In the Reign of the One-Nutted King

G

Gandalf Grey

Guest
In the reign of the one-nutted king

By Joe Bageant
Created Mar 4 2007 - 3:45pm

---Janked rats cried for blood as the prosthetic hand of love waved goodbye
to reason

By Joe Bageant

Not long ago protesting Danish construction workers won a historic victory
against workplace tyranny---they retained their company sponsored
on-the-job-beer breaks. Heartless employers being what they are, had asked
workers to pay half the cost of the beer. Oppression is ever boundless.

About that same time last fall a couple hundred American protesters gathered
in a Washington D.C. parking lot. Chronic liberal malcontents, they had the
gall to ask why our government was slaughtering hundreds of thousands of
abysmally ordinary folks in Iraq, people moreover like themselves who, even
under Saddam Hussein, whose reign was so infamously marked by his penchant
for black velvet paintings and the most sordid kinds of torture,
nevertheless managed to do what most common folks do in the world---send the
kids off to school every morning, cursed the Baghdad traffic, and perhaps a
little fudged on their taxes. So why are they being wiped out at great
public expense, and for no apparent reason?

This being a free republic, the American protesters stood in the parking
lot, packed butthole to belly button inside one of our fatherland's
designated Free Speech Zones (a bad case of branding if ever there was one),
and though they are no longer called that, the function is still the same.
Jabbing their signs upward, the protesters tried to wedge their message into
the wavering thicket of signage above their heads. Between rather strangely
meterless chants, such as "One, two, three, four, end the war!" the evil
librul protestors were left to contemplate just what those the Plexiglas
faced squadrons of police ninjas might do, should one of the dissidents make
a cautious move toward the Porto Johns, which were placed slightly over the
yellow painted line that assumedly marked the outer boundary free speech in
America. Was it better to ease over into the Porto John, or to hold it until
the "designated hour of disassemblage"? However ineffective state supervised
dissidence may be here, protesting is hard going in America. No Dane's beer
wrecked bladder could survive it.

Pity the poor American left, (who would be considered right wing moderates
in most of the world, but in America being against any war makes you a
leftist.) Any time American leftists start pointing at the root causes of
our national disease, they are neatly handed a fresh bloody war to oppose.
Each new generation of the left gets its energies sapped, gets locked into
the position of continually opposing one war, then another and another. Ever
since World War I (when they came up with the novel idea of world peace, a
notion now considered completely goofball in America today) they've been
standing on the street corners or in the parks---or more recently, inside
the Free Speech Zones way the hell out at the edge of town. At any rate,
they can never come close to naming the dark and profitable tumor at the
heart of America, the economic system under which we all live. To survive
and grow, the American system needs war, making war inevitable. To keep up
the pretense of freedom it needs harmless dissent.

America has a long record of stifling dissent exactly when dissent is most
needed. Democracy American style means we get free speech for trivial
matters but not for life-and-death issues. When an election is stolen, the
very party from whom it was stolen refuses to protest the theft because
well, "Nobody likes sour grapes, do they?" thereby assuring future electoral
thefts. When America supplies Israel with cluster bombs to kill Palestinian
children and grandmothers, you don't see rallies against Israel or American
arms cartels. You see yet another exercise of free speech on behalf those
things the politicians and corporations could care less about, and thus
grant us permission to "dissent" upon. Issues such as gender and identity,
or just about anything related to sexual freedom: "Go ahead, parade and rant
about your own penises and vulvas. Just don't challenge the banks, the war
machine or the fraudulent democratic process by which we manage the people.
Remember, ****ing with these things is called terrorism. So stick to your
own narrow "issues" like sexual freedom and nobody will get hurt. Got it
punk?"

Good ole sexual freedom, one of the American left's dearest golden oldies.
It's not as if sexual freedom has not been a fact of life in this country
ever since the puritans lost that fight in the Sixties and Seventies. Sure
there is a small but very damned loud contingency of bitter enders making a
last stand at imposing restrictions that the public has already rejected.
But we did win the sexual revolution, my friends. Look around at the movies,
gay and lesbian focused TV shows, pre-marital and extra-marital sex as the
main fare in magazines, popular novels and TV shows. Hell, we've even
created a couple of new sexes I still haven't figured out, all those
"crosses" and "trans" whatevers. We may not have become the Amsterdam of the
New World (which as near as I can tell, is Rio de Janero) but we
nevertheless won.

Better yet, people stand behind what they have won too. Bill Clinton is
living proof. The fact that Clinton, despite cigars, blowjobs, impeachment,
and $40 million spent by the Republicans to rub his face in a cum stained
dress on television for years on end, remains massively popular. Every year
we find him waving to the world from near the top of the list of the world's
most admired men. As a martyr symbol for sexual freedom---though we wish the
hell he could have kept it in his pants in the first place---all his
supposed sins, not to mention his genuine crimes against humanity, were
washed away. Much is attributed to his charm, his Oxford encyclopedic mind
and fried chicken grin. But he is no more charming than Ronald Reagan was,
even if Clinton could spot that senile old saint of the GOP a hundred IQ
points and still whip him on Jeopardy. Yet charm and smarts will get you but
so far, not to mention into a lot of trouble if you happen to have Clinton's
libido. Clinton's charm was only by comparison to the mostly second string
power hungry puds who preceded and succeeded him in that bugged Oval Office
chair.

The truth is that Clinton, like Reagan, ****ed over tens of millions of the
American poor, sentenced uncounted children to death by embargo, and shipped
millions of American jobs wholesale to the slums of Mysore and Mexico City.
He was as close to being a Republican as you can be without getting the
mandatory GOP lobotomy and a wet kiss from Ted Hagarty. Still though,
millions of Americans (including me) refuse to repudiate him because his
right to sexual privacy represented their own, and still represents their
own. And all the Bible haired gasbags on the Christian Broadcasting Network
and all the sexually frustrated Holy Rollers in the country are not going to
turn things around. We won that one.

But we have never won against a war until it is too damned late and the
Pentagon and the Halliburtons of this country have wrung every blood stained
buck from it and moved on toward setting up the next one. Yet the left,
perhaps sensing the futility of protesting the latest war from inside their
free speech cages---which seem only to be reserved for war
dissenters---dissipates its energies further by charging at the sly
Republican matador's array of fluttering capes, one of which is labeled
sexual privacy. No cage required. You can usually parade that one right down
the street, further proof the fatherland is a free land, and that the powers
that be could care less about that issue.

Janking the rats

While we are sniping at liberal sacred cows here, I may as well plink
briefly at another one---gun control. It's all bullshit. The left plays into
the parched red claws of the worst conservative elements when it makes a
fool of itself over what it does not understand, when it succumbs to the
righteous wailing of the anti-gun intelligentsia in the brownstones of
Chelsea. Twice as many people own guns as vote in this country, and half of
American households have at least one gun. Get over it. The guns are here to
stay. Gun control and sexual privacy are just two of the dozens of political
wedges liberals to drive on behalf of the same elite political and owning
class the sends yet another generation off to die in the name of the
country.

A rancid clammy smell permeates the room, the taste of vomit in the throat,
then.

SCREAMING MAN HERE! DIE FOR THEIR COUNTRY? BAGEANT YOU LOATHESOME DOUBLE
DEALING GODDAMNED LIZARD! NOT A SINGLE CALLOW CORN FED KANSAS STRIPPLING OR
LOS ANGELES MEXICAN SCARFING THEIR MICROWAVED BURRITOS IN IRAQ HAS DIED FOR,
OR HAD HIS ARMS BLOWN OFF FOR, HIS COUNTRY. THEY DIED (OR ARE TRYING TO
MASTER THE ARTS OF LOVE WITH THAT SEXY NEW PROSTHETIC CLAW) IN SERVICE OF
THE SYNDICATE. THEY DIED AT THE ORDERS OF ITS CEO, PRESIDENT SPARKY AND HIS
GANG OF ADDLED COLD WAR DROOLERS. AND MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT! THEY WILL
SOON GO OFF TO IRAN WHISTLING THE THEME FROM ROCKY AND SLEEP THE SLEEP OF
ZOMBIES IN THE 100 DEGREE DESERT NIGHTS BECAUSE, AHA! THE SYNDICATE'S MIND
SCRUBBING MACHINERY IS FAULTLESS! FROM THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGINACE IN GRADE
SCHOOL, TO THAT LAST SURPRISED LOOK ON THEIR FACES WHEN THE I.E.D. SAYS
"HELLO DARLING" IN FARSI, THEY WILL BE DREAMING OF EAGLES, AND FLAGS AND
PARIS HILTON'S CROTCH. BIRTH TO DEATH, THE MIND SCURBBER'S PROGRAMMING IS
FAULTLESS, I TELL YOU. FAULTLESS!

Hmmm..

Anyway, the reason liberals are sucker bait for every wedge the Republican
think tanks can hand them is because liberals, like every other American,
are conditioned to compete against each other---even fellow liberals. In a
monetized rat race society (best called The Company) that continually pits
its citizens/workers against one another in a toxic winner take all rat race
for quality education, health care, employment, crime free neighborhoods,
and political attention of any sort, then dubs it mere "competition," as if
it were a happy game of badminton, well ****. EVERYBODY rich or poor feels
existentially threatened. Republican capitalists feel threatened that
liberal humanism might empower workers, which it would, if anybody bothered
to practice it. The gay man fears the common homophobe, as if that dumb
******* has any more power than he does. So he grabs the bullhorn at the Gay
Pride rally and publicly denounces the homophobe---who really couldn't give
a **** and won't hear the denunciation anyway---never confronting the real
enemy because, like the homophobe, he has been conditioned to combative
personal response toward the guy down the street, instead of reason. CBS
Sixty Minutes covers the gay "issues," fifteen minutes a year, thereby
validating its protesters in a television managed state. Divisive politics
once again beats the snot out of reason.

Reason necessarily sets order and priorities to the world. For instance,
reason might dictate that issues such as secret torture sites, military star
chambers judging the citizenry, security state data banks on tens of
millions of Americans' private lives, or our destinies being bought and sold
without our participation (or even knowledge) by corporate campaign
contributions just might, mind you, have a higher priority than or animal
rights or abortion rights, at least for now. The fight for all these must be
continual of course, but, noble as these things are, we have a better chance
of achieving them or holding onto them if we are all rowing the societal
boat together, away from the waterfall ahead. A gay marriage license hanging
in your cubicle in the global labor gulag doesn't mean much.

A forensic search for signs of liberalism in America, true liberal unity of
the kind that broadly underpins any humane and progressive society, shows it
was DOA. Thanks to our birth to death indoctrination regarding the "American
spirit of competition," the rats in the race are not inclined to run
together or exercise their unified strength toward common purpose, or even
consider it. Though the world is by no means a simple either/or proposition
governed by the narrowest sort of struggle, we are conditioned to
unquestioningly assume so. If we stop to think, or apply reason and then act
on it, other rats will eat our lunch. That's what they are trained to do.

Luckily for the rat keepers of global capitalism, they have little to fear
when it comes to Americans being attracted to reason. Reason is boring stuff
in a nation---and increasingly, a world---whose cultural glue is television,
and whose main diversion is profoundly simplified emotionalism and conflict.
In fact, in the American rat race, reason is not only a fatal weakness, but
is also generally unavailable to a people who stay janked every waking
moment, ready to take on the next rat, then go home and watch more rats do
each other in on television, in a steady diet of visible conflict, both
overt an implied. Given that the human nervous system is programmed to
respond instantly to conflict, there simply is no mental space left for much
quiet thought to take root. Not when your nation's cultural values resemble
those of Tamerlain or Aleric the Goth---tribal, hierarchical, aggressive and
acquisitive.

By contrast, I am sitting in my kitchen in the village of Hopkins, Belize,
watching a lone Garifuna carpenter put a zinc roof on a nearby native
cabana. Squatting barefooted on the roof joists, he saws and nails and chats
all day with passersby on the sandy street below. A couple of times a day
one or another of them will voluntarily climb up to lend the carpenter a
hand for a half hour or so, then move on. Cooperation is an assumption, not
a consideration. In the same loose spirit neighbors often drift from house
to house at mealtimes, making easy conversation and gossip, eating a little
here, a little there as they go along so as not to burden any particular
household's meal. Next week the family sharing the food may be doing the
visiting because their own refrigerator is empty. No stigma attached. In a
culture marked by unemployment and food insecurity such sharing of labor or
food is a socially beneficial practice. Though no one here thinks about it,
such practices represent a very reasonable social support system in a
country with almost no social service resources. The elites on the other
hand, say the typically relaxed Belizean worker is lazy, and that the
country would be more prosperous if people like the Garifuna would sweat
harder to join the New World Order rat race, which profits the owning class
leaders as handsomely here as in the rest of the world. When the working
people call for improvement their demands are deemed unreasonable by the
elites, unaffordable is the usual excuse, though that doesn't prevent elite
in government from promising these things at election time.

Whether in Belize or America, neither the owners of government nor their
subset of social and financial managers are going to respond to any well
reasoned, socially beneficial cause unless they are forced to do so---with
emphasis on the word force. Social progress and a humane environment is
antithetical to the success of the owning and governing classes in America,
both being exactly the same thing in a nation whose Constitution is
essentially a guarantee of the rights of property. Things were that way from
the beginning, creating dynastic owning class, not just the Rockerfellers,
Bushes, Kennedys, but thousands of discreet regional and local ones across
the country which have been in place for a century or more---longer in
places like the South. Regardless of what written law says, they choose
which laws will actually be enforced. Or abolished. For them the long term
application of reason's kid brother, common sense, spells destruction.

**** Iraq, let's bomb Persia

On the other hand it doesn't take much critical thinking to stomp the ****
out of weakest guy and grab his lunch money. Or his turf or his oil. If
doing so should require some degree of thoughtfulness, then we had best
leave reason and thinking to more thoughtful leader rats. And so Condi Rice
and George Bush wrinkle their brows and try to look thoughtful, and profile
for the cameras or seize them head on with a bright vulpine stare. But not
even the Republican leadership has ever believed that logic and reason were
driving their game. Down inside the Republican leadership is deeply
realistic, even if it is of the tooth and claw reptilian brain sort of
realism: Eat, ****, kill, own the top of the rock where then sun is best.
They've had the top of the rock for the two terms usually granted them
before the game is up and the public throws them out, not because of any
particular public wisdom, but because when theft and high crime becomes
obscenely obvious to even the blindest beer sucking idiot, it is always the
Republicans who are in office. And now, even though the game is up,
President Sparky and the neocon Nefertitti have no choice but to keep on
trying to look wise and leader like, and keep on keeping on in the face of
the brewing public backlash, just keep on prevaricating until the neocon
junta they rode into town with can get out of Dodge before the indictments
come down---at which time Sparky signs the pardons on his way out the door.

SCREAMING MAN HERE! GODAMMIT BAGEANT, DON'T MAKE THINGS MORE COMPLICATED
THAN THEY ARE! THIS NATION OF FEEBS AND NOSE BORERS CAN'T EVEN SPELL
PREVARICATE! THE "PUBLIC BACKLASH" AS YOU CALL IT.ALL THAT SQUEALING ABOUT
THE BLOODY FOLLY IN IRAQ IS JUST SQUEALS FROM INSIDE THE SWINERY. THE
UNLETTERED HORDES HAVE FIGURED OUT WE HAVE LOST A WAR. THAT A BUNCH OF GOAT
SKINNERS IN FLIP FLOPS IS KICKING OUR ASSES UP AND DOWN THE STREETS OF
BAGHDAD LIKE A GODDAMNED SOCCER BALL. AND THEY SEE NOW THAT THEIR BOY,
GEORGE-ONE-NUTTED-KING-OF-THE-HUNS, TURNED OUT TO BE SIMPLE IN THE HEAD.
COMPLETELY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR HIM---A LOSER!

True enough. But no matter. We live in, as Gore Vidal put it, "The United
States of Amnesia," and President Sparky will later be canonized into
Republican sainthood, alongside Ronald Reagan, and dozens of airports and
highways will carry his name, until peak oil renders them dim relics
resembling the Mayan ball courts of Tikal. The deal stands unless real
catastrophe intervenes, either something natural, like a giant meteor
splashing a thousand mile wide hole in the Eastern Seaboard, or an unnatural
one inflicted by the money elites themselves, such as a depression so deep
that corn mush makes a dramatic comeback among the proles. Or, as the
administration would have us believe, maybe an all out nuclear war waged
upon us by Kim Il Sun with his both of his missiles. In any case, it must be
a genuine catastrophe, meaning that it must come between Americans and their
shopping malls. Otherwise, so long as voters can manage to hang onto their
jobs and be convinced of their safety from people like the Korean Brat Boy,
or the hapless dimwitted Shoe Bomber, they will stick with the incumbent rat
pack and its leader for at least eight years, even if their leader does
stumble over three syllable words and call the Greeks "Grecians." The
armature of all politics is fear, whether there be danger or not. Fear, and
the mind numbing monotony of the thinnest domestic platitudes.

Well hell. Now that the Bush administration has played all the fear cards
available---at least until he can bring a swarm if self-exploding Iranians
down upon us---the 2008 Democratic presidential hopefuls are left to hoof
the boards peddling the moldiest of platitudes. They don't seem one bit
embarrassed. Here you have candidates for leadership of the most
powerful---and clearly dangerous---country in the world and they have
absolutely nothing of substance to say on real issues domestic or foreign.
On domestic issues, they set their jaws for the cameras, and with a steely
glint in their eyes hinting of gravitas, deliver meaningless speeches in
threadbare language about health care, taxes and Social Security to millions
of Europeans and Middle Easterners on CNN and Aljazeera. I say that because
absolutely no one in America is listening except the blogosphere and the
congenital political junkies television seems to have produced, along with
the millions of sports fans and shopping channel addicts. The record shows
that neither party has done **** for over forty years about any of those
things, and probably never will, especially given that the country is (A-)
broke (shhhh, the mooks in the voting booths still think we are the richest
nation in the world), and (B-) so far in the hole we are a net debtor nation
to countries such as Mexico; if the Empire manages to survive a bit longer,
we may yet grovel before Yemen and Bolivia for a few bucks for a pint of
gasoline for the Hummer and a cup of French roast.

Meanwhile, as I write this, John McCain gives out a love call to the
Christian Right, promising to take down Roe vs. Wade, and lead America back
down the happy road toward coat hangar abortions. Like the one to leading
back sexual repression, that road washed out long ago, which doesn't stop
McCain and his kind from stoking illiterate white Christian nitwits to a
frenzy, thereby sidestepping the issue of whether we are going to devaluate
the dollar and pay the Mexicans in cash, or simply open the borders and let
millions of unemployed gringos go do yard work and send much needed pesos
home to their families.

Same goes for foreign policy, another of those creatures the administration
has rendered all but extinct, thanks to wardens and stewarts such as John
Bolton and the hard-faced Nefertitti in the $7,000 high heels (though I
gotta admit that Condi has the kind of legs that nearly justify them.) Oh,
the Republicans have announced whose Persian ass we are going to attempt to
kick next, but that is plain old thuggery, not foreign policy. Essentially
it's a retread of the WMD ruse, only this time the claim is "Iranian
intent," which neatly eliminates the problem of proof. "Hey, they are
thinking about it, and thinking leads to doing. So that makes'em a threat to
Americans."

As we said earlier, the human nervous system is programmed to respond
instantly to danger and violence, so thuggery smells like foreign policy to
rats that have been kept on the treadmill of fear by the GOP and in the dark
by both parties. And besides, sending the Empire's legions into Persia will
draw attention away from Iraq, just as Iraq draws attention away from the
war now being lost in Afghanistan. In the United States of Amnesia, history
is only eight and one half minutes long, about the length of time between
television commercials, and far less important than catching the second
segment of American Idol. Given that it takes longer than that to even say
hello to any foreign policy issue, odds are good we will continue to hear
zilch from the presidential candidates on the subject. And besides, there
are too many of both party's skeletons doing the "Danz Macabre" in that
closet.

Feast of promises

Like those "spider plants," sometimes called air plants, that hang from the
trees out my cabana window, the same ones that sprawl gracefully from little
jars of tap water in the apartments of solitary librarians and the elderly,
subsisting apparently on nothing but air and some miniscule bit of nutrients
to be obtained from water, American liberals seem to exist on bottled water
and hope. Legend has it that American liberalism once had deep traceable
roots in farm populism, the struggle for dignity of immigrants, fair wages
and good working conditions for laborers, and other such noble principles.
So noble in fact that even high minded sons of the owning class, people like
John Kennedy and Franklin Roosevelt were drawn to them as a way to kill time
between games of touch football at Hyannisport, the search for the perfect
Cuban cigar and accompanying highball, not to mention the prerequisite
sexual dalliances with other birds following the flock of the famous (Judth
Campbell Exner once told me JFK always had to be on the bottom due to his
bad back, and that he cackled like a frat boy when they screwed on the desk
of the oval office, as if thinking, she said, "Oh, if Bobby could see me
now!"

At any rate, noble causes and party politics are antithetical these days.
Beyond that, you must be the rich, or at least very useful to the
rich---like the Bush family was to the oil companies during its rise---to be
a player in either party, both of which are faces of the only real party in
this country, the party of business. Without a class base made up of real
people there can be no genuine political party. Without people from
different classes defending their class interests, there can be no politics.
Americans have been sold the idea that they are all somehow "middle class,"
whether they be shoveling chicken **** for Tysons, a seven buck an hour
"dietary technician" at the local hospital, or hawking credit card
applications out of a telemarketing center in Nebraska, they are all now
supposedly in the great middle class. Consequently, there are no politics to
our political system, just business transactions taking place behind the
curtain of a fraudulent democracy.

After forty years of having their natural base absorbed by the amorphous
middle class that isn't, and the meat of politics has been removed from the
table, leaving Spider plant liberals left to find sustenance in the most
minuscule nourishment. There are just enough tiny differences in the two
parties to sustain ever hopeful liberal voters, who have long accepted the
thin gruel served by the Democratic political elite as the prelude to a
promised feast. Of course the feast never comes because no Democrat is ever
going to do more than "address" a problem, rather than solve it. In fact,
for one of the Democratic elites to even acknowledge the existence of the
most glaring sort of inequity sends good liberals into political insulin
shock, so accustomed have their systems become to calorie free ideas and
"reality lite." Al Gore makes a film about global warming, but dares not
name the corporations that not only refuse to seek remedy, but insist on
escalating the problem, and who just happen to fund both parties. Instead he
tells the audience that they are personally to blame and must start
sacrificing, hanging their clothes on lines and so forth. Movies being
reality in this country, and documentaries liberal America hails it as a
turning point in our ravenous energy consumption, drives the six blocks home
from the Cineplex wondering where the hell one buys wooden clothespins,
having never seen one in entire suburban their lives. Al Gore gets an
Academy Award at the annual swarming of very rich swans living in a paradise
wherein they never even see their own laundry from the moment it drops from
their gilded bodies.

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton makes familiar noises about reforming health
care, but flatly declares that the insurance companies which hold the entire
nation for ransom "absolutely must be part of the solution." By that logic,
when it comes to stopping the war in Iraq, then Halliburton, Blackwater
Security, twenty thousand hired gun mercenaries, and several thousand
contractors presently cutting the fattest hog in their history must be
involved in ending the war. Even SCREAMING MAN has more veracity and
substance.

THE SCREAMING MAN HAS NEVER BEEN ACCUSED OF VERACITY! NOR ABSTENTION FROM
ANY SUBSTANCE KNOWN TO CIVILIZED OR UNCIVILIZED MAN, NOR AVERSION TO ANY
DEVIANT PRACTICE WHATSOEVER. (THEY DO NOT CALL HIM THE POL POT OF THE
BOUDOIR FOR NOTHING!) FUTHERMORE, FOR A HEFTY FEE, SCREAMING MAN'S
ENDORSEMENT, AND OR PHYSICAL PERSUASIVE EXPERTISE, IS AVAILABLE TO ANY VILE
PERSONAGE OR POLITICAL PARTY, REGARDLESS OF THEIR CRIMES WHATSOEVER. ARE YOU
LISTENING HILLARY CLINTON? YOU'RE GONNA NEED HELP IN TAKING OUT THAT GREAT
MOCHA HOPE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY BEFORE NEXT NOVEMBER!

Right now, almost seventy percent of Americans finally, mostly for the wrong
reasons, reject a senseless war that kills tens of thousands and bankrupts
our children's children. In response, it took four years for Democrats to
come haltingly to the conclusion that it just might be a good idea to end
it. But even so, a large number are still saying, "Let's test the water a
bit more, maybe wait until the polls show ninety nine percent. Can't be too
careful. And besides, Iraq would descend into chaos and bloodshed if we
pulled out."
Bloodshed and chaos? What do they think the Pentagon is conducting over
there right now, a Red Cross community blood drive? And mention cutting the
Pentagon back and spending a little of the dough on public education and
even the Dems begin to sound like Foghorn Leghorn in high dudgeon: "Whoa
there hoss! We gotta have thousands of nuklur waarheads ready to pop at any
time. Somebody in the Middle East besides our strategic partner, po'
defenseless little Israel, just might build one of their own."

How this "strategy" of reducing Israel's neighbors to rubble and guts serves
you and me is a reasonable enough question, one that can never be asked in
the United States, although I can assure you that the media and the public
here in Latin America openly ponder it. The question of why we continue to
hone the teeth of the Middle East's meanest junkyard dog, but refuse to
insist on a chain and muzzle is left to the readers' speculation. Israeli
belligerence is the third rail of American foreign policy that fries anyone
with the balls to bring it up. Look at what recently happened to poor ole
Jimmy Carter. Smoke is still curling up from his pasty old carcass. Will we
ever see the day when an American politician says out loud what so many of
us (and them) say privately?

Then there' is the foreign policy issue of the Third World and AIDS.

AW RIGHT BAGEANT! JUST SHUT UP AND LET SCREAMING MAN DIRECT YOUR DOLPHIN
WAXERS ACROSS THE KEYBOARD. LOOK, WHEN IT COMES TO AIDS, LET'S CALL IT LIKE
IT IS: EVERY WHITE MAN IN AMERICA KNOWS THE WORLD IS TOO DAMNED CROWDED, TOO
DAMNED BLACK AND FAR TOO ****ING BROWN. AND AIDS IS THE ONE THING THAT'S
WORKING OUT RIGHT FOR THE WHITE MAN. EVERY COUCH BOUND BEER SUCKING CACKER
KNOWS THAT IN THE BACK OF WHAT MIND HE HAS. AND EVERY ARUBA TANNED CPA
RUNNING THE FAMILY LEXUS THROUGH BUBBLES' CAR WASH IS SECRETLY THINKING THE
SAME THING---WHEN HE THINKS ABOUT IT AT ALL. AND EVERY POLITICIAN SECRETLY
KNOWS IT TOO, EVEN MOST OF THE BLACK ONES. SO THEY AIN'T GONNA BUST THE BANK
TO SAVE THE HOTTENTOTS IF THERE ARE NO VOTES IN IT.

THE BEAUTY OF IT IS THIS: THE WHITE GUY'S TEAM, AMERICA, WINS BY DOING
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! THE WHOLE IDEA IS SO GODDAMNED SICK NOBODY IN THE
WESTERN WORLD WOULD DARE ACCUSE HIM OF IT BECAUSE, HEY! THEY'VE THOUGHT THE
SAME THING. YESSIR, WHITEY HAS DRAWN THE "GET ONE GENOCIDE FOR FREE" CARD IN
HISTORY'S GREAT BOARD GAME. HE DOESN'T CATCH MANY BREAKS FROM HISTORY THESE
DAYS. WHEN HE DOES, HE'S GOTTA RIDE IT AND TRY NOT TO SMIRK. WHO SAYS WHITE
MEN DON'T DO SOLIDARITY?

Well, to be honest, those thoughts have crossed my mind too, though not with
such glee. Anybody with the intelligence of a flatworm can see AIDS is
taking out a lot more black and brown yellow asses that white ones. It comes
down to morals and how you really feel about it. If you happen to be among
that five percent of the world called Americans, who are horfing at least a
quarter of the world's wealth, one that depicts the faraway ninety-five
percent as either French queers, terrorists or HIV positive semi-cannibals,
well, you are not likely to cultivate your inner Mother Theresa are you?

Though dismal be the heart of man, we spider plants are feeling a bit
hardier these days. Supreme manager of the Democratic political smoke and
bubble machine that she is, Nancy Pelosi, at least to hear the echoes of the
media tell it, is serving up one helluva bunch of appetizers, a cornucopia
of proposed legislation. And as of this writing, there is even grappling on
the floor of Congress to take away those same imperial powers that Democrats
as well as Republicans granted our one nutted cowboy king. But even if he is
stripped of his Stetson crown and all the scepters of the empire, meaning
that those cattle prods of its "black site" torture chambers around the
world are called home and smashed, and even if Guantamo is leveled by the
corps of engineers and every prisoner given a fair trial on television for
all the world to see, we will only be approximately back to go. Back to
where we started. Which was not a good place at all, since the system was
already broken and was high balling toward its own destruction financially,
ecologically and socially.

And so we sit patiently under the tent out here on the lawn, in the final
dimming moments of the Empire. We've had the appetizers and are waiting for
the meat course: socialized medicine, a halving of the Pentagon's budget,
nationwide public transit, a tripling of corporate taxation, (which would
still not put corporations where they were in the fifties when they paid 80
percent of America's bills and still made billions), an energy plan that
works toward elimination of the automobile and a the closing of coal fired
plants, universal free higher education just like every other civilized
first world nation..none of which can even begin to happen without complete
campaign finance reform. That's some heavy meat and taters for any cook.

The band plays on, we fiddle with our napkins and wait. ****tails are poured
inside the grandly restored old homes in DC's Georgetown district. The deal,
the insiders agree, remains the same: Who buys the most campaign ads will
almost certainly play Pied Piper to the most votes.

Meanwhile, not a soul under the tent has noticed that the lights in the
kitchen were turned off a long, long time ago.

_______



--
NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available to advance understanding of
political, human rights, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. I
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107

"A little patience and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their
spells dissolve, and the people recovering their true sight, restore their
government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are
suffering deeply in spirit,
and incurring the horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public
debt. But if the game runs sometimes against us at home we must have
patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an opportunity of winning
back the principles we have lost, for this is a game where principles are at
stake."
-Thomas Jefferson
 
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 07:31:43 -0800, "Gandalf Grey"
<gandalfgrey@infectedmail.com> wrote:

>In the reign of the one-nutted king
>
>By Joe Bageant
>Created Mar 4 2007 - 3:45pm
>
>---Janked rats cried for blood as the prosthetic hand of love waved goodbye
>to reason
>
>By Joe Bageant
>
>Not long ago protesting Danish construction workers won a historic victory
>against workplace tyranny---they retained their company sponsored
>on-the-job-beer breaks. Heartless employers being what they are, had asked
>workers to pay half the cost of the beer. Oppression is ever boundless.
>
>About that same time last fall a couple hundred American protesters gathered
>in a Washington D.C. parking lot. Chronic liberal malcontents, they had the
>gall to ask why our government was slaughtering hundreds of thousands of
>abysmally ordinary folks in Iraq, people moreover like themselves who, even
>under Saddam Hussein, whose reign was so infamously marked by his penchant
>for black velvet paintings and the most sordid kinds of torture,
>nevertheless managed to do what most common folks do in the world---send the
>kids off to school every morning, cursed the Baghdad traffic, and perhaps a
>little fudged on their taxes. So why are they being wiped out at great
>public expense, and for no apparent reason?
>
>This being a free republic, the American protesters stood in the parking
>lot, packed butthole to belly button inside one of our fatherland's
>designated Free Speech Zones (a bad case of branding if ever there was one),


I bet you're one of those people who thinks that if congress
allows this crap, or if a municipality does, that your "rights have
been stolen". You were born with your rights, and no judge or supreme
court justice or president who's a chimp lookalike can "take away your
rights". They may be able to convince you that your rights exist as
determined by them, but that's all they can do, and if you fall for it
YOU'RE the schmuck.

>and though they are no longer called that, the function is still the same.
>Jabbing their signs upward, the protesters tried to wedge their message into
>the wavering thicket of signage above their heads. Between rather strangely
>meterless chants, such as "One, two, three, four, end the war!" the evil
>librul protestors were left to contemplate just what those the Plexiglas
>faced squadrons of police ninjas might do, should one of the dissidents make
>a cautious move toward the Porto Johns, which were placed slightly over the
>yellow painted line that assumedly marked the outer boundary free speech in
>America. Was it better to ease over into the Porto John, or to hold it until
>the "designated hour of disassemblage"? However ineffective state supervised
>dissidence may be here, protesting is hard going in America. No Dane's beer
>wrecked bladder could survive it.
>
>Pity the poor American left, (who would be considered right wing moderates
>in most of the world, but in America being against any war makes you a
>leftist.) Any time American leftists start pointing at the root causes of
>our national disease, they are neatly handed a fresh bloody war to oppose.
>Each new generation of the left gets its energies sapped, gets locked into
>the position of continually opposing one war, then another and another.


That's a piss poor cop out, if that's what it's intended to
be. And "the left" could have already done a lot for the environment
if social management wasn't more important to them.

>Ever
>since World War I (when they came up with the novel idea of world peace, a
>notion now considered completely goofball in America today) they've been
>standing on the street corners or in the parks---or more recently, inside
>the Free Speech Zones way the hell out at the edge of town. At any rate,
>they can never come close to naming the dark and profitable tumor at the
>heart of America, the economic system under which we all live. To survive
>and grow, the American system needs war, making war inevitable. To keep up
>the pretense of freedom it needs harmless dissent.
>
>America has a long record of stifling dissent exactly when dissent is most
>needed. Democracy American style means we get free speech for trivial
>matters but not for life-and-death issues. When an election is stolen, the
>very party from whom it was stolen refuses to protest the theft because
>well, "Nobody likes sour grapes, do they?" thereby assuring future electoral
>thefts.


If the Dems were all that upset about 2000 being stolen, why
did they want Kerry in 2004, who had supported the Iraq war and was a
Bush clone in every important way?

>When America supplies Israel with cluster bombs to kill Palestinian
>children and grandmothers,


Yeah, that's what they do with them, eh? It isn't for
Hezbollah, Hamas, etc, it's just kids and grandparents, right? You
****ing idiot. Go swallow Kevin Alfred Strom's dick.

>you don't see rallies against Israel or American
>arms cartels. You see yet another exercise of free speech on behalf those
>things the politicians and corporations could care less about, and thus
>grant us permission to "dissent" upon. Issues such as gender and identity,
>or just about anything related to sexual freedom: "Go ahead, parade and rant
>about your own penises and vulvas. Just don't challenge the banks, the war
>machine or the fraudulent democratic process by which we manage the people.
>Remember, ****ing with these things is called terrorism. So stick to your
>own narrow "issues" like sexual freedom and nobody will get hurt. Got it
>punk?"
>
>Good ole sexual freedom, one of the American left's dearest golden oldies.
>It's not as if sexual freedom has not been a fact of life in this country
>ever since the puritans lost that fight in the Sixties and Seventies. Sure
>there is a small but very damned loud contingency of bitter enders making a
>last stand at imposing restrictions that the public has already rejected.
>But we did win the sexual revolution, my friends. Look around at the movies,
>gay and lesbian focused TV shows, pre-marital and extra-marital sex as the
>main fare in magazines, popular novels and TV shows. Hell, we've even
>created a couple of new sexes I still haven't figured out, all those
>"crosses" and "trans" whatevers. We may not have become the Amsterdam of the
>New World (which as near as I can tell, is Rio de Janero) but we
>nevertheless won.


And what a favor that was... Let us know when that institution
of higher learning in California figures out their bathroom issue,
will ya'? You know, the one where they were thinking of adding a third
series of bathrooms for the "transgendered", etc.

And since you mentioned Israel, let us know when the utterly
sane students of Ber(serk)eley figure out how to quit wearing
Keffiyahs to protests and writing "**** Jews" on their lockers because
they think it's cool, you ****ing idiot.

>
>Better yet, people stand behind what they have won too. Bill Clinton is
>living proof. The fact that Clinton, despite cigars, blowjobs, impeachment,
>and $40 million spent by the Republicans to rub his face in a cum stained
>dress on television for years on end, remains massively popular. Every year
>we find him waving to the world from near the top of the list of the world's
>most admired men.


Maybe in a time or newsweek poll. Ask real people and see what
kind of answer you get. Most people admire Borat more, and he's not
real.

>As a martyr symbol for sexual freedom---though we wish the
>hell he could have kept it in his pants in the first place---all his
>supposed sins, not to mention his genuine crimes against humanity, were
>washed away. Much is attributed to his charm, his Oxford encyclopedic mind
>and fried chicken grin. But he is no more charming than Ronald Reagan was,
>even if Clinton could spot that senile old saint of the GOP a hundred IQ
>points and still whip him on Jeopardy. Yet charm and smarts will get you but
>so far, not to mention into a lot of trouble if you happen to have Clinton's
>libido. Clinton's charm was only by comparison to the mostly second string
>power hungry puds who preceded and succeeded him in that bugged Oval Office
>chair.
>
>The truth is that Clinton, like Reagan, ****ed over tens of millions of the
>American poor, sentenced uncounted children to death by embargo, and shipped
>millions of American jobs wholesale to the slums of Mysore and Mexico City.
>He was as close to being a Republican as you can be without getting the
>mandatory GOP lobotomy and a wet kiss from Ted Hagarty. Still though,
>millions of Americans (including me) refuse to repudiate him because his
>right to sexual privacy represented their own,


And because that is, and was, far more important to you than
the embargo against Iraq, the unnecessary order by Clinton to attack
it with cruise missiles, the ridiculous Somalia fiasco (Clinton lied;
he said it was in American interests, and it wasn't, and Somalians and
Americans died), or the intervention in the former Yugoslavia (Clinton
lied and a heck of a lot of people died, and on behalf of WESTERN
EUROPE yet!).

>and still represents their
>own. And all the Bible haired gasbags on the Christian Broadcasting Network
>and all the sexually frustrated Holy Rollers in the country are not going to
>turn things around. We won that one.


No one cares about whether or not you get turned around idiot.
And no one takes you seriously when you just proudly admitted that
filling the airwaves with tv shows that can't make it on the wit of
the writers is more important than the US not bullying other countries
for American business interests. So you not only have your priorities
skewed, you're too stupid to realize that your whole outlook is wrong.
This kind of pisses me off, but hey, I'm just one sane person.

>
>But we have never won against a war until it is too damned late and the
>Pentagon and the Halliburtons of this country have wrung every blood stained
>buck from it and moved on toward setting up the next one.


I wonder how much lower than #2 you're really willing to let
justice fall on your scale?

>Yet the left,
>perhaps sensing the futility of protesting the latest war from inside their
>free speech cages---which seem only to be reserved for war
>dissenters---dissipates its energies further by charging at the sly
>Republican matador's array of fluttering capes, one of which is labeled
>sexual privacy. No cage required. You can usually parade that one right down
>the street, further proof the fatherland is a free land, and that the powers
>that be could care less about that issue.


I would think you probably did not proofread this with an eye
toward "Have I mentioned anything maybe too much? Am I an idiot? If
I'm not an idiot, might I appear to be? Will people think I don't
really care about the war and that stuff, and how wrong it is if I
keep going back to this issue?"

>
>Janking the rats
>
>While we are sniping at liberal sacred cows here, I may as well plink
>briefly at another one---gun control. It's all bullshit. The left plays into
>the parched red claws of the worst conservative elements when it makes a
>fool of itself over what it does not understand, when it succumbs to the
>righteous wailing of the anti-gun intelligentsia in the brownstones of
>Chelsea. Twice as many people own guns as vote in this country, and half of
>American households have at least one gun. Get over it. The guns are here to
>stay. Gun control and sexual privacy are just two of the dozens of political
>wedges liberals to drive on behalf of the same elite political and owning
>class the sends yet another generation off to die in the name of the
>country.


Good heavens! Have you also seen the stats from the early '90s
where the FBI showed that only 1% - 3% of crimes involving firearms
were ones where "assault rifles" were used? Do you mean to say here
that you acknowledge that people are not being killed on every
streetcorner with AK-47s? Dewey Stokes would roll over in his office,
if the fat **** could manage to do it without hitting furniture.
It's a pretty nice office too, because almost since the "gun
control" movement started, a LOT more federal dollars go to precincts
with chiefs that support gun control measures (and make sure all their
underlings at least pretend to do so too) than ones with chiefs that
don't.

>
>A rancid clammy smell permeates the room, the taste of vomit in the throat,
>then.
>
>SCREAMING MAN HERE! DIE FOR THEIR COUNTRY? BAGEANT YOU LOATHESOME DOUBLE
>DEALING GODDAMNED LIZARD! NOT A SINGLE CALLOW CORN FED KANSAS STRIPPLING OR
>LOS ANGELES MEXICAN SCARFING THEIR MICROWAVED BURRITOS IN IRAQ HAS DIED FOR,
>OR HAD HIS ARMS BLOWN OFF FOR, HIS COUNTRY. THEY DIED (OR ARE TRYING TO
>MASTER THE ARTS OF LOVE WITH THAT SEXY NEW PROSTHETIC CLAW) IN SERVICE OF
>THE SYNDICATE. THEY DIED AT THE ORDERS OF ITS CEO, PRESIDENT SPARKY AND HIS
>GANG OF ADDLED COLD WAR DROOLERS. AND MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT! THEY WILL
>SOON GO OFF TO IRAN WHISTLING THE THEME FROM ROCKY AND SLEEP THE SLEEP OF
>ZOMBIES IN THE 100 DEGREE DESERT NIGHTS BECAUSE, AHA! THE SYNDICATE'S MIND
>SCRUBBING MACHINERY IS FAULTLESS! FROM THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGINACE IN GRADE
>SCHOOL, TO THAT LAST SURPRISED LOOK ON THEIR FACES WHEN THE I.E.D. SAYS
>"HELLO DARLING" IN FARSI, THEY WILL BE DREAMING OF EAGLES, AND FLAGS AND
>PARIS HILTON'S CROTCH. BIRTH TO DEATH, THE MIND SCURBBER'S PROGRAMMING IS
>FAULTLESS, I TELL YOU. FAULTLESS!


You really believe that? Do you really think that all the
soldiers over there are so completely dullwitted that they have no
doubts about the validity of the reasoning behind the war? Do you
really think they failed to notice that when the Taliban offered to
hand bin Laden over, Bush nearly tripped over himself in a rush to get
on camera and say "Too late", and the same with Iraq when Hussein said
he'd leave?

>
>Hmmm..
>
>Anyway, the reason liberals are sucker bait for every wedge the Republican
>think tanks can hand them is because liberals, like every other American,
>are conditioned to compete against each other---even fellow liberals.


I bet the part is coming soon where you tell us it's the evil
Republicans who make them compete... I'll just bet.

>In a
>monetized rat race society (best called The Company) that continually pits
>its citizens/workers against one another in a toxic winner take all rat race
>for quality education, health care, employment, crime free neighborhoods,
>and political attention of any sort, then dubs it mere "competition," as if
>it were a happy game of badminton, well ****. EVERYBODY rich or poor feels
>existentially threatened. Republican capitalists feel threatened that
>liberal humanism might empower workers, which it would, if anybody bothered
>to practice it. The gay man fears the common homophobe, as if that dumb
>******* has any more power than he does. So he grabs the bullhorn at the Gay
>Pride rally and publicly denounces the homophobe---who really couldn't give
>a **** and won't hear the denunciation anyway---never confronting the real
>enemy because, like the homophobe, he has been conditioned to combative
>personal response toward the guy down the street, instead of reason. CBS
>Sixty Minutes covers the gay "issues," fifteen minutes a year, thereby
>validating its protesters in a television managed state. Divisive politics
>once again beats the snot out of reason.
>
>Reason necessarily sets order and priorities to the world.


Most priorities are not based on reason.

>For instance,
>reason might dictate that issues such as secret torture sites, military star
>chambers judging the citizenry, security state data banks on tens of
>millions of Americans' private lives, or our destinies being bought and sold
>without our participation (or even knowledge) by corporate campaign
>contributions just might, mind you, have a higher priority than or animal
>rights or abortion rights, at least for now. The fight for all these must be
>continual of course, but, noble as these things are, we have a better chance
>of achieving them or holding onto them if we are all rowing the societal
>boat together, away from the waterfall ahead. A gay marriage license hanging
>in your cubicle in the global labor gulag doesn't mean much.
>
>A forensic search for signs of liberalism in America, true liberal unity of
>the kind that broadly underpins any humane and progressive society, shows it
>was DOA. Thanks to our birth to death indoctrination regarding the "American
>spirit of competition," the rats in the race are not inclined to run
>together or exercise their unified strength toward common purpose, or even
>consider it. Though the world is by no means a simple either/or proposition
>governed by the narrowest sort of struggle, we are conditioned to
>unquestioningly assume so. If we stop to think, or apply reason and then act
>on it, other rats will eat our lunch. That's what they are trained to do.
>
>Luckily for the rat keepers of global capitalism, they have little to fear
>when it comes to Americans being attracted to reason. Reason is boring stuff
>in a nation---and increasingly, a world---whose cultural glue is television,
>and whose main diversion is profoundly simplified emotionalism and conflict.
>In fact, in the American rat race, reason is not only a fatal weakness,


Okay, you say this, but do you know what it means? Give us an
example of reasoning regarding the Iraq war, etc?
Why not deconstruct Bush's "You're either with us, or you're
with the terrorists" BS? Can you? Or was all this just something you
thought made you sound smarter than the average Usenet poster?
What is the flaw in that statement?
You could say "But that's not true. You don't mean it in the
sense that 'you're either on our side or their side', you mean it in
the sense that if we don't support the ridiculous attempts to keep
OPEC nations on the dollar, we're with the terrorists, and the only
reason the corporate elite want them to stay there is not for our
benefit, but for their own - they don't want industrial jobs coming
back to America, which they would if the dollar was not kept
artificially high. Further, you present a false choice in a number of
ways. You define being 'with us' as supporting you. We don't think
you're the man for this job, or our best possible representative, and
further, most of us didn't vote for you in 2000...". That's something
that means something, instead of just blathering on about only the
most obvious facets of a lack of reasoning.
If you can't pick apart what a liar says using the reasoning
you're talking about, you may as well not bother going around
preaching that people ought to use something that you yourself don't
understand. Bush presented a false choice, because what he meant by it
is you either support the administration's policies, or you're with
the terrorists.
You may not even have to be able to explain that, but you
should at least know which questions you ought to ask of someone who
backs that sort of thing. Sometimes that can be very important too.

>but
>is also generally unavailable to a people who stay janked every waking
>moment, ready to take on the next rat, then go home and watch more rats do
>each other in on television, in a steady diet of visible conflict, both
>overt an implied. Given that the human nervous system is programmed to
>respond instantly to conflict, there simply is no mental space left for much
>quiet thought to take root. Not when your nation's cultural values resemble
>those of Tamerlain or Aleric the Goth---tribal, hierarchical, aggressive and
>acquisitive.
>
>By contrast, I am sitting in my kitchen in the village of Hopkins, Belize,
>watching a lone Garifuna carpenter put a zinc roof on a nearby native
>cabana. Squatting barefooted on the roof joists, he saws and nails and chats
>all day with passersby on the sandy street below. A couple of times a day
>one or another of them will voluntarily climb up to lend the carpenter a
>hand for a half hour or so, then move on. Cooperation is an assumption, not
>a consideration. In the same loose spirit neighbors often drift from house
>to house at mealtimes, making easy conversation and gossip, eating a little
>here, a little there as they go along so as not to burden any particular
>household's meal. Next week the family sharing the food may be doing the
>visiting because their own refrigerator is empty. No stigma attached. In a
>culture marked by unemployment and food insecurity such sharing of labor or
>food is a socially beneficial practice. Though no one here thinks about it,
>such practices represent a very reasonable social support system in a
>country with almost no social service resources. The elites on the other
>hand, say the typically relaxed Belizean worker is lazy, and that the
>country would be more prosperous if people like the Garifuna would sweat
>harder to join the New World Order rat race, which profits the owning class
>leaders as handsomely here as in the rest of the world. When the working
>people call for improvement their demands are deemed unreasonable by the
>elites, unaffordable is the usual excuse, though that doesn't prevent elite
>in government from promising these things at election time.


And the North American Union that's now proposed is really
just a widening of the "scab" pool by the elites. Remember how in the
early 1900s the robber barons would bring in by train the scabs they
needed to break any strikes, etc, at least when they weren't having
them machine gunned by the US Army? Meet the new scabs; they're from
EVERYWHERE in this part of the Western Hemisphere. At least that's the
way the new robber barons want it.
And what are your reasonable liberals doing about this? Well,
while Bush was giving the border guards the order to stand down, they
were busy... writing amnesty bills, BECAUSE THEY WORK FOR MOSTLY THE
SAME PEOPLE BUSH DOES YOU IDIOT.

>
>Whether in Belize or America, neither the owners of government nor their
>subset of social and financial managers are going to respond to any well
>reasoned, socially beneficial cause unless they are forced to do so---with
>emphasis on the word force. Social progress and a humane environment is
>antithetical to the success of the owning and governing classes in America,
>both being exactly the same thing in a nation whose Constitution is
>essentially a guarantee of the rights of property.


Ah, so that's the problem, and if we just fall for what the
Soviets did - the idea that the people ARE the state, and if the state
owns everything then the people really own it and everything will be
hunky-dory - then we'll all be fine, right?
You mentioned liberalism in here numerous times, but liberals
aren't supposed to be communists, and real communists are notoriously
un-liberal; just ask Trotsky, who was assassinated by real communist
henchmen.
By the way, it may interest you to know that 1), your
interpretation of the importance of various aspects of the US
constitution is not the only one that matters, 2), to most people it
means a lot more than property rights, and 3), most people don't
believe it's the enabler of evil that you obviously believe it is.

>Things were that way from
>the beginning, creating dynastic owning class, not just the Rockerfellers,
>Bushes, Kennedys, but thousands of discreet regional and local ones across
>the country which have been in place for a century or more---longer in
>places like the South. Regardless of what written law says, they choose
>which laws will actually be enforced. Or abolished. For them the long term
>application of reason's kid brother, common sense, spells destruction.
>
>**** Iraq, let's bomb Persia
>
>On the other hand it doesn't take much critical thinking to stomp the ****
>out of weakest guy and grab his lunch money. Or his turf or his oil. If
>doing so should require some degree of thoughtfulness, then we had best
>leave reason and thinking to more thoughtful leader rats. And so Condi Rice
>and George Bush wrinkle their brows and try to look thoughtful, and profile
>for the cameras or seize them head on with a bright vulpine stare. But not
>even the Republican leadership has ever believed that logic and reason were
>driving their game. Down inside the Republican leadership is deeply
>realistic, even if it is of the tooth and claw reptilian brain sort of
>realism: Eat, ****, kill, own the top of the rock where then sun is best.
>They've had the top of the rock for the two terms usually granted them
>before the game is up and the public throws them out, not because of any
>particular public wisdom, but because when theft and high crime becomes
>obscenely obvious to even the blindest beer sucking idiot, it is always the
>Republicans who are in office. And now, even though the game is up,
>President Sparky and the neocon Nefertitti have no choice but to keep on
>trying to look wise and leader like, and keep on keeping on in the face of
>the brewing public backlash, just keep on prevaricating until the neocon
>junta they rode into town with can get out of Dodge before the indictments
>come down---at which time Sparky signs the pardons on his way out the door.
>
>SCREAMING MAN HERE! GODAMMIT BAGEANT, DON'T MAKE THINGS MORE COMPLICATED
>THAN THEY ARE! THIS NATION OF FEEBS AND NOSE BORERS CAN'T EVEN SPELL
>PREVARICATE! THE "PUBLIC BACKLASH" AS YOU CALL IT.ALL THAT SQUEALING ABOUT
>THE BLOODY FOLLY IN IRAQ IS JUST SQUEALS FROM INSIDE THE SWINERY. THE
>UNLETTERED HORDES HAVE FIGURED OUT WE HAVE LOST A WAR. THAT A BUNCH OF GOAT
>SKINNERS IN FLIP FLOPS IS KICKING OUR ASSES UP AND DOWN THE STREETS OF
>BAGHDAD LIKE A GODDAMNED SOCCER BALL. AND THEY SEE NOW THAT THEIR BOY,
>GEORGE-ONE-NUTTED-KING-OF-THE-HUNS, TURNED OUT TO BE SIMPLE IN THE HEAD.
>COMPLETELY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR HIM---A LOSER!
>
>True enough. But no matter. We live in, as Gore Vidal put it, "The United
>States of Amnesia," and President Sparky will later be canonized into
>Republican sainthood, alongside Ronald Reagan, and dozens of airports and
>highways will carry his name, until peak oil renders them dim relics
>resembling the Mayan ball courts of Tikal. The deal stands unless real
>catastrophe intervenes, either something natural, like a giant meteor
>splashing a thousand mile wide hole in the Eastern Seaboard, or an unnatural
>one inflicted by the money elites themselves, such as a depression so deep
>that corn mush makes a dramatic comeback among the proles. Or, as the
>administration would have us believe, maybe an all out nuclear war waged
>upon us by Kim Il Sun with his both of his missiles. In any case, it must be
>a genuine catastrophe, meaning that it must come between Americans and their
>shopping malls.


William Pierce of the National Alliance (neo nazi trash) said
that he'd like to see the lights out at shopping malls from an energy
embargo so tight nothing could get through. Is this how the right and
left end up forming alliances?

>Otherwise, so long as voters can manage to hang onto their
>jobs and be convinced of their safety from people like the Korean Brat Boy,
>or the hapless dimwitted Shoe Bomber, they will stick with the incumbent rat
>pack and its leader for at least eight years, even if their leader does
>stumble over three syllable words and call the Greeks "Grecians." The
>armature of all politics is fear, whether there be danger or not. Fear, and
>the mind numbing monotony of the thinnest domestic platitudes.
>
>Well hell. Now that the Bush administration has played all the fear cards
>available---at least until he can bring a swarm if self-exploding Iranians
>down upon us---the 2008 Democratic presidential hopefuls are left to hoof
>the boards peddling the moldiest of platitudes. They don't seem one bit
>embarrassed. Here you have candidates for leadership of the most
>powerful---and clearly dangerous---country in the world and they have
>absolutely nothing of substance to say on real issues domestic or foreign.
>On domestic issues, they set their jaws for the cameras, and with a steely
>glint in their eyes hinting of gravitas, deliver meaningless speeches in
>threadbare language about health care, taxes and Social Security to millions
>of Europeans and Middle Easterners on CNN and Aljazeera. I say that because
>absolutely no one in America is listening except the blogosphere and the
>congenital political junkies television seems to have produced, along with
>the millions of sports fans and shopping channel addicts. The record shows
>that neither party has done **** for over forty years about any of those
>things, and probably never will, especially given that the country is (A-)
>broke (shhhh, the mooks in the voting booths still think we are the richest
>nation in the world), and (B-) so far in the hole we are a net debtor nation
>to countries such as Mexico; if the Empire manages to survive a bit longer,
>we may yet grovel before Yemen and Bolivia for a few bucks for a pint of
>gasoline for the Hummer and a cup of French roast.


I just have to wonder if you were one of those people when
Clinton was president who was saying "The economy will do fine now
that it's out of the hands of the Republicans".

>
>Meanwhile, as I write this, John McCain gives out a love call to the
>Christian Right, promising to take down Roe vs. Wade, and lead America back
>down the happy road toward coat hangar abortions. Like the one to leading
>back sexual repression, that road washed out long ago, which doesn't stop
>McCain and his kind from stoking illiterate white Christian nitwits


I'm from a mid-size city, and the only illiterate people I
know are imbeciles who if they were interested in politics, would
certainly be over on the left, and needless to say two of them have
already had more than 4 kids.

>to a
>frenzy, thereby sidestepping the issue of whether we are going to devaluate
>the dollar and pay the Mexicans in cash, or simply open the borders and let
>millions of unemployed gringos go do yard work and send much needed pesos
>home to their families.
>
>Same goes for foreign policy, another of those creatures the administration
>has rendered all but extinct, thanks to wardens and stewarts such as John
>Bolton and the hard-faced Nefertitti in the $7,000 high heels (though I
>gotta admit that Condi has the kind of legs that nearly justify them.) Oh,
>the Republicans have announced whose Persian ass we are going to attempt to
>kick next, but that is plain old thuggery, not foreign policy. Essentially
>it's a retread of the WMD ruse, only this time the claim is "Iranian
> intent," which neatly eliminates the problem of proof. "Hey, they are
>thinking about it, and thinking leads to doing. So that makes'em a threat to
>Americans."
>
>As we said earlier, the human nervous system is programmed to respond
>instantly to danger and violence, so thuggery smells like foreign policy to
>rats that have been kept on the treadmill of fear by the GOP and in the dark
>by both parties. And besides, sending the Empire's legions into Persia will
>draw attention away from Iraq, just as Iraq draws attention away from the
>war now being lost in Afghanistan. In the United States of Amnesia, history
>is only eight and one half minutes long, about the length of time between
>television commercials, and far less important than catching the second
>segment of American Idol. Given that it takes longer than that to even say
>hello to any foreign policy issue, odds are good we will continue to hear
>zilch from the presidential candidates on the subject. And besides, there
>are too many of both party's skeletons doing the "Danz Macabre" in that
>closet.


I'm pretty sick of people who suggest in all seriousness that
the average Joe in the US has an attention span of 8 minutes. These
are usually liberals who pretend to have a much greater one.
Okay then, which one of you liberals noticed that it was the
border state catholic hierarchy helping to settle tens of millions of
illegals, in line with what the corporate elite in the US want, and
that the appointment of "conservative" catholics to the supreme court
was probably payback for the help the border state bishops were about
to give to the whole thing? Do tell, do tell. I'm waiting...

>
>Feast of promises
>
>Like those "spider plants," sometimes called air plants, that hang from the
>trees out my cabana window, the same ones that sprawl gracefully from little
>jars of tap water in the apartments of solitary librarians and the elderly,
>subsisting apparently on nothing but air and some miniscule bit of nutrients
>to be obtained from water, American liberals seem to exist on bottled water
>and hope. Legend has it that American liberalism once had deep traceable
>roots in farm populism, the struggle for dignity of immigrants, fair wages
>and good working conditions for laborers, and other such noble principles.
>So noble in fact that even high minded sons of the owning class, people like
>John Kennedy and Franklin Roosevelt were drawn to them as a way to kill time
>between games of touch football at Hyannisport, the search for the perfect
>Cuban cigar and accompanying highball, not to mention the prerequisite
>sexual dalliances with other birds following the flock of the famous (Judth
>Campbell Exner once told me JFK always had to be on the bottom due to his
>bad back, and that he cackled like a frat boy when they screwed on the desk
>of the oval office, as if thinking, she said, "Oh, if Bobby could see me
>now!"
>
>At any rate, noble causes and party politics are antithetical these days.
>Beyond that, you must be the rich, or at least very useful to the
>rich---like the Bush family was to the oil companies during its rise---to be
>a player in either party, both of which are faces of the only real party in
>this country, the party of business.


"The business of America is business" ...

>Without a class base made up of real
>people there can be no genuine political party. Without people from
>different classes defending their class interests, there can be no politics.
>Americans have been sold the idea that they are all somehow "middle class,"
>whether they be shoveling chicken **** for Tysons, a seven buck an hour
>"dietary technician" at the local hospital, or hawking credit card
>applications out of a telemarketing center in Nebraska, they are all now
>supposedly in the great middle class. Consequently, there are no politics to
>our political system, just business transactions taking place behind the
>curtain of a fraudulent democracy.
>
>After forty years of having their natural base absorbed by the amorphous
>middle class that isn't, and the meat of politics has been removed from the
>table, leaving Spider plant liberals left to find sustenance in the most
>minuscule nourishment. There are just enough tiny differences in the two
>parties to sustain ever hopeful liberal voters, who have long accepted the
>thin gruel served by the Democratic political elite as the prelude to a
>promised feast. Of course the feast never comes because no Democrat is ever
>going to do more than "address" a problem, rather than solve it. In fact,
>for one of the Democratic elites to even acknowledge the existence of the
>most glaring sort of inequity sends good liberals into political insulin
>shock, so accustomed have their systems become to calorie free ideas and
>"reality lite." Al Gore makes a film about global warming, but dares not
>name the corporations that not only refuse to seek remedy, but insist on
>escalating the problem, and who just happen to fund both parties. Instead he
>tells the audience that they are personally to blame and must start
>sacrificing, hanging their clothes on lines and so forth. Movies being
>reality in this country, and documentaries liberal America hails it as a
>turning point in our ravenous energy consumption, drives the six blocks home
>from the Cineplex wondering where the hell one buys wooden clothespins,
>having never seen one in entire suburban their lives. Al Gore gets an
>Academy Award at the annual swarming of very rich swans living in a paradise
>wherein they never even see their own laundry from the moment it drops from
>their gilded bodies.


That's well said, and quite true. Look at this as one example.
We're all told about how we must give up large automobiles, etc, and
get on government trains with video cameras so the environment can be
safe, to say nothing of government crooks who want to know where
everyone is all the time - and damned well they do. No one talks about
the fact that automobile pollution contributes about 10% - 11% of air
pollution. The rest is from factories. Factories whose owners have
refused all along to ever install any pollution control equipment.
Now that they could be forced to, most of them have already
been closed, so new ones could open in once pristine places like the
Huallaga Valley of Peru, which now has a petro-chemical haze over it.
Nogales Arizona used to have a factory that spewed tonnes of
pollutants into the air. Now it's a few miles away on the other side
of the border with Mexico, and what's happening? People living in
Nogales are breathing the same crap, probably more because now there
are NO controls, and the company is getting away with it. I don't know
if anyone's heard Rush Limbaugh's take on this, but it would probably
be something like "See! See! And now the people there aren't even
making any money!", rather than "Why doesn't someone go over and shoot
these motherf kers?".

>
>Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton makes familiar noises about reforming health
>care, but flatly declares that the insurance companies which hold the entire
>nation for ransom "absolutely must be part of the solution." By that logic,
>when it comes to stopping the war in Iraq, then Halliburton, Blackwater
>Security, twenty thousand hired gun mercenaries, and several thousand
>contractors presently cutting the fattest hog in their history must be
>involved in ending the war. Even SCREAMING MAN has more veracity and
>substance.


Very true...

>
>THE SCREAMING MAN HAS NEVER BEEN ACCUSED OF VERACITY! NOR ABSTENTION FROM
>ANY SUBSTANCE KNOWN TO CIVILIZED OR UNCIVILIZED MAN, NOR AVERSION TO ANY
>DEVIANT PRACTICE WHATSOEVER. (THEY DO NOT CALL HIM THE POL POT OF THE
>BOUDOIR FOR NOTHING!) FUTHERMORE, FOR A HEFTY FEE, SCREAMING MAN'S
>ENDORSEMENT, AND OR PHYSICAL PERSUASIVE EXPERTISE, IS AVAILABLE TO ANY VILE
>PERSONAGE OR POLITICAL PARTY, REGARDLESS OF THEIR CRIMES WHATSOEVER. ARE YOU
>LISTENING HILLARY CLINTON? YOU'RE GONNA NEED HELP IN TAKING OUT THAT GREAT
>MOCHA HOPE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY BEFORE NEXT NOVEMBER!
>
>Right now, almost seventy percent of Americans finally, mostly for the wrong
>reasons, reject a senseless war that kills tens of thousands and bankrupts
>our children's children. In response, it took four years for Democrats to
>come haltingly to the conclusion that it just might be a good idea to end
>it. But even so, a large number are still saying, "Let's test the water a
>bit more, maybe wait until the polls show ninety nine percent. Can't be too
>careful. And besides, Iraq would descend into chaos and bloodshed if we
>pulled out."
>Bloodshed and chaos? What do they think the Pentagon is conducting over
>there right now, a Red Cross community blood drive? And mention cutting the
>Pentagon back and spending a little of the dough on public education and
>even the Dems begin to sound like Foghorn Leghorn in high dudgeon: "Whoa
>there hoss! We gotta have thousands of nuklur waarheads ready to pop at any
>time. Somebody in the Middle East besides our strategic partner, po'
>defenseless little Israel, just might build one of their own."


Get off the Israeli angle, or rightly be labelled what shills
who insist that Israel was wrong to occupy the West Bank and Gaza
Strip despite that that's where they were about to be invaded through
rightly get labelled. There.
Now, about the "defense" funding. You don't actually even have
to cut back much on acquisitions. The fact of the matter is, US
taxpayers are charged about double what the stuff the US armed forces
is getting is actually worth, if you average it all out. You could
keep all the stuff and just spend half.
The thing is, you have to make sure that every high level
employee of all major defense contractors are under 24 hour
surveillance, instead of busying themselves building systems to enable
the US government to have 24 hour surveillance on everyone else.

>
>How this "strategy" of reducing Israel's neighbors to rubble and guts serves
>you and me is a reasonable enough question, one that can never be asked in
>the United States, although I can assure you that the media and the public
>here in Latin America openly ponder it.


The US dollar was attacked by Saddam Hussein, and I was angry
about that. I figured he did what he did to hurt the US, and that
would benefit the Euro-dollar, and thusly the EU, and I figured it
wasn't so bad to go after him, although I wanted to see comeuppance
for the EU too. After all, you can't expect nothing to happen when you
set third world attack dogs on a supposed ally, after you've spent
years supplying them with advanced weaponry.
Now I've been thinking, "but that wouldn't have had to hurt US
consumers if you had a competent and honest government that could set
up price freezes and that sort of thing, and many jobs would come back
to the US if the dollar was not kept artificially high, and ... " -
well, you get the idea.
And of course about the only industry in the US that Jews
"own" as a group is Hollywood.
Where then does all this BS about the war being "for Israel"
come from? Apparently it comes from both neo nazis and the radical
left. What a combo.
So here, after having agreed about some things with you, I'm
left with the realization that you're a shill, and that you probably
know better than the story you're selling, but maybe you don't. Maybe
you're one of those idiots who can write a mostly convincing (but
unsubstantiated) bunch of allegations against an obviously criminal
regime like the Bush regime, but you don't really care about the
underlying causes of things, and you'd rather just take the easy way
out of analysis and truthfulness. Sucks to be you then, although you
might think based on the number of people following your path that
these should be your salad days.

>The question of why we continue to
>hone the teeth of the Middle East's meanest junkyard dog, but refuse to
>insist on a chain and muzzle is left to the readers' speculation. Israeli
>belligerence is the third rail of American foreign policy that fries anyone
>with the balls to bring it up.


Yeah! Just look back at 1967 when they threatened to drive the
Jews "into the sea" and tried to invade through the West Bank and Gaza
Strip. Oh .. wait, that was Nasser and his UAR. Oh well. Who needs
facts when you have leftist soundbites?

>Look at what recently happened to poor ole
>Jimmy Carter.


"Poor ole Jimmy Carter" kissed the asses of American
businessmen to a marginally lesser degree than some other presidents
when he was in office, and now he's doing it again. The people you're
"not allowed to talk about" are the oil barons and the defense
contractors, along with the CIA goons whose network props them up.
Carter bitched about Israel because it's approved subject matter now
that the oil barons are afraid of a genuine embargo, unlike the one in
the early '70s when their reserves went up 400% in value.

>Smoke is still curling up from his pasty old carcass. Will we
>ever see the day when an American politician says out loud what so many of
>us (and them) say privately?


So you're proud that he became a shill?

>
>Then there' is the foreign policy issue of the Third World and AIDS.
>
>AW RIGHT BAGEANT! JUST SHUT UP AND LET SCREAMING MAN DIRECT YOUR DOLPHIN
>WAXERS ACROSS THE KEYBOARD. LOOK, WHEN IT COMES TO AIDS, LET'S CALL IT LIKE
>IT IS: EVERY WHITE MAN IN AMERICA KNOWS THE WORLD IS TOO DAMNED CROWDED, TOO
>DAMNED BLACK AND FAR TOO ****ING BROWN. AND AIDS IS THE ONE THING THAT'S
>WORKING OUT RIGHT FOR THE WHITE MAN. EVERY COUCH BOUND BEER SUCKING CACKER
>KNOWS THAT IN THE BACK OF WHAT MIND HE HAS. AND EVERY ARUBA TANNED CPA
>RUNNING THE FAMILY LEXUS THROUGH BUBBLES' CAR WASH IS SECRETLY THINKING THE
>SAME THING---WHEN HE THINKS ABOUT IT AT ALL. AND EVERY POLITICIAN SECRETLY
>KNOWS IT TOO, EVEN MOST OF THE BLACK ONES. SO THEY AIN'T GONNA BUST THE BANK
>TO SAVE THE HOTTENTOTS IF THERE ARE NO VOTES IN IT.
>
>THE BEAUTY OF IT IS THIS: THE WHITE GUY'S TEAM, AMERICA, WINS BY DOING
>ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! THE WHOLE IDEA IS SO GODDAMNED SICK NOBODY IN THE
>WESTERN WORLD WOULD DARE ACCUSE HIM OF IT BECAUSE, HEY! THEY'VE THOUGHT THE
>SAME THING. YESSIR, WHITEY HAS DRAWN THE "GET ONE GENOCIDE FOR FREE" CARD IN
>HISTORY'S GREAT BOARD GAME. HE DOESN'T CATCH MANY BREAKS FROM HISTORY THESE
>DAYS. WHEN HE DOES, HE'S GOTTA RIDE IT AND TRY NOT TO SMIRK. WHO SAYS WHITE
>MEN DON'T DO SOLIDARITY?


You're a ****ing lunatic.

>
>Well, to be honest, those thoughts have crossed my mind too, though not with
>such glee. Anybody with the intelligence of a flatworm can see AIDS is
>taking out a lot more black and brown yellow asses that white ones. It comes
>down to morals and how you really feel about it. If you happen to be among
>that five percent of the world called Americans, who are horfing at least a
>quarter of the world's wealth, one that depicts the faraway ninety-five
>percent as either French queers, terrorists or HIV positive semi-cannibals,
>well, you are not likely to cultivate your inner Mother Theresa are you?
>
>Though dismal be the heart of man, we spider plants are feeling a bit
>hardier these days. Supreme manager of the Democratic political smoke and
>bubble machine that she is, Nancy Pelosi, at least to hear the echoes of the
>media tell it, is serving up one helluva bunch of appetizers, a cornucopia
>of proposed legislation. And as of this writing, there is even grappling on
>the floor of Congress to take away those same imperial powers that Democrats
>as well as Republicans granted our one nutted cowboy king. But even if he is
>stripped of his Stetson crown and all the scepters of the empire, meaning
>that those cattle prods of its "black site" torture chambers around the
>world are called home and smashed, and even if Guantamo is leveled by the
>corps of engineers and every prisoner given a fair trial on television for
>all the world to see, we will only be approximately back to go. Back to
>where we started. Which was not a good place at all, since the system was
>already broken and was high balling toward its own destruction financially,
>ecologically and socially.


That's not necessarily true. The Bush regime isn't just a
disaster on it's own; it's the institutionalization of a lot of what
was wrong before. It's actually more like what William Colby called
"the cult of intelligence" (meaning the people who runs things, like
the CIA... not some group of smart people), but it's real, it's there,
and I think the potential is there now to address a lot of problems
that hadn't been so obvious before. Of course, I think the potential
is there to do this in such a way that neither the ideologues of the
left or right must profit. I bet that irks the hell right out of you,
doesn't it?

>
>And so we sit patiently under the tent out here on the lawn, in the final
>dimming moments of the Empire. We've had the appetizers and are waiting for
>the meat course: socialized medicine, a halving of the Pentagon's budget,
>nationwide public transit, a tripling of corporate taxation, (which would
>still not put corporations where they were in the fifties when they paid 80
>percent of America's bills and still made billions),


That is correct, mostly. You can't just expect them to go
right back to '50s style taxes when they no longer have '50s style
dominance, but that's another issue. It's true though that '50s
corporate taxes would be considered piratical by today's standards,
but the pirates are running the white house now, and it's not
corporations they're interested in putting the screws to.

>an energy plan that
>works toward elimination of the automobile


, along with personal freedom of travel, and what the heck -
why not personal freedom altogether? It bugs us leftists, and you
know...

Sorry. I was channelling. Anyway, tell me what's wrong with
cars that get 100 mpg.

>and a the closing of coal fired
>plants, universal free higher education just like every other civilized
>first world nation..none of which can even begin to happen without complete
>campaign finance reform. That's some heavy meat and taters for any cook.
>
>The band plays on, we fiddle with our napkins and wait. ****tails are poured
>inside the grandly restored old homes in DC's Georgetown district. The deal,
>the insiders agree, remains the same: Who buys the most campaign ads will
>almost certainly play Pied Piper to the most votes.
>
>Meanwhile, not a soul under the tent has noticed that the lights in the
>kitchen were turned off a long, long time ago.


Ross Perot noticed, but you wouldn't have supported him
because he was honest.

>
>_______
 
Back
Top