Guest Daito Posted January 13, 2008 Share Posted January 13, 2008 Earlier Sunday in Bahrain, U.S. Vice Adm. Kevin Cosgriff, commander of the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet, which patrols the Gulf, told Bush that he took it "deadly seriously" when an Iranian fleet of high-speed boats charged at and threatened to blow up a three-ship U.S. Navy convoy passing near Iranian waters. The Iranian naval forces vanished as the American ship commanders were preparing to open fire. BWHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!! What a bunch of cowards. -- Daito daito@NOSPAMwickedsamurai.com irc.exilenet.org #american_politics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lee Posted January 13, 2008 Share Posted January 13, 2008 "Daito" <Daito@NOSPAMwickedsamurai.com> wrote in message news:20080113090651@daito.wickedsamurai.com... > > Earlier Sunday in Bahrain, U.S. Vice Adm. Kevin Cosgriff, commander > of the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet, which patrols the Gulf, told Bush that > he took it "deadly seriously" when an Iranian fleet of high-speed > boats charged at and threatened to blow up a three-ship U.S. Navy > convoy passing near Iranian waters. The Iranian naval forces vanished > as the American ship commanders were preparing to open fire. > > BWHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!! > > What a bunch of cowards. > -- > > Daito > > daito@NOSPAMwickedsamurai.com > irc.exilenet.org > #american_politics I think that the Iranian elite navy were looking for a propaganda coup, unfortunately for them it fell flat as people are getting wise to the radical Islamic version of world events. It has taken a long time and a lot of pain but it seems the powers that be are finally catching on how to deal with Islamfacist. Don't bomb them just send them to Coventry. In Iran the dwarfen president wants nuclear weapons yet can't even build something simple like a destroyer or frigate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jeff Morgan Posted January 13, 2008 Share Posted January 13, 2008 Lee wrote: > > I think that the Iranian elite navy were looking for a propaganda > coup, unfortunately for them it fell flat as people are getting wise > to the radical Islamic version of world events. > > It has taken a long time and a lot of pain but it seems the powers > that be are finally catching on how to deal with Islamfacist. Don't > bomb them just send them to Coventry. > Those patrol boats were not a threat to any of the US vessels. Even if they were filled to the gunnel's with explosive, they could not have sunk one of those ships. This was a non-event, a bullshit event so Bush could practice televised indignation and threats. The standard process for dealing with oil producing nations in the middle east is to create false flag ops (Gulf of Tonkin), followed by strikes and occupation. The Arab governments cooperating with the US today will be the victims of the US tommorrow. They're just too stupid to see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lee Posted January 13, 2008 Share Posted January 13, 2008 "Jeff Morgan" <nope@novalid.address> wrote in message news:13oka5qj0s4s092@corp.supernews.com... > Lee wrote: > >> >> I think that the Iranian elite navy were looking for a propaganda >> coup, unfortunately for them it fell flat as people are getting wise >> to the radical Islamic version of world events. >> >> It has taken a long time and a lot of pain but it seems the powers >> that be are finally catching on how to deal with Islamfacist. Don't >> bomb them just send them to Coventry. >> > > > > Those patrol boats were not a threat to any of the US vessels. Even > if they were filled to the gunnel's with explosive, they could not > have sunk one of those ships. This was a non-event, a bullshit event > so Bush could practice televised indignation and threats. > You missed out mate, I saw the first report on the news and fifteen minutes later on the second replay the phrase "you will explode in two minutes" had been censored out. Who could have sunk who is not relevant, what is important is that the West is finally learning how to deal with the propaganda war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Daito Posted January 13, 2008 Share Posted January 13, 2008 On 2008-01-13, Jeff Morgan <nope@novalid.address> wrote: > Lee wrote: > >> >> I think that the Iranian elite navy were looking for a propaganda >> coup, unfortunately for them it fell flat as people are getting wise >> to the radical Islamic version of world events. >> >> It has taken a long time and a lot of pain but it seems the powers >> that be are finally catching on how to deal with Islamfacist. Don't >> bomb them just send them to Coventry. >> > > > > Those patrol boats were not a threat to any of the US vessels. Even > if they were filled to the gunnel's with explosive, they could not > have sunk one of those ships. This was a non-event, a bullshit event > so Bush could practice televised indignation and threats. You are blinded by your Bush hatred. You have no proof as to anything you suggest but shuv it out there as if it is fact just like all silly little liberals do. > The standard process for dealing with oil producing nations in the > middle east is to create false flag ops (Gulf of Tonkin), followed by > strikes and occupation. The Arab governments cooperating with the US > today will be the victims of the US tommorrow. They're just too > stupid to see it. You're too stupid to see past anything moron.org or the libtard media shows you. You're a fucking idiot, a moron and leaning toward total retardation. -- Daito daito@NOSPAMwickedsamurai.com irc.exilenet.org #american_politics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tartarus Posted January 13, 2008 Share Posted January 13, 2008 On Jan 13, 9:14 am, Daito <Da...@NOSPAMwickedsamurai.com> wrote: > On 2008-01-13, Jeff Morgan <n...@novalid.address> wrote: > > The standard process for dealing with oil producing nations in the > > middle east is to create false flag ops (Gulf of Tonkin), followed by > > strikes and occupation. The Arab governments cooperating with the US > > today will be the victims of the US tommorrow. They're just too > > stupid to see it. > > You're too stupid to see past anything moron.org or the libtard media > shows you. You're a fucking idiot, a moron and leaning toward total > retardation. Wow, you are just as stupid as I remember from alt.hackers.malicious. Tartarus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abracadabra Posted January 13, 2008 Share Posted January 13, 2008 "Daito" <Daito@NOSPAMwickedsamurai.com> wrote in message news:20080113090651@daito.wickedsamurai.com... > > Earlier Sunday in Bahrain, U.S. Vice Adm. Kevin Cosgriff, commander > of the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet, which patrols the Gulf, told Bush that > he took it "deadly seriously" when an Iranian fleet of high-speed > boats charged at and threatened to blow up a three-ship U.S. Navy > convoy passing near Iranian waters. The Iranian naval forces vanished > as the American ship commanders were preparing to open fire. If it happened, which is doubtful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abracadabra Posted January 13, 2008 Share Posted January 13, 2008 "Lee" <me@localhost> wrote in message news:478a32b4$0$13935$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk... > > "Jeff Morgan" <nope@novalid.address> wrote in message > news:13oka5qj0s4s092@corp.supernews.com... >> Lee wrote: >> >>> >>> I think that the Iranian elite navy were looking for a propaganda >>> coup, unfortunately for them it fell flat as people are getting wise >>> to the radical Islamic version of world events. >>> >>> It has taken a long time and a lot of pain but it seems the powers >>> that be are finally catching on how to deal with Islamfacist. Don't >>> bomb them just send them to Coventry. >>> >> >> >> >> Those patrol boats were not a threat to any of the US vessels. Even >> if they were filled to the gunnel's with explosive, they could not >> have sunk one of those ships. This was a non-event, a bullshit event >> so Bush could practice televised indignation and threats. >> > > You missed out mate, I saw the first report on the news and fifteen > minutes later on the second replay the phrase "you will explode in two > minutes" had been censored out. The "voice" wasn't even Iranian - it sounded like some Redneck who thinks he can sound Arabic. BTW, why did the Navy have seperate sound and video recordings of this "event" that had to be patched together? Why does any navel ship have a sound recording crew and a video recording crew at all? > Who could have sunk who is not relevant, what is important is that the > West is finally learning how to deal with the propaganda war. Uh, we lost that one, because it was so obviously made up by the USA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lee Posted January 13, 2008 Share Posted January 13, 2008 "abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:478a4f63$0$7223$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... > > "Lee" <me@localhost> wrote in message > news:478a32b4$0$13935$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk... >> >> "Jeff Morgan" <nope@novalid.address> wrote in message >> news:13oka5qj0s4s092@corp.supernews.com... >>> Lee wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I think that the Iranian elite navy were looking for a propaganda >>>> coup, unfortunately for them it fell flat as people are getting wise >>>> to the radical Islamic version of world events. >>>> >>>> It has taken a long time and a lot of pain but it seems the powers >>>> that be are finally catching on how to deal with Islamfacist. Don't >>>> bomb them just send them to Coventry. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Those patrol boats were not a threat to any of the US vessels. Even >>> if they were filled to the gunnel's with explosive, they could not >>> have sunk one of those ships. This was a non-event, a bullshit event >>> so Bush could practice televised indignation and threats. >>> >> >> You missed out mate, I saw the first report on the news and fifteen >> minutes later on the second replay the phrase "you will explode in two >> minutes" had been censored out. > > The "voice" wasn't even Iranian - it sounded like some Redneck who thinks > he can sound Arabic. > BTW, why did the Navy have seperate sound and video recordings of this > "event" that had to be patched together? Why does any navel ship have a > sound recording crew and a video recording crew at all? > >> Who could have sunk who is not relevant, what is important is that the >> West is finally learning how to deal with the propaganda war. > > Uh, we lost that one, because it was so obviously made up by the USA. > > I don't think anything was lost, the only losers are the people that support islamofacism with its emphasis on propaganda that it uses to make up for its inability to produce something simple like a warship. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Daito Posted January 13, 2008 Share Posted January 13, 2008 On 2008-01-13, Tartarus <tartarus@rome.com> wrote: > On Jan 13, 9:14 am, Daito <Da...@NOSPAMwickedsamurai.com> wrote: >> On 2008-01-13, Jeff Morgan <n...@novalid.address> wrote: > >> > The standard process for dealing with oil producing nations in the >> > middle east is to create false flag ops (Gulf of Tonkin), followed by >> > strikes and occupation. The Arab governments cooperating with the US >> > today will be the victims of the US tommorrow. They're just too >> > stupid to see it. >> >> You're too stupid to see past anything moron.org or the libtard media >> shows you. You're a fucking idiot, a moron and leaning toward total >> retardation. > > Wow, you are just as stupid as I remember from alt.hackers.malicious. > Says a libtard. I am like..so..burned.. :o -- Daito daito@NOSPAMwickedsamurai.com irc.exilenet.org #american_politics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abracadabra Posted January 13, 2008 Share Posted January 13, 2008 "Lee" <me@localhost> wrote in message news:478a5bed$0$8413$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk... > > "abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:478a4f63$0$7223$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... >> >> "Lee" <me@localhost> wrote in message >> news:478a32b4$0$13935$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk... >>> >>> "Jeff Morgan" <nope@novalid.address> wrote in message >>> news:13oka5qj0s4s092@corp.supernews.com... >>>> Lee wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I think that the Iranian elite navy were looking for a propaganda >>>>> coup, unfortunately for them it fell flat as people are getting wise >>>>> to the radical Islamic version of world events. >>>>> >>>>> It has taken a long time and a lot of pain but it seems the powers >>>>> that be are finally catching on how to deal with Islamfacist. Don't >>>>> bomb them just send them to Coventry. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Those patrol boats were not a threat to any of the US vessels. Even >>>> if they were filled to the gunnel's with explosive, they could not >>>> have sunk one of those ships. This was a non-event, a bullshit event >>>> so Bush could practice televised indignation and threats. >>>> >>> >>> You missed out mate, I saw the first report on the news and fifteen >>> minutes later on the second replay the phrase "you will explode in two >>> minutes" had been censored out. >> >> The "voice" wasn't even Iranian - it sounded like some Redneck who thinks >> he can sound Arabic. >> BTW, why did the Navy have seperate sound and video recordings of this >> "event" that had to be patched together? Why does any navel ship have a >> sound recording crew and a video recording crew at all? >> >>> Who could have sunk who is not relevant, what is important is that the >>> West is finally learning how to deal with the propaganda war. >> >> Uh, we lost that one, because it was so obviously made up by the USA. >> >> > > I don't think anything was lost, US credibility, not that we had much left. > the only losers are the people that support islamofacism What's "islamofacism"? BTW, you need to learn to spell "Fascist". > with its emphasis on propaganda that it uses to make up for its inability > to produce something simple like a warship. Why would Iran need large navy with neighbors like Pakistan, the former USSR and Iraq? Wouldn't that be a waste of money? They couldn't build anything that would compete with the US Navy - wouldn't building large warships be stupid? You don't seem to know anything about the military or warfare. Maybe you're just stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lee Posted January 13, 2008 Share Posted January 13, 2008 "abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:478a782c$0$5151$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... > > "Lee" <me@localhost> wrote in message > news:478a5bed$0$8413$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk... >> >> "abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:478a4f63$0$7223$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... >>> >>> "Lee" <me@localhost> wrote in message >>> news:478a32b4$0$13935$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk... >>>> >>>> "Jeff Morgan" <nope@novalid.address> wrote in message >>>> news:13oka5qj0s4s092@corp.supernews.com... >>>>> Lee wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think that the Iranian elite navy were looking for a propaganda >>>>>> coup, unfortunately for them it fell flat as people are getting wise >>>>>> to the radical Islamic version of world events. >>>>>> >>>>>> It has taken a long time and a lot of pain but it seems the powers >>>>>> that be are finally catching on how to deal with Islamfacist. Don't >>>>>> bomb them just send them to Coventry. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Those patrol boats were not a threat to any of the US vessels. Even >>>>> if they were filled to the gunnel's with explosive, they could not >>>>> have sunk one of those ships. This was a non-event, a bullshit event >>>>> so Bush could practice televised indignation and threats. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You missed out mate, I saw the first report on the news and fifteen >>>> minutes later on the second replay the phrase "you will explode in two >>>> minutes" had been censored out. >>> >>> The "voice" wasn't even Iranian - it sounded like some Redneck who >>> thinks he can sound Arabic. >>> BTW, why did the Navy have seperate sound and video recordings of this >>> "event" that had to be patched together? Why does any navel ship have a >>> sound recording crew and a video recording crew at all? >>> >>>> Who could have sunk who is not relevant, what is important is that the >>>> West is finally learning how to deal with the propaganda war. >>> >>> Uh, we lost that one, because it was so obviously made up by the USA. >>> >>> >> >> I don't think anything was lost, > > US credibility, not that we had much left. > >> the only losers are the people that support islamofacism > > What's "islamofacism"? > BTW, you need to learn to spell "Fascist". > >> with its emphasis on propaganda that it uses to make up for its inability >> to produce something simple like a warship. > > Why would Iran need large navy with neighbors like Pakistan, the former > USSR and Iraq? Wouldn't that be a waste of money? They couldn't build > anything that would compete with the US Navy - wouldn't building large > warships be stupid? You don't seem to know anything about the military or > warfare. Maybe you're just stupid. > > Ex squadi dude, just looking from a tactical point of view, why offer a nuclear threat if you cant even build a tank or APC? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abracadabra Posted January 13, 2008 Share Posted January 13, 2008 "Lee" <me@localhost> wrote in message news:478a8540$0$13935$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk... > > "abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:478a782c$0$5151$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... >> >> "Lee" <me@localhost> wrote in message >> news:478a5bed$0$8413$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk... >>> >>> "abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:478a4f63$0$7223$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... >>>> >>>> "Lee" <me@localhost> wrote in message >>>> news:478a32b4$0$13935$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk... >>>>> >>>>> "Jeff Morgan" <nope@novalid.address> wrote in message >>>>> news:13oka5qj0s4s092@corp.supernews.com... >>>>>> Lee wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think that the Iranian elite navy were looking for a propaganda >>>>>>> coup, unfortunately for them it fell flat as people are getting wise >>>>>>> to the radical Islamic version of world events. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It has taken a long time and a lot of pain but it seems the powers >>>>>>> that be are finally catching on how to deal with Islamfacist. Don't >>>>>>> bomb them just send them to Coventry. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Those patrol boats were not a threat to any of the US vessels. Even >>>>>> if they were filled to the gunnel's with explosive, they could not >>>>>> have sunk one of those ships. This was a non-event, a bullshit event >>>>>> so Bush could practice televised indignation and threats. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You missed out mate, I saw the first report on the news and fifteen >>>>> minutes later on the second replay the phrase "you will explode in two >>>>> minutes" had been censored out. >>>> >>>> The "voice" wasn't even Iranian - it sounded like some Redneck who >>>> thinks he can sound Arabic. >>>> BTW, why did the Navy have seperate sound and video recordings of this >>>> "event" that had to be patched together? Why does any navel ship have a >>>> sound recording crew and a video recording crew at all? >>>> >>>>> Who could have sunk who is not relevant, what is important is that the >>>>> West is finally learning how to deal with the propaganda war. >>>> >>>> Uh, we lost that one, because it was so obviously made up by the USA. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I don't think anything was lost, >> >> US credibility, not that we had much left. >> >>> the only losers are the people that support islamofacism >> >> What's "islamofacism"? >> BTW, you need to learn to spell "Fascist". >> >>> with its emphasis on propaganda that it uses to make up for its >>> inability to produce something simple like a warship. >> >> Why would Iran need large navy with neighbors like Pakistan, the former >> USSR and Iraq? Wouldn't that be a waste of money? They couldn't build >> anything that would compete with the US Navy - wouldn't building large >> warships be stupid? You don't seem to know anything about the military or >> warfare. Maybe you're just stupid. >> >> > Ex squadi dude, just looking from a tactical point of view, why offer a > nuclear threat if you cant even build a tank or APC? Who says the Iraqis can't build or buy tanks? Fact is a country in Iran's position needs land and air forces much more than navel forces. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gooserider Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 "Daito" <Daito@NOSPAMwickedsamurai.com> wrote in message news:20080113090651@daito.wickedsamurai.com... > > Earlier Sunday in Bahrain, U.S. Vice Adm. Kevin Cosgriff, commander > of the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet, which patrols the Gulf, told Bush that > he took it "deadly seriously" when an Iranian fleet of high-speed > boats charged at and threatened to blow up a three-ship U.S. Navy > convoy passing near Iranian waters. The Iranian naval forces vanished > as the American ship commanders were preparing to open fire. > > BWHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!! > > What a bunch of cowards. > If the Iranians actually wanted to sink ships, they have the anti-ship missiles with which to do it. Do yourself a BIG favor and Google "Sunburn missile". Three speedboats approaching ships in international waters does not a war make. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gogarty Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 In article <478a782c$0$5151$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>, abra@hotmail.com says... > > > >"Lee" <me@localhost> wrote in message >news:478a5bed$0$8413$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk... > >> with its emphasis on propaganda that it uses to make up for its inability >> to produce something simple like a warship. > Simple? Warships are not simple. Big ones cost billions and have crews of thousands. The destruction of a single carrier could cost almost as many lives as the entire Iraq war so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gogarty Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 In article <478a986e$0$7199$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>, abra@hotmail.com says... > >>> >> Ex squadi dude, just looking from a tactical point of view, why offer a >> nuclear threat if you cant even build a tank or APC? > >Who says the Iraqis can't build or buy tanks? Fact is a country in Iran's >position needs land and air forces much more than navel forces. > A. Usual jingoistic crap that says the rest of the world can't do shit. You have not been paying attention. Iran has built a large and sophisticated armaments industry precislet because they were sanctioned. B. They need naval forces, but not very big ones. All they need to do is block the Strait. There will be no capital ship engagements. Remember PT109. Made of wood, about 85 feet, armed with four torpedoes and 50 mm machine guns. Could take out a battle ship with luck. Launch a thousand of them you don't need luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lee Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 "Gogarty" <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu.ie> wrote in message news:20080114-025604.877.0@Gogarty.news.bway.net... > In article <478a986e$0$7199$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>, abra@hotmail.com > says... >> > >>>> >>> Ex squadi dude, just looking from a tactical point of view, why offer a >>> nuclear threat if you cant even build a tank or APC? >> >>Who says the Iraqis can't build or buy tanks? Fact is a country in Iran's >>position needs land and air forces much more than navel forces. >> > A. Usual jingoistic crap that says the rest of the world can't do shit. > You > have not been paying attention. Iran has built a large and sophisticated > armaments industry precislet because they were sanctioned. > > B. They need naval forces, but not very big ones. All they need to do is > block > the Strait. There will be no capital ship engagements. Remember PT109. > Made of > wood, about 85 feet, armed with four torpedoes and 50 mm machine guns. > Could > take out a battle ship with luck. Launch a thousand of them you don't need > luck. > Battleships became redundant about the time of the sinking of the Prince of Wales and Repulse near Malaya in WW2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tartarus Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 On Jan 13, 1:38 pm, Daito <Da...@NOSPAMwickedsamurai.com> wrote: > On 2008-01-13, Tartarus <tarta...@rome.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 13, 9:14 am, Daito <Da...@NOSPAMwickedsamurai.com> wrote: > >> On 2008-01-13, Jeff Morgan <n...@novalid.address> wrote: > > >> > The standard process for dealing with oil producing nations in the > >> > middle east is to create false flag ops (Gulf of Tonkin), followed by > >> > strikes and occupation. The Arab governments cooperating with the US > >> > today will be the victims of the US tommorrow. They're just too > >> > stupid to see it. > > >> You're too stupid to see past anything moron.org or the libtard media > >> shows you. You're a fucking idiot, a moron and leaning toward total > >> retardation. > > > Wow, you are just as stupid as I remember from alt.hackers.malicious. > > Says a libtard. I am like..so..burned.. :o You would be right, except that I am a conservative and intelligent. I have seen dozens of your illogical posts. You can't argue worth a shit and repeatedly come to false conclusions, just because they are easily expressed as sound bites you have picked up from elsewhere. Tartarus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.