Third World; with devastating long term effects in terms of both

>national wealth and labor displacements.

They've been doing this for decades.

> Corporations even sponsor the

>importation of alien labor, forcing domestic wages lower, stressing

>social service systems, and placing the genetic continuity of the

>domestic population at risk. All for a profit.

Corporations Exist to make a profit.

>These examples, again, show no difference between Capitalism and

>Bolshevism in that, in the end, both systems have the same effects and

>therefore only differ in methodology. Legislation in Capitalist

>systems serves to create de-facto state enterprises in important

>sectors such as media and electricity, while pollution, wage

>depression and globalization without regard to cultural preservation

>or preservation of human bio-diversity work the same in both

>instances. -- John Young, EAU

You're showing up a half-century late and $100 short for the train

ticket out of here.

Lg

In article

<17f08f9d-a4f4-417b-82b5-a2d2a7336311@r60g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,

Sentinel <yaxcozv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:

> How Does It Feel To Be A 'Human Commodity?

>

> 2008-01-01

>

> True wealth lies in the scarcity of one's wants-as opposed to the

> abundance of one's possessions.

>

> by Chris Maser

>

> We, as a society, are losing sight of one another as human

> beings-witness the Wall-Street money chase in which numerous, large

> corporations discount human value as they increasingly convert people

> into faceless commodities that are

We're not going to trade our freedom for your utopia.

--

NeoLibertarian

http://www.elihu.envy.nu/NeoPics/UncleHood.jpg

"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

news:2ojtn3pec1djkvgh0qcicqgf4v14797t2n@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:56:13 -0800 (PST), Sentinel

> <yaxcozv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:

>

>>

>>How Does It Feel To Be A 'Human Commodity?

>>

>>2008-01-01

>>

>>True wealth lies in the scarcity of one's wants-as opposed to the

>>abundance of one's possessions.

>>

>>by Chris Maser

>>

>>We, as a society, are losing sight of one another as human

>>beings-witness the Wall-Street money chase in which numerous, large

>>corporations discount human value as they increasingly convert people

>>into faceless commodities that are bought and sold on a whim to

>>improve the corporate standing in the competitive marketplace.

>

> MOST corporations do this, and a certain percentage of turnover in

> the employee pool is _expected_. Nothing new going on here. It's

> been that way for as long as I can remember (and that is a long time).

>

>> After

>>all, market share translates into political power, which translates

>>into higher profit margins, both of which exacerbate the corporate

>>disregard for people, the rampant destruction of Nature, and the

>>squandering of natural resources.

>>

>>There was a time when people were valued for what they were as

>>individuals.

>

> I'm 62, and I can't remember when that was; when people were valued

> for what they were as individuals. For me, it's always been a case of

> "how much money can this moke make for the company, vs. how much are

> we paying him for salary"

>

>> Although American workers have long had an enforced

>>workweek of 40 hours, there currently is an insidious infringement

>>into personal life due to pagers and cell phones, which allow

>>corporations to "own" employees 24 hours a day. Businesses seem to

>>have no moral compunctions about calling employees whenever they

>>choose-"for the good of the company."

>

> When I was in the workforce, we called them electronic dog leashes.

>

>> For those who would choose to

>>live by the corporate proverb, "for the good of the company," the

>>Families and Work Institute said that in 2001 employees are more

>>likely to:

>>

>> lose sleep

>> have physical and emotional health problems

>> make mistakes on the job

>> feel and express anger at employers

>> resent co-workers who they perceive are not pulling their weight

>> look for different jobs

>

> Too true

>

>>Because consumption and consumerism dominate social discourse and

>>political agendas of all parties, consumerism hogs the limelight at

>>center stage as the prime objective of Western industrialized

>>societies, which, in the collective, are known as "consumer

>>societies." Within these consumer societies, the purpose of

>>consumption is: variety, distraction from daily stresses, pleasure,

>>power, and the status that one hopes will bring with them a measure of

>>happiness and social security. None of this comes to pass, however,

>>because people themselves are increasingly seen as economic

>>commodities. How can a commodity find security from another commodity?

>

> You can't. My boss told me "If you want a paycheck, come to work. If

> you want Love, buy a dog." and that's a direct quote.

>

>>In this sense, the marketplace satisfies only temporarily our

>>collective neuroses, while hiding the values that give true meaning to

>>human life.9

>

> I have all I could want and then some, except for some pistols that

> I've been looking at for too many years now.

Looks like Glickman is forming his own jew defence league. He sees the

writing on the wall :o)

I want a Desert Eagle in

> .50 caliber. Stainless Steel thank you. And IIRC, it is about $1,000

> US

Glickman you'll hurt yourself with that thing lol

>

> I will have that money inside the next couple/few years

It takes you a few years to buy a $1k gun? lol

, as a

> settlement arrives for a certain medical issue.

You mean the insurance company is paying you for falling out of your tree?

>

>>Author James B. Twitchell puts it nicely: "Once we are fed and

>>sheltered, our needs are and have always been cultural, not natural.

>>Until there is some other system to codify and satisfy those needs and

>>yearnings, commercialism [consumerism]-and the culture it carries with

>>it-will continue not just to thrive but to triumph."

>>

>>Continue...

>>

>>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18977.htm

>>

>> While benefitting from one's efforts cannot be said to be inherently

>>evil, and can actually be quite just; corporations are not individuals

>>and the decisions they make are totally devoid of the considerations

>>of an individual; serving only to further profit at any price.

>

> Welcome to the Real World

>

>> In

>>other words, while an individual's ethical system may hold any number

>>of things as a supreme value, a corporation's supreme value has to be

>>profit; because that is its precondition for survival.

>

> and always has been

>

>>Two notable examples of this are the fact that many corporations that

>>notoriously pollute the environment will move manufacturing facilities

>>to countries with fewer environmental regulations rather than invest

>>the money to comply with stricter regulations in their home country.

>

> They've been doing this for decades.

>

>>Likewise, corporations have no loyalty to the people of the nation in

>>which they were formed, and seek to reduce the cost of labor through

>>any legal method, which increasingly puts the people in Western

>>nations in direct competition with low wage or even slave labor in the

>>Third World; with devastating long term effects in terms of both

>>national wealth and labor displacements.

>

> They've been doing this for decades.

>

>> Corporations even sponsor the

>>importation of alien labor, forcing domestic wages lower, stressing

>>social service systems, and placing the genetic continuity of the

>>domestic population at risk. All for a profit.

>

> Corporations Exist to make a profit.

>

>>These examples, again, show no difference between Capitalism and

>>Bolshevism in that, in the end, both systems have the same effects and

>>therefore only differ in methodology. Legislation in Capitalist

>>systems serves to create de-facto state enterprises in important

>>sectors such as media and electricity, while pollution, wage

>>depression and globalization without regard to cultural preservation

>>or preservation of human bio-diversity work the same in both

>>instances. -- John Young, EAU

>

> You're showing up a half-century late and $100 short for the train

> ticket out of here.

>

> Lg

>

On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:23:22 GMT, "Avenger" <avenger@avengers.co.uk>

wrote:

> I want a Desert Eagle in

>> .50 caliber. Stainless Steel thank you. And IIRC, it is about $1,000

>> US

>

>Glickman you'll hurt yourself with that thing lol

It's a handful. Yeah maybe. I had a .44 Magnum Redhawk, and that was

like holding a Howitzer when it fired. I mean, at dusk you could see

4 feet of flames coming out of the muzzle, and a couple of feet coming

out the sides around the forcing cone to the barrel. Completely

kicked the gun up OVER your head.

And a badass bullet the .44 Magnum is with respect to terminal

ballistics. But rumor has it, the .50 is meaner, and I mean to find

out.

Lg

Ask Perot.

"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

news:bfutn35i17lg4ikhvf3qr10ur6p9sa85ig@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:23:22 GMT, "Avenger" <avenger@avengers.co.uk>

> wrote:

>

>> I want a Desert Eagle in

>>> .50 caliber. Stainless Steel thank you. And IIRC, it is about $1,000

>>> US

>>

>>Glickman you'll hurt yourself with that thing lol

>

> It's a handful. Yeah maybe. I had a .44 Magnum Redhawk, and that was

> like holding a Howitzer when it fired. I mean, at dusk you could see

> 4 feet of flames coming out of the muzzle, and a couple of feet coming

> out the sides around the forcing cone to the barrel. Completely

> kicked the gun up OVER your head.

>

> And a badass bullet the .44 Magnum is with respect to terminal

> ballistics. But rumor has it, the .50 is meaner, and I mean to find

> out.

>

> Lg

>

"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

news:bfutn35i17lg4ikhvf3qr10ur6p9sa85ig@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:23:22 GMT, "Avenger" <avenger@avengers.co.uk>

> wrote:

>

>> I want a Desert Eagle in

>>> .50 caliber. Stainless Steel thank you. And IIRC, it is about $1,000

>>> US

>>

>>Glickman you'll hurt yourself with that thing lol

>

> It's a handful. Yeah maybe. I had a .44 Magnum Redhawk, and that was

> like holding a Howitzer when it fired.

You prove perfectly, the old addage of "The bigger the gun, the smaller the

penis."

Grow up silly little boy.

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:48:01 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

<yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>

>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>news:bfutn35i17lg4ikhvf3qr10ur6p9sa85ig@4ax.com...

>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:23:22 GMT, "Avenger" <avenger@avengers.co.uk>

>> wrote:

>>

>>> I want a Desert Eagle in

>>>> .50 caliber. Stainless Steel thank you. And IIRC, it is about $1,000

>>>> US

>>>

>>>Glickman you'll hurt yourself with that thing lol

>>

>> It's a handful. Yeah maybe. I had a .44 Magnum Redhawk, and that was

>> like holding a Howitzer when it fired.

>

>You prove perfectly, the old addage of "The bigger the gun, the smaller the

>penis."

>

>Grow up silly little boy.

>

You've done this comparison? Then...present the evidence. Or go away

a liar.

Lg

"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

news:fa8un3l95onoh2fvjfif5dg7n4mn0495df@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:48:01 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

> <yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>

>>

>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>news:bfutn35i17lg4ikhvf3qr10ur6p9sa85ig@4ax.com...

>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:23:22 GMT, "Avenger" <avenger@avengers.co.uk>

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> I want a Desert Eagle in

>>>>> .50 caliber. Stainless Steel thank you. And IIRC, it is about $1,000

>>>>> US

>>>>

>>>>Glickman you'll hurt yourself with that thing lol

>>>

>>> It's a handful. Yeah maybe. I had a .44 Magnum Redhawk, and that was

>>> like holding a Howitzer when it fired.

>>

>>You prove perfectly, the old addage of "The bigger the gun, the smaller

>>the

>>penis."

>>

>>Grow up silly little boy.

>>

> You've done this comparison? Then...present the evidence. Or go away

> a liar.

I'm a psychologist, jew cunt.

"The bigger the gun, the smaller the penis" is well known.

>

> Lg

>

>

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:59:20 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

<yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>I'm a psychologist, jew cunt.

>

>"The bigger the gun, the smaller the penis" is well known.

First you say you're a psychologist, and then you PROVE you're not by

saying the bigger the gun, the smaller the penis.

Cramer...Crammit.

Lg

"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

news:fa8un3l95onoh2fvjfif5dg7n4mn0495df@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:48:01 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

> <yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>

>>

>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>news:bfutn35i17lg4ikhvf3qr10ur6p9sa85ig@4ax.com...

>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:23:22 GMT, "Avenger" <avenger@avengers.co.uk>

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> I want a Desert Eagle in

>>>>> .50 caliber. Stainless Steel thank you. And IIRC, it is about $1,000

>>>>> US

>>>>

>>>>Glickman you'll hurt yourself with that thing lol

>>>

>>> It's a handful. Yeah maybe. I had a .44 Magnum Redhawk, and that was

>>> like holding a Howitzer when it fired.

Glickman just remember that we have Soviet made gyrojet pistols. Yours is a

pop gun compared with it :o)

http://files.uzitalk.com/images/usma/museum/gyrojet.jpg

>>

>>You prove perfectly, the old addage of "The bigger the gun, the smaller

>>the

>>penis."

>>

>>Grow up silly little boy.

>>

> You've done this comparison? Then...present the evidence. Or go away

> a liar.

>

> Lg

>

On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:34:59 GMT, "Professor Bugsbomb"

<bugs@intherugs.org> wrote:

>

>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>news:fa8un3l95onoh2fvjfif5dg7n4mn0495df@4ax.com...

>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:48:01 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

>> <yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>>

>>>

>>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>>news:bfutn35i17lg4ikhvf3qr10ur6p9sa85ig@4ax.com...

>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:23:22 GMT, "Avenger" <avenger@avengers.co.uk>

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> I want a Desert Eagle in

>>>>>> .50 caliber. Stainless Steel thank you. And IIRC, it is about $1,000

>>>>>> US

>>>>>

>>>>>Glickman you'll hurt yourself with that thing lol

>>>>

>>>> It's a handful. Yeah maybe. I had a .44 Magnum Redhawk, and that was

>>>> like holding a Howitzer when it fired.

>

>Glickman just remember that we have Soviet made gyrojet pistols. Yours is a

>pop gun compared with it :o)

>

>http://files.uzitalk.com/images/usma/museum/gyrojet.jpg

I have nothing against imported firearms. In fact, in many ways, I

think they are better than American Made.

I am planning on Israeli Desert Eagle, and Italian Baretta (where is

it made?). And maybe some other foreign stuff. But be _careful_ to

find out where it is made. I even had some CZ made pistols.

Excellent workmanship.

So you want russian. That's fine. Spend your money any way you want

to. Enjoy yourself, because Life is short.

Lg

>>>You prove perfectly, the old addage of "The bigger the gun, the smaller

>>>the

>>>penis."

>>>

>>>Grow up silly little boy.

>>>

>> You've done this comparison? Then...present the evidence. Or go away

>> a liar.

>>

>> Lg

>>

>

"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

news:m27vn3p2bccrpmhnfgra8u5c4uhpvso12n@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:59:20 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

> <yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>

>>I'm a psychologist, jew cunt.

>>

>>"The bigger the gun, the smaller the penis" is well known.

>

> First you say you're a psychologist, and then you PROVE you're not by

> saying the bigger the gun, the smaller the penis.

Well known phenomenon, jew cunt.

"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

news:fq40o35n85a2lihtfav1mu247jl66vi6me@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:34:59 GMT, "Professor Bugsbomb"

> <bugs@intherugs.org> wrote:

>

>>

>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>news:fa8un3l95onoh2fvjfif5dg7n4mn0495df@4ax.com...

>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:48:01 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

>>> <yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>>>

>>>>

>>>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>>>news:bfutn35i17lg4ikhvf3qr10ur6p9sa85ig@4ax.com...

>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:23:22 GMT, "Avenger" <avenger@avengers.co.uk>

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> I want a Desert Eagle in

>>>>>>> .50 caliber. Stainless Steel thank you. And IIRC, it is about

>>>>>>> $1,000

>>>>>>> US

>>>>>>

>>>>>>Glickman you'll hurt yourself with that thing lol

>>>>>

>>>>> It's a handful. Yeah maybe. I had a .44 Magnum Redhawk, and that was

>>>>> like holding a Howitzer when it fired.

>>

>>Glickman just remember that we have Soviet made gyrojet pistols. Yours is

>>a

>>pop gun compared with it :o)

>>

>>http://files.uzitalk.com/images/usma/museum/gyrojet.jpg

>

> I have nothing against imported firearms. In fact, in many ways, I

> think they are better than American Made.

>

> I am planning on Israeli Desert Eagle, and Italian Baretta (where is

> it made?). And maybe some other foreign stuff. But be _careful_ to

> find out where it is made. I even had some CZ made pistols.

> Excellent workmanship.

If you're after quality, go for H & K or Walther.

On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:48:58 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

<yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>

>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>news:m27vn3p2bccrpmhnfgra8u5c4uhpvso12n@4ax.com...

>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:59:20 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

>> <yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>>

>>>I'm a psychologist, jew cunt.

>>>

>>>"The bigger the gun, the smaller the penis" is well known.

>>

>> First you say you're a psychologist, and then you PROVE you're not by

>> saying the bigger the gun, the smaller the penis.

>

>Well known phenomenon, jew cunt.

>

It is a well known MYTH.

You are a fraud.

Lg

On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:51:44 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

<yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>

>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>news:fq40o35n85a2lihtfav1mu247jl66vi6me@4ax.com...

>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:34:59 GMT, "Professor Bugsbomb"

>> <bugs@intherugs.org> wrote:

>>

>>>

>>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>>news:fa8un3l95onoh2fvjfif5dg7n4mn0495df@4ax.com...

>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:48:01 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

>>>> <yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>>>>news:bfutn35i17lg4ikhvf3qr10ur6p9sa85ig@4ax.com...

>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:23:22 GMT, "Avenger" <avenger@avengers.co.uk>

>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> I want a Desert Eagle in

>>>>>>>> .50 caliber. Stainless Steel thank you. And IIRC, it is about

>>>>>>>> $1,000

>>>>>>>> US

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Glickman you'll hurt yourself with that thing lol

>>>>>>

>>>>>> It's a handful. Yeah maybe. I had a .44 Magnum Redhawk, and that was

>>>>>> like holding a Howitzer when it fired.

>>>

>>>Glickman just remember that we have Soviet made gyrojet pistols. Yours is

>>>a

>>>pop gun compared with it :o)

>>>

>>>http://files.uzitalk.com/images/usma/museum/gyrojet.jpg

>>

>> I have nothing against imported firearms. In fact, in many ways, I

>> think they are better than American Made.

>>

>> I am planning on Israeli Desert Eagle, and Italian Baretta (where is

>> it made?). And maybe some other foreign stuff. But be _careful_ to

>> find out where it is made. I even had some CZ made pistols.

>> Excellent workmanship.

>

>If you're after quality, go for H & K or Walther.

>

Come on. Everybody knows Walther used to be good, but is now shit.

Well, almost everybody.

SIG is good.

Lg

>>>>>>

>>>>>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>>>>>news:bfutn35i17lg4ikhvf3qr10ur6p9sa85ig@4ax.com...

>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:23:22 GMT, "Avenger" <avenger@avengers.co.uk>

>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> I want a Desert Eagle in

>>>>>>>>> .50 caliber. Stainless Steel thank you. And IIRC, it is about

>>>>>>>>> $1,000

>>>>>>>>> US

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>Glickman you'll hurt yourself with that thing lol

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> It's a handful. Yeah maybe. I had a .44 Magnum Redhawk, and that

>>>>>>> was

>>>>>>> like holding a Howitzer when it fired.

>>>>

>>>>Glickman just remember that we have Soviet made gyrojet pistols. Yours

>>>>is

>>>>a

>>>>pop gun compared with it :o)

>>>>

>>>>http://files.uzitalk.com/images/usma/museum/gyrojet.jpg

>>>

>>> I have nothing against imported firearms. In fact, in many ways, I

>>> think they are better than American Made.

>>>

>>> I am planning on Israeli Desert Eagle, and Italian Baretta (where is

>>> it made?).

It's made at their factory in Gardone Val Trompia since the 16th century.

Accept no israeli jew immitations lol

And maybe some other foreign stuff. But be _careful_ to

>>> find out where it is made. I even had some CZ made pistols.

>>> Excellent workmanship.

Hey be careful if it's made in israel, it might blow up on your face lol

>>

>>If you're after quality, go for H & K or Walther.

>>

>

> Come on. Everybody knows Walther used to be good, but is now shit.

> Well, almost everybody.

>

> SIG is good.

Glickman, we all know you have never even fired a Daisy BB gun haha

>

> Lg

>

"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

news:jd90o3ti3kdbq8tu9d7o5tsfjhak7llcgu@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:48:58 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

> <yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>

>>

>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>news:m27vn3p2bccrpmhnfgra8u5c4uhpvso12n@4ax.com...

>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:59:20 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

>>> <yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>>>

>>>>I'm a psychologist, jew cunt.

>>>>

>>>>"The bigger the gun, the smaller the penis" is well known.

>>>

>>> First you say you're a psychologist, and then you PROVE you're not by

>>> saying the bigger the gun, the smaller the penis.

>>

>>Well known phenomenon, jew cunt.

>>

> It is a well known MYTH.

Nope. I'm the expert, you're the lying yid.

>

> You are a fraud.

Nope. You're a lying yid.

>

> Lg

>

>

"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

news:ui90o3t97kstu9bj5tuloi6luj1t7lr3sj@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:51:44 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

> <yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>

>>

>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>news:fq40o35n85a2lihtfav1mu247jl66vi6me@4ax.com...

>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:34:59 GMT, "Professor Bugsbomb"

>>> <bugs@intherugs.org> wrote:

>>>

>>>>

>>>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>>>news:fa8un3l95onoh2fvjfif5dg7n4mn0495df@4ax.com...

>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:48:01 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

>>>>> <yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>>>>>news:bfutn35i17lg4ikhvf3qr10ur6p9sa85ig@4ax.com...

>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:23:22 GMT, "Avenger" <avenger@avengers.co.uk>

>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> I want a Desert Eagle in

>>>>>>>>> .50 caliber. Stainless Steel thank you. And IIRC, it is about

>>>>>>>>> $1,000

>>>>>>>>> US

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>Glickman you'll hurt yourself with that thing lol

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> It's a handful. Yeah maybe. I had a .44 Magnum Redhawk, and that

>>>>>>> was

>>>>>>> like holding a Howitzer when it fired.

>>>>

>>>>Glickman just remember that we have Soviet made gyrojet pistols. Yours

>>>>is

>>>>a

>>>>pop gun compared with it :o)

>>>>

>>>>http://files.uzitalk.com/images/usma/museum/gyrojet.jpg

>>>

>>> I have nothing against imported firearms. In fact, in many ways, I

>>> think they are better than American Made.

>>>

>>> I am planning on Israeli Desert Eagle, and Italian Baretta (where is

>>> it made?). And maybe some other foreign stuff. But be _careful_ to

>>> find out where it is made. I even had some CZ made pistols.

>>> Excellent workmanship.

>>

>>If you're after quality, go for H & K or Walther.

>>

>

> Come on. Everybody knows Walther used to be good, but is now shit.

Can't trust the word of a yid.

Go ahead and buy your Desert Eagle bucket of puss, but be sure you order

plenty of spare return springs and slides.

"Dr. Lippschitz" <doc@yeshiva.il> wrote in message

news:BCXfj.436$Z61.306@trnddc07...

>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>>>>>>news:bfutn35i17lg4ikhvf3qr10ur6p9sa85ig@4ax.com...

>>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:23:22 GMT, "Avenger"

>>>>>>>> <avenger@avengers.co.uk>

>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> I want a Desert Eagle in

>>>>>>>>>> .50 caliber. Stainless Steel thank you. And IIRC, it is about

>>>>>>>>>> $1,000

>>>>>>>>>> US

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>Glickman you'll hurt yourself with that thing lol

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> It's a handful. Yeah maybe. I had a .44 Magnum Redhawk, and that

>>>>>>>> was

>>>>>>>> like holding a Howitzer when it fired.

>>>>>

>>>>>Glickman just remember that we have Soviet made gyrojet pistols. Yours

>>>>>is

>>>>>a

>>>>>pop gun compared with it :o)

>>>>>

>>>>>http://files.uzitalk.com/images/usma/museum/gyrojet.jpg

>>>>

>>>> I have nothing against imported firearms. In fact, in many ways, I

>>>> think they are better than American Made.

>>>>

>>>> I am planning on Israeli Desert Eagle, and Italian Baretta (where is

>>>> it made?).

>

> It's made at their factory in Gardone Val Trompia since the 16th century.

> Accept no israeli jew immitations lol

>

>

>

> And maybe some other foreign stuff. But be _careful_ to

>>>> find out where it is made. I even had some CZ made pistols.

>>>> Excellent workmanship.

>

> Hey be careful if it's made in israel, it might blow up on your face lol

The Desert Eagles (at least the .44 magnums) did just that. Bad habit of

cracking slides.

>

>

>

>>>

>>>If you're after quality, go for H & K or Walther.

>>>

>>

>> Come on. Everybody knows Walther used to be good, but is now shit.

>> Well, almost everybody.

>>

>> SIG is good.

>

> Glickman, we all know you have never even fired a Daisy BB gun haha

>

>

>

>>

>> Lg

>>

>

>

>

On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:28:50 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

<yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>

>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>news:jd90o3ti3kdbq8tu9d7o5tsfjhak7llcgu@4ax.com...

>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:48:58 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

>> <yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>>

>>>

>>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>>news:m27vn3p2bccrpmhnfgra8u5c4uhpvso12n@4ax.com...

>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:59:20 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

>>>> <yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>>I'm a psychologist, jew cunt.

>>>>>

>>>>>"The bigger the gun, the smaller the penis" is well known.

>>>>

>>>> First you say you're a psychologist, and then you PROVE you're not by

>>>> saying the bigger the gun, the smaller the penis.

>>>

>>>Well known phenomenon, jew cunt.

>>>

>> It is a well known MYTH.

>

>Nope. I'm the expert, you're the lying yid.

>>

>> You are a fraud.

>

>Nope. You're a lying yid.

>

>

>>

>> Lg

>>

>>

FRAUD

FRAUD, LYING BASTARD.

PHONY

I graduated. You haven't even been enrolled yet. FRAUD ! PHONY!

Are you practicing medicine without a license ?

Do you know what the penalty is for that?

Lg

On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 03:08:17 GMT, "Dr. Lippschitz" <doc@yeshiva.il>

wrote:

>Glickman, we all know you have never even fired a Daisy BB gun haha

You know that eh? You are suck a sick bastard, you belong in a cage.

Now that you have my address, why don't you come here and see the gun

collection I =don't= have, and the bullets I have that don't exist.

LIAR, Phony, FRAUD! You are all the same.

EVERY LIAR will now be killfiled. Not for any short term, but

forever. Because I believe that dishonesty is a mark of EVIL.

I will start with you Shit Lips. You're gone. As of this post, all

you incarnations are null and void.

To HELL with you.

Lg

On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:31:58 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

<yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>

>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>news:ui90o3t97kstu9bj5tuloi6luj1t7lr3sj@4ax.com...

>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:51:44 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

>> <yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>>

>>>

>>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>>news:fq40o35n85a2lihtfav1mu247jl66vi6me@4ax.com...

>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:34:59 GMT, "Professor Bugsbomb"

>>>> <bugs@intherugs.org> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>>>>news:fa8un3l95onoh2fvjfif5dg7n4mn0495df@4ax.com...

>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:48:01 +1000, "B'injamin Cr'amer"

>>>>>> <yidsrbollocks@mosttimes.yes> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>>>>>>news:bfutn35i17lg4ikhvf3qr10ur6p9sa85ig@4ax.com...

>>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:23:22 GMT, "Avenger" <avenger@avengers.co.uk>

>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> I want a Desert Eagle in

>>>>>>>>>> .50 caliber. Stainless Steel thank you. And IIRC, it is about

>>>>>>>>>> $1,000

>>>>>>>>>> US

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>Glickman you'll hurt yourself with that thing lol

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> It's a handful. Yeah maybe. I had a .44 Magnum Redhawk, and that

>>>>>>>> was

>>>>>>>> like holding a Howitzer when it fired.

>>>>>

>>>>>Glickman just remember that we have Soviet made gyrojet pistols. Yours

>>>>>is

>>>>>a

>>>>>pop gun compared with it :o)

>>>>>

>>>>>http://files.uzitalk.com/images/usma/museum/gyrojet.jpg

>>>>

>>>> I have nothing against imported firearms. In fact, in many ways, I

>>>> think they are better than American Made.

>>>>

>>>> I am planning on Israeli Desert Eagle, and Italian Baretta (where is

>>>> it made?). And maybe some other foreign stuff. But be _careful_ to

>>>> find out where it is made. I even had some CZ made pistols.

>>>> Excellent workmanship.

>>>

>>>If you're after quality, go for H & K or Walther.

>>>

>>

>> Come on. Everybody knows Walther used to be good, but is now shit.

>

>Can't trust the word of a yid.

>

>Go ahead and buy your Desert Eagle bucket of puss, but be sure you order

>plenty of spare return springs and slides.

Do you think I'm going to pay $1,000 for a pistol that is going to

fall apart on me? I'm doing research on it right now, on the Web. If

there are negative reports on them, it shouldn't take long to find out

about it.

Lg