"I know he's the decider for the White House. But he's not the decider for the United States Senate.

[Harry Hope]

From The Associated Press, 3/22/07:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070322...prosecutors;_ylt=Aqa0VHmqBvEh_dNEJhDj1uys0NUE

Subpoenas force talks for testimony deal

By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON -

A Senate Republican offered President Bush a compromise Thursday in
the standoff over the dismissals of federal prosecutors, suggesting
that select lawmakers question Karl Rove and other administration
officials in public, but not under oath.

White House counsel Fred Fielding promised to convey the offer to
Bush, said Sen. Arlen Specter, who took the first step toward
brokering a deal a few hours after the Senate Judiciary Committee
approved but did not issue subpoenas for Rove and others.

Specter's plan would grant one of Bush's key demands

 

[Dan Kimmel]

"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:6kd603piscapvje6hg1okkfl1k2n2bskc3@4ax.com...
>
> From The Associated Press, 3/22/07:
>
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070322...prosecutors;_ylt=Aqa0VHmqBvEh_dNEJhDj1uys0NUE
>
> Subpoenas force talks for testimony deal
>
> By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer
>
> WASHINGTON -
>
> A Senate Republican offered President Bush a compromise Thursday in
> the standoff over the dismissals of federal prosecutors, suggesting
> that select lawmakers question Karl Rove and other administration
> officials in public, but not under oath.
>
> White House counsel Fred Fielding promised to convey the offer to
> Bush, said Sen. Arlen Specter, who took the first step toward
> brokering a deal a few hours after the Senate Judiciary Committee
> approved but did not issue subpoenas for Rove and others.
>
> Specter's plan would grant one of Bush's key demands - that the
> officials named in the subpoena authorization testify without being
> sworn. But the proposal dismisses other White House conditions by
> suggesting that Rove and the others testify in public.

Specter is so used to rolling over for Bush, that he thinks he's in a
position to "negotiate." He's not. He's just another Republic pol who
can't seem to understand he's not making the rules any more.

Put these people under oath, in public, on the record. Period.

 

[Karma Ghia]

In article <w-OdnUMrc_vaIp7bnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@rcn.net>,
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote:

> "Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
> news:6kd603piscapvje6hg1okkfl1k2n2bskc3@4ax.com...
> >
> > From The Associated Press, 3/22/07:
> >
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070322/ap_on_go_pr_wh/fired_prosecutors;_ylt=Aqa0
> VHmqBvEh_dNEJhDj1uys0NUE
> >
> > Subpoenas force talks for testimony deal
> >
> > By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer
> >
> > WASHINGTON -
> >
> > A Senate Republican offered President Bush a compromise Thursday in
> > the standoff over the dismissals of federal prosecutors, suggesting
> > that select lawmakers question Karl Rove and other administration
> > officials in public, but not under oath.
> >
> > White House counsel Fred Fielding promised to convey the offer to
> > Bush, said Sen. Arlen Specter, who took the first step toward
> > brokering a deal a few hours after the Senate Judiciary Committee
> > approved but did not issue subpoenas for Rove and others.
> >
> > Specter's plan would grant one of Bush's key demands - that the
> > officials named in the subpoena authorization testify without being
> > sworn. But the proposal dismisses other White House conditions by
> > suggesting that Rove and the others testify in public.
>
> Specter is so used to rolling over for Bush, that he thinks he's in a
> position to "negotiate." He's not. He's just another Republic pol who
> can't seem to understand he's not making the rules any more.
>
> Put these people under oath, in public, on the record. Period.

Yes! that's the right thing to do. The truth shall set you free.

--

Money: What a concept?

 

[Scotius]

On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 02:08:08 GMT, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:

>
>From The Associated Press, 3/22/07:
>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070322...prosecutors;_ylt=Aqa0VHmqBvEh_dNEJhDj1uys0NUE
>
>Subpoenas force talks for testimony deal
>
>By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer
>
>WASHINGTON -
>
>A Senate Republican offered President Bush a compromise Thursday in
>the standoff over the dismissals of federal prosecutors, suggesting
>that select lawmakers question Karl Rove and other administration
>officials in public, but not under oath.
>
>White House counsel Fred Fielding promised to convey the offer to
>Bush, said Sen. Arlen Specter, who took the first step toward
>brokering a deal a few hours after the Senate Judiciary Committee
>approved but did not issue subpoenas for Rove and others.
>
>Specter's plan would grant one of Bush's key demands

 

[theloneranger100@aol.com]

Yup... and I still can't decide which dick to suck... Maybe Bush's dick will
be better for my thirsty mouth....
hee......heee.........



"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:6kd603piscapvje6hg1okkfl1k2n2bskc3@4ax.com...
>
> From The Associated Press, 3/22/07:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070322...prosecutors;_ylt=Aqa0VHmqBvEh_dNEJhDj1uys0NUE
>
> Subpoenas force talks for testimony deal
>
> By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer
>
> WASHINGTON -
>
> A Senate Republican offered President Bush a compromise Thursday in
> the standoff over the dismissals of federal prosecutors, suggesting
> that select lawmakers question Karl Rove and other administration
> officials in public, but not under oath.
>
> White House counsel Fred Fielding promised to convey the offer to
> Bush, said Sen. Arlen Specter, who took the first step toward
> brokering a deal a few hours after the Senate Judiciary Committee
> approved but did not issue subpoenas for Rove and others.
>
> Specter's plan would grant one of Bush's key demands - that the
> officials named in the subpoena authorization testify without being
> sworn. But the proposal dismisses other White House conditions by
> suggesting that Rove and the others testify in public.
>
> "Mr. Fielding did not accept or reject it," White House spokeswoman
> Dana Perino said.
>
> Presidential press secretary Tony Snow again cast the administration's
> offer to allow Rove and the others to talk to lawmakers in private as
> the best deal Democrats are going to get.
>
> "We opened with a compromise," he told reporters.
>
> Democrats also did not budge from their insistence that Rove be
> questioned publicly and under oath.
>
> "I've had a lot of those unstructured briefings and found that I was
> given, in many instances, not the whole truth, nothing near the whole
> truth," said the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, Sen. Patrick
> Leahy, D-Vt.
>
> His committee, by voice vote Thursday, gave Leahy authority to issue
> subpoenas for Rove, former White House Counsel Harriet Miers and her
> deputy, William Kelley.
>
> The House Judiciary Committee chairman, Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich.,
> was given that same authority a day earlier.
>
> But neither chairman appeared in a rush to issue the subpoenas to
> White House officials and provoke a showdown.
>
> In letters Thursday, Senate and House Democrats rejected Fielding's
> offer to let Rove and other officials talk about their roles in the
> firings, but only on Bush's terms: in private, off the record and not
> under oath.
>
> "I have never heard the Senate take an ultimatum like that," Leahy
> said.
>
> "I know he's the decider for the White House," Leahy added, referring
> to Bush.
>
> "But he's not the decider for the United States Senate."
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
> Go get 'em, Senator
>
> Harry

 

[theloneranger100@aol.com]

Yup... and I still can't decide which dick to suck... Maybe Bush's dick will
be better for my thirsty mouth....
hee......heee.........


"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:6kd603piscapvje6hg1okkfl1k2n2bskc3@4ax.com...
>
> From The Associated Press, 3/22/07:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070322...prosecutors;_ylt=Aqa0VHmqBvEh_dNEJhDj1uys0NUE
>
> Subpoenas force talks for testimony deal
>
> By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer
>
> WASHINGTON -
>
> A Senate Republican offered President Bush a compromise Thursday in
> the standoff over the dismissals of federal prosecutors, suggesting
> that select lawmakers question Karl Rove and other administration
> officials in public, but not under oath.
>
> White House counsel Fred Fielding promised to convey the offer to
> Bush, said Sen. Arlen Specter, who took the first step toward
> brokering a deal a few hours after the Senate Judiciary Committee
> approved but did not issue subpoenas for Rove and others.
>
> Specter's plan would grant one of Bush's key demands - that the
> officials named in the subpoena authorization testify without being
> sworn. But the proposal dismisses other White House conditions by
> suggesting that Rove and the others testify in public.
>
> "Mr. Fielding did not accept or reject it," White House spokeswoman
> Dana Perino said.
>
> Presidential press secretary Tony Snow again cast the administration's
> offer to allow Rove and the others to talk to lawmakers in private as
> the best deal Democrats are going to get.
>
> "We opened with a compromise," he told reporters.
>
> Democrats also did not budge from their insistence that Rove be
> questioned publicly and under oath.
>
> "I've had a lot of those unstructured briefings and found that I was
> given, in many instances, not the whole truth, nothing near the whole
> truth," said the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, Sen. Patrick
> Leahy, D-Vt.
>
> His committee, by voice vote Thursday, gave Leahy authority to issue
> subpoenas for Rove, former White House Counsel Harriet Miers and her
> deputy, William Kelley.
>
> The House Judiciary Committee chairman, Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich.,
> was given that same authority a day earlier.
>
> But neither chairman appeared in a rush to issue the subpoenas to
> White House officials and provoke a showdown.
>
> In letters Thursday, Senate and House Democrats rejected Fielding's
> offer to let Rove and other officials talk about their roles in the
> firings, but only on Bush's terms: in private, off the record and not
> under oath.
>
> "I have never heard the Senate take an ultimatum like that," Leahy
> said.
>
> "I know he's the decider for the White House," Leahy added, referring
> to Bush.
>
> "But he's not the decider for the United States Senate."
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
> Go get 'em, Senator
>
> Harry