License For Tyranny

P

Patriot Games

Guest
http://www.nrapublications.org/standing guard/Index.asp

License For Tyranny

There is no element in the poisonous alchemy of the globalist gun ban
crowd more dangerous to American freedom than the twin evils of gun-owner
licensing and firearm registration. Never forget that they exist only as
precursors to gun confiscation.

Registration is the key ingredient in the anti-gun rights brew marking
presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's core beliefs. And photographing and
fingerprinting honest American citizens as a condition of potential gun
ownership is the key gun control scheme of Hillary's rival, U.S. Senator
Barack Obama, D-Ill.

As for gun confiscation? Both leading Democratic candidates, Obama and
Hillary, are supporters of firearm bans. For Clinton, that includes the
confiscations that took place in New Orleans in the wake of hurricane
Katrina. Hillary has pushed vigorously for a harsher version of Bill Clinton's
semi-auto ban, a hallmark of their "co-Presidency" and a stark reminder of
what 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue would have in store for you upon the return of
this "political team."

For his part, Obama has variously supported bans on the manufacture,
sales, and possession of handguns; the extension of the Clinton gun ban; and
most remarkably, in 1998 as a state senator, embraced the call to "ban the
sale or transfer of all forms of semi-automatic weapons."

In seeking to capture the White House in November 2008, both Hillary
Clinton and Barack Obama are lying in saying they support the Second
Amendment.

A look back into recent history reveals the truth.

As a prominent leader of the George Soros-funded and Rosie O'Donnell-hosted
Million Mom March in May 2000, Hillary Clinton made this single demand:

''We have to license and register all handguns." But as the New York
Times elaborated, it was more than that:

"If elected to the Senate, Mrs. Clinton said she'd work with Sen. Dianne
Feinstein, D-Calif., on her bill that would require prospective gun buyers
to first obtain a gun license by passing a background check and a safety
course exam. The bill would also establish a national registry to record all
gun sales."

As for Obama, as the U.S. Supreme Court is about to hear the landmark
challenge to the District of Columbia's total handgun ban, he blithely
labeled that draconian law "common sense," and said he believes it is
constitutional. D.C. not only bans private ownership of handguns, but also
prohibits operable long guns in private homes for self defense.

In all the years I have been on the frontlines of this fight, there have
been no conversations more sad and more elemental to the future of our
freedom than with activists in two English speaking countries a world apart.

Both good men experienced tyranny-the theft of their freedom, their
dignity, their honor and their private property-made possible through
licensing and registration.

My friend in Australia-a licensed gun owner who had first forfeited his
registered semi-auto and pump rifles and his self-loading shotguns in
1997-described the gun bans in that country. Holding his most prized
possession, a fine Krieghoff Luger, he said:

"My father fought in World War II. This is the only remembrance of his
service that I have. Now I have to give it to the government for
destruction."

Asked about resistance, he said angrily, "If your guns are registered,
all of this bravado just withers. If your firearm is registered you have a
choice, you either have to give it up, or you're going to jail. Keep your
NRA strong. Don't ever allow the government to register your guns."

My friend in England, like his Australian counterpart, was a licensed
gun owner; he had given police obligatory information about his guns and was
forced to agree to warrantless inspections of his home to check on his gun
storage. That was before police took his guns for destruction. He had the
same message for Americans:

"If they don't know you have firearms, they can't come and take them
away from you." That truth was emphatically repeated by John Crook, the man
who replaced Rebecca Peters as the gun confiscation guru in Australia, after
she moved on to her U.N.-world gun-ban perch. Crook, who headed "Gun Control
Australia," said on a "World Today" broadcast interview, "where there was
gun registration, [we] brought in a lot of guns. After all, two-thirds of a
million guns is a lot to bring in . ."

Those two-thirds of a million registered long guns were chopped and
torched, often in front of their licensed owners.

That ban was followed by a massive increase in violent crime, which was
followed by another round of gun confiscation and destruction, this time of
handguns not approved by government-like my activist friend's war souvenir
Luger.

In pressing for the handgun ban, Rebecca Peters confessed that the long
gun ban she created was really aimed at sporting guns and collectibles:

"The fact that many civilians owned self-loading or semi-automatic
rifles and shotguns for the purpose of sport did not make those guns
suitable for civilian ownership." Her ban, she said, "took away nearly
700,000 of them to be melted down into soup cans and bus-stop benches ...."

That brings us back to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. If either wins
the White House, and if gun rights majorities are not returned to the U.S.
Senate and House, I guarantee that Peters and her boss, George Soros, will
be writing the gun control agenda, beginning with registration and
licensing, all with the goal of turning our guns-Americans' guns-into
international soup cans and park benches.

We must organize, as never before, and vote to keep our guns out of the
wrong hands-out of the hands of an oppressive gun ban regime!
 
On Feb 8, 7:54 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> http://www.nrapublications.org/standing guard/Index.asp


Oh, look! It's from National Rifle Association! Hardly an objective
source!

> License For Tyranny
> There is no element in the poisonous alchemy of the globalist gun ban
> crowd more dangerous to American freedom than the twin evils of gun-owner
> licensing and firearm registration. Never forget that they exist only as
> precursors to gun confiscation.


I not at all surprised you are back here yet again, PG, after being
proved to be such a political LOSER just like your buddy Rush
Limbaugh.

Both of you supported Thompson, until he crapped out. Both of you
supported Romney, until his campaign was going nowhere and he pulled
out.

Wow, actually that's FOUR Republican losers!

Since Rush and you have chosen to be so blind in your beliefs, you
just still have NOT gotten a clue that your brand of
ultraconservative, Christian fundamentalist politics is being totally
rejected by the vast majority of the American people, Republicans,
Democrats, and Independents.

You didn't get a clue in November 2006. You have gotten a clue what
your political candidates of choice were reject. You didn't get a
clue when the majority of Republicans rejected you. And you still
won't get a ****ing clue come this November what a Democratic
President AND a truly Democratic-controlled Congress will be elected.

That is because you ultraconservative fanatics are driven by ignorant
beliefs -- and not by fact or reality.

You bigots had your chance and you blew it, Big Time, that's to George
H.W. Bush, his Republican Administration, and years of a Republican-
controlled Congress.

Your life is the tale of an idiot, full of sound and fury, and
signifying nothing , Patriot Games.

-Tom Sr.
 
Don't you need a license to legally drive?
Doesn't the car have to be registered?

So, that's the first step towards banning autos????




"Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote in message
news:47ac510c$0$8643$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> http://www.nrapublications.org/standing guard/Index.asp
>
> License For Tyranny
>
> There is no element in the poisonous alchemy of the globalist gun ban
> crowd more dangerous to American freedom than the twin evils of gun-owner
> licensing and firearm registration. Never forget that they exist only as
> precursors to gun confiscation.
>
> Registration is the key ingredient in the anti-gun rights brew marking
> presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's core beliefs. And photographing

and
> fingerprinting honest American citizens as a condition of potential gun
> ownership is the key gun control scheme of Hillary's rival, U.S. Senator
> Barack Obama, D-Ill.
>
> As for gun confiscation? Both leading Democratic candidates, Obama and
> Hillary, are supporters of firearm bans. For Clinton, that includes the
> confiscations that took place in New Orleans in the wake of hurricane
> Katrina. Hillary has pushed vigorously for a harsher version of Bill

Clinton's
> semi-auto ban, a hallmark of their "co-Presidency" and a stark reminder of
> what 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue would have in store for you upon the return

of
> this "political team."
>
> For his part, Obama has variously supported bans on the manufacture,
> sales, and possession of handguns; the extension of the Clinton gun ban;

and
> most remarkably, in 1998 as a state senator, embraced the call to "ban the
> sale or transfer of all forms of semi-automatic weapons."
>
> In seeking to capture the White House in November 2008, both Hillary
> Clinton and Barack Obama are lying in saying they support the Second
> Amendment.
>
> A look back into recent history reveals the truth.
>
> As a prominent leader of the George Soros-funded and Rosie

O'Donnell-hosted
> Million Mom March in May 2000, Hillary Clinton made this single demand:
>
> ''We have to license and register all handguns." But as the New York
> Times elaborated, it was more than that:
>
> "If elected to the Senate, Mrs. Clinton said she'd work with Sen.

Dianne
> Feinstein, D-Calif., on her bill that would require prospective gun buyers
> to first obtain a gun license by passing a background check and a safety
> course exam. The bill would also establish a national registry to record

all
> gun sales."
>
> As for Obama, as the U.S. Supreme Court is about to hear the landmark
> challenge to the District of Columbia's total handgun ban, he blithely
> labeled that draconian law "common sense," and said he believes it is
> constitutional. D.C. not only bans private ownership of handguns, but also
> prohibits operable long guns in private homes for self defense.
>
> In all the years I have been on the frontlines of this fight, there

have
> been no conversations more sad and more elemental to the future of our
> freedom than with activists in two English speaking countries a world

apart.
>
> Both good men experienced tyranny-the theft of their freedom, their
> dignity, their honor and their private property-made possible through
> licensing and registration.
>
> My friend in Australia-a licensed gun owner who had first forfeited

his
> registered semi-auto and pump rifles and his self-loading shotguns in
> 1997-described the gun bans in that country. Holding his most prized
> possession, a fine Krieghoff Luger, he said:
>
> "My father fought in World War II. This is the only remembrance of his
> service that I have. Now I have to give it to the government for
> destruction."
>
> Asked about resistance, he said angrily, "If your guns are registered,
> all of this bravado just withers. If your firearm is registered you have a
> choice, you either have to give it up, or you're going to jail. Keep your
> NRA strong. Don't ever allow the government to register your guns."
>
> My friend in England, like his Australian counterpart, was a licensed
> gun owner; he had given police obligatory information about his guns and

was
> forced to agree to warrantless inspections of his home to check on his gun
> storage. That was before police took his guns for destruction. He had the
> same message for Americans:
>
> "If they don't know you have firearms, they can't come and take them
> away from you." That truth was emphatically repeated by John Crook, the

man
> who replaced Rebecca Peters as the gun confiscation guru in Australia,

after
> she moved on to her U.N.-world gun-ban perch. Crook, who headed "Gun

Control
> Australia," said on a "World Today" broadcast interview, "where there was
> gun registration, [we] brought in a lot of guns. After all, two-thirds of

a
> million guns is a lot to bring in . ."
>
> Those two-thirds of a million registered long guns were chopped and
> torched, often in front of their licensed owners.
>
> That ban was followed by a massive increase in violent crime, which

was
> followed by another round of gun confiscation and destruction, this time

of
> handguns not approved by government-like my activist friend's war souvenir
> Luger.
>
> In pressing for the handgun ban, Rebecca Peters confessed that the

long
> gun ban she created was really aimed at sporting guns and collectibles:
>
> "The fact that many civilians owned self-loading or semi-automatic
> rifles and shotguns for the purpose of sport did not make those guns
> suitable for civilian ownership." Her ban, she said, "took away nearly
> 700,000 of them to be melted down into soup cans and bus-stop benches

....."
>
> That brings us back to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. If either

wins
> the White House, and if gun rights majorities are not returned to the U.S.
> Senate and House, I guarantee that Peters and her boss, George Soros, will
> be writing the gun control agenda, beginning with registration and
> licensing, all with the goal of turning our guns-Americans' guns-into
> international soup cans and park benches.
>
> We must organize, as never before, and vote to keep our guns out of

the
> wrong hands-out of the hands of an oppressive gun ban regime!
>
 
Back
Top