Justice Scalia's Daughter Gets Special Treatment in DUI/chilld endangermentcase

  • Thread starter Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDE
  • Start date
S

Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDE

Guest
http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/05/31/scalia.daughter.ap/index.html

Scalia's daughter gets probation for DUI
POSTED: 9:55 a.m. EDT, May 31, 2007

WHEATON, Illinois (AP) -- The daughter of U.S. Supreme Court Justice
Antonin Scalia was sentenced to 18 months of court supervision after
pleading guilty to drunken driving.

Ann S. Banaszewski, 45, of Wheaton, Illinois, on Wednesday accepted a
plea agreement under which prosecutors dropped four other charges
including endangering the life of a child and failure to secure a child
younger than eight in a child-restraint system.

She was arrested February 12 while driving away from a fast-food
restaurant in Wheaton, 20 miles west of Chicago. Three of her children
were inside her 1996 Ford van when someone called police to report a
suspected intoxicated driver, authorities have said.

Banaszewski didn't contest the automatic six-month suspension of her
driver's license for refusing to take a breath test.

A DuPage County judge also sentenced her to 140 hours of public service
and to attend counseling sessions, according to Paul Darrah, a spokesman
for the DuPage County state's attorney's office.

Banaszewski's attorney, Donald Ramsell, said the plea agreement was fair
to both sides.

Scalia, who began serving on the Supreme Court in 1986, has nine children.

----------------

WTF were the child endangerment charges dropped? What happened to the
repubs and all their talk about PROTECTING THE CHILDREN?? Bitch should
have been locked up. I'm no coddler.
 
In article <0VD7i.16769$j63.10422@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

> http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/05/31/scalia.daughter.ap/index.html


>
> WTF were the child endangerment charges dropped? What happened to the
> repubs and all their talk about PROTECTING THE CHILDREN?? Bitch should
> have been locked up. I'm no coddler.


There's no good reason that, instead of improving the engineering of the
automobile, we've criminalized otherwise accepted behavior.

--
NeoLibertarian

"The nine most terrifying words in the English
language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'"
---Ronald Reagan
 
In article <0VD7i.16769$j63.10422@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
xeton2001@yahoo.com says...
>
>
>
>http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/05/31/scalia.daughter.ap/index.html
>
> Scalia's daughter gets probation for DUI
>POSTED: 9:55 a.m. EDT, May 31, 2007
>
>WHEATON, Illinois (AP) -- The daughter of U.S. Supreme Court Justice
>Antonin Scalia was sentenced to 18 months of court supervision after
>pleading guilty to drunken driving.
>
>Ann S. Banaszewski, 45, of Wheaton, Illinois, on Wednesday accepted a
>plea agreement under which prosecutors dropped four other charges
>including endangering the life of a child and failure to secure a child
>younger than eight in a child-restraint system.
>
>She was arrested February 12 while driving away from a fast-food
>restaurant in Wheaton, 20 miles west of Chicago. Three of her children
>were inside her 1996 Ford van when someone called police to report a
>suspected intoxicated driver, authorities have said.
>
>Banaszewski didn't contest the automatic six-month suspension of her
>driver's license for refusing to take a breath test.
>
>A DuPage County judge also sentenced her to 140 hours of public service
>and to attend counseling sessions, according to Paul Darrah, a spokesman
>for the DuPage County state's attorney's office.
>
>Banaszewski's attorney, Donald Ramsell, said the plea agreement was fair
>to both sides.
>
>Scalia, who began serving on the Supreme Court in 1986, has nine children.
>
>----------------
>
>WTF were the child endangerment charges dropped? What happened to the
>repubs and all their talk about PROTECTING THE CHILDREN?? Bitch should
>have been locked up. I'm no coddler.


Yeah, we know. You're obsessed.
 
Neolibertarian wrote:
> In article <0VD7i.16769$j63.10422@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/05/31/scalia.daughter.ap/index.html

>
>
>>WTF were the child endangerment charges dropped? What happened to the
>>repubs and all their talk about PROTECTING THE CHILDREN?? Bitch should
>>have been locked up. I'm no coddler.

>
>
> There's no good reason that, instead of improving the engineering of the
> automobile, we've criminalized otherwise accepted behavior.


I'll bite: How would you improve the automobile to prevent DUI deaths?
Require ignition interlocks in every car? Much too expensive per life
saved (relative to other ways we could spend money to save lives).
 
Neolibertarian wrote:
> In article <0VD7i.16769$j63.10422@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/05/31/scalia.daughter.ap/index.html

>
>> WTF were the child endangerment charges dropped? What happened to the
>> repubs and all their talk about PROTECTING THE CHILDREN?? Bitch should
>> have been locked up. I'm no coddler.

>
> There's no good reason that, instead of improving the engineering of the
> automobile, we've criminalized otherwise accepted behavior.
>


You are truly sick. Bet you're one of those NAMBLAites who want child
molesting legalized too.

Driving drunk with kids in the car is only accepted behavior among the
psychos. Get help please.
 
Gogarty wrote:

>
> Yeah, we know. You're obsessed.
>


And you're a psychopath for thinking it's ok the drive drunk with kids
in the car.
 
In article <f3naq3$oon$2@blue.rahul.net>,
John David Galt <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:

> Neolibertarian wrote:
> > In article <0VD7i.16769$j63.10422@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> > Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/05/31/scalia.daughter.ap/index.html

> >
> >
> >>WTF were the child endangerment charges dropped? What happened to the
> >>repubs and all their talk about PROTECTING THE CHILDREN?? Bitch should
> >>have been locked up. I'm no coddler.

> >
> >
> > There's no good reason that, instead of improving the engineering of the
> > automobile, we've criminalized otherwise accepted behavior.

>
> I'll bite: How would you improve the automobile to prevent DUI deaths?
> Require ignition interlocks in every car? Much too expensive per life
> saved (relative to other ways we could spend money to save lives).


It's technology that was pretty well perfected in 1928. There's so many
ways that one hardly knows where to begin.

For one thing, if the roads moved instead of the cars...

--
NeoLibertarian

"The nine most terrifying words in the English
language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'"
---Ronald Reagan
 
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>
>WTF were the child endangerment charges dropped? What happened to the
>repubs and all their talk about PROTECTING THE CHILDREN?? Bitch should
>have been locked up. I'm no coddler.


Hey, at least she got charged.

Not like some dimocrapic senators who walk away unscathed from murder.


--

We're all here
because we're not all there.
 
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>Gogarty wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah, we know. You're obsessed.
>>

>
>And you're a psychopath for thinking it's ok the drive drunk with kids
>in the car.


Where did the poster you responded to state that he thought it was ok
to drive drunk with kids in the car? He didn't? Wow, your delusions
are showing again, but that's no surprise, is it loser?

Ever feel like addressing the issue?


--

We're all here
because we're not all there.
 
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS:
> Gogarty wrote:
>
> >
> > Yeah, we know. You're obsessed.
> >

>
> And you're a psychopath for thinking it's ok the drive drunk with kids
> in the car.


Is it OK to do this to the likes of a rat like you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AQ2EYjh9Qw ??

Note: Graphic content.

--
necromancer

Deadly Psychopath. And Proud of it, Man!!
 
In article <8OL7i.12116$296.831@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
xeton2001@yahoo.com says...
>
>
>Gogarty wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah, we know. You're obsessed.
>>

>
>And you're a psychopath for thinking it's ok the drive drunk with kids
>in the car.


My kids all survived.
 
In article <aNL7i.12115$296.1417@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
xeton2001@yahoo.com says...
>
>
>Neolibertarian wrote:
>> In article <0VD7i.16769$j63.10422@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
>> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/05/31/scalia.daughter.ap/index.html

>>
>>> WTF were the child endangerment charges dropped? What happened to the
>>> repubs and all their talk about PROTECTING THE CHILDREN?? Bitch should
>>> have been locked up. I'm no coddler.

>>
>> There's no good reason that, instead of improving the engineering of the
>> automobile, we've criminalized otherwise accepted behavior.
>>

>
>You are truly sick. Bet you're one of those NAMBLAites who want child
>molesting legalized too.
>
>Driving drunk with kids in the car is only accepted behavior among the
>psychos. Get help please.


Oh, please! You are exceedngly obsessed.
 
On May 31, 10:48 pm, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
<xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Gogarty wrote:
>
> > Yeah, we know. You're obsessed.

>
> And you're a psychopath for thinking it's ok the drive drunk with kids
> in the car.


It is if you cover one eye. If you leave both open the double-vision
makes it a little less OK, but with a hand over an eye there's no
reason it's not perfectly safe. Certainly safer than riding with a
psycho such as yourself regardless of your intoxication level.
 
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>Neolibertarian wrote:
>> In article <0VD7i.16769$j63.10422@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
>> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/05/31/scalia.daughter.ap/index.html

>>
>>> WTF were the child endangerment charges dropped? What happened to the
>>> repubs and all their talk about PROTECTING THE CHILDREN?? Bitch should
>>> have been locked up. I'm no coddler.

>>
>> There's no good reason that, instead of improving the engineering of the
>> automobile, we've criminalized otherwise accepted behavior.
>>

>
>You are truly sick. Bet you're one of those NAMBLAites who want child
>molesting legalized too.


What is your bizarre fascination with NAMBLA? At least it's off the
gay porno mags for the time being.

>Driving drunk with kids in the car is only accepted behavior among the
>psychos. Get help please.


Fortunately with the psychos who do this, Darwin's job gets easier.



--

We're all here
because we're not all there.
 
In article <aNL7i.12115$296.1417@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Neolibertarian wrote:
> > In article <0VD7i.16769$j63.10422@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> > Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/05/31/scalia.daughter.ap/index.html

> >
> >> WTF were the child endangerment charges dropped? What happened to the
> >> repubs and all their talk about PROTECTING THE CHILDREN?? Bitch should
> >> have been locked up. I'm no coddler.

> >
> > There's no good reason that, instead of improving the engineering of the
> > automobile, we've criminalized otherwise accepted behavior.
> >

>
> You are truly sick. Bet you're one of those NAMBLAites who want child
> molesting legalized too.
>
> Driving drunk with kids in the car is only accepted behavior among the
> psychos. Get help please.


You're the "sick" one, if you see what I mean.

Since 9/11, nearly 252,000 Americans have died on US roads and
highways. 2, 000,000 have been seriously injured.

The status quo isn't working. "Staying the course" verges on the insane.

Yet, according to you, criminalizing certain behaviors will "fix" this
broken system. This is your idea of a "surge" that's somehow to solve a
problem which obviously can't be solved that way.

Continuously navigating those machines flying along at 70 miles an hour
means that, should you look away just for an instant, it might well be
the last thing you ever do. Sober or drunk, well trained, poorly
trained, alert or exhausted--it doesn't matter. Death claims them all
out on our highways and byways.

Laws and cops ain't the answer to anything. And never is.

--
NeoLibertarian

"The nine most terrifying words in the English
language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'"
---Ronald Reagan
 
Neolibertarian wrote:
>In article <aNL7i.12115$296.1417@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Neolibertarian wrote:
>> > In article <0VD7i.16769$j63.10422@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
>> > Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/05/31/scalia.daughter.ap/index.html
>> >
>> >> WTF were the child endangerment charges dropped? What happened to the
>> >> repubs and all their talk about PROTECTING THE CHILDREN?? Bitch should
>> >> have been locked up. I'm no coddler.
>> >
>> > There's no good reason that, instead of improving the engineering of the
>> > automobile, we've criminalized otherwise accepted behavior.
>> >

>>
>> You are truly sick. Bet you're one of those NAMBLAites who want child
>> molesting legalized too.
>>
>> Driving drunk with kids in the car is only accepted behavior among the
>> psychos. Get help please.

>
>You're the "sick" one, if you see what I mean.
>
>Since 9/11, nearly 252,000 Americans have died on US roads and
>highways. 2, 000,000 have been seriously injured.
>
>The status quo isn't working. "Staying the course" verges on the insane.
>
>Yet, according to you, criminalizing certain behaviors will "fix" this
>broken system. This is your idea of a "surge" that's somehow to solve a
>problem which obviously can't be solved that way.
>
>Continuously navigating those machines flying along at 70 miles an hour
>means that, should you look away just for an instant, it might well be
>the last thing you ever do. Sober or drunk, well trained, poorly
>trained, alert or exhausted--it doesn't matter. Death claims them all
>out on our highways and byways.
>
>Laws and cops ain't the answer to anything. And never is.


Don't try to educate 'em.

Let Darwin do it. :-D


--

We're all here
because we're not all there.
 
Back
Top