...McJerk gets pummeled on the new GI bill

H

Harry Hope

Guest
So where's McCain on this, who has made "support the troops" his
campaign mantra?


http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters?bid=45&pid=307120

04/06/2008

MCCAIN GETS FLAK ON THE NEW GI BILL...


It would seem like a no-brainer for any presidential candidate:

a bill, introduced by two veterans, with the support of veterans
associations around the country, that increases the opportunity for
vets to go to college.

Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have co-sponsored a bill put
forth last fall by Jim Webb of Virginia and Chuck Hagel, Republican
from Nebraska, called the "Post-9/11 Veterans' Educational Act," that
is a return to the spirit of the World War II GI Bill, with enough
funding such that every returning veteran is guaranteed a quality
education.

The bill, put forth as the first step in making "A 21st Century GI
Bill," would give veterans who qualified tuition for a full four years
of college, as well as a stipend for books and living expenses.

Currently, veterans are covered by the Montgomery GI bill, which
requires that troops pay $100 a month during their service, which then
qualifies them for around $800 per month for college tuition.

As Webb and Hagel pointed out in an op-ed last year, that barely
covers courses and books at many community colleges, let alone a state
school or private university.

So where's McCain on this, who has made "support the troops" his
campaign mantra?

When asked in March by a representative of Student Veterans of America
why he wouldn't co-sponsor the bill, McCain wavered and mumbled,
saying, "Uh, I haven't had the chance to examine the bill."

Several weeks later, it seems he still hasn't had a chance to, and
needless to say, many aren't happy.

"McCain needs to be on this bill," Webb told reporters recently.

"I have said to him several times that this is not a political issue."
And this week, Vote Vets and Brave New Films made a fascinating video
featuring young vets talking about their own difficulties getting
access to education and calling on McCain to sign on to the bill.

The most plausible explanation for McCain's reluctance is the White
House's resistance to the bill, with the argument that such an effort
would affect military retention rates.

But from the so-called "maverick," and a veteran, one would expect
better.

________________________________________________

So where's McJerk on this, who has made "support the troops" his
campaign mantra?
 
Harry Hope wrote:
> So where's McCain on this, who has made "support the troops" his
> campaign mantra?
>
>
> http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters?bid=45&pid=307120
>
> 04/06/2008
>
> MCCAIN GETS FLAK ON THE NEW GI BILL...
>
>
> It would seem like a no-brainer for any presidential candidate:
>
> a bill, introduced by two veterans, with the support of veterans
> associations around the country, that increases the opportunity for
> vets to go to college.
>
> Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have co-sponsored a bill put
> forth last fall by Jim Webb of Virginia and Chuck Hagel, Republican
> from Nebraska, called the "Post-9/11 Veterans' Educational Act," that
> is a return to the spirit of the World War II GI Bill, with enough
> funding such that every returning veteran is guaranteed a quality
> education.
>
> The bill, put forth as the first step in making "A 21st Century GI
> Bill," would give veterans who qualified tuition for a full four years
> of college, as well as a stipend for books and living expenses.
>
> Currently, veterans are covered by the Montgomery GI bill, which
> requires that troops pay $100 a month during their service, which then
> qualifies them for around $800 per month for college tuition.
>
> As Webb and Hagel pointed out in an op-ed last year, that barely
> covers courses and books at many community colleges, let alone a state
> school or private university.
>
> So where's McCain on this, who has made "support the troops" his
> campaign mantra?
>
> When asked in March by a representative of Student Veterans of America
> why he wouldn't co-sponsor the bill, McCain wavered and mumbled,
> saying, "Uh, I haven't had the chance to examine the bill."
>
> Several weeks later, it seems he still hasn't had a chance to, and
> needless to say, many aren't happy.
>
> "McCain needs to be on this bill," Webb told reporters recently.
>
> "I have said to him several times that this is not a political issue."
> And this week, Vote Vets and Brave New Films made a fascinating video
> featuring young vets talking about their own difficulties getting
> access to education and calling on McCain to sign on to the bill.
>
> The most plausible explanation for McCain's reluctance is the White
> House's resistance to the bill, with the argument that such an effort
> would affect military retention rates.
>
> But from the so-called "maverick," and a veteran, one would expect
> better.
>
> ________________________________________________
>
> So where's McJerk on this, who has made "support the troops" his
> campaign mantra?


Seems maybe he cannot dirty his hands with cooperating with Democrats,
like most every Republican out there.

If he cannot work with Democrats, especially with something that
benefits our soldiers readjust to society, then he has no business
being president of this country.
 
Back
Top